FULL DETAILS (Read-only)  -> Click Here to Create PDF for Current Dataset of Trial
CTRI Number  CTRI/2025/12/099671 [Registered on: 22/12/2025] Trial Registered Prospectively
Last Modified On: 22/12/2025
Post Graduate Thesis  Yes 
Type of Trial  Interventional 
Type of Study   Surgical/Anesthesia 
Study Design  Randomized, Parallel Group, Active Controlled Trial 
Public Title of Study   Comparison of driving pressure guided ventilation versus standard ventilatory strategy on post operative lung collapse in patients undergoing liver transplant 
Scientific Title of Study   Comparison of Driving pressure guided ventilation versus conventional ventilation on postoperative lung atelectasis in patients undergoing Living donor liver transplant (LDLT)- A single centre randomised controlled trial 
Trial Acronym  NIL 
Secondary IDs if Any  
Secondary ID  Identifier 
NIL  NIL 
 
Details of Principal Investigator or overall Trial Coordinator (multi-center study)  
Name  Pragya Maheshwari 
Designation  Senior Resident 
Affiliation  Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences 
Address  Department of Anaesthesia, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, D1, Vasant Kunj, Delhi

South
DELHI
110070
India 
Phone  7838643123  
Fax    
Email  pragyamaheshwari19@gmail.com  
 
Details of Contact Person
Scientific Query
 
Name  Anil Yadav 
Designation  Assistant Professor 
Affiliation  Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences 
Address  Department of Anaesthesia, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, D1, Vasant Kunj, Delhi

South
DELHI
110070
India 
Phone  8089337600  
Fax    
Email  doc.anilyadav@gmail.com  
 
Details of Contact Person
Public Query
 
Name  Anil Yadav 
Designation  Assistant Professor 
Affiliation  Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences 
Address  Department of Anaesthesia, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, D1, Vasant Kunj, Delhi


DELHI
110070
India 
Phone  8089337600  
Fax    
Email  doc.anilyadav@gmail.com  
 
Source of Monetary or Material Support  
NIL 
 
Primary Sponsor  
Name  Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences 
Address  D1, Vasant Kunj, Delhi 
Type of Sponsor  Research institution and hospital 
 
Details of Secondary Sponsor  
Name  Address 
NIL  NIL 
 
Countries of Recruitment     India  
Sites of Study  
No of Sites = 1  
Name of Principal Investigator  Name of Site  Site Address  Phone/Fax/Email 
Pragya Maheshwari  Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences  HPB OT complex, 3rd and 4th floor, Institute of Liver and biliary Sciences, Delhi
South
DELHI 
7838643123

pragyamaheshwari19@gmail.com 
 
Details of Ethics Committee  
No of Ethics Committees= 1  
Name of Committee  Approval Status 
Institutional Ethics Committee / Institutional Review Board ILBS  Approved 
 
Regulatory Clearance Status from DCGI  
Status 
Not Applicable 
 
Health Condition / Problems Studied  
Health Type  Condition 
Patients  (1) ICD-10 Condition: K703||Alcoholic cirrhosis of liver, (2) ICD-10 Condition: K739||Chronic hepatitis, unspecified, (3) ICD-10 Condition: O||Medical and Surgical, (4) ICD-10 Condition: K746||Other and unspecified cirrhosis ofliver,  
 
Intervention / Comparator Agent  
Type  Name  Details 
Intervention  Driving pressure guided ventilation  The PEEP would be titrated at multiple time points intraoperatively based on the driving pressure 
Comparator Agent  Standard lung protective ventilation  Standard lung protective ventilation with a fixed PEEP 5 would be used throughout the intraoperative period 
 
Inclusion Criteria  
Age From  18.00 Year(s)
Age To  60.00 Year(s)
Gender  Both 
Details  Adult patients aged 18-60 years undergoing Living Donor Liver Transplant 
 
ExclusionCriteria 
Details  Preexisting severe pulmonary disease, severe hepatopulmonary syndrome, severe hydrothorax, cardiac dysfunction such as valvular abnormalities, severe systolic dysfunction, acute liver failure, retransplantation, BMI more than 40, patients with chest wall deformity or history of previous thoracic surgeries, patient refusal. 
 
Method of Generating Random Sequence   Computer generated randomization 
Method of Concealment   On-site computer system 
Blinding/Masking   Participant and Outcome Assessor Blinded 
Primary Outcome  
Outcome  TimePoints 
The incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications.  Upto post operative day 3 
 
Secondary Outcome  
Outcome  TimePoints 
NIL  NIL 
 
Target Sample Size   Total Sample Size="68"
Sample Size from India="68" 
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (Total)= "Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (India)="Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials" 
Phase of Trial   N/A 
Date of First Enrollment (India)   05/01/2026 
Date of Study Completion (India) Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials 
Date of First Enrollment (Global)  Date Missing 
Date of Study Completion (Global) Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials 
Estimated Duration of Trial   Years="0"
Months="8"
Days="0" 
Recruitment Status of Trial (Global)   Not Applicable 
Recruitment Status of Trial (India)  Not Yet Recruiting 
Publication Details   N/A 
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement

Will individual participant data (IPD) be shared publicly (including data dictionaries)?  

Response - NO
Brief Summary  
This single-centre randomized controlled trial evaluates whether driving pressure-guided ventilation offers better postoperative pulmonary outcomes than conventional lung-protective ventilation in adult patients undergoing living donor liver transplantation. The liver transplant patients often experience unique respiratory challenges, including decreased lung compliance due to factors like ascites and hepatopulmonary syndrome. These patients are at an increased risk for postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs), making optimal ventilatory management a clinical priority.

Research shows that driving pressure, a measurement reflecting the pressure used to deliver each breath, is a stronger predictor of PPCs than conventional ventilator parameters. Although numerous studies in non-transplant surgical populations support limiting driving pressure to reduce the risk of PPCs, no randomized trials have specifically addressed this strategy in the context of liver transplantation. Unique characteristics of liver transplant recipients, such as altered physiology, dynamic intraoperative changes, and specific concerns around hemodynamic stability, make it necessary to validate these findings within the transplant cohort.

The proposed study fills this gap by directly comparing the incidence of lung atelectasis (as measured by lung ultrasound), oxygenation indices, pulmonary complications, respiratory and hemodynamic parameters, ventilator duration, ICU stay length, and early graft outcomes between the two ventilatory strategies.
 
Close