One of the most crucial, yet modifiable, factors influencing postoperative outcomes is the depth of anaesthesia. Traditional methods of estimating anaesthetic depth, based on haemodynamic parameters and clinical signs, may sometimes be inadequate or misleading in elderly patients due to blunted autonomic responses or age related altered pharmacodynamics. The Bispectral Index BIS monitor provides a quantitative, objective, real time measure of the patient’s level of consciousness and helps titrate adequate depth of anaesthesia, by analysing the Electroencephalogram EEG. BIS values range from 0 no brain activity to 100 fully awake, with optimal general anaesthesia depth typically maintained between 40 and 60. Hence BIS monitoring helps avoid both excessively deep as well as light levels of sedation causing awareness and stress related complication. In elderly patients, over sedation is particularly harmful, often leading to delayed emergence, hypotension, post operative cognitive impairment, in the form ofPost Operative Delirium, Post Operative Cognitive Dysfunction. Assessing cognitive impairment through tools like Quality of recovery questionnaire QoR15, Confusion assessment Method CAM score, Mini mental scale examination MMSE, provide a better understanding of the post operative recovery profile. In Prolonged laparoscopic surgeries, the response of the patient during intraoperative positioning, usage of Carbon dioxide gas, and haemodynamic alterations, could all be exaggerated when considered for an elderly patient. Thus, it is crucial to have balanced and optimal anaesthesia management in elderly patients to avoid complications in post operative care. BIS monitoring addresses these challenges by helping anaesthesiologists maintain an optimal depth of anaesthesia, minimising drug overuse while ensuring patient safety. Hence, a randomised, prospective study is being proposed in MGH, to evaluate the impact of using BIS monitoring guided anaesthesia in elderly patients undergoing prolonged laparoscopic surgeries in comparison to empirically guided anaesthesia care
|