FULL DETAILS (Read-only)  -> Click Here to Create PDF for Current Dataset of Trial
CTRI Number  CTRI/2026/02/104100 [Registered on: 17/02/2026] Trial Registered Prospectively
Last Modified On: 17/02/2026
Post Graduate Thesis  No 
Type of Trial  Interventional 
Type of Study   Surgical/Anesthesia 
Study Design  Randomized, Parallel Group, Active Controlled Trial 
Public Title of Study   A study comparing two ultrasound guided nerve block techniques i.e. intertransverse plane block and erector spinae plane block for post surgery pain relief after thoracic spine surgery 
Scientific Title of Study   Comparison of intertransverse plane block vs erector spinae plane block for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing thoracic spine surgery: double-blind, prospective, randomised controlled trial 
Trial Acronym  NIL 
Secondary IDs if Any  
Secondary ID  Identifier 
NIL  NIL 
 
Details of Principal Investigator or overall Trial Coordinator (multi-center study)  
Name  Dr GHAZALA ANIS FATIMA  
Designation  Assistant professor  
Affiliation  Dr Ram Manohar Lohia Institute of Medical Sciences  
Address  Room no 12, Department of Anesthesiology, 6th floor, Academic block, Dr Ram Manohar Lohia Institute Medical Sciences, Lucknow

Lucknow
UTTAR PRADESH
226010
India 
Phone  8826088453  
Fax    
Email  ghazalafatima08@gmail.com  
 
Details of Contact Person
Scientific Query
 
Name  Dr GHAZALA ANIS FATIMA  
Designation  Assistant professor  
Affiliation  Dr Ram Manohar Lohia Institute of Medical Sciences  
Address  Room no 12, Department of Anaesthesiology, 6th floor, Academic block, Dr Ram Manohar Lohia Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow

Lucknow
UTTAR PRADESH
226010
India 
Phone  8826088453  
Fax    
Email  ghazalafatima08@gmail.com  
 
Details of Contact Person
Public Query
 
Name  Dr GHAZALA ANIS FATIMA  
Designation  Assistant professor  
Affiliation  Dr Ram Manohar Lohia Institute of Medical Sciences  
Address  Room no 12, Department of Anaesthesiology, 6th floor, Academic block, Dr Ram Manohar Lohia Institute Medical Sciences, Lucknow

Lucknow
UTTAR PRADESH
226010
India 
Phone  8826088453  
Fax    
Email  ghazalafatima08@gmail.com  
 
Source of Monetary or Material Support  
Dr Ram Manohar Lohia Institute of Medical Sciences, Gomti Nagar, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India - 226010 
 
Primary Sponsor  
Name  Dr Ram Manohar Lohia Institute of Medical Sciences 
Address  Gomti Nagar, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India - 226010 
Type of Sponsor  Government medical college 
 
Details of Secondary Sponsor  
Name  Address 
NIL  NIL 
 
Countries of Recruitment     India  
Sites of Study  
No of Sites = 1  
Name of Principal Investigator  Name of Site  Site Address  Phone/Fax/Email 
Dr Ghazala Anis Fatima   Dr Ram Manohar Lohia Institute of Medical Sciences   Room no 12, Department of Anaesthesiology, 6th floor, Academic Block,
Lucknow
UTTAR PRADESH 
8826088453

ghazalafatima08@gmail.com 
 
Details of Ethics Committee  
No of Ethics Committees= 1  
Name of Committee  Approval Status 
DR RAM MANOHAR LOHIA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   Approved 
 
Regulatory Clearance Status from DCGI  
Status 
Not Applicable 
 
Health Condition / Problems Studied  
Health Type  Condition 
Patients  (1) ICD-10 Condition: O||Medical and Surgical,  
 
Intervention / Comparator Agent  
Type  Name  Details 
Comparator Agent  Erector spine plane block  Bilateral erector spine plane block with 0.125% bupivacain 20 ml each side in patients undergoing thoracic spine surgery will be performed preoperatively after induction. VAS on movement at 6 hours post operatively will be assessed. Also, the average number of dermatomes blocked will be assessed at 6 and 24 hours postoperatively and the time to first use of rescue analgesic, the amount of NSAIDs, opioids used will be noted. Patients will be assessed till 24 hours postoperatively (total duration). 
Intervention  Intertransverse plane block  Bilateral intertransverse plane block with 0.125% bupivacain 20 ml each side in patients undergoing thoracic spine surgery will be performed preoperatively after induction. VAS on movement at 6 hours post operatively will be assessed. Also, the average number of dermatomes blocked will be assessed at 6 and 24 hours postoperatively and the time to first use of rescue analgesic, the amount of NSAIDs, opioids used will be noted. Patients will be assessed till 24 hours postoperatively (total duration). 
 
Inclusion Criteria  
Age From  20.00 Year(s)
Age To  70.00 Year(s)
Gender  Both 
Details  American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status 13 who are scheduled for thoracic spine surgery in neurosurgery OT 
 
ExclusionCriteria 
Details  Age more than 70 or less than 20 years, allergy to local anesthetics, BMI more than 30 kg per m2, the presence of coagulopathy, daily use of opioid analgesics, mental or neurological disorders, allergy to analgesics (acetaminophen, non- steroidal anti- inflammatory drugs or opioids), disorder in communication, Previous thoracic spine surgery. 
 
Method of Generating Random Sequence   Permuted block randomization, fixed 
Method of Concealment   Sequentially numbered, sealed, opaque envelopes 
Blinding/Masking   Participant and Outcome Assessor Blinded 
Primary Outcome  
Outcome  TimePoints 
VAS on movement  6 hours postoperatively 
 
Secondary Outcome  
Outcome  TimePoints 
The average number of blocked dermatomes along the anterior axillary line, midclavicular line & scapular line.  6 hours & 24 hours postoperatively  
The time to first use of rescue analgesic; the amount of non- steroidal anti- inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and opioid use  Till 24 hours postoperatively  
 
Target Sample Size   Total Sample Size="48"
Sample Size from India="48" 
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (Total)= "Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (India)="Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials" 
Phase of Trial   N/A 
Date of First Enrollment (India)   01/04/2026 
Date of Study Completion (India) Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials 
Date of First Enrollment (Global)  Date Missing 
Date of Study Completion (Global) Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials 
Estimated Duration of Trial   Years="1"
Months="0"
Days="0" 
Recruitment Status of Trial (Global)   Not Applicable 
Recruitment Status of Trial (India)  Not Yet Recruiting 
Publication Details   N/A 
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement

Will individual participant data (IPD) be shared publicly (including data dictionaries)?  

Response - YES
  1. What data in particular will be shared?
    Response - Individual participant data that underlie the results reported in this article, after de-identification (text, tables, figures, and appendices).

  2. What additional supporting information will be shared?
    Response -  Study Protocol
    Response -  Statistical Analysis Plan

  3. Who will be able to view these files?
    Response - Researchers whose proposed use of the data has been approved by an independent review committee identified for this purpose.

  4. For what types of analyses will this data be available?
    Response - To achieve aims in the approved proposal.

  5. By what mechanism will data be made available?
    Response - Proposals should be directed to [ghazalafatima08@gmail.com].

  6. For how long will this data be available start date provided 16-02-2028 and end date provided 16-02-2031?
    Response - Beginning 9 months and ending 36 months following article publication.

  7. Any URL or additional information regarding plan/policy for sharing IPD? 
    Additional Information - NIL
Brief Summary  


Spine surgeries are generally associated with significant perioperative pain. Various nerve blocks like thoracic paravertebral block and erector spinae plane block have been suggested for managing postoperative pain in patients undergoing thoracic spine surgery. The TPVB is advocated as the first choice regional anaesthetic technique for thoracic surgeries. However, this advanced block technique involves the needle tip penetrating the superior costotransverse ligament, placing it in close proximity to the pleura and thereby carrying a risk of pneumothorax. The ESP block is less invasive with an easily identifiable landmark that makes it a potentially safe alternative to TPVB for thoracic spine surgeries.
Intertransverse process block has been recently identified as a modification of the TPVB for postoperative analgesia. It has shown better analgesia for thoracoscopic surgeries, lumbar decompression and large breast cancer operations than ESP block. ITP block is a collective name for several reported block techniques, including the midpoint transverse process to pleura block, multiple injection costotransverse block, subtransverse process interligamentary block and costotransverse foramen block. The mechanism of action is related to the potential spread of local anaesthetic in the paravertebral space through the superior costotransverse ligament.
No study has till date assessed the effect of ITP block on postoperative recovery characteristics in patients undergoing thoracic spine surgery.
We hypothesize that the ITP block will provide better postoperative pain relief compared with ESP block for thoracic spine surgeries.
Objective
Aim
To assess the differences in postoperative analgesic effects between Intertransverse process block and Erector Spinae Plane Block under ultrasound guidance in patients undergoing thoracic spine surgery.
Primary objective
The median difference in the visual analogue scale scores between the ITP block and the ESP block groups on movement 6 hours postoperatively in patients undergoing thoracic spine surgery.
Secondary objective
The average number of blocked dermatomes along the anterior axillary line midclavicular line and scapular line at 6 and 24 hours postoperatively.
The time to first use of rescue analgesic and the amount of non steroidal anti inflammatory drugs and opioid use.
Description of trial design
Trial design
Prospective double blind parallel controlled randomised single centre clinical trial.
Unit of randomisation is individual participant.
Allocation ratio is 1 ratio 1.
Trial setting This will be a single centre study to be conducted in Neurosurgery OT under the Department of Anaesthesiology Dr Ram Manohar Lohia Institute of Medical Sciences Lucknow Uttar Pradesh. Written informed consent will be taken from patients.
Study duration 12 months for data collection 2 months for data analysis and 2 months for writing the manuscript total 16 months.
Sample size assessment
This study is a randomised controlled trial with the experimental group receiving ITP block and the control group receiving ESP block. The primary outcome is the median difference in the visual analogue scale scores between the ITP block and the ESP block groups on movement 6 hours postoperatively in patients undergoing thoracic spine surgery.
Assuming that the intertransverse block compared to the ESP block will result in 10 mm lower VAS on movement at 6 hours after surgery at 90 percent power and at 5 percent significance level and at the 10 mm standard deviation of VAS 22 patients per group will be required. Taking attrition rate to be 10 percent a total of 46 patients will be required for the study. To facilitate block randomisation the study ultimately plans to recruit 48 patients.
Randomisation and blinding
A total of 48 cases will be randomised using statistical product and service solution SPSS version 26 employing a block randomisation method with a block length of 4. The 48 subjects will be divided into 12 blocks and the two trial groups will be represented by A and B. In advance each block will have different arrangements of A and B corresponding to a number. Subsequently a set of random numbers will be generated in SPSS and the arrangement of the blocks will be determined according to the order of these random numbers. Subjects will be assigned their corresponding blocks and group conditions based on the order of enrolment with their final group assignment represented solely by A or B. The final group distribution will be 24 cases in the ITP block group and 24 cases in the ESP block group.
All random number generation and subject enrolment will be managed by a nurse who will not participate in the subsequent trial processes. This nurse will be unaware of the specific groups represented by A and B. After generating the corresponding group assignments the nurse will place the group information A or B into an opaque sealed envelope. All sealed envelopes will be stored in a locked cabinet and opened by the attending anaesthesiologist on the day of surgery before the block procedure. The attending anaesthesiologist is informed and understands what A or B corresponds to in actual groups and will then perform the corresponding block procedure. This anaesthesiologist will not be involved in the study group allocation or subsequent data analysis. All other personnel involved in the study such as surgeons outcome assessors and data analysts will remain blinded to the subjects allocation.
Sampling technique
Patients planned to undergo thoracic spine surgery will be screened for eligibility during the pre anaesthetic checkup visit which will be done 2 days before the scheduled surgery. The pre anaesthetic checkup will be conducted as per institutional practice and written informed consent will be taken from eligible patients.
The envelopes will be opened on the day of surgery when the patient is shifted to the operating room table. The two study groups will be
Group one ITP block group
Group two ESP block group
Masking
Both the anaesthesiologist providing anaesthesia management and the researcher who will follow up after the operation will be blinded.
Intervention description
Each enrolled patient will undergo standard monitoring and bispectral index monitoring. Anaesthesia induction involves pre oxygenation followed by intravenous administration of propofol 2 mg per kg fentanyl 2 microgram per kg and vecuronium 0.1 mg per kg. All patients will undergo intubation with a wire reinforced endotracheal tube. After the patient is placed in prone position the chief anaesthesiologist will open the envelope and perform the appropriate nerve block according to group assignment.
ITPB group
Twenty millilitres of 0.125 percent bupivacaine will be injected after confirming correct needle placement under ultrasound guidance.
ESPB group
Twenty millilitres of 0.125 percent bupivacaine will be injected deep to the erector spinae muscle under ultrasound guidance after confirmation of correct needle placement.
Anaesthesia maintenance will be achieved with fentanyl 0.5 to 1 microgram per kg per hour vecuronium 0.04 mg per kg per hour and sevoflurane 1.8 percent. Unless contraindicated all patients will receive intravenous ondansetron 4 mg dexamethasone 5 mg and paracetamol 1 g approximately 15 minutes before cessation of anaesthesia. BIS will be maintained between 40 and 60 and blood pressure within 20 percent of baseline values.
Data collection
Outcome measures will be assessed at 0 2 6 12 24 and 48 hours postoperatively. Data will be stored in Microsoft Excel and analysed after trial completion.
Primary outcome
VAS on movement at 6 hours postoperatively.
Secondary outcomes
Number of blocked dermatomes at 6 and 24 hours.
Time to first rescue analgesic.
Total NSAID and opioid consumption.
Rescue analgesia
If VAS score is 40 mm or more additional NSAIDs will be administered. If pain persists opioids such as fentanyl or tramadol will be given.
Inclusion criteria
Patients aged 20 to 70 years with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status 1 to 3 scheduled for thoracic spine surgery.
Exclusion criteria
Age less than 20 or more than 70 years allergy to local anaesthetics BMI more than 30 kg per meter square coagulopathy daily opioid use mental or neurological disorders allergy to analgesics communication disorders previous thoracic spine surgery.
All patients will be operated on by the same neurosurgeon.

 
Close