| CTRI Number |
CTRI/2025/08/092750 [Registered on: 11/08/2025] Trial Registered Prospectively |
| Last Modified On: |
09/08/2025 |
| Post Graduate Thesis |
Yes |
| Type of Trial |
Interventional |
|
Type of Study
|
Drug Dentistry |
| Study Design |
Randomized, Crossover Trial |
|
Public Title of Study
|
Reducing Injection Pain During Dental Anesthesia: A Comparison of Numbing Gel and Ice Therapy. |
|
Scientific Title of Study
|
Comparative evaluation of injection pain during administration of local anaesthesia after topical anaesthetic gel versus cryotherapy application: A randomised controlled trial |
| Trial Acronym |
NIL |
|
Secondary IDs if Any
|
| Secondary ID |
Identifier |
| NIL |
NIL |
|
|
Details of Principal Investigator or overall Trial Coordinator (multi-center study)
|
| Name |
Dr Sunayana Bidave |
| Designation |
Post Graduate student |
| Affiliation |
RD Dental Collge and Research Centre, Nagpur |
| Address |
311 Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics
Nagpur MAHARASHTRA 440019 India |
| Phone |
9405389193 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
sbidave155@gmail.com |
|
Details of Contact Person Scientific Query
|
| Name |
Dr Pratima Shenoi |
| Designation |
HOD and Guide |
| Affiliation |
RD Dental College and Research Centre Nagpur |
| Address |
311 Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics
Nagpur MAHARASHTRA 440019 India |
| Phone |
9822220506 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
prshenoi@gmail.com |
|
Details of Contact Person Public Query
|
| Name |
Dr Sunayana Bidave |
| Designation |
Post Graduate student |
| Affiliation |
RD Dental Collge and Research Centre, Nagpur |
| Address |
311 Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics
MAHARASHTRA 440019 India |
| Phone |
9405389193 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
sbidave155@gmail.com |
|
|
Source of Monetary or Material Support
|
| Ranjeet Deshmukh Dental College and Research Centre, Nagpur 440019 |
|
|
Primary Sponsor
|
| Name |
Dr Sunayana Bidave |
| Address |
Hingna Road, Digdoh hills, Police Nagar, Nagpur 440019 |
| Type of Sponsor |
Other [Self] |
|
|
Details of Secondary Sponsor
|
|
|
Countries of Recruitment
|
India |
|
Sites of Study
|
| No of Sites = 1 |
| Name of Principal
Investigator |
Name of Site |
Site Address |
Phone/Fax/Email |
| Dr Sunayana Bidave |
RD Dental College and Research Centre, Nagpur |
311 Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics Nagpur MAHARASHTRA |
9405389193
sbidave155@gmail.com |
|
|
Details of Ethics Committee
|
| No of Ethics Committees= 1 |
| Name of Committee |
Approval Status |
| Ranjeet Deshmukh Dental College and Research Centre Ethics Committee |
Approved |
|
|
Regulatory Clearance Status from DCGI
|
|
|
Health Condition / Problems Studied
|
| Health Type |
Condition |
| Patients |
(1) ICD-10 Condition: 3||Administration, |
|
|
Intervention / Comparator Agent
|
| Type |
Name |
Details |
| Intervention |
Injection Pain During Administration Of Local Anesthesia |
1) Topical Anesthetic Gel (2% lignocaine gel, for 1 min applied on mucosal surface) vs
2)Cryotherapy (sterile distilled water frozen in custom-made
polypropylene molds 5 mm × 10 mm applied on mucosal surface for 15 seconds) |
|
|
Inclusion Criteria
|
| Age From |
18.00 Year(s) |
| Age To |
60.00 Year(s) |
| Gender |
Both |
| Details |
Patients requiring endodontic intervention in atleast two teeth, either in the same or contralateral arch requiring local anaesthesia. |
|
| ExclusionCriteria |
| Details |
Patients allergic to local anaesthetic agent. Patients anxious to local anaesthesia. Patients allergic to any other drugs and/or conditions that influence the pain score. Patients taken any premedication before procedure. Patients who will refuse to give informed consent . Patients with acute infections at the injection site. |
|
|
Method of Generating Random Sequence
|
Not Applicable |
|
Method of Concealment
|
Not Applicable |
|
Blinding/Masking
|
Not Applicable |
|
Primary Outcome
|
| Outcome |
TimePoints |
| Pain perception during the administration of local anesthesia will be assessed using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS). |
At Baseline |
|
|
Secondary Outcome
|
| Outcome |
TimePoints |
| NIL |
NIL |
|
|
Target Sample Size
|
Total Sample Size="17" Sample Size from India="17"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (Total)= "17"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (India)="17" |
|
Phase of Trial
|
N/A |
|
Date of First Enrollment (India)
|
20/08/2025 |
| Date of Study Completion (India) |
20/11/2025 |
| Date of First Enrollment (Global) |
Date Missing |
| Date of Study Completion (Global) |
Date Missing |
|
Estimated Duration of Trial
|
Years="0" Months="3" Days="0" |
|
Recruitment Status of Trial (Global)
|
Not Applicable |
| Recruitment Status of Trial (India) |
Completed |
|
Publication Details
|
N/A |
|
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement
|
Will individual participant data (IPD) be shared publicly (including data dictionaries)?
Response - NO
|
|
Brief Summary
|
Introduction: Pain management is a critical component of successful endodontic treatment, particularly during intraoperative and postoperative stages. Adequate control of pain not only enhances patient comfort but also contributes to overall treatment efficacy and patient compliance. Local anesthetics (LAs) are indispensable in minimizing discomfort associated with a variety of dental, endodontic, and minor surgical procedures.To minimize injection-related discomfort, a range of strategies has been investigated. These include the use of topical anesthetic gels, precooling techniques (such as ice or refrigerant spray), buffering of anesthetic solutions to reduce acidity and injection pain, and advanced delivery systems like computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery (CCLAD) devices. Given this gap in evidence, the present clinical trial aims to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of a topical anesthetic gel and cryotherapy in reducing pain perception during the administration of local anesthesia in dental patients. Aim: The aim of this study is to compare and evaluate of injection pain during administration of local anesthesia after topical anesthetic gel versus cryotherapy application. Objectives:
- To evaluate the injection pain during administration of local anesthesia after topical anesthetic gel versus cryotherapy application.
- To compare the injection pain during administration of local anesthesia after topical anesthetic gel versus cryotherapy application.
Primary Hypothesis: There is a significant difference between the injection pain during administration of local anesthesia after topical anesthetic gel versus cryotherapy application. Null Hpothesis: There is no significant difference between the injection pain during administration of local anesthesia after topical anesthetic gel versus cryotherapy application. Study design: Two arm, crossover controlled trial. Study Population: Patients visiting the Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics for endodntic treatment. Sample Size: the total sample size estimated was 17 per group. Group allocation: For patients requiring endodontic or restorative treatment involving two or more teeth, two separate pre-treatment protocols corresponding to their assigned group will be applied—one before anesthesia for each tooth. This approach will be adopted to optimize local anesthesia efficacy across multiple sites, ensuring adequate pain control during treatment of each tooth. The timing of each pre-treatment and injection will be standardized to maintain consistency and reduce variability in anesthetic effectiveness. Group A- Topical Anaesthetic gel. Group B- Cryotherapy. Pain assessment: Pain perception during the administration of local anesthesia will be assessed using a VAS scale. The VAS will consist of a 10 cm horizontal line, where 0 represents "no pain" and 10 represents the "worst imaginable pain." Each patient will be informed about the purpose and use of the scale prior to the procedure.
|