| CTRI Number |
CTRI/2025/07/090827 [Registered on: 14/07/2025] Trial Registered Prospectively |
| Last Modified On: |
02/07/2025 |
| Post Graduate Thesis |
Yes |
| Type of Trial |
Interventional |
|
Type of Study
|
Dentistry |
| Study Design |
Randomized, Parallel Group, Placebo Controlled Trial |
|
Public Title of Study
|
Dental implant healing in diabetes: comparing UV-treated and untreated implants |
|
Scientific Title of Study
|
A Split-Mouth Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Soft Tissue Healing and Crestal Bone Levels Around Photo-Functionalized Versus Non-Functionalized Dental Implants in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus |
| Trial Acronym |
NIL |
|
Secondary IDs if Any
|
| Secondary ID |
Identifier |
| NIL |
NIL |
|
|
Details of Principal Investigator or overall Trial Coordinator (multi-center study)
|
| Name |
ANKITA RAMESH GOMARE |
| Designation |
JUNIOR RESIDENT 1 |
| Affiliation |
Santosh deemed to be university, Ghaziabad |
| Address |
Department of Prosthodontics and crown & Bridge, Santosh Dental College, Santosh Deemed to be University, 1, Santosh nagar, Sector 12, Block H, Pratap Vihar, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh
Ghaziabad UTTAR PRADESH 201009 India |
| Phone |
7219033159 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
ankitagomare2020@gmail.com |
|
Details of Contact Person Scientific Query
|
| Name |
Dr Akshay Bhargava |
| Designation |
Dean |
| Affiliation |
Santosh deemed to be university, Ghaziabad |
| Address |
Department of Prosthodontics and crown & Bridge, Santosh Dental College, Santosh Deemed to be University, 1, Santosh nagar, Sector 12, Block H, Pratap Vihar, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh
Ghaziabad UTTAR PRADESH 201009 India |
| Phone |
9999960255 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
akshay.bhargava@santosh.ac.in |
|
Details of Contact Person Public Query
|
| Name |
ANKITA RAMESH GOMARE |
| Designation |
JUNIOR RESIDENT 1 |
| Affiliation |
Santosh deemed to be university, Ghaziabad |
| Address |
Department of Prosthodontics and crown & Bridge, Santosh Dental College, Santosh Deemed to be University, 1, Santosh nagar, Sector 12, Block H, Pratap Vihar, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh
Ghaziabad UTTAR PRADESH 201009 India |
| Phone |
7219033159 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
ankitagomare2020@gmail.com |
|
|
Source of Monetary or Material Support
|
| Department of Prosthodontics and Crwon & Bridge , Santosh Dental College , Santosh Deemed to be University
1, Santosh Nagar, Sector 12, Block H, Pratap Vihar, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh 201009 |
|
|
Primary Sponsor
|
| Name |
Not Applicable |
| Address |
Not Applicable |
| Type of Sponsor |
Research institution |
|
|
Details of Secondary Sponsor
|
| Name |
Address |
| Not applicable |
Not Applicable |
|
|
Countries of Recruitment
|
India |
|
Sites of Study
|
| No of Sites = 1 |
| Name of Principal
Investigator |
Name of Site |
Site Address |
Phone/Fax/Email |
| ANKITA RAMESH GOMARE |
Santosh Dental College and Hospital Ghaziabad |
Department of Prosthodontics and crown & Bridge, Santosh Dental College, Santosh Deemed to be University, 1, Santosh nagar, Sector 12, Block H, Pratap Vihar, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh , 201009 Ghaziabad UTTAR PRADESH |
07219033159
ankitagomare2020@gmail.com |
|
|
Details of Ethics Committee
|
| No of Ethics Committees= 1 |
| Name of Committee |
Approval Status |
| Ethical committee of santosh deemed to be university ghaziabad |
Approved |
|
|
Regulatory Clearance Status from DCGI
|
|
|
Health Condition / Problems Studied
|
| Health Type |
Condition |
| Patients |
(1) ICD-10 Condition: K068||Other specified disorders of gingiva and edentulous alveolar ridge, |
|
|
Intervention / Comparator Agent
|
| Type |
Name |
Details |
| Comparator Agent |
Normal (non-UV-treated) dental implants |
These implants are used straight from the package without UV treatment.
They are placed in the same patient for comparison.
|
| Intervention |
Photofunctionalized dental implants |
UV-treated dental implants
These implants are exposed to ultraviolet (UV) light before placement.
The UV light makes the implant surface more active, helping it heal better and attach to bone faster.
These are called photofunctionalized implants.
|
|
|
Inclusion Criteria
|
| Age From |
30.00 Year(s) |
| Age To |
59.00 Year(s) |
| Gender |
Both |
| Details |
Minimum of two teeth indicated for extraction on each side of the arch.
Age between 30 to 59 year
controlled diabetic status:
HbA1c : 6.5 percent to 8.0 percent
Fasting glucose : 90 to 130 mg per dl
postprandial glucose : less than 180 mg per dl
Nonsmokers
Presence of functional opposing dentition |
|
| ExclusionCriteria |
| Details |
•Individuals with uncontrolled systemic disease like hypertension.
•Patients presenting abuse of drugs or alcohol, use of tobacco.
•Patients presenting with handicap condition that would adversely affect the capacity to maintain satisfactory oral hygiene or complete the study protocol.
•Patient with immunocompromised conditions, including HIV
|
|
|
Method of Generating Random Sequence
|
Other |
|
Method of Concealment
|
Other |
|
Blinding/Masking
|
Participant and Outcome Assessor Blinded |
|
Primary Outcome
|
| Outcome |
TimePoints |
Soft Tissue Healing
Clinical evaluation of soft tissue healing around photofunctionalized and non-photofunctionalized implants.
Assessed on Day 0 (baseline), Day 3, Day 6, and Day 15 using standardized clinical parameters (e.g., redness, swelling, bleeding).
Crestal Bone Level Changes
Radiographic assessment of bone levels around the implants using Radiovisiography (RVG).
Measurements taken at baseline (implant placement), 2 months, and 4 months postoperatively.
|
Soft Tissue Healing
Clinical evaluation of soft tissue healing- Day 0 (baseline), Day 3, Day 6, and Day 15
Crestal Bone Level Changes
Radiographic assessment of bone levels - at baseline (implant placement), 2 months, and 4 months postoperatively.
|
|
|
Secondary Outcome
|
| Outcome |
TimePoints |
Comparison between Test and Control Sites (Split-Mouth)
Comparison of healing outcomes between the UV-treated (photofunctionalized) and non-treated implants within the same patient.
Effectiveness of Photofunctionalization in Diabetic
months (bone level).
Patients
Evaluation of whether UV-treated implants lead to improved healing in controlled Type II diabetic individuals compared to untreated implants.
|
baseline, day 3, day 15 (soft tissue)
baseline, 2 months , 4 months |
|
|
Target Sample Size
|
Total Sample Size="10" Sample Size from India="10"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (Total)= "Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (India)="Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials" |
|
Phase of Trial
|
N/A |
|
Date of First Enrollment (India)
|
01/08/2025 |
| Date of Study Completion (India) |
Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials |
| Date of First Enrollment (Global) |
Date Missing |
| Date of Study Completion (Global) |
Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials |
|
Estimated Duration of Trial
|
Years="0" Months="0" Days="0" |
|
Recruitment Status of Trial (Global)
|
Not Applicable |
| Recruitment Status of Trial (India) |
Not Yet Recruiting |
|
Publication Details
|
N/A |
|
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement
|
Will individual participant data (IPD) be shared publicly (including data dictionaries)?
Response - NO
|
|
Brief Summary
|
This study is a split-mouth randomized controlled clinical trial designed to evaluate and compare soft tissue healing and crestal bone level changes around photo-functionalized (UV-treated) and non-functionalized dental implants in controlled Type II diabetic patients. A total of 9 patients requiring at least two immediate implants were selected, resulting in 18 implant sites. Each patient received one UV-treated implant and one non-treated implant on opposite sides of the dental arch. Soft tissue healing was clinically assessed on Days 0, 3, 6, and 15, while crestal bone levels were measured radiographically using RVG at baseline, 2 months, and 4 months post-placement. The study aims to determine the effectiveness of photofunctionalization in enhancing early soft and hard tissue healing in diabetic individuals, with the goal of improving implant outcomes in this medically compromised group. |