Title of Study Comparative assessment of effectiveness between oral cyclosporine and oral methotrexate in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis a prospective, parallel-group observational study. Introduction Plaque psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory dermatological disorder with significant physical and psychosocial impact. Methotrexate and cyclosporine are established systemic therapies for moderate to severe cases, but comparative data on their effectiveness and safety in Indian patients remain limited and inconsistent. This study aims to directly compare both agents regarding disease improvement and adherence over 16 weeks. Objectives Primary Objective To assess and compare the change in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index PASI score from baseline to 16 weeks between oral cyclosporine and oral methotrexate. Secondary Objective To compare patient adherence rates at 16 weeks using the Simplified Medication Adherence Questionnaire SMAQ scale in both treatment groups. Methodology a Materials and Methods Study design is Prospective, parallel-group, observational study. Location is Dermatology OPD of tertiary care teaching hospital. Duration is 24 months July 2025–July 2027 . Enrolment Patients will be allocated to receive either oral cyclosporine or oral methotrexate, as per dermatologist discretion, with standard topical adjuncts emollients, corticosteroids . Four scheduled follow-up visits at 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks . b Inclusion Criteria Age 18–65 years inclusive , any gender. Moderate to severe plaque psoriasis PASI greater than or equal to10 , diagnosis by dermatologist. New patients prescribed one of the study drugs. less than or equal to16 weeks prior systemic therapy, documented PASI at defined intervals. Adjunct topical therapy allowed. Written informed consent. c Exclusion Criteria Non plaque psoriasis subtypes. Use of other systemic anti psoriatic therapies or biologics in combination. History of drug allergy methotrexate or cyclosporine , malignancy, pregnancy, significant liver or renal impairment. Determined unsuitable by treating dermatologist. d Endpoints Primary Endpoint Change in mean PASI score from baseline to 16 weeks. Secondary Endpoints Proportion of patients attaining PASI75 at 16 weeks. Proportion of patients adherent to therapy SMAQ score equal to 0 at 16 weeks . e Primary Outcome Mean reduction in PASI score at week 16 between groups. f Secondary Outcomes Proportion with PASI75 response. Proportion with good adherence to cyclosporine and methotrexate SMAQ score equal to 0 . Study Procedure Eligibility screening, signed informed consent. Baseline clinical examination, history, PASI scoring. Allocation to Group A cyclosporine or Group B methotrexate per standard prescribing. Regular follow ups at 4, 8, 12, 16 weeks with repeat PASI scoring and adherence assessment. Data recorded in case record forms. Drug Availability Both drugs oral cyclosporine and oral methotrexate are available at the study site and prescribed as per routine clinical practice. Folic acid supplementation provided with methotrexate. Data Collection Clinical data and adherence scores will be documented at each visit in standardized electronic and paper forms. Statistical Analysis Sample size 80 40 per group , with 10percentage dropout rate anticipated. Unpaired t test for mean change in PASI. ANCOVA to adjust for baseline PASI. Logistic regression for prognostic factors related to treatment success/failure. Repeated measures ANOVA for within group PASI changes. Chi square for PASI75 and adherence rates. Analysis performed via GraphPad Prism and SPSS v26 p less than 0.05 is significant. Ethical Consideration Study conducted under institutional ethics committee approval, following ICMR, Good Clinical Practice, Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent required privacy and confidentiality assured patients free to withdraw at any time. Expected Impact This study will provide robust comparative evidence on the efficacy, safety, and adherence of oral cyclosporine and methotrexate in moderate to severe plaque psoriasis among Indian patients, guiding future therapeutic decisions and standard of care protocols. |