FULL DETAILS (Read-only)  -> Click Here to Create PDF for Current Dataset of Trial
CTRI Number  CTRI/2025/10/096307 [Registered on: 22/10/2025] Trial Registered Prospectively
Last Modified On: 17/10/2025
Post Graduate Thesis  Yes 
Type of Trial  Interventional 
Type of Study   Dentistry 
Study Design  Randomized, Parallel Group Trial 
Public Title of Study   Comparison of lidocaine and articaine for numbing the lower jaw in patients with dental infection-related pain. 
Scientific Title of Study   Comparison of the anesthetic efficacy of lidocaine Vs articaine for IANB in Peripheral sensitization and differential blockade following acute periapical pathology 
Trial Acronym  NIL 
Secondary IDs if Any  
Secondary ID  Identifier 
NIL  NIL 
 
Details of Principal Investigator or overall Trial Coordinator (multi-center study)  
Name  Dr Abhipsha Tikayat Ray 
Designation  Postgraduate student 
Affiliation  Meenakshi ammal dental college and hospital 
Address  Meenakshi Ammal Dental College, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Room number:5, Alapakkam Main Road, Maduravoyal, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600095, India
Meenakshi Ammal Dental College, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Room number:5, Alapakkam Main Road, Maduravoyal, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600095, India
Chennai
TAMIL NADU
600095
India 
Phone  08847801978  
Fax    
Email  abhipshatikayatray@gmail.com  
 
Details of Contact Person
Scientific Query
 
Name  Dr Thomas Zachariah 
Designation  Professor 
Affiliation  Meenakshi ammal dental college and hospital 
Address  Meenakshi Ammal Dental College, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Room number:5, Alapakkam Main Road, Maduravoyal, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600095, India
Meenakshi Ammal Dental College, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Room number:5, Alapakkam Main Road, Maduravoyal, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600095, India
Chennai
TAMIL NADU
600095
India 
Phone  9600073639  
Fax    
Email  thomas.zach@gmail.com  
 
Details of Contact Person
Public Query
 
Name  Dr Abhipsha Tikayat Ray 
Designation  Postgraduate student 
Affiliation  Meenakshi ammal dental college and hospital 
Address  Meenakshi Ammal Dental College, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Room number:5, Alapakkam Main Road, Maduravoyal, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600095, India
Meenakshi Ammal Dental College, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Room number:5, Alapakkam Main Road, Maduravoyal, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600095, India
Chennai
TAMIL NADU
600095
India 
Phone  08847801978  
Fax    
Email  abhipshatikayatray@gmail.com  
 
Source of Monetary or Material Support  
Meenakshi Ammal Dental College, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Room number:5, Alapakkam Main Road, Maduravoyal, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600095, India 
 
Primary Sponsor  
Name  Dr Abhipsha Tikayat Ray 
Address  Meenakshi Ammal Dental College Alapakkam Main Road, Maduravoyal, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600095 
Type of Sponsor  Other [Self Fuinded] 
 
Details of Secondary Sponsor  
Name  Address 
NIL  NIL 
 
Countries of Recruitment     India  
Sites of Study  
No of Sites = 1  
Name of Principal Investigator  Name of Site  Site Address  Phone/Fax/Email 
Dr Abhipsha Tikayat Ray  Meenakshi ammal dental college and hospital  Meenakshi Ammal Dental College, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Room number:5, Alapakkam Main Road, Maduravoyal, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600095, India
Chennai
TAMIL NADU 
08847801978

abhipshatikayatray@gmail.com 
 
Details of Ethics Committee  
No of Ethics Committees= 1  
Name of Committee  Approval Status 
Institutional Ethical Committee  Approved 
 
Regulatory Clearance Status from DCGI  
Status 
Not Applicable 
 
Health Condition / Problems Studied  
Health Type  Condition 
Healthy Human Volunteers  Healthy patients reporting to department of oral and maxillofacial surgery for regular extraction of carious tooth with periapical pathology 
 
Intervention / Comparator Agent  
Type  Name  Details 
Comparator Agent  2 percent lidocaine with adrenaline (1:100,000)  This study aimed to compare the anesthetic efficacy of 2 percent lidocaine with adrenaline and 4 percent articaine with adrenaline for inferior alveolar nerve block in patients with acute periapical pathology, focusing on onset time, pulpal sensibility, proprioceptive blockade, and the need for additional anesthesia, particularly in the presence of peripheral sensitization. 
Intervention  4% Articaine with 1:10,000 adrenaline  This study aimed to compare the anesthetic efficacy of 2 percent lidocaine with adrenaline and 4 percent articaine with adrenaline for inferior alveolar nerve block in patients with acute periapical pathology, focusing on onset time, pulpal sensibility, proprioceptive blockade, and the need for additional anesthesia, particularly in the presence of peripheral sensitization. 
 
Inclusion Criteria  
Age From  18.00 Year(s)
Age To  80.00 Year(s)
Gender  Both 
Details  The inclusion criteria were:
Patients who consent to participate in the study.
Patients over 18 years of age
Patients who fall in the category ASA I and II as per the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification.
Patients with acutely infected (acute periodontitis/acute periapical abscess) mandibular teeth are indicated for extraction under LA
 
 
ExclusionCriteria 
Details  The exclusion criteria:
Patients who do not consent to be part of the study.
Patients below 18 years of age.
Patient is allergic to those mentioned above local anesthetic agent or their constituents.
Patients with systemic metabolic and comorbid conditions where tooth extraction is contraindicated.
Uncontrolled diabetes and hypertension
Extraction in patients post radiotherapy
End-stage renal disease
Malignant diseases (Leukemia, lymphoma)
Myocardial infarction or stroke in the past 6 months
Extraction of teeth associated with tumors, benign or malignant
Pregnancy (1st and 3rd trimester) patients
Blood dyscrasias: coagulation and other platelet disorders
 
 
Method of Generating Random Sequence   Coin toss, Lottery, toss of dice, shuffling cards etc 
Method of Concealment   Not Applicable 
Blinding/Masking   Participant Blinded 
Primary Outcome  
Outcome  TimePoints 
We’ll get to know which combination of local anesthetic agent is effective (2% Lidocaine with adrenaline 1:80,000 concentration or 4% Articaine with adrenaline 1:100,000 concentration) in providing adequate anesthesia during IANB in patients with irreversible pulpitis of mandibular teeth with moderate to severe spontaneous pain  Before local anesthesia administration, patients will rate pain on a Numeric Pain Rating Scale (0-10). Electric pulp testing will precede LA administration, followed by IANB by the same operator. After 3ml IANB, pulp testing will be done after 10 minutes. Time between LA and numbness or anesthesia onset will be recorded. Tenderness on percussion will be checked; if positive, another 3ml IANB will be administered. After anesthesia, the tooth will be extracted. 
 
Secondary Outcome  
Outcome  TimePoints 
NIL  NIL 
 
Target Sample Size   Total Sample Size="52"
Sample Size from India="52" 
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (Total)= "Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (India)="Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials" 
Phase of Trial   N/A 
Date of First Enrollment (India)   06/11/2025 
Date of Study Completion (India) Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials 
Date of First Enrollment (Global)  Date Missing 
Date of Study Completion (Global) Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials 
Estimated Duration of Trial   Years="0"
Months="1"
Days="0" 
Recruitment Status of Trial (Global)   Not Yet Recruiting 
Recruitment Status of Trial (India)  Not Yet Recruiting 
Publication Details   N/A 
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement

Will individual participant data (IPD) be shared publicly (including data dictionaries)?  

Response - NO
Brief Summary  

This study aimed to compare the anesthetic efficacy of 2 percentage lidocaine with adrenaline and 4 percentage articaine with adrenaline for inferior alveolar nerve block in patients with acute periapical pathology focusing on onset time pulpal sensibility proprioceptive blockade and the need for additional anesthesia particularly in the presence of peripheral sensitization.

A prospective randomized double blind clinical study will be conducted on 52 patients diagnosed with acute periapical infections requiring mandibular tooth extraction under local anesthesia Patients will be divided into two groups Group A receiving 2 percent lidocaine and Group B receiving 4 percent articaine Pulpal sensitivity will be evaluated using an electric pulp tester before and after inferior alveolar nerve block The time interval between anesthetic administration and onset of subjective and objective signs will be recorded Pain perception will be assessed using a Visual Analog Scale The total anesthetic volume and number of blocks required will be documented 
Close