| CTRI Number |
CTRI/2026/04/107952 [Registered on: 09/04/2026] Trial Registered Prospectively |
| Last Modified On: |
09/04/2026 |
| Post Graduate Thesis |
Yes |
| Type of Trial |
Interventional |
|
Type of Study
|
Surgical/Anesthesia |
| Study Design |
Randomized, Parallel Group, Active Controlled Trial |
|
Public Title of Study
|
A study comparing bone marrow aspiration concentrate vs own bone graft in single level spinal fusion |
|
Scientific Title of Study
|
Efficacy of bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) as compared to autograft in achieving spinal fusion in patients undergoing single level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) - a Pilot RCT |
| Trial Acronym |
|
|
Secondary IDs if Any
|
| Secondary ID |
Identifier |
| NIL |
NIL |
|
|
Details of Principal Investigator or overall Trial Coordinator (multi-center study)
|
| Name |
Dr MOHAMMED IRFAN M P |
| Designation |
JUNIOR RESIDENT |
| Affiliation |
JIPMER, Puducherry |
| Address |
Department of orthopedics
JIPMER, Dhanavantari Nagar Puducherry,605006
Pondicherry PONDICHERRY 605006 India |
| Phone |
8921352551 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
mohirfanmp@gmail.com |
|
Details of Contact Person Scientific Query
|
| Name |
Dr. Pasupathy. P |
| Designation |
Associate Professor |
| Affiliation |
JIPMER, Puducherry |
| Address |
Department of Orthopaedics
JIPMER, Puducherry
Pondicherry PONDICHERRY 605006 India |
| Phone |
8921352551 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
drastos@gmail.com |
|
Details of Contact Person Public Query
|
| Name |
Dr MOHAMMED IRFAN M P |
| Designation |
JUNIOR RESIDENT |
| Affiliation |
JIPMER, Puducherry |
| Address |
Department of orthopedics
JIPMER, Dhanavantari Nagar Puducherry,605006
Pondicherry PONDICHERRY 605006 India |
| Phone |
8921352551 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
mohirfanmp@gmail.com |
|
|
Source of Monetary or Material Support
|
| JIPMER, Dhanavantari Nagar Puducherry,605006 |
|
|
Primary Sponsor
|
| Name |
JIPMER |
| Address |
Dhanavantari nagar
Puducherry 605006 |
| Type of Sponsor |
Government medical college |
|
|
Details of Secondary Sponsor
|
|
|
Countries of Recruitment
|
India |
|
Sites of Study
|
| No of Sites = 1 |
| Name of Principal
Investigator |
Name of Site |
Site Address |
Phone/Fax/Email |
| Dr Mohammed Irfan M P |
JIPMER, Puducherry |
Department of Orthopeadics,
Dhanavantari nagar, Puducherry
605006 Pondicherry PONDICHERRY |
08921352551
mohirfanmp@gmail.com |
|
|
Details of Ethics Committee
|
| No of Ethics Committees= 1 |
| Name of Committee |
Approval Status |
| IEC-INSTITUTIONALINTERVENTIONALSTUDIESJIPMER, PUDUCHERRY |
Approved |
|
|
Regulatory Clearance Status from DCGI
|
|
|
Health Condition / Problems Studied
|
| Health Type |
Condition |
| Patients |
(1) ICD-10 Condition: M511||Thoracic, thoracolumbar and lumbosacral intervertebral disc disorders with radiculopathy, |
|
|
Intervention / Comparator Agent
|
| Type |
Name |
Details |
| Comparator Agent |
autograft |
Surgical Procedure: A single-level TLIF will be performed under standard surgical protocols. The graft material (autograft) harvested from the spinous process and lamina will be packed into the disc space and the interbody cage. |
| Intervention |
bone marrow aspirate concentrate |
The bone marrow needle assembly, syringes, and filters will be washed with heparin. Eight 10-mL syringes, each containing 1.5 mL of anticoagulant citrate dextrose solution A
(ACD-A), will be utilized for the bone marrow
aspiration.
Patient will be placed in prone position. The areas of aspiration will be sterilely prepared and draped as per standard protocol.
Under general anesthesia before starting the TLIF surgery, a bone marrow aspiration needle will be employed, and the total resultant volume of 50 ml (including ACD -A) will be collected from posterior iliac crest.
Single-needle insertion with redirection (SS method): A small incision will be placed at the desired site with a scalpel. A reusable 11-gauge bone marrow aspiration needle will be used. The needle is inserted through the incision site and rotated
with careful pressure until it goes through the cortex. Once placed, the trocar will be advanced 2 cm before the introducer is removed. A 10-mL syringe with 1.5 mL of ACD-A is then attached to the trocar. A total of 8.5 mL of bone marrow will be
aspirated at this depth as follows: 3 mL will be aspirated after trocar removal; then, the needle was rotated 90° clockwise, and an additional 3 mL will be aspirated. A final 2.5 mL of aspirate is obtained following another 90° of rotation. The first 10-mL
syringe is removed and sterilely capped. The trocar will be then pulled back 0.5 cm, and a new 10-mL syringe with 1.5 mL of ACD-A is employed via the same “aspirate-rotate-aspirate” technique, adding an additional 8.5 mL of BMA to the total.
This second 10-mL syringe will be sterilely capped. Again, the trocar is pulled back another 0.5 cm, and the same “aspiraterotate-aspirate” technique will be employed, adding 8.5 mL of BMA to the total. After 34 mL of BMA is harvested (with 6 mL
of ACD-A), the introducer will be placed back into the trocar, and the device will be redirected 30° laterally and advanced 2 cm. Again, a 10-mL syringe with 1.5 mL of ACD-A will be used, and the “aspirate-rotate-aspirate” technique described
above is employed, adding 8.5 mL of BMA. The full 10-mL syringe will be capped, and a new 10-mL syringe with 1.5 mL of ACD-A will be placed. As previous, the trocar will be pulled back 0.5 cm, and the same “aspirate-rotate-aspirate” technique is
employed till 80 ml of bone marrow aspirate [including ACD -A] is obtained[20]
The aspirated marrow and ACDA will be then passed through a sterile 150-mm filter into 50 ml conical tubes to remove particulate matter. One milliliter of this filtered material will be
sent for laboratory analysis and the rest will be sent for centrifugation.
Once the BMAC is obtained, it will be transported back to the OT in a sterile container.
|
|
|
Inclusion Criteria
|
| Age From |
18.00 Year(s) |
| Age To |
65.00 Year(s) |
| Gender |
Both |
| Details |
Patients aged 18-65 Years
Patients undergoing single level TLIF
|
|
| ExclusionCriteria |
| Details |
Previous spinal surgery at the same level
Presence of infection or malignancy in the spine
Presence of infection or malignancy at the donor site
|
|
|
Method of Generating Random Sequence
|
Computer generated randomization |
|
Method of Concealment
|
Sequentially numbered, sealed, opaque envelopes |
|
Blinding/Masking
|
Participant Blinded |
|
Primary Outcome
|
| Outcome |
TimePoints |
1. To determine the feasibility of achieving spinal fusion using BMAC in patients undergoing single level TLIF
2. To compare the rate of spinal fusion achieved by BMAC and autograft in patients undergoing single level TLIF |
Initially 6 week post op, followed by 3 months and then 6 months |
|
|
Secondary Outcome
|
| Outcome |
TimePoints |
| Secondary to compare the rates of the cage migration implant failure infection & reoperation between the groups |
Initially 6week post op followed by 3 months & then 6 months |
|
|
Target Sample Size
|
Total Sample Size="40" Sample Size from India="40"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (Total)= "Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (India)="Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials" |
|
Phase of Trial
|
Phase 1/ Phase 2 |
|
Date of First Enrollment (India)
|
01/05/2026 |
| Date of Study Completion (India) |
Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials |
| Date of First Enrollment (Global) |
Date Missing |
| Date of Study Completion (Global) |
Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials |
|
Estimated Duration of Trial
|
Years="2" Months="0" Days="0" |
|
Recruitment Status of Trial (Global)
|
Not Yet Recruiting |
| Recruitment Status of Trial (India) |
Not Yet Recruiting |
|
Publication Details
|
N/A |
|
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement
|
Will individual participant data (IPD) be shared publicly (including data dictionaries)?
Response - NO
|
|
Brief Summary
|
Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) is an established approach to spinal fusion surgery that involves accessing the lower spine through the inter-vertebral foramina. The vertebral disc is subsequently removed, and a bone graft is placed to fuse the adjacent vertebral bodies. However, Autograft is considered the biologically most suitable graft material due to its osteogenic and osteoconductive properties. The use bone graft in spine surgeries mainly targeted to achieve bone healing and fusion between the affected vertebrae. Most of studies point out that autograft contributes to good fusion rates, and decreases the need of re operation. Although studies have highlighted the postoperative complications and patient dis-satisfaction due to discomfort from the harvest site. Therefore, there has been a large push to discover alternative bone graft fusion materials. Several options have gained substantial attention and are being studied to determine their efficacy. With the modernization of biotechnology, there has been a concerted effort to develop novel biomaterials that can be used to augment spine surgery. An alternative method is the use of BMA, a method that has become popular in Orthopaedics at the end of the last century and the beginning of the present. This orthobiologic product has been used in many treatments of some musculoskeletal disorders, such as non-union, bone defects, arthritis, ligament tears, and osteonecrosis of the femoral head. BMAC from patient own bone marrow contain stem cell and growth factor that promote healing. |