Title
Effect of Task-Oriented Client-Centered Training vs Conventional Rehabilitation on Functional Performance and Quality of Life in Patients with Spinal Cord Injury
Background
Spinal cord injury (SCI) disrupts motor and sensory function, resulting in significant disability. Most cases occur in males aged 20–35, primarily due to trauma. Injuries are classified as complete or incomplete using the AIS (American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale). SCI affects not only physical health but also emotional well-being and quality of life.
Rationale
Despite the prevalence of SCI, there’s a lack of robust randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examining the comparative effectiveness of task-oriented client-centered training versus conventional rehabilitation. This study aims to fill that gap by evaluating functional and quality of life outcomes.
Research Question
Does task-oriented client-centered training have a greater effect than conventional rehabilitation on functional performance and quality of life in patients with SCI?
Aim
To evaluate the effect of Task-oriented client-centered training on functional performance and quality of life in SCI patients.
Objectives
1. Assess effect of Task-oriented client-centered training and conventional rehab on functional performance.
2. Compare both interventions on performance and quality of life.
3. Assess and compare impact on quality of life using WHOQOL-BREF.
Hypotheses
Null: No significant differences exist between groups.
Alternative: Task-oriented client-centered training significantly improves outcomes compared to conventional rehab.
Study Design
Type: Randomized Controlled Trial
Period: June 2025 – July 2026
Location: Paraplegia Ward, PGIMS, Rohtak
Participants: 40 patients with SCI level T1 and below, AIS C/D
Groups:
Group A: Conventional Rehabilitation
Group B: Task-Oriented Client-Centered Training
Interventions
Conventional Rehab: ROM exercises, isometrics, stretching, breathing exercises, progressive strengthening over 4 weeks.
Task-oriented client-centered training:
Phase 1: Identify patient-specific goals using Goal Attainment Scale (GAS).
Phase 2: Task analysis and custom training plan.
Phase 3: Weekly structured training (part practice, whole practice, random practice).
Outcome Measures
1. SCIM IV (Functional Independence)
2. GAS (Goal Achievement)
3. WHOQOL-BREF (Quality of Life)
Sample Size
40 total (20 per group), based on power calculation from prior research (Singh et al.).
Data Analysis
Descriptive statistics via SPSS.
ANOVA to compare inter-group outcomes.
Review of Literature Highlights
Spooren et al. (2011): Task-oriented client-centered training improves upper limb skills in tetraplegia.
Chompoonimit et al. (2014, 2016): 8-week Task-oriented client-centered training improved physical function and self-esteem.
Choi et al. (2022): Task-oriented client-centered training benefits upper limb and ADL post-stroke.
Pelletier et al. (2023): SCI-specific exercise improves health but is under-address. |