| “Comparative Study of Laparoscopic and Open Cholecystectomy for Symptomatic Gall Stone Disease” Submitted by: Dr. Kanishka Patel Course: MS General Surgery (2023–2026) Institution: Varun Arjun Medical College & Rohilkhand Hospital, Shahjahanpur, UP 1. Introduction: Cholecystectomy is the standard treatment for symptomatic gallstones. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has largely replaced open cholecystectomy (OC) due to advantages like: Smaller incisions Less postoperative pain Shorter hospital stays Faster recovery However, safety concerns in complex cases still persist. This study compares both methods to guide surgical decision-making.
2. Review of Literature: Operative Time: Initially longer for LC but now comparable as surgical experience has grown. Hospital Stay & Recovery: LC results in significantly shorter stays and quicker return to normal activities. Pain: Postoperative pain is consistently lower with LC. Complications: OC and LC have comparable complication rates. LC had more bile duct injuries early on, now reduced. Cost-Effectiveness: Though LC is costlier initially, it is more cost-effective long term. Patient Satisfaction: Higher with LC due to faster recovery and better cosmetic results. Recent Advances: SILS and robotic-assisted surgeries show promise for even better outcomes.
3. Aim & Objectives:
Aim: To compare outcomes of laparoscopic vs. open cholecystectomy in symptomatic gallstone disease.
Objectives:
1. Compare operative time 2. Compare postoperative pain 3. Evaluate hospital stay 4. Compare complications 5. Assess patient satisfaction 6. Analyze cost-effectiveness
4. Materials and Methods: Study Type: Prospective, comparative study Duration: 1 year Setting: Varun Arjun Medical College & Rohilkhand Hospital Sample Size: 60 patients (30 LC, 30 OC) Inclusion: Adults (18–75 years) with symptomatic gallstones, ASA I/II Exclusion: Complicated gallstones, prior abdominal surgeries, severe comorbidities, pregnancy Randomization: Computer-generated or sealed envelope technique Surgical Technique: LC: 4-port technique OC: Right subcostal incision Data Collection Parameters: Demographics: Age, sex, BMI, comorbidities Operative data: Operative time, intra-op complications, conversion rates Postoperative data: Pain score (VAS), complications, hospital stay, recovery, scar assessment Follow-up: 1 week, 1 month, 3 months Statistical Tests: Chi-square, Fisher’s exact, t-test (Significance: p < 0.05) 5. Ethical Considerations: Approval from the Institutional Ethics Committee Informed consent in English & Hindi Patient confidentiality maintained Participation voluntary, with no effect on standard care Risks and benefits explained No insurance coverage; institutional care in case of complications 6. Consent Form Highlights: Explained in native language Participant can withdraw anytime Consent for use of anonymous data in publications Details regarding duration, benefits, risks, and confidentiality provide 7. Study Proforma Includes: Personal details History (complaints, medical/surgical/family/social) Examination (general, abdominal) Investigations (CBC, LFT, USG, etc.) Diagnosis Treatment & follow-up plan 8. Gantt Chart:
(To be submitted as per institutional format showing proposed timeline)
|