| CTRI Number |
CTRI/2025/11/097430 [Registered on: 13/11/2025] Trial Registered Prospectively |
| Last Modified On: |
13/11/2025 |
| Post Graduate Thesis |
Yes |
| Type of Trial |
Interventional |
|
Type of Study
|
Surgical/Anesthesia |
| Study Design |
Randomized, Parallel Group Trial |
|
Public Title of Study
|
A comparison of two airway management devices i.e. GMA-Tulip and i-gel in adult patients undergoing general anaesthesia |
|
Scientific Title of Study
|
A prospective randomized comparison of GMA-Tulip versus i-gel in adult patients undergoing general anaesthesia |
| Trial Acronym |
NIL |
|
Secondary IDs if Any
|
| Secondary ID |
Identifier |
| NIL |
NIL |
|
|
Details of Principal Investigator or overall Trial Coordinator (multi-center study)
|
| Name |
Dr Prashant Kumar |
| Designation |
Professor |
| Affiliation |
Pt. B.D. Sharma PGIMS, Rohtak |
| Address |
Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Pt. B.D. Sharma PGMIS, Rohtak
Rohtak HARYANA 124001 India |
| Phone |
9416336901 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
Pk.pgims@yahoo.com |
|
Details of Contact Person Scientific Query
|
| Name |
Dr Ananya Bansal |
| Designation |
Junior Resident |
| Affiliation |
Pt. B.D. Sharma PGIMS, Rohtak |
| Address |
Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Pt. B.D. Sharma PGMIS, Rohtak
Rohtak HARYANA 124001 India |
| Phone |
9899953548 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
ananyab1999@gmail.com |
|
Details of Contact Person Public Query
|
| Name |
Dr Ananya Bansal |
| Designation |
Junior Resident |
| Affiliation |
Pt. B.D. Sharma PGIMS, Rohtak |
| Address |
Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Pt. B.D. Sharma PGMIS, Rohtak
Rohtak HARYANA 124001 India |
| Phone |
9899953548 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
ananyab1999@gmail.com |
|
|
Source of Monetary or Material Support
|
| Pandit B.D. Sharma Univeristy, PGIMS Rohtak, Haryana 124001 |
|
|
Primary Sponsor
|
| Name |
NIL |
| Address |
NIL |
| Type of Sponsor |
Other [NIL] |
|
|
Details of Secondary Sponsor
|
|
|
Countries of Recruitment
|
India |
|
Sites of Study
|
| No of Sites = 1 |
| Name of Principal
Investigator |
Name of Site |
Site Address |
Phone/Fax/Email |
| Dr Ananya Bansal |
Pt. B.D. Sharma, PGIMS |
Department of
Anaesthesiology and
Critical Care, Modular
OT Complex, Second
Floor, PGIMS Rohtak
Rohtak
HARYANA Rohtak HARYANA |
9899953548
ananyab1999@gmail.com |
|
|
Details of Ethics Committee
|
| No of Ethics Committees= 1 |
| Name of Committee |
Approval Status |
| Biomedical Research Ethics Committee Pt BD Sharma PGIMS Rohtak |
Approved |
|
|
Regulatory Clearance Status from DCGI
|
|
|
Health Condition / Problems Studied
|
| Health Type |
Condition |
| Patients |
(1) ICD-10 Condition: Z138||Encounter for screening for otherspecified diseases and disorders, (2) ICD-10 Condition: O||Medical and Surgical, |
|
|
Intervention / Comparator Agent
|
| Type |
Name |
Details |
| Comparator Agent |
GMA- Tulip |
An appropriate size of LMA i.e. GMA Tulip (size 3 or 4) will be selected as per manufacturer’s recommendation according to weight. Airway device will be checked before use as recommended and will be lubricated with water-based gel. Airway devices will be
introduced using the standard technique for insertion. Correct placement of the device will be confirmed by chest auscultation, and display of a square wave capnography trace. The oropharyngeal leak pressure will be measured by taking the patient on manual
ventilation mode, closing the APL valve of the circle system at 30 cmH20 and fixed gas
flow of 3 L/min and recording the airway pressure at which an audible air leak is
observed. The OLP will be measured after LMA insertion (T0) and also one hour after
the surgery (T1). |
| Comparator Agent |
i - gel |
An appropriate size of LMA i.e. i-gel (size 3 or 4) will be selected as per manufacturer’s recommendation according to weight. Airway device will be checked before use as recommended and will be lubricated with water-based gel. Airway devices will be introduced using the standard technique for insertion. Correct placement of the device will be confirmed by chest auscultation, and display of a square wave capnography trace. The oropharyngeal leak pressure will be measured by taking the patient on manual ventilation mode, closing the APL valve of the circle system at 30 cmH20 and fixed gas flow of 3 L/min and recording the airway pressure at which an audible air leak is observed. The OLP will be measured after LMA insertion (T0) and also one hour after the surgery (T1). |
| Comparator Agent |
To compare the clinical performance and safety profile of GMA Tulip and i-gel
supraglottic airway devices in adult patients undergoing elective surgery under general
anaesthesia. |
Patients undergoing surgery
under general anaesthesia will
be intubated under all standard
operating protocols using an
appropriate size of LMA, either GMA Tulip or i-gel. Measurement of Oropharyngeal Leak Pressure, number of attempts taken for
intubation, time taken for
intubation, first pass success
rate, ease of intubation, evaluation of device placement by fibreoptic grading, haemodynamic variations and postoperative patient comfort will
be noted. |
|
|
Inclusion Criteria
|
| Age From |
18.00 Year(s) |
| Age To |
60.00 Year(s) |
| Gender |
Both |
| Details |
One hundred patients of either sex aged 18-60 years belonging to
American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I or II scheduled for
elective surgery under general anaesthesia where placement of supraglottic device is
indicated will be included in the study |
|
| ExclusionCriteria |
| Details |
Patients having respiratory or pharyngeal pathology, mouth
opening less 2.0cms, Body mass index more 30kgm-2, pregnancy, full stomach, will be
excluded from the study. |
|
|
Method of Generating Random Sequence
|
Computer generated randomization |
|
Method of Concealment
|
Case Record Numbers |
|
Blinding/Masking
|
Not Applicable |
|
Primary Outcome
|
| Outcome |
TimePoints |
To compare the oropharyngeal leak
pressure as a measure of placement and airway seal
|
1. The performace of Two gadgets will be compared after insertion, throughout the operative procedure and removal of device.
surgical period may last from one hour to 2 hours.
MAP, HR, Sp02 will be evaluated at baseline, after induction, after device placement and 5 minutes after device placement |
|
|
Secondary Outcome
|
| Outcome |
TimePoints |
Assess the time taken for device placement, the ease of insertion & first-attempt
success rate
Evaluate the device placement by fibreoptic grading
Compare haemodynamic responses to device insertion.
Assess the postoperative patient comfort
|
Outcome will be assessed after induction, after insertion, after device placement & 5 minutes after device placement Mean arterial pressure, Heart rate, Sp02 will be evaluated at baseline, after induction, after device placement & 5 minutes after device placement
|
|
|
Target Sample Size
|
Total Sample Size="100" Sample Size from India="100"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (Total)= "Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (India)="Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials" |
|
Phase of Trial
|
N/A |
|
Date of First Enrollment (India)
|
10/02/2026 |
| Date of Study Completion (India) |
Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials |
| Date of First Enrollment (Global) |
Date Missing |
| Date of Study Completion (Global) |
Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials |
|
Estimated Duration of Trial
|
Years="1" Months="6" Days="0" |
|
Recruitment Status of Trial (Global)
|
Not Applicable |
| Recruitment Status of Trial (India) |
Not Yet Recruiting |
|
Publication Details
|
N/A |
|
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement
|
Will individual participant data (IPD) be shared publicly (including data dictionaries)?
Response - YES
- What data in particular will be shared?
Response - Individual participant data that underlie the results reported in this article, after de-identification (text, tables, figures, and appendices).
- What additional supporting information will be shared?
Response - Study Protocol Response - Statistical Analysis Plan Response - Clinical Study Report
- Who will be able to view these files?
Response - Researchers whose proposed use of the data has been approved by an independent review committee identified for this purpose.
- For what types of analyses will this data be available?
Response - To achieve aims in the approved proposal.
- By what mechanism will data be made available?
Response - Proposals should be directed to [kiranpreet72@rediffmail.com].
- For how long will this data be available start date provided 02-01-1970 and end date provided 02-01-1970?
Response - Immediately following publication. No end date.
- Any URL or additional information regarding plan/policy for sharing IPD?
Additional Information - NIL
|
|
Brief Summary
|
This study is to compare the clinical performance of two supraglottic devices i.e. GMA-Tulip and i-gel. Adult patients aged between 18-60 years of either sex of ASA grade 1 and 2 scheduled for elective surgery requiring general anaesthesia and endotracheal intubation will be included. Oropharyngeal Leak Pressure, Number of attempts, time taken for intubation, first pass, success rate of intubation, ease of intubation, optimisation manoeuvres required for intubation and haemodynamic variations after induction, after insertion and five minutes after the device placement will be noted. Data will be compiled and appropriate statistical test will be used to analyze the results. |