| CTRI Number |
CTRI/2015/11/006332 [Registered on: 02/11/2015] Trial Registered Prospectively |
| Last Modified On: |
28/10/2015 |
| Post Graduate Thesis |
No |
| Type of Trial |
Interventional |
|
Type of Study
|
Medical Device Diagnostic |
| Study Design |
Randomized, Parallel Group, Active Controlled Trial |
|
Public Title of Study
|
A clinical study to assess the efficacy of a newer variety of an endoscopic device for diagnosing bile duct cancer |
|
Scientific Title of Study
|
A randomized controlled study to assess diagnostic yield for malignant biliary strictures with newer variety of biliary brush |
| Trial Acronym |
|
|
Secondary IDs if Any
|
| Secondary ID |
Identifier |
| NIL |
NIL |
|
|
Details of Principal Investigator or overall Trial Coordinator (multi-center study)
|
| Name |
Palakurthy Murali Krishna |
| Designation |
Professor and Head, Department of Gastroenterology, Andhra Medical College |
| Affiliation |
Andhra Medical College |
| Address |
Department of Gastroenterology, Andhra Medical College, King George Hospital, Maharanipeta, Visakhapatnam-530002, Andhra Pradesh, India
Visakhapatnam ANDHRA PRADESH 530002 India |
| Phone |
9032032000 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
muralikrishna63@yahoo.com |
|
Details of Contact Person Scientific Query
|
| Name |
Palakurthy Murali Krishna |
| Designation |
Professor and Head, Department of Gastroenterology, Andhra Medical College |
| Affiliation |
Andhra Medical College |
| Address |
Department of Gastroenterology, Andhra Medical College, King George Hospital, Maharanipeta, Visakhapatnam-530002, Andhra Pradesh, India
ANDHRA PRADESH 530002 India |
| Phone |
9032032000 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
muralikrishna63@yahoo.com |
|
Details of Contact Person Public Query
|
| Name |
Palakurthy Murali Krishna |
| Designation |
Professor and Head, Department of Gastroenterology, Andhra Medical College |
| Affiliation |
Andhra Medical College |
| Address |
Department of Gastroenterology, Andhra Medical College, King George Hospital, Maharanipeta, Visakhapatnam-530002, Andhra Pradesh, India
ANDHRA PRADESH 530002 India |
| Phone |
9032032000 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
muralikrishna63@yahoo.com |
|
|
Source of Monetary or Material Support
|
| Department of Gastroenterology, Andhra Medical College, King George Hospital, Maharanipeta, Visakhapatnam 530002, Andhra Pradesh |
|
|
Primary Sponsor
|
| Name |
Andhra Medical College |
| Address |
Department of Gastroenterology, Andhra Medical College, King George Hospital, Maharanipeta, Visakhapatnam 530002, Andhra Pradesh |
| Type of Sponsor |
Government medical college |
|
|
Details of Secondary Sponsor
|
|
|
Countries of Recruitment
|
India |
|
Sites of Study
|
| No of Sites = 1 |
| Name of Principal
Investigator |
Name of Site |
Site Address |
Phone/Fax/Email |
| Palakurthy Murali Krishna |
Andhra Medical College |
Department of Gastroenterology, Andhra Medical College, King George Hospital, Maharanipeta, Visakhapatnam 530002, Andhra
Pradesh, India Visakhapatnam ANDHRA PRADESH |
9032032000
muralikrishna63@yahoo.com |
|
|
Details of Ethics Committee
|
| No of Ethics Committees= 1 |
| Name of Committee |
Approval Status |
| Institutional Ethics Committee, Andhra Medical College, Visakhapatnam |
Approved |
|
|
Regulatory Clearance Status from DCGI
|
|
|
Health Condition / Problems Studied
|
| Health Type |
Condition |
| Patients |
Patients presenting to the gastroenterology department with features of cholestatic jaundice and clinical diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma or stricture in common bile duct., |
|
|
Intervention / Comparator Agent
|
| Type |
Name |
Details |
| Intervention |
9 Fr wire-guided cytology brush (Infinity sampling device, US Endoscopy). |
It has a combination of soft and stiff bristles for better tissue acquisition.
Length of brush is 29 mm.
Diameter of brush is 4.75 mm |
| Comparator Agent |
The wire guided "RX Cytology Brush by Boston Scientific". |
It measures 2.1 mm X 2.7mm (8 Fr) |
|
|
Inclusion Criteria
|
| Age From |
12.00 Year(s) |
| Age To |
90.00 Year(s) |
| Gender |
Both |
| Details |
1.Biochemical evidence of cholestasis
a.Increase of Alkaline Phosphatase greater than three times the upper normal limit
And / or
b.Serum direct bilirubin greater than 2.0 mg per dl
OR
2.Extra hepatic bile duct stricture without discrete mass on Computer Tomography (CT) or Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)or Magnetic resonance Cholangio Pancreatography (MRCP).
AND
3.Documented extra hepatic biliary stricture during the Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangio Pancreatography (ERCP)
|
|
| ExclusionCriteria |
| Details |
1.Patients unwilling to participate in the trial
2.Inability to undergo standard ERCP (post surgical anatomy, other contraindications for ERCP)
3.No clinical suspicion for malignancy
4.CT or MRI scan showing an associated mass
5.Pregnancy, lactation
6.Children less than 12 yrs of age and adults greater than 90 years of age (both exclusive)
7.Endoscopically visible peri- ampullary tumor
8.Strictures not permitting the passage of guide wire or biliary brush
9.Previous brushing or placement of biliary stent.
10.Co- morbid conditons like chronic pancreatitis, Ampullary neoplasm, Carcinoma pancreas, Carcinoma Gall bladder,Hepatocellular carcinoma, metastatic disease with extrabiliary or unknown primary tumour, benign hepatic masses
11.Any ERCP evidence of bile duct compression
12.Postoperative, traumatic and idiopathic biliary strictures. |
|
|
Method of Generating Random Sequence
|
Computer generated randomization |
|
Method of Concealment
|
An Open list of random numbers |
|
Blinding/Masking
|
Participant and Outcome Assessor Blinded |
|
Primary Outcome
|
| Outcome |
TimePoints |
To identify the sensitivity and applicability of a newer cytology brush for tissue sampling of biliary strictures.
The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value will be calculated for both the randomized groups.
Analysis will be done based on percentages, chi square test and other relevant tests of significance.
|
Each patient will be followed up after the procedure and at the end of six months after randomization |
|
|
Secondary Outcome
|
| Outcome |
TimePoints |
| To compare the percentage of patients diagnosed with malignant biliary stricture between newer and older variety of biliary btush |
The pathology report after the procedure is performed will be studied for this outcome |
|
|
Target Sample Size
|
Total Sample Size="52" Sample Size from India="52"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (Total)= "Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (India)="Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials" |
|
Phase of Trial
|
N/A |
|
Date of First Enrollment (India)
|
15/11/2015 |
| Date of Study Completion (India) |
Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials |
| Date of First Enrollment (Global) |
Date Missing |
| Date of Study Completion (Global) |
Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials |
|
Estimated Duration of Trial
|
Years="0" Months="10" Days="0" |
|
Recruitment Status of Trial (Global)
|
Not Applicable |
| Recruitment Status of Trial (India) |
Not Yet Recruiting |
|
Publication Details
|
|
|
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement
|
Will individual participant data (IPD) be shared publicly (including data dictionaries)?
|
|
Brief Summary
|
Biliary strictures are a known association with many neoplastic and inflammatory diseases of the bile duct, pancreas and ampulla.Differentiating the benign from malignant strictures is essential for a proper treatment and follow- up of the patient.Though radiological techniques like ultrasonography, Computer Tomography, Endoscopic Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Cholangio Pancreatography (MRCP) can diagnose the strictures, they are not sufficient in differentiating the benign from malignant strictures.Brush cytology has a high specificity , but its drawback is the lower sensitivity rates. New biliary brush models were proposed in order to increase the sensitivity. Some models provided a better diagnostic yield while others did not.There are no published randomized prospective studies comparing the older brush with newer ones (with respect to the newer brushes in market as of 2011). Also, no studies have been proposed in India based on the newer biliary brushes available in the market. The present randomized controlled study will address these issues and will compare the older biliary brush with a newer one. This will be a randomized, participant and outcome assessor blinded, active controlled, prospective study. Patients with high risk for malignant biliary strictures will be studied. They include patients presenting to the gastroenterology department with features of cholestatic jaundice and clinical diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma or stricture in common bile duct and those with elevated serum alkaline phosphatase and elevated serum total bilirubin. Biliary brushing in the intervention group will be performed with a newer variety of biliary brush (9 Fr wire-guided cytology brush (Infinity sampling device, US Endoscopy). It has a combination of soft and stiff bristles and hypothesized for better tissue acquisition). Biliary brushing in the comparator group will be performed with wire guided "RX Cytology Brush by Boston Scientific". It measures 2.1 mm X 2.7mm (8 Fr) The study will recruit 52 participants with 26 each in the intervention group and in the comparator group. After obtaining consent from the patient, he/ she will be subjected to Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangio Pancreatography (ERCP). The common bile duct will be visualized under flouroscopy. The presence of stricture in common bile duct will be confirmed. The biliary brush will be supplied to the endoscopist by an assistant. The assistant will pick the relevant type of biliary brush based on the randomized code. The assistant will not be a part of the study. Biliary brushungs will be obtained from the common bile duct. The biliary brush will be retracted and will be placed in a sterile plastic continer filled with Cytolyt solution (methanol). The tip of the brush with bristles will be cut and will also be placed in the solution. Cell block will be prepared and will be analyzed by the pathologist. The pathologist will be blinded regarding the type of biliary brush used for that patient. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value will be calculated for both the randomized groups. Analysis will be done based on percentages, chi square test and other relevant tests of significance. |