| CTRI Number |
CTRI/2025/12/099975 [Registered on: 31/12/2025] Trial Registered Prospectively |
| Last Modified On: |
29/12/2025 |
| Post Graduate Thesis |
Yes |
| Type of Trial |
Interventional |
|
Type of Study
|
Surgical/Anesthesia |
| Study Design |
Randomized, Parallel Group, Active Controlled Trial |
|
Public Title of Study
|
3D mesh comparison with normal flat mesh in inguinal hernia repair |
|
Scientific Title of Study
|
Surgical outcomes of 3-Dimensional mesh compared with polypropylene mesh in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair : A randomized trial |
| Trial Acronym |
NIL |
|
Secondary IDs if Any
|
| Secondary ID |
Identifier |
| NIL |
NIL |
|
|
Details of Principal Investigator or overall Trial Coordinator (multi-center study)
|
| Name |
Dr Shreya Gupta |
| Designation |
Junior Resident |
| Affiliation |
All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Nagpur |
| Address |
Room no 202, OPD building, Department of General Surgery, All
India Institute of Medical Sciences, Mihan, Dahegaon, Nagpur
Nagpur MAHARASHTRA 441108 India |
| Phone |
9812161230 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
9.216.shreya@gmail.com |
|
Details of Contact Person Scientific Query
|
| Name |
Dr Bhupendra Mehra |
| Designation |
Professor |
| Affiliation |
All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Nagpur |
| Address |
Room no 206, OPD building, Department of General Surgery, All
India Institute of Medical Sciences, Mihan, Dahegaon, Nagpur
Nagpur MAHARASHTRA 441108 India |
| Phone |
9822817958 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
drbhupi_mehra@rediffmail.com |
|
Details of Contact Person Public Query
|
| Name |
Dr Shreya Gupta |
| Designation |
Junior Resident |
| Affiliation |
All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Nagpur |
| Address |
Room no 202, OPD building, Department of General Surgery, All
India Institute of Medical Sciences, Mihan, Dahegaon, Nagpur
Nagpur MAHARASHTRA 441108 India |
| Phone |
9812161230 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
9.216.shreya@gmail.com |
|
|
Source of Monetary or Material Support
|
| All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Dahegaon, MIHAN, Nagpur.
PINCODE:441108 |
|
|
Primary Sponsor
|
| Name |
Dr Shreya Gupta |
| Address |
Room no 202,
Department of General
Surgery, All India
Institute of Medical
Sciences, Mihan,
Dahegaon, Nagpur
Nagpur, 441108
MAHARASHTRA |
| Type of Sponsor |
Other [Self] |
|
|
Details of Secondary Sponsor
|
|
|
Countries of Recruitment
|
India |
|
Sites of Study
|
| No of Sites = 1 |
| Name of Principal
Investigator |
Name of Site |
Site Address |
Phone/Fax/Email |
| Dr Shreya Gupta |
All India Institute of Medical Sciences |
Room no 202,
Department of General
Surgery, All India
Institute of Medical
Sciences, Mihan,
Dahegaon, Nagpur
441108
Nagpur MAHARASHTRA |
9812161230
9.216.shreya@gmail.com |
|
|
Details of Ethics Committee
|
| No of Ethics Committees= 1 |
| Name of Committee |
Approval Status |
| Institutional Ethics Committee, Department of Pharmacology, AIIMS Nagpur |
Approved |
|
|
Regulatory Clearance Status from DCGI
|
|
|
Health Condition / Problems Studied
|
| Health Type |
Condition |
| Patients |
(1) ICD-10 Condition: K409||Unilateral inguinal hernia, without obstruction or gangrene, |
|
|
Intervention / Comparator Agent
|
| Type |
Name |
Details |
| Intervention |
Placement of 3-Dimensional Mesh in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair |
One group will be intervened by placement of 3-Dimensional mesh in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.
The primary advantage of 3D pre-shaped meshes is twofold: first, it reduces operative time. Second, they do not require fixation, they are associated with a lower risk of nerve injury and chronic pain which may occur during tacking or suturing. Therefore, theoretically, postoperative pain should be lower. |
| Comparator Agent |
Placement of Flat polypropylene mesh in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair |
Second group will be intervened by placement of Polypropylene meshes in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.
However, they are sometimes associated with complications such as chronic postoperative pain, infection, and mesh shrinkage. These issues are usually associated with the physical properties of the mesh as well as the patient’s inflammatory response. To mitigate these side effects, recent meshes are designed with larger pores and are relatively lightweight. |
|
|
Inclusion Criteria
|
| Age From |
18.00 Year(s) |
| Age To |
75.00 Year(s) |
| Gender |
Both |
| Details |
Patients with Unilateral or Bilateral Inguinal Hernia , gender- male and female with Age- 18-75 years |
|
| ExclusionCriteria |
| Details |
Patients with Recurrent inguinal hernia , Obstructed hernia, Strangulated hernia, Irreducible Inguinal hernia
Patients below 18years age
Patients with Psychiatric illness
Patients with Previous midline scars
Patients with Immunocomprised status or uncontrolled diabetes or any major comorbidities
Patients with Inability to complete follow up protocol
Patients with conversion of lap to open hernia repair
|
|
|
Method of Generating Random Sequence
|
Computer generated randomization |
|
Method of Concealment
|
Sequentially numbered, sealed, opaque envelopes |
|
Blinding/Masking
|
Open Label |
|
Primary Outcome
|
| Outcome |
TimePoints |
| To evaluate the intra-operative and post-operative complications between 3D mesh and Polypropylene mesh among patients with clinically or radiologically proven Inguinal Hernia admitted undergoing laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair . |
Patients will be followed up on post-operative days 1 and 3 for pain and seroma formation. Dressing will be changed on post-operative day 3 to assess wound infection. Skin sutures will be removed on post-operative day 10.
Follow-up protocol after suture removal: 1 Month, 3 Months, and 6 Months: QOL and Recurrence. |
|
|
Secondary Outcome
|
| Outcome |
TimePoints |
Total operating time
Post-operative pain
Use of additional analgesia
Return to work
Wound complications (seroma & wound infection)
Recurrence
Quality Of Life (QOL) Parameters
Hospital stay
treatment cost |
Total operating time
Day-3, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months
Use of additional analgesia - yes/no
Return to work
Wound complications (seroma & wound infection)
Recurrence
1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months
Total Hospital stay
Total treatment cost |
|
|
Target Sample Size
|
Total Sample Size="50" Sample Size from India="50"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (Total)= "Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (India)="Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials" |
|
Phase of Trial
|
Phase 2/ Phase 3 |
|
Date of First Enrollment (India)
|
12/01/2026 |
| Date of Study Completion (India) |
Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials |
| Date of First Enrollment (Global) |
Date Missing |
| Date of Study Completion (Global) |
Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials |
|
Estimated Duration of Trial
|
Years="1" Months="6" Days="0" |
|
Recruitment Status of Trial (Global)
|
Not Applicable |
| Recruitment Status of Trial (India) |
Not Yet Recruiting |
|
Publication Details
|
N/A |
|
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement
|
Will individual participant data (IPD) be shared publicly (including data dictionaries)?
Response - YES
- What data in particular will be shared?
Response - All of the individual participant data collected during the trial, after de-identification.
- What additional supporting information will be shared?
Response - Study Protocol Response - Statistical Analysis Plan Response - Informed Consent Form Response - Clinical Study Report
- Who will be able to view these files?
Response - Anyone
- For what types of analyses will this data be available?
Response - Any purpose.
- By what mechanism will data be made available?
Response - Data are available indefinitely at (Link to be included 9.216.shreya@gmail.com).
- For how long will this data be available start date provided 02-01-1970 and end date provided 02-01-1970?
Response - Immediately following publication. No end date.
- Any URL or additional information regarding plan/policy for sharing IPD?
Additional Information - NIL
|
|
Brief Summary
|
Inguinal hernia is the most common abdominal wall hernia, with a significantly higher incidence in males. Its development is influenced by congenital factors, posterior wall weakness, and conditions that raise intra-abdominal pressure. While open mesh repair has been the traditional standard, laparoscopic approaches such as Transabdominal Preperitoneal and Totally Extraperitoneal repair are increasingly preferred for their reduced postoperative pain, quicker recovery, and shorter hospital stay. Polypropylene mesh remains widely used but is associated with chronic pain, seroma formation, and mesh shrinkage. Newer three-dimensional anatomically contoured meshes have been introduced to improve conformity to the preperitoneal space, reduce the need for fixation, and potentially lower postoperative discomfort and complications. This study aims to compare surgical outcomes of three-dimensional mesh with polypropylene mesh in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair at a tertiary care center in central India. |