FULL DETAILS (Read-only)  -> Click Here to Create PDF for Current Dataset of Trial
CTRI Number  CTRI/2026/04/107688 [Registered on: 07/04/2026] Trial Registered Prospectively
Last Modified On: 06/04/2026
Post Graduate Thesis  No 
Type of Trial  Interventional 
Type of Study   Surgical/Anesthesia 
Study Design  Randomized, Parallel Group Trial 
Public Title of Study   Comparing Two Neck Spine Operations in Patients with Spinal Cord Pressure: Is Nerve Monitoring Helpful? 
Scientific Title of Study   A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Cervical Laminectomy with and without Intraoperative Neuromonitoring in Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy 
Trial Acronym  NIL 
Secondary IDs if Any  
Secondary ID  Identifier 
NIL  NIL 
 
Details of Principal Investigator or overall Trial Coordinator (multi-center study)  
Name  Prof S.Rajasekaran 
Designation  Professor, Head of the Department 
Affiliation  Ganga Medical Centre and Hospital 
Address  Chairman and HOD office, First floor, B block, Ganga Hospital, 314, Mettupalayam Road, Saibaba colony, Coimbatore-641043
Saibaba colony
Coimbatore
TAMIL NADU
641043
India 
Phone  9843022325  
Fax    
Email  rajasekaran.orth@gmail.com  
 
Details of Contact Person
Scientific Query
 
Name  Prof SRajasekaran 
Designation  Professor, Head of the Department 
Affiliation  Ganga Medical Centre and Hospital 
Address  Chairman and Hod office, first floor, Block, Ganga Hospital, 314, Mettupalayam Road, Saibaba colony, Coimbatore-641043
Saibaba colony
Coimbatore
TAMIL NADU
641043
India 
Phone  9843022325  
Fax    
Email  rajasekaran.orth@gmail.com  
 
Details of Contact Person
Public Query
 
Name  Prof SRajasekaran 
Designation  Professor, Head of the Department 
Affiliation  Ganga Medical Centre and Hospital 
Address  hairman and Hod office, first floor, Block, Ganga Hospital, 314, Mettupalayam Road, Saibaba colony, Coimbatore-641043
Saibaba colony
Coimbatore
TAMIL NADU
641043
India 
Phone  9843022325  
Fax    
Email  rajasekaran.orth@gmail.com  
 
Source of Monetary or Material Support  
Nil 
 
Primary Sponsor  
Name  Ganga Orthopaedics Research and Education Foundation 
Address  SF No.442 Post, NGGO Colony, Vattamalaipalayam, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu- 641022.  
Type of Sponsor  Other [Registered Trust, Darpan registration no-TN/2018/0191674] 
 
Details of Secondary Sponsor  
Name  Address 
NIL  NIL 
 
Countries of Recruitment     India  
Sites of Study  
No of Sites = 1  
Name of Principal Investigator  Name of Site  Site Address  Phone/Fax/Email 
Gnanaprakash Gurusamy  Ganga Hospital  Spine department, B block, 313, Mettupalayam Road, Saibaba colony Coimbatore
Coimbatore
TAMIL NADU 
08668173135

gnana395@gmail.com 
 
Details of Ethics Committee  
No of Ethics Committees= 1  
Name of Committee  Approval Status 
Institutional Review Board- Ganga Medical Centre and Hospitals pvt Ltd   Approved 
 
Regulatory Clearance Status from DCGI  
Status 
Not Applicable 
 
Health Condition / Problems Studied  
Health Type  Condition 
Patients  (1) ICD-10 Condition: M471||Other spondylosis with myelopathy, (2) ICD-10 Condition: M480||Spinal stenosis,  
 
Intervention / Comparator Agent  
Type  Name  Details 
Intervention  Posterior cervical enbloc laminectomy and instrumentation  Posterior cervical decompression will be performed by enbloc laminectomy at the clinically and radiologically involved levels. Posterior instrumented fusion will be done using lateral mass screws and rods (and C7 pedicle screws where appropriate). The procedure will be performed under general anaesthesia in prone position with head fixation. Standard peri-operative antibiotics and postoperative rehabilitation will be followed as per institutional protocol. 
Comparator Agent  Posterior cervical piecemeal laminectomy and instrumentation  Posterior cervical decompression will be performed by laminectomy at the clinically and radiologically involved levels. Posterior instrumented fusion will be done using lateral mass screws and rods (and C7 pedicle screws where appropriate). The procedure will be performed under general anaesthesia in prone position with head fixation. Standard peri-operative antibiotics and postoperative rehabilitation will be followed as per institutional protocol. 
 
Inclusion Criteria  
Age From  18.00 Year(s)
Age To  80.00 Year(s)
Gender  Both 
Details  Adult patients more than 18 years of age,
Clinical diagnosis of cervical myelopathy,
Multilevel involvement - more than 2 levels requiring posterior decompression,
Neuutral or lordotic cervical spine,
Ability to provide written informed consent 
 
ExclusionCriteria 
Details  -cervical kyphosis
-Conditions requiring anterior and posterior surgery
-Previous cervical spine surgery
- Trauma, infection, tumor, or inflammatory spinal disease 
 
Method of Generating Random Sequence   Computer generated randomization 
Method of Concealment   Sequentially numbered, sealed, opaque envelopes 
Blinding/Masking   Participant and Outcome Assessor Blinded 
Primary Outcome  
Outcome  TimePoints 
To compare the intraoperative neuromonitoring responses, specifically motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) and somatosensory-evoked potentials (SEPs), between en bloc and piecemeal laminectomy techniques in patients undergoing surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy, with respect to the incidence of signal improvement, deterioration, or no change during decompression.  preop, immediate postop, 24 hours, 48 hours, 72 hours, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year 
 
Secondary Outcome  
Outcome  TimePoints 
3.2.Secondary objectives (if any):
· To compare the incidence of intraoperative and postoperative neurological complications, including transient or persistent neurological worsening, between the two groups.
· To assess and compare clinical neurological outcomes using the modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) score at follow-up.
· To compare the incidence of dural tear and postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leakage, operating time, and blood loss between en bloc and piecemeal laminectomy techniques.
· To analyze the relationship between intraoperative neuromonitoring changes and postoperative neurological recovery in patients undergoing posterior cervical decompression.  
preop, immediate postop, 24 hours, 48 hours, 72 hours, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year 
 
Target Sample Size   Total Sample Size="100"
Sample Size from India="100" 
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (Total)= "Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (India)="Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials" 
Phase of Trial   N/A 
Date of First Enrollment (India)   25/04/2026 
Date of Study Completion (India) Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials 
Date of First Enrollment (Global)  Date Missing 
Date of Study Completion (Global) Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials 
Estimated Duration of Trial   Years="1"
Months="0"
Days="0" 
Recruitment Status of Trial (Global)   Not Applicable 
Recruitment Status of Trial (India)  Not Yet Recruiting 
Publication Details   N/A 
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement

Will individual participant data (IPD) be shared publicly (including data dictionaries)?  

Response - NO
Brief Summary  

Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is a common cause of spinal cord dysfunction requiring surgical decompression in patients with progressive neurological deficits. Posterior cervical laminectomy is widely used for multilevel disease and can be performed using either en bloc or piecemeal techniques. While en bloc laminectomy provides rapid decompression, it may result in sudden spinal cord expansion and intraoperative neuromonitoring changes. In contrast, piecemeal laminectomy allows gradual decompression and may reduce intraoperative neural stress.

There is limited prospective randomized evidence comparing these two techniques. This study is a single-center randomized controlled trial designed to compare intraoperative neuromonitoring responses (MEPs and SEPs), perioperative parameters, and clinical outcomes between en bloc and piecemeal laminectomy in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

A total of 100 patients will be enrolled and randomized into two groups. The primary outcome is intraoperative neuromonitoring changes, while secondary outcomes include neurological recovery (mJOA score), complications, operative time, and blood loss. The findings of this study aim to provide evidence to guide surgical decision-making and improve patient outcomes in cervical myelopathy.

 
Close