| CTRI Number |
CTRI/2026/01/102096 [Registered on: 27/01/2026] Trial Registered Prospectively |
| Last Modified On: |
23/01/2026 |
| Post Graduate Thesis |
Yes |
| Type of Trial |
Interventional |
|
Type of Study
|
Physiotherapy (Not Including YOGA) |
| Study Design |
Randomized, Parallel Group, Active Controlled Trial |
|
Public Title of Study
|
Best Physiotherapy Techniques for Scapulocostal Syndrome” |
|
Scientific Title of Study
|
Effectiveness of Pulsed Muscle Energy Technique as compared with Scapular stabilization exercises on Functional Capacity, Pain and Quality of life in patients with Scapulocostal Syndrome – A Randomized Controlled Trial |
| Trial Acronym |
|
|
Secondary IDs if Any
|
| Secondary ID |
Identifier |
| Nil |
NIL |
|
|
Details of Principal Investigator or overall Trial Coordinator (multi-center study)
|
| Name |
Aliver Justin |
| Designation |
Professor |
| Affiliation |
Kerala University of Health Sciences |
| Address |
Department of Physiotherapy
DR.SMCSI MEDICAL COLLEGE AND HOSPITAL
Karakonam , Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala Dr.SMCSI MEDICAL COLLEGE AND HOSPITAL Thiruvananthapuram KERALA 695504 India |
| Phone |
09952828928 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
aliverpt@gmail.com |
|
Details of Contact Person Scientific Query
|
| Name |
DR. Jeniffer Augustina |
| Designation |
Assistant Professor |
| Affiliation |
Hindustan Institute of technology and science. |
| Address |
Hindustan Institute of technology and Science,Rajiv Gandhi salai,Padur,Chennai
Chennai TAMIL NADU 603103 India |
| Phone |
9962448947 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
sjenifera@hindustanuniv.ac.in |
|
Details of Contact Person Public Query
|
| Name |
Mr. Ammuthan |
| Designation |
manager |
| Affiliation |
Muthu Neuro Centre |
| Address |
Muthu neuro centre, Ashok Nager,Chunkankadai, Nagercoil
Kanniyakumari TAMIL NADU 695503 India |
| Phone |
09952828928 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
amuthan.mnch@gmail.com |
|
|
Source of Monetary or Material Support
|
| Dr.SMCSI Medical college and Hospital, Karakonam, Thiruvandrum, Kerala - 695504 |
|
|
Primary Sponsor
|
| Name |
P Aliver Justin |
| Address |
Dr.SMCSI Medical college and Hospital, Karakonam, Thiruvandrum - 695504 |
| Type of Sponsor |
Other [Self] |
|
|
Details of Secondary Sponsor
|
| Name |
Address |
| Muthu Neuro Centre |
Chunkankadai, Nagercoil |
|
|
Countries of Recruitment
|
India |
|
Sites of Study
|
| No of Sites = 1 |
| Name of Principal
Investigator |
Name of Site |
Site Address |
Phone/Fax/Email |
| Dr Acksen Thanka Raja |
Somerville Memorial Medical college and Hospital |
Department of Physiotherapy,Dr.SMCSI Medical college and hospital, Karakonam, Thiruvananthapuram, kerala Thiruvananthapuram KERALA |
8778908404
acksen@gmail.com |
|
|
Details of Ethics Committee
|
| No of Ethics Committees= 1 |
| Name of Committee |
Approval Status |
| Dr.SMCSI Medical college |
Approved |
|
|
Regulatory Clearance Status from DCGI
|
|
|
Health Condition / Problems Studied
|
| Health Type |
Condition |
| Patients |
(1) ICD-10 Condition: M625||Muscle wasting and atrophy, not elsewhere classified, |
|
|
Intervention / Comparator Agent
|
| Type |
Name |
Details |
| Intervention |
Pulsed Muscle Energy Technique and Scapular Stabilization Exercises |
Pulsed Muscle Energy Technique (PMET) is an advanced form of the traditional Muscle Energy Technique (MET), developed to produce therapeutic effects through controlled, rhythmic, and intermittent isometric contractions. Unlike conventional MET, which relies on a sustained isometric contraction of 5–10 seconds followed by a period of relaxation and passive stretch, PMET employs a series of gentle, repetitive (pulsed) muscle contractions interspersed with brief relaxation phases. This rhythmic modulation of muscle activity aims to restore optimal length–tension relationships, enhance neuromuscular coordination, and facilitate pain-free mobility within the physiological range of motion.
Patient Preparation and Positioning
• Environment: Quiet, comfortable with adequate space for therapist movement around the patient.
• Patient Position: Usually in prone lying or sitting posture depending on comfort and therapist access.
o Prone position: The patient lies face-down with arms resting by the side, allowing the scapula to rest in slight protraction.
o Sitting position: The patient sits upright with the therapist positioned behind, stabilizing the shoulder girdle.
• Therapist Position: Standing or seated beside the affected side, ensuring proper leverage and stabilization of the thoracic cage.
• Assessment: Identify areas of palpable tenderness, taut bands, or trigger points over the medial border of the scapula through palpation and confirm restricted scapular motion.
Procedure
1. Engagement of the Restriction Barrier: The therapist passively moves the scapula into gentle protraction or elevation until the first tissue resistance is felt, without provoking pain. This establishes the barrier position for treatment.
2. Instruction to the Patient: The patient is instructed to attempt a gentle isometric contraction of the scapular retractors (rhomboids and middle trapezius) — as if trying to pull the shoulder blade toward the spine — while the therapist resists the movement.
3. Pulsed Contraction Phase:
o The patient performs repetitive submaximal isometric contractions (approximately 20–30% of maximal effort) in a rhythmic pulsed pattern—1 to 2 contractions per seconds followed by 1 second relaxation.
o Each set consists of 5–10 pulsed contractions.
o The therapist maintains counterforce during each pulse to ensure isometric control and prevents compensatory movements.
4. Relaxation and Repositioning: After each set, the patient relaxes completely, and the therapist gently repositions the scapula into a new barrier of increased mobility. The process is repeated for 3–5 sets, depending on tolerance and clinical response.
5. Re-assessment: Following treatment, scapular mobility, resting tone, and tenderness are reassessed. |
| Comparator Agent |
Scapular Stabilization Exercises |
Scapular Stabilization Exercises (SSE) are targeted therapeutic exercises designed to restore normal scapulothoracic kinematics by strengthening weak periscapular muscles (primarily the serratus anterior, lower trapezius) and down-regulating or stretching overactive muscles (upper trapezius, pectoralis minor). They aim to correct scapular dyskinesis, improve shoulder control during arm elevation, decrease mechanical impingement, and reduce pain and disability in a range of shoulder and cervicothoracic conditions. |
|
|
Inclusion Criteria
|
| Age From |
18.00 Year(s) |
| Age To |
60.00 Year(s) |
| Gender |
Both |
| Details |
1. Diagnosed with scapulocostal syndrome by using Scapular Compression Test: Stabilizing the scapula during movement can alleviate symptoms if scapular instability is contributing. (Unilateral or Bilateral)
2. Presence of self-reported shoulder girdle dysfunction as indicated by a minimum score of 20% disability on the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI).
3. Report a minimum pain intensity of 4 and maximum 8 on the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) in the last 7 days.
4. willing to provide informed consent and adhere to the study protocol.
5. Participants with intact neuromuscular control and no evidence of upper motor neuron lesion.
|
|
| ExclusionCriteria |
| Details |
1.Individuals with cervical radiculopathy, thoracic outlet syndrome, cervical spondylosis, or intervertebral disc pathology confirmed clinically.
2.Patients presenting with rotator cuff injuries, adhesive capsulitis, subacromial impingement, or any post-traumatic shoulder pathology will be excluded, as these conditions may independently alter scapular mechanics.
3.Patients who have received corticosteroid injections, or analgesic therapy within the past two weeks.
4.Subjects with spinal deformities (e.g., scoliosis, kyphosis) or significant postural deviations that affect scapular alignment will not be included.
5.Pregnant or lactating women, and individuals with systemic illnesses affecting musculoskeletal health (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis)
|
|
|
Method of Generating Random Sequence
|
Computer generated randomization |
|
Method of Concealment
|
Sequentially numbered, sealed, opaque envelopes |
|
Blinding/Masking
|
Investigator Blinded |
|
Primary Outcome
|
| Outcome |
TimePoints |
1. Functional Performance: Measured by Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI)
2. Pain Intensity: Measured by Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS, 0–10)
|
Pre intervention, Post intervention, 2week follow up, 6 week follow up |
|
|
Secondary Outcome
|
| Outcome |
TimePoints |
Secondary Outcomes:
1. Health-Related Quality of Life (QoL): Measured by Short Form-36 (SF-36)
2. Pain Pressure Threshold (PPT): Measured using algometer
3. Range of Motion (ROM): Scapular and shoulder mobility measurements
|
Pre intervention, Post intervention, 2week follow up, 6 week follow up. |
|
|
Target Sample Size
|
Total Sample Size="60" Sample Size from India="60"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (Total)= "Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (India)="Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials" |
|
Phase of Trial
|
Phase 3/ Phase 4 |
|
Date of First Enrollment (India)
|
20/03/2026 |
| Date of Study Completion (India) |
Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials |
| Date of First Enrollment (Global) |
Date Missing |
| Date of Study Completion (Global) |
Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials |
|
Estimated Duration of Trial
|
Years="2" Months="3" Days="0" |
|
Recruitment Status of Trial (Global)
|
Not Yet Recruiting |
| Recruitment Status of Trial (India) |
Not Yet Recruiting |
|
Publication Details
|
N/A |
|
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement
|
Will individual participant data (IPD) be shared publicly (including data dictionaries)?
Response - NO
|
|
Brief Summary
|
This randomized controlled trial investigates the effectiveness of Pulsed Muscle Energy Technique (PMET) compared to Scapular Stabilization Exercises (SSE) on functional capacity, pain, and quality of life in patients with Scapulocostal Syndrome (SCS). Sixty participants aged 18 to 60 years, clinically diagnosed with SCS, will be recruited from the Physiotherapy Department at Dr. SMCSI Medical College. Participants will be randomly allocated into two groups: Group A (PMET) and Group B (SSE). The study aims to compare both interventions using validated outcome measures such as the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) for function, Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) for pain, and SF 36 for quality of life. Additional measures including Pain Pressure Threshold (PPT) and scapular range of motion will serve as secondary outcomes. The PMET intervention involves rhythmic, submaximal isometric contractions of scapular stabilizer muscles, including the rhomboids and middle trapezius, applied in short pulses to release myofascial tension and improve scapular mobility. In contrast, the SSE program emphasizes motor control, muscle activation, and postural correction through progressive exercises targeting the serratus anterior and lower trapezius. Both interventions will be administered three times per week for six weeks, with evaluations conducted at baseline, two weeks, and six weeks. The study integrates artificial intelligence based tools such as Elicit, Scite AI, and Kinovea to support literature synthesis, data accuracy, and motion analysis, ensuring methodological precision and minimizing human error during data collection and analysis. Data will be analyzed using SPSS version 29 with statistical significance set at p less than 0.05. Independent t tests and chi square tests will assess baseline comparability, while mixed model repeated measures ANOVA will examine within group and between group effects over time. AI assisted validation and double entry procedures will ensure data integrity, and blinding of assessors will minimize bias. This study aims to provide evidence based insights into the comparative efficacy of PMET and SSE in improving pain, functional performance, and overall quality of life in individuals with scapulocostal syndrome, guiding future physiotherapy interventions for scapulothoracic dysfunction. |