| CTRI Number |
CTRI/2025/09/094969 [Registered on: 17/09/2025] Trial Registered Prospectively |
| Last Modified On: |
16/09/2025 |
| Post Graduate Thesis |
No |
| Type of Trial |
Interventional |
|
Type of Study
|
Surgical/Anesthesia |
| Study Design |
Randomized, Parallel Group Trial |
|
Public Title of Study
|
“Comparing Two Simple Nail Support Methods for Early Ingrown Toenails: Cotton Nail Cast vs. Gutter Splint” |
|
Scientific Title of Study
|
Efficacy of Cotton Nail Cast Versus Enhanced Gutter Splint in Early Stage Great Toe Onychocryptosis (Stage 1 and 2a):A Randomised Control Trial at a Tertiary care Centre in Mandya. |
| Trial Acronym |
NIL |
|
Secondary IDs if Any
|
| Secondary ID |
Identifier |
| NIL |
NIL |
|
|
Details of Principal Investigator or overall Trial Coordinator (multi-center study)
|
| Name |
Dr Shivu N |
| Designation |
Post graduate, Department of Dermatology, MIMS , Mandya |
| Affiliation |
Mandya institute of medical sciences, Mandya |
| Address |
OPD No-13 , 2nd floor
Department of dermatology
Mandya institute of medical sciences, Mandya-571403
Mandya KARNATAKA 571403 India |
| Phone |
7760640806 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
shivunagaraj111@gmail.com |
|
Details of Contact Person Scientific Query
|
| Name |
Dr Shashikumar B M |
| Designation |
Associate professor and Head of the department, Department of Dermatology, MIMS ,Mandya |
| Affiliation |
Mandya institute of medical sciences, Mandya |
| Address |
OPD No-13 , 2nd floor
Department of dermatology
Mandya institute of medical sciences, Mandya-571403
Mandya KARNATAKA 571403 India |
| Phone |
9886197902 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
shashikumarbm@gmail.com |
|
Details of Contact Person Public Query
|
| Name |
Dr Shashikumar B M |
| Designation |
Associate professor and Head of the department, Department of Dermatology, MIMS ,Mandya |
| Affiliation |
Mandya institute of medical sciences, Mandya |
| Address |
OPD No-13 , 2nd floor
Department of dermatology
Mandya institute of medical sciences, Mandya-571403
Mandya KARNATAKA 571403 India |
| Phone |
9886197902 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
shashikumarbm@gmail.com |
|
|
Source of Monetary or Material Support
|
| OPD No-13 , 1st floor,
Department of dermatology,
Mandya institute of medical sciences,
India, Karnataka, Mandya - 571403. |
|
|
Primary Sponsor
|
| Name |
Shivu N |
| Address |
OPD No-13 , 1st floor,
Department of dermatology,
Mandya institute of medical sciences,
India, Karnataka, Mandya - 571403. |
| Type of Sponsor |
Other [Self] |
|
|
Details of Secondary Sponsor
|
|
|
Countries of Recruitment
|
India |
|
Sites of Study
|
| No of Sites = 1 |
| Name of Principal
Investigator |
Name of Site |
Site Address |
Phone/Fax/Email |
| Dr Shivu N |
Mandya institute of medical sciences, Mandya |
OPD No 13 , 1st floor
Department of dermatology. Mandya KARNATAKA |
7760640806
shivunagaraj111@gmail.com |
|
|
Details of Ethics Committee
|
| No of Ethics Committees= 1 |
| Name of Committee |
Approval Status |
| Institution Ethics Committee, MIMS , Mandya |
Approved |
|
|
Regulatory Clearance Status from DCGI
|
|
|
Health Condition / Problems Studied
|
| Health Type |
Condition |
| Patients |
(1) ICD-10 Condition: L600||Ingrowing nail, |
|
|
Intervention / Comparator Agent
|
| Type |
Name |
Details |
| Intervention |
Cotton nail cast |
•Name: Cotton Nail Cast
•Type: Conservative non-surgical technique
•Description: Placement of a small rolled piece of sterile cotton beneath the ingrown edge of the great toenail to elevate the nail plate, fixing it with cyanoacrylate adhesive , relieve pressure on periungual tissue, and guide normal nail growth.
•Dosage/Duration: Applied in each outpatient visit and replaced as required until resolution of symptoms or end of follow-up period. |
| Comparator Agent |
enhanced gutter splint technique |
•Name: Enhanced Gutter Splint Technique
•Type: Conservative non-surgical technique
•Description: Insertion of a trimmed sterile intravenous infusion tube or pediatric NG tube segment (gutter splint) along the ingrown nail edge after local anesthesia, fixed with adhesive to protect periungual skin and guide proper nail growth.
•Dosage/Duration: Applied once and retained in place until spontaneous extrusion or until resolution of symptoms or upto 4 to 6 weeks, with follow-up as per protocol.
|
|
|
Inclusion Criteria
|
| Age From |
18.00 Year(s) |
| Age To |
60.00 Year(s) |
| Gender |
Both |
| Details |
Patients with symptomatic ingrown toenail (Stage I or IIa ) aged more than 18 years of age , both sexes attending the outpatient department of dermatology and willing to give written informed consent for the study.
|
|
| ExclusionCriteria |
| Details |
Peripheral vascular disease.
Active local infection or cellulitis.
Immunocompromised status (e.g., HIV, Transplant recipients , Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus).
Allergy to cyanoacrylate glue.
Local deformity of the digit (e.g, Hallux varus/valgus).
|
|
|
Method of Generating Random Sequence
|
Coin toss, Lottery, toss of dice, shuffling cards etc |
|
Method of Concealment
|
Other |
|
Blinding/Masking
|
Not Applicable |
|
Primary Outcome
|
| Outcome |
TimePoints |
| To compare the efficacy of Cotton Nail Cast and Enhanced Gutter Splint Technique in Stage 1 & 2a Disease onychocryptosis patients attending the outpatient department of dermatology, MIMS , Mandya. |
Baseline (Day 0) – Before intervention .
Day 3, Day 7, 1 Month, 3 Months, and 6 Months.
Symptom evaluation: pain, difficulty walking, shoe-wear limitation
Clinical signs: erythema, swelling, granulation tissue, discharge
Photographs: taken at baseline, and at 1, 3, and 6 months
Pain scores: using Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Assessment of complications: recurrence, nail dystrophy, infection, abscess, scarring, or spike formation |
|
|
Secondary Outcome
|
| Outcome |
TimePoints |
To evaluate and compare patient satisfaction, postoperative pain, healing time, and complications between the two treatment modalities.
|
Baseline (Day 0) – Before intervention .
Day 3, Day 7, 1 Month, 3 Months, and 6 Months.
Symptom evaluation: pain, difficulty walking, shoe-wear limitation
Clinical signs: erythema, swelling, granulation tissue, discharge
Photographs: taken at baseline, and at 1, 3, and 6 months
Pain scores: using Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Assessment of complications: recurrence, nail dystrophy, infection, abscess, scarring, or spike formation
|
|
|
Target Sample Size
|
Total Sample Size="66" Sample Size from India="66"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (Total)= "Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (India)="Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials" |
|
Phase of Trial
|
Phase 4 |
|
Date of First Enrollment (India)
|
01/10/2025 |
| Date of Study Completion (India) |
Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials |
| Date of First Enrollment (Global) |
Date Missing |
| Date of Study Completion (Global) |
Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials |
|
Estimated Duration of Trial
|
Years="1" Months="0" Days="0" |
|
Recruitment Status of Trial (Global)
|
Not Applicable |
| Recruitment Status of Trial (India) |
Open to Recruitment |
|
Publication Details
|
N/A |
|
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement
|
Will individual participant data (IPD) be shared publicly (including data dictionaries)?
Response - NO
|
|
Brief Summary
|
This prospective randomised comparative study evaluates the effectiveness of cotton nail cast and enhanced gutter splint techniques in managing early-stage great toe onychocryptosis (Stage 1 and 2a) at a tertiary care centre in Mandya. Patients meeting inclusion criteria will be randomised into two equal groups to receive either cotton nail cast or enhanced gutter splint application. Both are conservative, minimally invasive methods designed to relieve pain, reduce periungual inflammation, and correct nail plate embedding without surgery. Participants will be assessed at baseline, Day 3, Day 7, 1 Month, 3 Months, and 6 Months. Primary objective is To evaluate and compare efficacy, patient satisfaction, postoperative pain, healing time, and complications between the two treatment modalities.The study aims to provide comparative evidence on two low-cost, office-based techniques, helping clinicians choose the most effective and patient-friendly method for early-stage ingrown toenail management, potentially reducing the need for surgical interventions.
|