| CTRI Number |
CTRI/2025/09/094986 [Registered on: 17/09/2025] Trial Registered Prospectively |
| Last Modified On: |
17/03/2026 |
| Post Graduate Thesis |
No |
| Type of Trial |
Interventional |
|
Type of Study
|
Drug |
| Study Design |
Randomized, Parallel Group, Placebo Controlled Trial |
|
Public Title of Study
|
A study comparing capecitabine with megestrol acetate or placebo in patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (CAMEO Study) |
|
Scientific Title of Study
|
A placebo-controlled, randomised phase III trial comparing capecitabine with megestrol acetate or capecitabine with placebo in hormone receptor-positive and HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (CAMEO Study) |
| Trial Acronym |
CAMEO Study |
|
Secondary IDs if Any
|
| Secondary ID |
Identifier |
| NIL |
NIL |
|
|
Details of Principal Investigator or overall Trial Coordinator (multi-center study)
|
| Name |
Dr Anuradha Mehta |
| Designation |
Assistant Professor |
| Affiliation |
Tata Memorial Hospital |
| Address |
11th floor 1101, Homi Bhabha Building, Tata Memorial Hospital, Dr. Ernest Borges Road , Parel Mumbai 400012
Mumbai MAHARASHTRA 400012 India |
| Phone |
9953532070 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
anuradhamehta1911@gmail.com |
|
Details of Contact Person Scientific Query
|
| Name |
Dr Anuradha Mehta |
| Designation |
Assistant Professor |
| Affiliation |
Tata Memorial Hospital |
| Address |
11th floor 1101, Homi Bhabha Building, Tata Memorial Hospital, Dr. Ernest Borges Road , Parel Mumbai 400012
Mumbai MAHARASHTRA 400012 India |
| Phone |
9953532070 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
anuradhamehta1911@gmail.com |
|
Details of Contact Person Public Query
|
| Name |
Dr Anuradha Mehta |
| Designation |
Assistant Professor |
| Affiliation |
Tata Memorial Hospital |
| Address |
11th floor 1101, Homi Bhabha Building, Tata Memorial Hospital, Dr. Ernest Borges Road , Parel Mumbai 400012 11th floor 1101, Homi Bhabha Building, Tata Memorial Hospital, Dr. Ernest Borges Road , Parel Mumbai 400012 Mumbai MAHARASHTRA 400012 India |
| Phone |
9953532070 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
anuradhamehta1911@gmail.com |
|
|
Source of Monetary or Material Support
|
| Tata Memorial Hospital, Dr. Ernest Borges Road , Mumbai Parel 400012 |
|
|
Primary Sponsor
|
| Name |
Tata Memorial Hospital |
| Address |
1102 11 Floor , Homi Bhabha Building , Tata Memorial Hospital, Dr. Ernest Borges Road , Parel Mumbai 400012 |
| Type of Sponsor |
Research institution and hospital |
|
|
Details of Secondary Sponsor
|
|
|
Countries of Recruitment
|
India |
|
Sites of Study
|
| No of Sites = 1 |
| Name of Principal
Investigator |
Name of Site |
Site Address |
Phone/Fax/Email |
| Dr Anuradha Mehta |
Tata Memorial Hospital |
11th floor 1101, Homi Bhabha Building , Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Dr. Ernest Borges Road , Parel Mumbai 400012 Mumbai MAHARASHTRA |
09953532070
anuradhamehta1911@gmail.com |
|
Details of Ethics Committee
Modification(s)
|
| No of Ethics Committees= 1 |
| Name of Committee |
Approval Status |
| Institutional Ethics Committee-II |
Approved |
|
|
Regulatory Clearance Status from DCGI
|
|
|
Health Condition / Problems Studied
|
| Health Type |
Condition |
| Patients |
(1) ICD-10 Condition: C508||Malignant neoplasm of overlappingsites of breast, |
|
|
Intervention / Comparator Agent
|
| Type |
Name |
Details |
| Comparator Agent |
Capecitabine + Placebo (Identical in appearance with
Megestrol acetate ) |
Arm B (Control Group): Placebo (identical in appearance
with Megestrol acetate) with capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 PO BD
for 2 weeks with 1 week off in every 3 weekly cycles |
| Intervention |
Capecitabine with Megestrol Acetate |
Arm A (Experimental Group): Megestrol acetate (MA) 160
mg per oral (PO) once a day (OD) with capecitabine 1000
mg/m2 PO BD for 2 weeks with 1 week off in every 3 weekly
cycles |
|
|
Inclusion Criteria
|
| Age From |
18.00 Year(s) |
| Age To |
80.00 Year(s) |
| Gender |
Both |
| Details |
Age 18 and above years.
Post-menopausal women or pre-menopausal women on ovarian suppression Histologically proven breast cancer: In advanced or metastatic stage HR positive either estrogen receptor positive and/or progesterone receptor positive as per ASCO-CAP guidelines HER2 negative defined as IHC 2 positive/ISH negative or IHC 0 and 1 positive.
Received at least two lines of endocrine-based therapy for advanced or metastatic disease or had cancer progression while undergoing adjuvant endocrine therapy or within 12 months of completion of adjuvant endocrine therapy.
Prior CDK4 or 6 inhibitor is mandatory.
Have received no prior line of chemotherapy in the metastatic setting. ECOG PS less than 2. |
|
| ExclusionCriteria |
| Details |
Contraindication to capecitabine.
Patients with prior megestrol acetate or current exposure to natural/synthetic progesterone compounds.
Patients with uncontrolled brain metastases. Patients with a history of venous thromboembolism or known thrombophilia |
|
|
Method of Generating Random Sequence
|
Permuted block randomization, fixed |
|
Method of Concealment
|
Not Applicable |
|
Blinding/Masking
|
Not Applicable |
|
Primary Outcome
|
| Outcome |
TimePoints |
To compare progression-free survival (PFS) between patients receiving capecitabine with Megestrol
acetate (MA) versus capecitabine with placebo (Identical in appearance with Megestrol acetate ) |
PFS (time from randomisation until disease progression per RECIST 1.1 or death, whichever occurs first) |
|
|
Secondary Outcome
|
| Outcome |
TimePoints |
| To compare the 2 groups for: Overall Survival (OS) between both arms, Tumour response rates in patients with measurable disease (ORR), Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR), Safety (side effects), Quality of Life (QOL). |
OS: Survival follow-up every 3 months after progression until death
ORR:Tumour assessment every 12 ± 1 weeks until progression
CBR:Tumour assessment every 12 ± 1 weeks until progression, QoL:At baseline, then every 12 weeks during treatment, & at treatment discontinuation |
|
|
Target Sample Size
|
Total Sample Size="366" Sample Size from India="366"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (Total)= "Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (India)="Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials" |
|
Phase of Trial
|
Phase 3 |
|
Date of First Enrollment (India)
|
08/10/2025 |
| Date of Study Completion (India) |
Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials |
| Date of First Enrollment (Global) |
Date Missing |
| Date of Study Completion (Global) |
Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials |
|
Estimated Duration of Trial
|
Years="5" Months="2" Days="0" |
|
Recruitment Status of Trial (Global)
|
Not Applicable |
| Recruitment Status of Trial (India) |
Not Yet Recruiting |
|
Publication Details
|
N/A |
|
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement
|
Will individual participant data (IPD) be shared publicly (including data dictionaries)?
Response - NO
|
|
Brief Summary
|
Study Design: This is a placebo-controlled, randomized phase III clinical trial. Background: There is an unmet need for effective treatment for patients with hormone receptor positive and human epidermal growth factor negative advanced/metastatic breast cancer that have progressed on two lines of endocrine-based therapy. Novel agents being investigated in this setting pose significant financial toxicity with disease control ranging from 7 to 13 months in the 2nd or 3rd line of therapy. Combination chemotherapy with hormone therapy could address the intra-tumoral heterogeneity post multiple lines of therapy. Megestrol acetate has demonstrated response rates of 30 percentage and median progression-free survival of 3 months in heavily pre-treated patients with MBC, irrespective of estrogen and/or progesterone receptor status. In a non-randomized trial, the addition of chemotherapy to MA in 29 heavily pretreated MBC patients reported a median PFS of 7 months and no significant toxicities. Hence, we hypothesize that combination of MA with chemotherapy will improve PFS in patients with HR+ MBC. In this study, we are testing this hypothesis by comparing two arms: MA plus capecitabine vs capecitabine plus placebo. Aim:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of combination capecitabine and megestrol acetate in patients with HR positive MBC who are chemotherapy naïve. Primary Objective: To compare progression-free survival between patients receiving capecitabine with megesterol acetate versus capecitabine with placebo which is Identical to MA Secondary Objective: To compare the 2 groups for: Overall Survival between both arms, objective response rates in patients with measurable disease ,Clinical Benefit Rate, Safety , Quality of Life Key Inclusion Criteria: Age 18 and above years ,post-menopausal women or pre-menopausal women on ovarian suppression, Histologically proven breast cancer: In advanced or metastatic stage HR positive either estrogen receptor positive and/or progesterone receptor positive as per ASCO-CAP guidelines HER2 negative defined as IHC 2 positive/ISH negative or IHC 0 and 1 positive. Received at least two lines of endocrine-based therapy for advanced or metastatic disease or had cancer progression while undergoing adjuvant endocrine therapy or within 12 months of completion of adjuvant endocrine therapy. Prior CDK4 or 6 inhibitor is mandatory. Have received no prior line of chemotherapy in the metastatic setting. ECOG PS less than 2. Key Exclusion Criteria: Contraindication to capecitabine. Patients with prior megestrol acetate or current exposure to natural/synthetic progesterone compounds.Patients with uncontrolled brain metastases. Patients with a history of venous thromboembolism or known thrombophilia Treatment Plan: Consenting patients will be randomly assigned to Arm A Experimental Group : Megestrol acetate (MA) 160 mg per oral once a day with capecitabine 1000 mg per m2 PO BD for 2 weeks with 1 week off in every 3 weekly cycles Arm B Control Group: Placebo which is identical in appearance with Megestrol acetate with capecitabine 1000 mg per m2 PO BD for 2 weeks with 1 week off in every 3 weekly cycles Treatment will continue until disease progression, intolerable toxicity or patient decision to stop. Follow-up assessments: Patients will be followed up for clinical assessment and laboratory parameters every 21 window period of pluse or minus 3 days. Assessment of disease status with contrast-enhanced computed tomography of the thorax, abdomen, and pelvis will be performed every 12 window period of pluse or minus 1 weeks. After disease progression, subsequent treatment administration will be as per standard institutional practice, and patients will be followed up every 3 months until death. Statistical Consideration: This is randomised, placebo-controlled, phase III trial in which 332 patients with MBC will be randomized with equal probability to one of two possible treatment regimens: MA 160 mg per oral once a day with capecitabine 1000 mg per m2 PO BD for 2 weeks with 1 week off in every 3 weekly cycles or Placebo (identical in appearance to MA) administered per oral once a day and capecitabine 1000 mg per m2 PO BD for 2 weeks with 1 week off in every 3 weekly cycles. With 329 PFS events, the log-rank test has a power of 0.90 to detect a hazard ratio of 0.70 an increasing the median PFS from 6 months to 8 months with a two-sided type I error rate of 0.05. The following calculations assume a monthly accrual rate of 9 patients or month accrued over a 39 month period, followed for 24 months after study closure and that PFS is assumed to follow an exponential distribution. |