| CTRI Number |
CTRI/2025/08/093050 [Registered on: 14/08/2025] Trial Registered Prospectively |
| Last Modified On: |
13/08/2025 |
| Post Graduate Thesis |
Yes |
| Type of Trial |
Interventional |
|
Type of Study
|
Medical Device Surgical/Anesthesia |
| Study Design |
Other |
|
Public Title of Study
|
Studying how different head and neck positions affect the fit of a breathing mask used during surgery |
|
Scientific Title of Study
|
Influence of different head and neck positions on oropharyngeal leak pressure with laryngeal mask airway protector in elective surgeries |
| Trial Acronym |
NIL |
|
Secondary IDs if Any
|
| Secondary ID |
Identifier |
| NIL |
NIL |
|
|
Details of Principal Investigator or overall Trial Coordinator (multi-center study)
|
| Name |
Praveen kumar S |
| Designation |
Junior resident |
| Affiliation |
Government Medical College and Hospital,Chandigarh |
| Address |
Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care,Block D,Level 5,GMCH,Sector 32-B,Chandigarh
CHANDIGARH
160030
India
Chandigarh CHANDIGARH 160030 India |
| Phone |
8610745088 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
praveenlycan88@gmail.com |
|
Details of Contact Person Scientific Query
|
| Name |
Dr Deepak Thapa |
| Designation |
Professor |
| Affiliation |
Government Medical College and Hospital,Chandigarh |
| Address |
Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care,Block D,Level 5,GMCH,Sector 32-B,Chandigarh
CHANDIGARH
160030
India
Chandigarh CHANDIGARH 160030 India |
| Phone |
9646121524 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
dpkthapa@gmail.com |
|
Details of Contact Person Public Query
|
| Name |
Dr Vanita Ahuja |
| Designation |
Professor |
| Affiliation |
Government Medical College and Hospital,Chandigarh |
| Address |
Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care,Block D,Level 5,GMCH,Sector 32-B,Chandigarh
CHANDIGARH
160030
India
Chandigarh CHANDIGARH 160030 India |
| Phone |
9646121649 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
vanitaanupam@gmail.com |
|
|
Source of Monetary or Material Support
|
| Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care,Block D,Level 5,GMCH,Sector 32-B,Chandigarh
CHANDIGARH
160030
India |
|
|
Primary Sponsor
|
| Name |
Government Medical College and Hospital |
| Address |
Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care,Block D,Level 5,GMCH,Sector 32-B,Chandigarh
CHANDIGARH
160030
India |
| Type of Sponsor |
Government medical college |
|
|
Details of Secondary Sponsor
|
|
|
Countries of Recruitment
|
India |
|
Sites of Study
|
| No of Sites = 1 |
| Name of Principal
Investigator |
Name of Site |
Site Address |
Phone/Fax/Email |
| Dr Praveen Kumar S |
Government Medical College and Hospital |
Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care,Block D,Level 5,GMCH,Sector 32-B,Chandigarh
CHANDIGARH
160030
India Chandigarh CHANDIGARH |
8610745088
praveenlycan88@gmail.com |
|
|
Details of Ethics Committee
|
| No of Ethics Committees= 1 |
| Name of Committee |
Approval Status |
| Institutional Ethics Commitee,GMCH,Chandigarh |
Approved |
|
|
Regulatory Clearance Status from DCGI
|
|
|
Health Condition / Problems Studied
|
| Health Type |
Condition |
| Patients |
(1) ICD-10 Condition: O||Medical and Surgical, |
|
|
Intervention / Comparator Agent
|
| Type |
Name |
Details |
| Comparator Agent |
NIL |
NIL |
| Intervention |
Supraglottic airway device |
Supraglottic airway device(LMA PROTECTOR) will be inserted after induction and neuromuscular blockade to secure the airway.The Oropharyngeal Leak Pressure in cm of water is measured after 5minutes in each head position (neutral,flexion,extension,right lateral and left lateral position) of head and neck after establishing the airway.Once the surgery is over,the patient will be reversd and the supraglottic airway device will be removed.Patient will be monitored in the postoperative ward for 30 minutes |
|
|
Inclusion Criteria
|
| Age From |
18.00 Year(s) |
| Age To |
70.00 Year(s) |
| Gender |
Both |
| Details |
1.Patients with American society of anaesthesiologist physical status grade 1 and 2
2.age between 18-70
3.patients undergoing elective surgeries requiring controlled ventilation under general anaesthesia. |
|
| ExclusionCriteria |
| Details |
1. Patients with anticipated difficult airway Airway Difficulty Score 2. Morbid obesity
3. Pregnant women
4. Major maxilla-facial trauma or cervical spine pathology
5. Severe cardiorespiratory, cerebrovascular, renal, hepatic or musculoskeletal diseases
6. Severe coagulopathy or history of anticoagulant use
7. Patients at increased risk of pulmonary aspiration such as gastroesophageal reflux disease, peptic ulcer disease, full stomach 8. Surgery in prone position |
|
|
Method of Generating Random Sequence
|
Not Applicable |
|
Method of Concealment
|
Not Applicable |
|
Blinding/Masking
|
Not Applicable |
|
Primary Outcome
|
| Outcome |
TimePoints |
| Comparing the difference in oropharyngeal leak pressure with changes in head and neck positions using the LMA Protector airway device |
After induction and 5minutes after neutral head position,5minutes after flexion head position,5minutes after extension head position,5minutes after right lateral position and 5minutes after left lateral head position.
|
|
|
Secondary Outcome
|
| Outcome |
TimePoints |
1.To study the insertion time of LMA Protector
2.To study the number of attempt required for insertion
3.To study the ease of insertion of the device
4.To study hemodynamic variations in different head & neck positions
5.To study fiberoptic assessment of glottic view through the device.
6.To study post-operative complications such as sore throat, stridor or hoarseness, dental
trauma, any other relevant complications. |
1.After insertion of LMA device
2.After insertion of LMA device
3.After indertion of LMA device
4.5minutes after each head position flexion,extension,neutral,right lateral,left lateral head position
5.30 minutes after insertion of LMA device
6.Immediately after removal of LMA tube to 48 hours after removal to tube |
|
|
Target Sample Size
|
Total Sample Size="60" Sample Size from India="60"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (Total)= "Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (India)="Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials" |
|
Phase of Trial
|
Phase 4 |
|
Date of First Enrollment (India)
|
15/09/2025 |
| Date of Study Completion (India) |
Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials |
| Date of First Enrollment (Global) |
Date Missing |
| Date of Study Completion (Global) |
Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials |
|
Estimated Duration of Trial
|
Years="1" Months="6" Days="0" |
|
Recruitment Status of Trial (Global)
|
Not Yet Recruiting |
| Recruitment Status of Trial (India) |
Not Yet Recruiting |
|
Publication Details
|
N/A |
|
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement
|
Will individual participant data (IPD) be shared publicly (including data dictionaries)?
Response - NO
|
|
Brief Summary
|
Airway management has evolved considerably over the past decade, primarily due to advancements in Supraglottic Airway Devices These devices provide a significant alternative in general anesthesia for situations where tracheal intubation poses challenges, facilitating ventilation and oxygenation. It is particularly beneficial in emergency situations and for patients with anatomically complex airways.SADs are generally categorized into first and second generation devices. First generation equipments include the use of a basic airway pipes such as the laryngeal mask airway without features aimed at minimizing aspiration. Second generation, like the ProSeal LMA, I-gel and LMA Protector contains more newer features like gastric drainage port and epiglottis blockers which both improve safety and efficiency. The effectiveness of supraglottic airway devices particularly their ability to maintain a proper seal can depend on head movements. Flexing neck decreases anteroposterior diameter of pharynx by relieving anterior pharyngeal muscle tension, while extending the neck increases this diameter.Most supraglottic airway devices are designed to be inserted gently into oropharynx to create a reliable seal, ensuring consistent ventilation. Ongoing clinical research evaluating the LMA Protector have indicated that it allows for straightforward insertion and achieves superior oropharyngeal leak pressures relative to other routinely utilised devices. We hypothesize that laryngeal mask airway protector achieves superior OLP in flexion head position.
AIM
To observe the Influence of different head and neck positions on oropharyngeal leak pressure with Laryngeal Mask Airway Protector airway in elective surgeries
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: Comparing the difference in oropharyngeal leak pressure with changes in head and neck positions using the LMA Protector airway device
SECONDARY OBJECTIVE: To study the insertion time of LMA Protector To study the number of attempt required for insertion To study the ease of insertion of the deviceTo study hemodynamic variations in different head and neck positions To study fiberoptic assessment of glottic view through the device. To study post-operative complications such as sore throat, stridor or hoarseness, dental trauma, any other relevant complications.
METHODOLOGY
The study protocol outlines thorough pre anaesthesia workup including physical examinations and various test and assessment of dufficult airway.patients will be advised fasting and will be premedicated accordingly.During anaesthesia standard procedures will be followed,including preoxygenation,induction with propofol,and neuromuscular blockade.After insertion of LMA,monitoring parameters are measured. mode. Hemodynamic parameters [HR (heart rate), ECG, NIBP,SpO2 and End Tidal Carbon dioxide will be monitored and recorded with every head positions.After the end of surgery and reversal from anaesthetic agents, the study device will be removed and the incidence of blood stain on the device will be recorded.
Following observations will be recorded in all the patients: 1. OLP in cm of water, in neutral, flexion, extension, right lateral and left lateral position of head and neck 2. Time taken for SAD insertion 3. Ease of insertion of SAD. The ease of insertion of device will be graded. 4. Number of attempts for successful SAD insertion. 5. Fibreoptic grading of the laryngeal view through the study device. 6. Any adverse events during the procedure like oxygen desaturation, soft tissue or dentaltrauma, blood stain on device. 7. Degree of postoperative sore throat 8. Intraoperative hemodynamic parameters HR, NIBP,oxygen saturation end-tidal carbondioxide level preoperatively, before and after insertion, in all head positions.
|