FULL DETAILS (Read-only)  -> Click Here to Create PDF for Current Dataset of Trial
CTRI Number  CTRI/2025/10/096314 [Registered on: 22/10/2025] Trial Registered Prospectively
Last Modified On: 20/10/2025
Post Graduate Thesis  Yes 
Type of Trial  Interventional 
Type of Study   Dentistry 
Study Design  Randomized, Parallel Group Trial 
Public Title of Study   This study compares how well different floss tie methods work to keep the tooth dry and clean during the cementation of dental restorations and to see which method gives the best outcome clinically. 
Scientific Title of Study   Comparative clinical evaluation of efficacy of different floss tie isolation technique for adhesive cementation of dental restorations- An In Vivo Study. 
Trial Acronym  NIL 
Secondary IDs if Any  
Secondary ID  Identifier 
NIL  NIL 
 
Details of Principal Investigator or overall Trial Coordinator (multi-center study)  
Name  Dr Ruchi Kumar Purbey 
Designation  PG student 
Affiliation  KM Shah dental college and hospital  
Address  Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics KM Shah dental college and hospital Sumandeep Vidyapeeth university waghodia vadodara

Vadodara
GUJARAT
391760
India 
Phone  09755975516  
Fax    
Email  ruchikumar2507@gmail.com  
 
Details of Contact Person
Scientific Query
 
Name  Dr Nimisha Shah 
Designation  Head of the department 
Affiliation  KM Shah dental college and hospital  
Address  Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics KM Shah dental college and hospital Sumandeep Vidyapeeth university waghodia vadodara

Vadodara
GUJARAT
391760
India 
Phone  9998994299  
Fax    
Email  nshah7873@gmail.com  
 
Details of Contact Person
Public Query
 
Name  Dr Nimisha Shah 
Designation  Head of the department 
Affiliation  KM Shah dental college and hospital  
Address  Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics KM Shah dental college and hospital Sumandeep Vidyapeeth university waghodia vadodara


GUJARAT
391760
India 
Phone  9998994299  
Fax    
Email  nshah7873@gmail.com  
 
Source of Monetary or Material Support  
KM Shah Dental College and Hospital Sumandeep vidhyapeeth University , Waghodia, Vadodara, Gujarat 
 
Primary Sponsor  
Name  Dr Ruchi Kumar Purbey 
Address  KM Shah dental college and hospital, Sumandeep Vidhyapeeth University, Waghodia, Vadodara, Gujrat , India Pincode:391760 
Type of Sponsor  Other [Self] 
 
Details of Secondary Sponsor  
Name  Address 
NIL  NIL 
 
Countries of Recruitment     India  
Sites of Study  
No of Sites = 1  
Name of Principal Investigator  Name of Site  Site Address  Phone/Fax/Email 
Dr Ruchi Kumar Purbey  KM Shah dental college and hospital  Room no. 8 Department of conservative dentistry and endodontics KM Shah dental college and hospital Sumandeep Vidyapeeth university waghodia vadodara
Vadodara
GUJARAT 
09755975516

ruchikumar2507@gmail.com 
 
Details of Ethics Committee  
No of Ethics Committees= 1  
Name of Committee  Approval Status 
Sumandeep VIdhyapeeth Institutional Ethics Committee  Approved 
 
Regulatory Clearance Status from DCGI  
Status 
Not Applicable 
 
Health Condition / Problems Studied  
Health Type  Condition 
Patients  (1) ICD-10 Condition: K038||Other specified diseases of hard tissues of teeth,  
 
Intervention / Comparator Agent  
Type  Name  Details 
Intervention  Cocofloss   To evaluate and compare the clinical efficacy and post operative pain of Cocofloss as floss tie isolation technique with conventional and PTFE floss for adhesive cementation of dental restorations .  
Comparator Agent  Conventional floss   To evaluate and compare the clinical efficacy and post operative pain of Conventional floss as floss tie isolation technique with PTFE and cocofloss for adhesive cementation of dental restorations .  
Intervention  PTFE floss   To evaluate and compare the clinical efficacy and post operative pain of PTFE as floss tie isolation technique with conventional and cocofloss for adhesive cementation of dental restorations .  
 
Inclusion Criteria  
Age From  18.00 Year(s)
Age To  65.00 Year(s)
Gender  Both 
Details  1.Patients between age group of 18 to 65 years is included in study.
2.Tooth preparation with equi-gingival finish line.
3.A written informed consent will be taken from all the patients and only those patients ready to sign the consent form will be included in the study.
 
 
ExclusionCriteria 
Details  1.Patients with poor oral hygiene and gingival/periodontal diseases will be excluded from the study.
2.Patients with latex allergy will be excluded.
3.Tooth with subgingival caries, cracks will be excluded.
4.Medically compromised patients will be excluded from the study.
5.Badly mutilated teeth which are difficult for isolation will be excluded.
 
 
Method of Generating Random Sequence   Computer generated randomization 
Method of Concealment   Sequentially numbered, sealed, opaque envelopes 
Blinding/Masking   Participant Blinded 
Primary Outcome  
Outcome  TimePoints 
To evaluate and compare the clinical efficacy of conventional, PTFE and cocofloss as isolation techniques for adhesive cementation of dental restorations using self-designed criteria.   baseline 
 
Secondary Outcome  
Outcome  TimePoints 
To assess post operative pain of conventional, PTFE and cocofloss as isolation techniques for adhesive cementation of dental restorations using Verbal Rating scale   baseline, 6 hours and 12 hours 
 
Target Sample Size   Total Sample Size="90"
Sample Size from India="90" 
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (Total)= "Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (India)="Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials" 
Phase of Trial   Phase 4 
Date of First Enrollment (India)   01/11/2025 
Date of Study Completion (India) Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials 
Date of First Enrollment (Global)  Date Missing 
Date of Study Completion (Global) Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials 
Estimated Duration of Trial   Years="0"
Months="6"
Days="0" 
Recruitment Status of Trial (Global)   Not Applicable 
Recruitment Status of Trial (India)  Open to Recruitment 
Publication Details   N/A 
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement

Will individual participant data (IPD) be shared publicly (including data dictionaries)?  

Response - NO
Brief Summary  

To evaluate and compare the clinical efficacy of conventional, PTFE and Cocofloss as isolation techniques for adhesive cementation of dental restorations using self-designed criteria. Post operative pain assessment will be done using Verbal Rating scale at baseline, 6hrs and 12 hrs interval. Results of the study will help us to know which material clinically performs better for the isolation during cementation of dental restorations.

 
Close