| CTRI Number |
CTRI/2026/02/102769 [Registered on: 02/02/2026] Trial Registered Prospectively |
| Last Modified On: |
01/02/2026 |
| Post Graduate Thesis |
Yes |
| Type of Trial |
Interventional |
|
Type of Study
|
Surgical/Anesthesia |
| Study Design |
Randomized, Parallel Group Trial |
|
Public Title of Study
|
Comparison of two different nerve block techniques for reducing pain in children after keyhole chest surgery. |
|
Scientific Title of Study
|
Comparison of Erector Spinae Plane Block and Serratus Anterior Plane Block for Post operative analgesia in Pediatric Throacoscopic surgeries |
| Trial Acronym |
NIL |
|
Secondary IDs if Any
|
| Secondary ID |
Identifier |
| NIL |
NIL |
|
|
Details of Principal Investigator or overall Trial Coordinator (multi-center study)
|
| Name |
Anjith V |
| Designation |
Junior Resident (Academic) |
| Affiliation |
All India Institute of Medical Sciences |
| Address |
Department of Anaesthesiology, Pain Medicine and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi
South DELHI 110029 India |
| Phone |
9787542172 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
anjithvinod36@gmail.com |
|
Details of Contact Person Scientific Query
|
| Name |
Anju Gupta |
| Designation |
Associate Professor |
| Affiliation |
All India Institute of Medical Sciences |
| Address |
Department of Anaesthesiology, Pain Medicine and Critical Care
Room no 06, Porta cabin 4th floor
Main Block
All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi
South DELHI 110029 India |
| Phone |
9911573371 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
dranjugupta09@gmail.com |
|
Details of Contact Person Public Query
|
| Name |
Anju Gupta |
| Designation |
Associate Professor |
| Affiliation |
All India Institute of Medical Sciences |
| Address |
Department of Anaesthesiology, Pain Medicine and Critical Care
Room no 06, Porta cabin 4th floor
Main Block
All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi
South DELHI 110029 India |
| Phone |
9911573371 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
dranjugupta09@gmail.com |
|
|
Source of Monetary or Material Support
|
| All India Institute of Medical Sciences(AIIMS), New Delhi
Ansari Nagar, New Delhi - 110029
Delhi, India
|
|
|
Primary Sponsor
|
| Name |
All Indian Institute of Medical Sciences |
| Address |
AIIMS, Ansari Nagar, Delhi 110029 |
| Type of Sponsor |
Research institution and hospital |
|
|
Details of Secondary Sponsor
|
|
|
Countries of Recruitment
|
India |
|
Sites of Study
|
| No of Sites = 1 |
| Name of Principal
Investigator |
Name of Site |
Site Address |
Phone/Fax/Email |
| Dr Anjith V |
All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi |
Paediatric surgery OT, Mother and Child Hospital Block, AIIMS, New Delhi
Ansari Nagar, New Delhi-110029
Delhi, India South DELHI |
9787542172
anjithvinod36@gmail.com |
|
|
Details of Ethics Committee
|
| No of Ethics Committees= 1 |
| Name of Committee |
Approval Status |
| Institute Ethics Committee, AIIMS, New Delhi |
Approved |
|
|
Regulatory Clearance Status from DCGI
|
|
|
Health Condition / Problems Studied
|
| Health Type |
Condition |
| Patients |
(1) ICD-10 Condition: J958||Other intraoperative and postprocedural complications and disorders of respiratory system, not elsewhere classified, |
|
|
Intervention / Comparator Agent
|
| Type |
Name |
Details |
| Intervention |
Erector Spinae plane block |
The Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) block is an ultrasound-guided injection of local anesthetic deep to the erector spinae muscle, aiming to block spinal nerves for pain relief. Its considered a potentially safer and less complex regional anesthesia option for procedures like thoracoscopic surgeries. The intervention will take a total of 15 minutes and the observation period extends upto 24 hours after surgery
|
| Comparator Agent |
Serratus Anterior Plane Block |
The Serratus Anterior Plane (SAP) block involves injecting local anesthetic near the serratus anterior muscle, often guided by ultrasound. This technique primarily targets the lateral cutaneous branches of the intercostal nerves, providing pain relief mainly to the anterolateral chest wall. The procedure will take 15 minutes while the observation will be for 24 hours post surgery
|
|
|
Inclusion Criteria
|
| Age From |
2.00 Month(s) |
| Age To |
10.00 Year(s) |
| Gender |
Both |
| Details |
1.Children aged 2 months to 10 years
2. ASA Physical status I-III
3. Scheduled for thoracoscopic surgery
|
|
| ExclusionCriteria |
| Details |
1. Known allergy or hypersensitivity to local anesthetics such as ropivacaine
2. Coagulopathy or bleeding disorders, or if the patient is receiving anticoagulant therapy
3. Infection at the proposed injection site (e.g., local cellulitis or abscess)
4. Pre-existing neuromuscular disorders (e.g., muscular dystrophy, myasthenia gravis) or chronic pain conditions that may interfere with pain perception or assessment
5. Developmental delay or cognitive impairment that prevents reliable use of the FLACC pain scale
6. Refusal to participate by parent or legal guardian or withdrawal of consent at any point
7. Requirement for postoperative mechanical ventilation, either planned or anticipated intraoperatively
8. Conversion to thoracotomy.
|
|
|
Method of Generating Random Sequence
|
Computer generated randomization |
|
Method of Concealment
|
Sequentially numbered, sealed, opaque envelopes |
|
Blinding/Masking
|
Participant, Investigator, Outcome Assessor and Date-entry Operator Blinded |
|
Primary Outcome
|
| Outcome |
TimePoints |
| Comparison of postoperative pain intensity between the ESPB and SAPB groups, specifically measured using the FLACC score at the 3 hour mark post surgery. |
at 3 hour mark after surgery |
|
|
Secondary Outcome
|
| Outcome |
TimePoints |
| Compare the total intraoperative and postoperative fentanyl consumption between the Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) group and the Serratus Anterior Plane Block (SAPB) group. |
During surgery and till 24 hrs post surgery |
| Compare postoperative pain intensity using the FLACC (Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability) score at 1, 6, 12 and 24 hours postoperatively between the two groups. |
At 1, 6, 12, 24 hours postoperatively |
| Compare the time interval from the end of surgery to the first administration of rescue analgesia between the two groups. |
Until 24 hours postoperatively |
| Assess parental satisfaction with the allocated postoperative pain management regimen using a 5-point Likert scale. |
During 24 hour postoperative period |
| Assess early functional recovery using caregiver-reported outcomes, potentially including parameters like mobility, feeding, and sleep patterns.(Boretsky recover Bingo card |
During 24 hour postoperative period |
| Compare salivary cortisol levels, as a physiological marker of stress, at baseline, at one hour, and 24 hours postoperatively between the two groups. |
Baseline, at one hour and 24 hours post surgery |
| Evaluate and compare the incidence of adverse events, including postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), sedation, hypotension, and any complications directly related to the nerve block procedure (e.g., hematoma, infection, visceral injury), between the two groups. |
During surgery and till 24 hour post operative period |
|
|
Target Sample Size
|
Total Sample Size="58" Sample Size from India="58"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (Total)= "Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (India)="Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials" |
|
Phase of Trial
|
N/A |
|
Date of First Enrollment (India)
|
12/02/2026 |
| Date of Study Completion (India) |
Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials |
| Date of First Enrollment (Global) |
Date Missing |
| Date of Study Completion (Global) |
Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials |
|
Estimated Duration of Trial
|
Years="2" Months="0" Days="0" |
|
Recruitment Status of Trial (Global)
|
Not Applicable |
| Recruitment Status of Trial (India) |
Not Yet Recruiting |
|
Publication Details
|
N/A |
|
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement
|
Will individual participant data (IPD) be shared publicly (including data dictionaries)?
Response - NO
|
|
Brief Summary
|
This prospective, randomized, double-blinded controlled trial, titled Comparison of Erector Spinae Plane Block and Serratus Anterior Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Pediatric Thoracoscopic Surgeries, A Randomized Trial, aims to evaluate optimal regional analgesic strategies for children undergoing thoracoscopic surgery at AIIMS, New Delhi. Recognizing that even minimally invasive procedures can cause significant postoperative pain, and considering the limitations of traditional blocks in pediatrics, this study compares two ultrasound-guided interfascial plane blocks, the Erector Spinae Plane Block and the Serratus Anterior Plane Block. The core objective is to assess their comparative analgesic efficacy and safety, hypothesizing that ESPB will demonstrate non-inferior analgesic efficacy to SAPB in this patient population. Following Institutional Ethics Committee approval and informed parental consent, 58 pediatric patients, aged 2 months to 10 years, ASA I-III scheduled for elective thoracoscopic surgery will be randomized to receive either ESPB or SAPB. The ESPB group will receive an ultrasound-guided block at the T5 level with 0.5 mL/kg of 0.25% ropivacaine plus clonidine 1 mcg/kg, while the SAPB group will receive an ultrasound-guided block at the 5th rib midaxillary line with a similar local anesthetic solution. Both blocks are administered post-induction of standardized general anesthesia, with the patient, parents, outcome assessor, and postoperative care team blinded to the allocated intervention. The primary endpoint is the comparison of postoperative pain intensity using the FLACC score at 3 hours post-surgery. Key secondary outcomes include total intraoperative and 24-hour postoperative fentanyl consumption, FLACC scores at multiple other time points, time to first rescue analgesia, parental satisfaction, early functional recovery, salivary cortisol levels as a stress biomarker, and the incidence of adverse events or block-related complications. The findings are anticipated to provide robust evidence to inform clinical decision-making for postoperative pain management in pediatric thoracoscopic surgery.
|