FULL DETAILS (Read-only)  -> Click Here to Create PDF for Current Dataset of Trial
CTRI Number  CTRI/2025/08/092652 [Registered on: 08/08/2025] Trial Registered Prospectively
Last Modified On: 07/08/2025
Post Graduate Thesis  No 
Type of Trial  Observational 
Type of Study   Prospective, Within-subject comparison 
Study Design  Non-randomized, Multiple Arm Trial 
Public Title of Study   A Prospective Observational Study in Patients with Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms to Compare the Effectiveness of Electronic and Paper-Based Bladder Diaries for Clinical Assessment 
Scientific Title of Study   A single centre, Prospective, observational study to evaluate the effectiveness of electronic versus paper-based bladder diaries in the clinical assessment of lower urinary tract symptoms. 
Trial Acronym  NIL 
Secondary IDs if Any  
Secondary ID  Identifier 
NIL  NIL 
 
Details of Principal Investigator or overall Trial Coordinator (multi-center study)  
Name  Dr AjayKumar Gajengi 
Designation  Consultant Urologist 
Affiliation  Bhaktivedanta Hospital and Research Institute 
Address  Bhaktivedanta Hospital and Research Institute OPD No. 8, Department of Urology, Swami Marg, Sector 6, Srishti Complex, Mira Road East, Thane, Maharashtra, India 401107.

Mumbai
MAHARASHTRA
401107
India 
Phone  9867975935  
Fax    
Email  drgajengiajay@gmail.com  
 
Details of Contact Person
Scientific Query
 
Name  Dr AjayKumar Gajengi 
Designation  Consultant Urologist 
Affiliation  Bhaktivedanta Hospital and Research Institute 
Address  Bhaktivedanta Hospital and Research Institute OPD No. 8, Department of Urology, Swami Marg, Sector 6, Srishti Complex, Mira Road East, Thane, Maharashtra, India 401107.

Mumbai
MAHARASHTRA
401107
India 
Phone  9867975935  
Fax    
Email  drgajengiajay@gmail.com  
 
Details of Contact Person
Public Query
 
Name  Dr AjayKumar Gajengi 
Designation  Consultant Urologist 
Affiliation  Bhaktivedanta Hospital and Research Institute 
Address  Bhaktivedanta Hospital and Research Institute OPD No. 8, Department of Urology, Swami Marg, Sector 6, Srishti Complex, Mira Road East, Thane, Maharashtra, India 401107.

Mumbai
MAHARASHTRA
401107
India 
Phone  9867975935  
Fax    
Email  drgajengiajay@gmail.com  
 
Source of Monetary or Material Support  
Bhaktivedanta Hospital and Research Institute, Bhaktivedanta Swami Marg, Sector 6, Sector 2, Srishti Complex, Mira road East, Thane, Maharashtra, India 401107. 
 
Primary Sponsor  
Name  Bhaktivedanta Hospital and Research Institute 
Address  Bhaktivedanta Hospital and Research Institute, Bhaktivedanta Swami Marg, Sector 6, Sector 2, Srishti Complex, Mira Road East, Thane, Maharashtra, India 401107. 
Type of Sponsor  Research institution and hospital 
 
Details of Secondary Sponsor  
Name  Address 
NIL  NIL 
 
Countries of Recruitment     India  
Sites of Study  
No of Sites = 1  
Name of Principal Investigator  Name of Site  Site Address  Phone/Fax/Email 
Dr AjayKumar Gajengi  Bhaktivedanta Hospital and Research Institute  Bhaktivedanta Swami Marg, Sector 6, Sector 2, Srishti Complex, Mira Road East, Mira Bhayandar, Maharashtra 401107
Thane
MAHARASHTRA 
9867975935

drgajengiajay@gmail.com 
 
Details of Ethics Committee  
No of Ethics Committees= 1  
Name of Committee  Approval Status 
Bhaktivedanta Hospital Ethics Committee for Biomedical and Health Research   Approved 
 
Regulatory Clearance Status from DCGI  
Status 
Not Applicable 
 
Health Condition / Problems Studied  
Health Type  Condition 
Patients  (1) ICD-10 Condition: X||New Technology,  
 
Intervention / Comparator Agent  
Type  Name  Details 
Comparator Agent  NIL  NIL 
Intervention  NIL  NIL 
 
Inclusion Criteria  
Age From  18.00 Year(s)
Age To  80.00 Year(s)
Gender  Both 
Details  1.Age more than or equal to 18 years with documented LUTS.
2.Owns and can operate a smartphone (for EBD arm).
3.Able to read/write in the study language.
4.Giving consent to participate in the study
 
 
ExclusionCriteria 
Details  1.Cognitive impairment prevents diary use.
2.Inability to use mobile devices (if assigned to EBD).
3.Illiteracy (if assigned to PBD only).
4.Not giving consent to participate in the study.
 
 
Method of Generating Random Sequence   Not Applicable 
Method of Concealment   Not Applicable 
Blinding/Masking   Not Applicable 
Primary Outcome  
Outcome  TimePoints 
The study will be to determine whether electronic bladder diaries improve user compliance, data completeness, and clinical utility compared to traditional paper-based diaries in the assessment of lower urinary tract symptoms.  At Day 02, Day 04 and Day 05 
 
Secondary Outcome  
Outcome  TimePoints 
1. Proportion of fully completed diary fields per day.
2. Number of missing or inconsistent entries in each diary format to evaluate data quality.
3. Patient satisfaction & preference assessed using a 5-point Likert scale questionnaire.
4. Usability scores derived from participant responses regarding ease of use, clarity, & overall experience with each diary type.
5. Time required by clinicians to review & summarize data from each diary format.
6. Data accuracy & reliability, based on logical consistency, physiological plausibility, & timestamp verification.
7. Participant adherence over the four-day period, comparing consistency in diary completion between formats.
 
At Day 02, Day 04 & Day 05 
 
Target Sample Size   Total Sample Size="100"
Sample Size from India="100" 
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (Total)= "Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (India)="Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials" 
Phase of Trial   N/A 
Date of First Enrollment (India)   19/08/2025 
Date of Study Completion (India) Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials 
Date of First Enrollment (Global)  Date Missing 
Date of Study Completion (Global) Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials 
Estimated Duration of Trial   Years="0"
Months="6"
Days="0" 
Recruitment Status of Trial (Global)   Not Applicable 
Recruitment Status of Trial (India)  Open to Recruitment 
Publication Details   N/A 
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement

Will individual participant data (IPD) be shared publicly (including data dictionaries)?  

Response - NO
Brief Summary   This study aims to compare electronic bladder diaries (EBD) and paper bladder diaries (PBD) in assessing lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). The primary objective is to evaluate the feasibility, user compliance, data completeness, and overall satisfaction of EBDs versus PBDs. Secondary objectives include comparing data accuracy, clinician ease-of-use, and patient preference between the two formats. This single-center, prospective, observational study will enroll participants aged 18 or older, with documented LUTS, who can use a smartphone and read/write in the study language. Over a period of four days, participants will complete both EBD and PBD, and data on voiding patterns, fluid intake, urgency, incontinence, and nocturia will be collected. The study will measure compliance, data quality, and user satisfaction to determine if EBD offers superior benefits in clinical utility compared to traditional PBDs 
Close