FULL DETAILS (Read-only)  -> Click Here to Create PDF for Current Dataset of Trial
CTRI Number  CTRI/2025/05/086975 [Registered on: 15/05/2025] Trial Registered Prospectively
Last Modified On: 14/05/2025
Post Graduate Thesis  Yes 
Type of Trial  Interventional 
Type of Study   Physiotherapy (Not Including YOGA) 
Study Design  Randomized, Parallel Group Trial 
Public Title of Study   Comparison between Nerve Gliding and Muscle Release Technique to improve leg Flexiblity and Balance in Stroke patients. 
Scientific Title of Study   Comparison between Neural Mobilization and Myofascial Release Technique on lower limb Flexibility and Balance in Stroke patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial 
Trial Acronym  NIL 
Secondary IDs if Any  
Secondary ID  Identifier 
NIL  NIL 
 
Details of Principal Investigator or overall Trial Coordinator (multi-center study)  
Name  Rishita Dey 
Designation  Post Graduate Resident 
Affiliation  Sancheti Institute for Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation,College of Physiotherapy 
Address  Sancheti Institute for Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation,College of Physiotherapy,Department of Neuro Physiotherapy, 11/12 Thube Park, Shivajinagar, Pune

Pune
MAHARASHTRA
411005
India 
Phone  8369270751  
Fax    
Email  rish.d02@gmail.com  
 
Details of Contact Person
Scientific Query
 
Name  Dr Sadhana Mukhi 
Designation  Associate Professor, Neuro Physiotherapy Department 
Affiliation  Sancheti Institute for Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation,College of Physiotherapy 
Address  Sancheti Institute for Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation,College of Physiotherapy, Department of Neuro Physiotherapy, 11/12 Thube Park, Shivajinagar, Pune

Pune
MAHARASHTRA
411005
India 
Phone  8007011772  
Fax    
Email  sadhananimbhore123@gmail.com  
 
Details of Contact Person
Public Query
 
Name  Dr Sadhana Mukhi 
Designation  Associate Professor, Neuro Physiotherapy Department 
Affiliation  Sancheti Institute for Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation,College of Physiotherapy 
Address  Sancheti Institute for Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation,College of Physiotherapy, Department of Neuro Physiotherapy, 11/12 Thube Park, Shivajinagar, Pune

Pune
MAHARASHTRA
411005
India 
Phone  8007011772  
Fax    
Email  sadhananimbhore123@gmail.com  
 
Source of Monetary or Material Support  
Sancheti Institute for Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation College of Physiotherapy,Shivajinagar,Pune-411005 
 
Primary Sponsor  
Name  Sancheti Institute for Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, College of Physiotherapy 
Address  Sancheti Institute for Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, College of Physiotherapy, 11/12 Thube Park, Shvajinagar, Pune- 411005 
Type of Sponsor  Private medical college 
 
Details of Secondary Sponsor  
Name  Address 
NIL  NIL 
 
Countries of Recruitment     India  
Sites of Study  
No of Sites = 1  
Name of Principal Investigator  Name of Site  Site Address  Phone/Fax/Email 
Rishita Dey  Sancheti Institute for Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, College of Physiotherapy  1st floor, Sancheti Institute for Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation,College of Physiotherapy, 11/12 Thube Park, Shivajinagar, Pune
Pune
MAHARASHTRA 
8369270751

rish.d02@gmail.com 
 
Details of Ethics Committee  
No of Ethics Committees= 1  
Name of Committee  Approval Status 
Sancheti Institute for Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, College of Physiotherapy  Approved 
 
Regulatory Clearance Status from DCGI  
Status 
Not Applicable 
 
Health Condition / Problems Studied  
Health Type  Condition 
Patients  (1) ICD-10 Condition: G811||Spastic hemiplegia,  
 
Intervention / Comparator Agent  
Type  Name  Details 
Comparator Agent  Myofascial Release Technique  Total intervention duration- 4 weeks, Frequency- 3 sessions per week. Targetted muscles- Hamstring, Quadriceps, Gastrocnemius and Plantarfascia Each targeted muscle group will receive approximately 5 minutes of application time per session. The therapy will focus on the hamstrings, gastrocnemius, quadriceps, and plantar fascia. For the hamstrings, the patient will be positioned prone with a small pillow under the ankles, and the therapist will apply deep pressure and longitudinal strokes from the ischial tuberosity to the knee. For the gastrocnemius, the patient will lie prone with feet hanging off the table to allow ankle mobility, while deep strokes and sustained pressure are applied along the calf muscles. For the quadriceps, the patient will be supine with a towel roll under the knee, and the therapist will use gliding strokes and deep sustained pressure along the anterior thigh from the hip to the knee. For the plantar fascia, the patient will be either in a long sitting position with the foot supported or prone with slight ankle dorsiflexion, while deep thumb pressure is applied along the sole, focusing on the medial arch and heel.  
Intervention  Neural Mobilization  Total intervention duration- 4 weeks, Frequency- 3 sessions per week. Techniques Used: Sciatic Nerve Mobilization: Supine position with neck and trunk neutral; unaffected limb stabilized. Straight Leg Raise combined with ankle dorsiflexion, hip adduction/internal rotation, and cervical flexion. 10 sequences per set, 3 sets per session, with 1-minute rest between sets. Femoral Nerve Mobilization: Side-lying position with neck and trunk neutral; unaffected limb stabilized. Hip extension, knee flexion with ankle plantarflexion, combined with oscillatory knee and hip movements and cervical flexion. 10 sequences per set, 3 sets per session, with 1-minute rest between sets. 
 
Inclusion Criteria  
Age From  45.00 Year(s)
Age To  65.00 Year(s)
Gender  Both 
Details  1.Patients diagnosed with CVA more than 3 months
2.Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE)score of 24 and above
3.Spasticity grade 2 or lower according to modified Ashworth scale
4.Lower limb voluntary control grade between 3-5
5.Self ambulatory patients ambulating with or without cane
 
 
ExclusionCriteria 
Details  1.Unstable cardiovascular conditions like uncontrolled hypertension, peripheral vascular disease, recent MI.
2.Other neurological disorders.
3.Any musculoskeletal disorders affecting gait such as total knee or total hip arthroplasty in affected side, fracture in affected lower extremity.
 
 
Method of Generating Random Sequence   Computer generated randomization 
Method of Concealment   An Open list of random numbers 
Blinding/Masking   Outcome Assessor Blinded 
Primary Outcome  
Outcome  TimePoints 
Balance (BBS)- Static and Dynamic balance  At baseline (0 week)
Post intervention (4 weeks) 
 
Secondary Outcome  
Outcome  TimePoints 
Functional Balance (TUG)  At baseline (0 week)
Post intervention (4 weeks) 
Flexibility ( using Goniometer)  At baseline (0 week)
Post intervention (4 weeks) 
 
Target Sample Size   Total Sample Size="30"
Sample Size from India="30" 
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (Total)= "Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (India)="Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials" 
Phase of Trial   N/A 
Date of First Enrollment (India)   30/05/2025 
Date of Study Completion (India) Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials 
Date of First Enrollment (Global)  Date Missing 
Date of Study Completion (Global) Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials 
Estimated Duration of Trial   Years="1"
Months="0"
Days="0" 
Recruitment Status of Trial (Global)   Not Applicable 
Recruitment Status of Trial (India)  Not Yet Recruiting 
Publication Details   N/A 
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement

Will individual participant data (IPD) be shared publicly (including data dictionaries)?  

Response - NO
Brief Summary  

Stroke often leads to lower limb spasticity, reduced range of motion, and increased stiffness in muscles and fascia, along with altered neural mechanics due to compromised nerve mobility and blood supply. These structural changes contribute to motor impairments, decreased flexibility, poor balance, and limited mobility, especially in sub-acute and chronic stroke patients. Neural Mobilization (NM) and Myofascial Release (MFR) are therapeutic techniques aimed at improving flexibility, reducing spasticity, and enhancing balance. Although both techniques have shown positive effects individually, their comparative effectiveness in stroke rehabilitation is still unclear. This study aims to compare the effects of NM and MFR on lower limb flexibility and balance to identify the more effective intervention, ultimately aiming to improve functional outcomes and quality of life in stroke survivors.

Null Hypothesis (H0):- 

There will be comparable effect of neural mobilization and myofascial release on lower limb flexibility and balance in sub-acute and chronic stroke patients.

 

Alternate Hypothesis:- 

(H1) - Neural mobilization will be more effective on lower limb flexibility and balance as compared to Myofascial release in sub-acute and chronic stroke patients.

(H2) - Myofascial release technique will be more effective than neural mobilization on lower limb flexibility and balance in sub-acute and chronic stroke patients.

 
Close