FULL DETAILS (Read-only)  -> Click Here to Create PDF for Current Dataset of Trial
CTRI Number  CTRI/2015/11/006332 [Registered on: 02/11/2015] Trial Registered Prospectively
Last Modified On: 28/10/2015
Post Graduate Thesis  No 
Type of Trial  Interventional 
Type of Study   Medical Device
Diagnostic 
Study Design  Randomized, Parallel Group, Active Controlled Trial 
Public Title of Study   A clinical study to assess the efficacy of a newer variety of an endoscopic device for diagnosing bile duct cancer 
Scientific Title of Study   A randomized controlled study to assess diagnostic yield for malignant biliary strictures with newer variety of biliary brush 
Trial Acronym   
Secondary IDs if Any  
Secondary ID  Identifier 
NIL  NIL 
 
Details of Principal Investigator or overall Trial Coordinator (multi-center study)  
Name  Palakurthy Murali Krishna 
Designation  Professor and Head, Department of Gastroenterology, Andhra Medical College 
Affiliation  Andhra Medical College 
Address  Department of Gastroenterology, Andhra Medical College, King George Hospital, Maharanipeta, Visakhapatnam-530002, Andhra Pradesh, India

Visakhapatnam
ANDHRA PRADESH
530002
India 
Phone  9032032000  
Fax    
Email  muralikrishna63@yahoo.com  
 
Details of Contact Person
Scientific Query
 
Name  Palakurthy Murali Krishna 
Designation  Professor and Head, Department of Gastroenterology, Andhra Medical College 
Affiliation  Andhra Medical College 
Address  Department of Gastroenterology, Andhra Medical College, King George Hospital, Maharanipeta, Visakhapatnam-530002, Andhra Pradesh, India


ANDHRA PRADESH
530002
India 
Phone  9032032000  
Fax    
Email  muralikrishna63@yahoo.com  
 
Details of Contact Person
Public Query
 
Name  Palakurthy Murali Krishna 
Designation  Professor and Head, Department of Gastroenterology, Andhra Medical College 
Affiliation  Andhra Medical College 
Address  Department of Gastroenterology, Andhra Medical College, King George Hospital, Maharanipeta, Visakhapatnam-530002, Andhra Pradesh, India


ANDHRA PRADESH
530002
India 
Phone  9032032000  
Fax    
Email  muralikrishna63@yahoo.com  
 
Source of Monetary or Material Support  
Department of Gastroenterology, Andhra Medical College, King George Hospital, Maharanipeta, Visakhapatnam 530002, Andhra Pradesh 
 
Primary Sponsor  
Name  Andhra Medical College 
Address  Department of Gastroenterology, Andhra Medical College, King George Hospital, Maharanipeta, Visakhapatnam 530002, Andhra Pradesh 
Type of Sponsor  Government medical college 
 
Details of Secondary Sponsor  
Name  Address 
NIL  NIL 
 
Countries of Recruitment     India  
Sites of Study  
No of Sites = 1  
Name of Principal Investigator  Name of Site  Site Address  Phone/Fax/Email 
Palakurthy Murali Krishna  Andhra Medical College  Department of Gastroenterology, Andhra Medical College, King George Hospital, Maharanipeta, Visakhapatnam 530002, Andhra Pradesh, India
Visakhapatnam
ANDHRA PRADESH 
9032032000

muralikrishna63@yahoo.com 
 
Details of Ethics Committee  
No of Ethics Committees= 1  
Name of Committee  Approval Status 
Institutional Ethics Committee, Andhra Medical College, Visakhapatnam  Approved 
 
Regulatory Clearance Status from DCGI  
Status 
Not Applicable 
 
Health Condition / Problems Studied  
Health Type  Condition 
Patients  Patients presenting to the gastroenterology department with features of cholestatic jaundice and clinical diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma or stricture in common bile duct.,  
 
Intervention / Comparator Agent  
Type  Name  Details 
Intervention  9 Fr wire-guided cytology brush (Infinity sampling device, US Endoscopy).  It has a combination of soft and stiff bristles for better tissue acquisition. Length of brush is 29 mm. Diameter of brush is 4.75 mm 
Comparator Agent  The wire guided "RX Cytology Brush by Boston Scientific".  It measures 2.1 mm X 2.7mm (8 Fr) 
 
Inclusion Criteria  
Age From  12.00 Year(s)
Age To  90.00 Year(s)
Gender  Both 
Details  1.Biochemical evidence of cholestasis
a.Increase of Alkaline Phosphatase greater than three times the upper normal limit
And / or
b.Serum direct bilirubin greater than 2.0 mg per dl

OR

2.Extra hepatic bile duct stricture without discrete mass on Computer Tomography (CT) or Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)or Magnetic resonance Cholangio Pancreatography (MRCP).

AND

3.Documented extra hepatic biliary stricture during the Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangio Pancreatography (ERCP)
 
 
ExclusionCriteria 
Details  1.Patients unwilling to participate in the trial

2.Inability to undergo standard ERCP (post surgical anatomy, other contraindications for ERCP)

3.No clinical suspicion for malignancy

4.CT or MRI scan showing an associated mass

5.Pregnancy, lactation

6.Children less than 12 yrs of age and adults greater than 90 years of age (both exclusive)

7.Endoscopically visible peri- ampullary tumor

8.Strictures not permitting the passage of guide wire or biliary brush

9.Previous brushing or placement of biliary stent.

10.Co- morbid conditons like chronic pancreatitis, Ampullary neoplasm, Carcinoma pancreas, Carcinoma Gall bladder,Hepatocellular carcinoma, metastatic disease with extrabiliary or unknown primary tumour, benign hepatic masses

11.Any ERCP evidence of bile duct compression

12.Postoperative, traumatic and idiopathic biliary strictures. 
 
Method of Generating Random Sequence   Computer generated randomization 
Method of Concealment   An Open list of random numbers 
Blinding/Masking   Participant and Outcome Assessor Blinded 
Primary Outcome  
Outcome  TimePoints 
To identify the sensitivity and applicability of a newer cytology brush for tissue sampling of biliary strictures.

The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value will be calculated for both the randomized groups.
Analysis will be done based on percentages, chi square test and other relevant tests of significance.
 
Each patient will be followed up after the procedure and at the end of six months after randomization 
 
Secondary Outcome  
Outcome  TimePoints 
To compare the percentage of patients diagnosed with malignant biliary stricture between newer and older variety of biliary btush  The pathology report after the procedure is performed will be studied for this outcome 
 
Target Sample Size   Total Sample Size="52"
Sample Size from India="52" 
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (Total)= "Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (India)="Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials" 
Phase of Trial   N/A 
Date of First Enrollment (India)   15/11/2015 
Date of Study Completion (India) Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials 
Date of First Enrollment (Global)  Date Missing 
Date of Study Completion (Global) Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials 
Estimated Duration of Trial   Years="0"
Months="10"
Days="0" 
Recruitment Status of Trial (Global)   Not Applicable 
Recruitment Status of Trial (India)  Not Yet Recruiting 
Publication Details    
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement

Will individual participant data (IPD) be shared publicly (including data dictionaries)?  

Brief Summary  

Biliary strictures are a known association with many neoplastic and inflammatory diseases of the bile duct, pancreas and ampulla.Differentiating the benign from malignant strictures is essential for a proper treatment and follow- up of the patient.Though radiological techniques like ultrasonography, Computer Tomography, Endoscopic Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Cholangio Pancreatography (MRCP) can diagnose the strictures, they are not sufficient in differentiating the benign from malignant strictures.Brush cytology has a high specificity , but its drawback is the lower sensitivity rates. New biliary brush models were proposed in order to increase the sensitivity. Some models provided a better diagnostic yield while others did not.There are no published randomized prospective studies comparing the older brush with newer ones (with respect to the newer brushes in market as of 2011). Also, no studies have been proposed in India based on the newer biliary brushes available in the market. The present randomized controlled study will address these issues and will compare the older biliary brush with a newer one.

This will be a randomized, participant and outcome assessor blinded, active controlled, prospective study. 

Patients with high risk for malignant biliary strictures will be studied. They include patients presenting to the gastroenterology department with features of cholestatic jaundice and clinical diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma or stricture in common bile duct and those with elevated serum alkaline phosphatase and elevated serum total bilirubin. Biliary brushing in the intervention group will be performed with  a newer variety of biliary brush (9 Fr wire-guided cytology brush (Infinity sampling device, US Endoscopy). It has a combination of soft and stiff bristles and hypothesized for better tissue acquisition).

Biliary brushing in the comparator group will be performed with wire guided "RX Cytology Brush by Boston Scientific". It measures 2.1 mm X 2.7mm (8 Fr)

The study will recruit 52 participants  with 26 each in the intervention group and in the comparator group.

After obtaining consent from the patient, he/ she will be subjected to Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangio Pancreatography (ERCP). The common bile duct will be visualized under flouroscopy. The presence of stricture in common bile duct will be confirmed. The biliary brush will be supplied to the endoscopist by an assistant. The assistant will pick the relevant type of biliary brush based on the randomized code. The assistant will not be a part of the study. Biliary brushungs will be obtained from the common bile duct. The biliary brush will be retracted and will be placed in a sterile plastic continer filled with Cytolyt solution (methanol). The tip of the brush with bristles will be cut and will also be placed in the solution. Cell block will be prepared and will be analyzed by the pathologist. The pathologist will be blinded regarding the type of biliary brush used for that patient.

The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value will be calculated for both the randomized groups. Analysis will be done based on percentages, chi square test and other relevant tests of significance.

 
Close