This study aims to compare the efficacy of intravaginal boric acid and oral fluconazole in the management of recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis (RVVC), focusing on clinical outcomes, quality of life, and baseline Dectin-1 status. R VVC, characterized by four or more symptomatic episodes of vulvovaginal candidiasis within a year, has become increasingly difficult to treat due to rising resistance to azole antifungals, especially among non-albicans Candida species. Although boric acid has demonstrated promising results in azole-resistant infections, head-to-head comparative studies with fluconazole incorporating objective and standardized outcome measures remain limited. In this randomized study, women aged 18 to 50 years with clinically confirmed RVVC will be enrolled after informed consent. Eligible participants will be randomized in a I: 1 ratio to receive either intravaginal boric acid (600 mg once daily for 14 days) or oral fluconazole (150 mg on days 0, 3, 6, and 14). A composite clinical symptom score will be used to quantify symptom severity, while the Vulvar Disease Quality of Life Index (VDQLI) will assess patient-reported impact on daily life. Additionally, Dectin-1 levels will be measured at baseline from vaginal secretions using ELISA, to explore innate immune function related to fungal recognition. Women who are pregnant, lactating, immunocompromised, or have taken antifungal medication in the past two weeks will be excluded from the study. The primary outcome is improvement in the composite symptom score post-treatment, and secondary outcomes include enhancement in quality of life and the descriptive analysis of baseline Dectin-1 levels. While boric acid is expected to demonstrate equal or superior clinical and QoL outcomes, baseline Dectin-1 profiling may help uncover immunological predispositions contributing to RVVC susceptibility. The results may contribute to refining individualized treatment strategies and understanding host-pathogen interactions in recurrent fungal infections. |