FULL DETAILS (Read-only)  -> Click Here to Create PDF for Current Dataset of Trial
CTRI Number  CTRI/2025/12/099716 [Registered on: 23/12/2025] Trial Registered Prospectively
Last Modified On: 22/12/2025
Post Graduate Thesis  No 
Type of Trial  Interventional 
Type of Study   Drug
Surgical/Anesthesia 
Study Design  Randomized, Parallel Group Trial 
Public Title of Study   Comparison between efficacy of erector spinae plane block and retrolaminar block (2 types of injections with local anaesthetics) in providing pain relief after spine surgery 
Scientific Title of Study   Efficacy of erector spinae plane block versus retrolaminar block for perioperative analgesia following posterior dorso-lumbar spine instrumentation surgery 
Trial Acronym  NIL 
Secondary IDs if Any  
Secondary ID  Identifier 
NIL  NIL 
 
Details of Principal Investigator or overall Trial Coordinator (multi-center study)  
Name  Dr Soumya Chakrabarti 
Designation  Consultant 
Affiliation  IPGMER Kolkata 
Address  Bangur Institute of Neurosciences, department of Neuroanaesthesia, first floor, 244, AJC Bose Road, Bhowanipore, Kolkata

Kolkata
WEST BENGAL
700020
India 
Phone  8910129978  
Fax    
Email  drsoumyachakrabarti@rediffmail.com  
 
Details of Contact Person
Scientific Query
 
Name  Dr Soumya Chakrabarti 
Designation  Consultant 
Affiliation  IPGMER Kolkata 
Address  Bangur Institute of Neurosciences, department of Neuroanaesthesia, first floor, 244, AJC Bose Road, Bhowanipore, Kolkata

Kolkata
WEST BENGAL
700020
India 
Phone  8910129978  
Fax    
Email  drsoumyachakrabarti@rediffmail.com  
 
Details of Contact Person
Public Query
 
Name  Dr Soumya Chakrabarti 
Designation  Consultant 
Affiliation  IPGMER Kolkata 
Address  Bangur Institute of Neurosciences, department of Neuroanaesthesia, first floor, 244, AJC Bose Road, Bhowanipore, Kolkata

Kolkata
WEST BENGAL
700020
India 
Phone  8910129978  
Fax    
Email  drsoumyachakrabarti@rediffmail.com  
 
Source of Monetary or Material Support  
No monetory support. Drugs used and ultrasound machine used will be from the government supply 
 
Primary Sponsor  
Name  NIL 
Address  Not applicable 
Type of Sponsor  Other [None] 
 
Details of Secondary Sponsor  
Name  Address 
NIL  NIL 
 
Countries of Recruitment     India  
Sites of Study  
No of Sites = 1  
Name of Principal Investigator  Name of Site  Site Address  Phone/Fax/Email 
Dr Soumya Chakrabarti  IPGMER & SSKM Hospital   Bangur institute of Neurosciences, department of Neuroanaesthesia, first floor, operation theatre
Kolkata
WEST BENGAL 
8910129978

drsoumyachakrabarti@rediffmail.com 
 
Details of Ethics Committee  
No of Ethics Committees= 1  
Name of Committee  Approval Status 
IPGME&R Research Oversight Committee  Approved 
 
Regulatory Clearance Status from DCGI  
Status 
Not Applicable 
 
Health Condition / Problems Studied  
Health Type  Condition 
Patients  (1) ICD-10 Condition: M480||Spinal stenosis,  
 
Intervention / Comparator Agent  
Type  Name  Details 
Comparator Agent  Erector spinae plane block  19 ml of 0.25 % bupivacaine and 1 ml of dexamethasone given bilaterally between erector spinae muscle and transverse process under ultrasound guidance at surgical level over 5 minutes before induction of anaesthesia  
Intervention  Retrolaminar block  19 ml of 0.25 % bupivacaine and 1 ml of dexamethasone given bilaterally between transversospinalis muscles and laminae under ultrasound guidance at surgical levels over 5 minutes before induction of anaesthesia  
 
Inclusion Criteria  
Age From  18.00 Year(s)
Age To  65.00 Year(s)
Gender  Both 
Details  1. Age 18 – 65 years of age
2. Either gender
3. ASA status I-II
4. Patients undergoing thoracolumbar spine instrumentation surgeries
5. Patients getting extubated at the end of the surgery
6. Patients with intact mentation and speech
 
 
ExclusionCriteria 
Details  1. Surgery duration exceeding 3 hours
2. Patient having any coagulopathy
3. Patient having scar or infection at injection site
4. Patient having any psychiatric disorder, severe cardiac, pulmonary, hepatic or renal insufficiency
5. History of preoperative chronic opioid use, long term drinking or psychotropic drug use
6. Pregnancy and lactation
7. Patients with severe visual and auditory disorders
8. History of allergy or anaphylaxis to any local anesthetic
9. Spine instrumentation not more than 3 vertebral levels
10. Intraoperative alteration of surgery
11. Patients who will withdraw for any reason
 
 
Method of Generating Random Sequence   Computer generated randomization 
Method of Concealment   Sequentially numbered, sealed, opaque envelopes 
Blinding/Masking   Participant Blinded 
Primary Outcome  
Outcome  TimePoints 
VAS score postoperatively upto 24 hours  upto 24 hours after extubation 
 
Secondary Outcome  
Outcome  TimePoints 
(a) first time to postoperative systemic rescue analgesic
(b) perioperative hemodynamics upto 24 hours postoperatively
(c) adverse effects in the two groups
 
from administration of block upto 24 hours after extubation 
 
Target Sample Size   Total Sample Size="40"
Sample Size from India="40" 
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (Total)= "Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (India)="Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials" 
Phase of Trial   N/A 
Date of First Enrollment (India)   02/03/2026 
Date of Study Completion (India) Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials 
Date of First Enrollment (Global)  Date Missing 
Date of Study Completion (Global) Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials 
Estimated Duration of Trial   Years="0"
Months="6"
Days="0" 
Recruitment Status of Trial (Global)   Not Yet Recruiting 
Recruitment Status of Trial (India)  Not Yet Recruiting 
Publication Details   N/A 
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement

Will individual participant data (IPD) be shared publicly (including data dictionaries)?  

Response - NO
Brief Summary   Spine instrumentation surgeries involve extensive amount of tissue and bone trauma thus resulting in significant perioperative pain. Effective analgesia involves a multimodal approach combining systemic medications, regional nerve blocks, and patient controlled analgesia. Recently, regional analgesia techniques, such as the erector spinae plane block (ESPB), retrolaminar block (RLB) and thoracolumbar interfascial plane (TLIP) block, are being used. In this study, we will compare the efficacy of ultrasound guided ESPB and RLB in decreasing perioperative pain, the requirement of systemic analgesics and maintaining haemodynamic stability in dorsolumbar spine instrumentation surgeries. This will be a single blinded randomised controlled trial. After randomisation into two groups, we will administer either of ESPB or RLB with 19 ml 0f 0.25 % bupivacaine and 1 ml of dexamethasone bilaterally at a single targeted level approximately half an hour before surgery. We will record haemodynamics at various time points, and postoperative pain scores upto 24 hours. We will also document the requirement of systemic rescue analgesics postoperatively. 
Close