| CTRI Number |
CTRI/2025/09/095211 [Registered on: 22/09/2025] Trial Registered Prospectively |
| Last Modified On: |
20/09/2025 |
| Post Graduate Thesis |
No |
| Type of Trial |
Interventional |
|
Type of Study
|
Process of Care Changes |
| Study Design |
Randomized, Parallel Group, Active Controlled Trial |
|
Public Title of Study
|
Effect of Chlorhexidine Wash Versus Povidone Iodine Wash on Wound Healing in Patients with Diabetic Foot Ulcers |
|
Scientific Title of Study
|
A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Chlorhexidine Soap Versus Povidone Iodine Wash in the Wound Management of Diabetic Foot Ulcers |
| Trial Acronym |
NIL |
|
Secondary IDs if Any
|
| Secondary ID |
Identifier |
| NIL |
NIL |
|
|
Details of Principal Investigator or overall Trial Coordinator (multi-center study)
|
| Name |
Dr Dennis P Jose |
| Designation |
Orthopedic Consultant |
| Affiliation |
Lakeshore Hospital, Cochin |
| Address |
Division of Foot and Ankle and Podiatry
VPS Lakeshore hospital
Kochi
India
Ernakulam KERALA 682040 India |
| Phone |
9895283937 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
drdennisp@gmail.com |
|
Details of Contact Person Scientific Query
|
| Name |
Dr Dennis P Jose |
| Designation |
Orthopedic Consultant |
| Affiliation |
Lakeshore Hospital, Cochin |
| Address |
Division of Foot and Ankle and Podiatry
VPS Lakeshore hospital
Kochi
India
Ernakulam KERALA 682040 India |
| Phone |
9895283937 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
drdennisp@gmail.com |
|
Details of Contact Person Public Query
|
| Name |
Dr Dennis P Jose |
| Designation |
Orthopedic Consultant |
| Affiliation |
Lakeshore Hospital, Cochin |
| Address |
Division of Foot and Ankle and Podiatry
VPS Lakeshore hospital
Kochi
India
Ernakulam KERALA 682040 India |
| Phone |
9895283937 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
drdennisp@gmail.com |
|
|
Source of Monetary or Material Support
|
|
|
Primary Sponsor
|
| Name |
Dr Dennis P Jose |
| Address |
Division of Foot and Ankle and Podiatry
VPS Lakeshore hospital
Kochi
India |
| Type of Sponsor |
Other [SELF] |
|
|
Details of Secondary Sponsor
|
|
|
Countries of Recruitment
|
India |
|
Sites of Study
|
| No of Sites = 1 |
| Name of Principal
Investigator |
Name of Site |
Site Address |
Phone/Fax/Email |
| Dr Dennis P Jose |
Lakeshore Hospital, Kochi |
Room No 3037, Foot and ankle department, VPS Lakeshore hospital
Kochi
India Ernakulam KERALA |
9895283937
drdennisp@gmail.com |
|
|
Details of Ethics Committee
|
| No of Ethics Committees= 1 |
| Name of Committee |
Approval Status |
| Lakeshore Ethics Committee |
Approved |
|
|
Regulatory Clearance Status from DCGI
|
|
|
Health Condition / Problems Studied
|
| Health Type |
Condition |
| Patients |
(1) ICD-10 Condition: E116||Type 2 diabetes mellitus with other specified complications, |
|
|
Intervention / Comparator Agent
|
| Type |
Name |
Details |
| Intervention |
Chlorhexidine Gluconate Solution I.P 4% w/v |
The intervention consists of wound cleansing with a chlorhexidine containing soap applied at every dressing change once in 3 days for a period of three weeks. |
| Comparator Agent |
Povidone Iodine Wash |
Participants allocated to the comparator group will receive povidone iodine wash for wound cleansing at the same frequency and duration as for intervention group. |
|
|
Inclusion Criteria
|
| Age From |
18.00 Year(s) |
| Age To |
75.00 Year(s) |
| Gender |
Both |
| Details |
Presence of Meggitt Wagner grade 1 to 4 diabetic foot ulcer |
|
| ExclusionCriteria |
| Details |
Use of other topical antiseptics or treatments outside protocol
Known allergy to chlorhexidine or povidone iodine
|
|
|
Method of Generating Random Sequence
|
Computer generated randomization |
|
Method of Concealment
|
Sequentially numbered, sealed, opaque envelopes |
|
Blinding/Masking
|
Participant and Outcome Assessor Blinded |
|
Primary Outcome
|
| Outcome |
TimePoints |
| Mean reduction in Bates Jensen wound assessment tool (BWAT) score |
Before intervention and after 3 weeks of intervention |
|
|
Secondary Outcome
|
| Outcome |
TimePoints |
| Time to complete healing |
1 month |
| Incidence of adverse effects |
1 month |
|
|
Target Sample Size
|
Total Sample Size="66" Sample Size from India="66"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (Total)= "Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (India)="Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials" |
|
Phase of Trial
|
N/A |
|
Date of First Enrollment (India)
|
20/10/2025 |
| Date of Study Completion (India) |
Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials |
| Date of First Enrollment (Global) |
Date Missing |
| Date of Study Completion (Global) |
Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials |
|
Estimated Duration of Trial
|
Years="1" Months="0" Days="0" |
|
Recruitment Status of Trial (Global)
|
Not Applicable |
| Recruitment Status of Trial (India) |
Not Yet Recruiting |
|
Publication Details
|
N/A |
|
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement
|
Will individual participant data (IPD) be shared publicly (including data dictionaries)?
Response - YES
- What data in particular will be shared?
Response - Individual participant data that underlie the results reported in this article, after de-identification (text, tables, figures, and appendices).
- What additional supporting information will be shared?
Response - Study Protocol Response - Informed Consent Form Response - Clinical Study Report
- Who will be able to view these files?
Response - Researchers whose proposed use of the data has been approved by an independent review committee identified for this purpose.
- For what types of analyses will this data be available?
Response - To achieve aims in the approved proposal.
- By what mechanism will data be made available?
Response - Proposals should be directed to [drdennisp@gmail.com].
- For how long will this data be available start date provided 13-12-2029 and end date provided 19-12-2029?
Response - Beginning 3 months and ending 5 years following article publication.
- Any URL or additional information regarding plan/policy for sharing IPD?
Additional Information - NIL
|
|
Brief Summary
|
Diabetic foot ulcers are a common complication of diabetes and a major cause of hospital admissions and amputations. Effective wound cleansing is critical in their management. Two commonly used antiseptics are chlorhexidine and povidone iodine, but there is limited comparative evidence on their effectiveness in wound healing in diabetic foot ulcers. This single-centre, randomised controlled trial will compare chlorhexidine-containing soap versus povidone iodine wash for wound cleansing in patients with diabetic foot ulcers. Eligible adult patients with Wagner grade 1–4 ulcers will be randomised into two groups. Wound status will be assessed at baseline and after 3 weeks using the Bates-Jensen Wound Assessment Tool (BWAT) by an independent, blinded observer. The primary outcome is the mean reduction in BWAT score. Secondary outcomes include time to complete healing and incidence of adverse effects. A total of 66 patients (33 per group) will be included. Standard diabetic foot care, including debridement, offloading, antibiotics if required, and glycaemic control, will be provided to all participants. This study aims to provide evidence on which antiseptic wash—chlorhexidine or povidone iodine—is more effective for wound healing in diabetic foot ulcers. |