Study Title: Effectiveness of Adjunct Supervised Pulmonary Tele-rehabilitation as Compared to Standard Treatment in the Management of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease at a Tertiary Care Hospital in Delhi: A Randomised Controlled Trial Rationale: Studies comparing facility based Pulmonary Rehabilitation (PR) with home-based Pulmonary Tele-rehabilitation (PTR) have demonstrated that COPD patients engaging in Pulmonary Tele-rehabilitation (PTR) experience similar improvements in walking capacity, respiratory symptoms, quality of life, physical fitness, and muscle strength. Thus, PTR holds considerable promise in bridging the access gap by addressing challenges related to transportation, cost, and mobility limitations, making it a compelling alternative to facility-based pulmonary rehabilitation for COPD management. [10,14-16] In India, PTR remains under-researched, with mainly review articles available. No study comparing PTR with standard COPD management in the Indian context was found. This study aims to fill that gap. Aim: To evaluate the effectiveness of supervised Pulmonary Tele-rehabilitation (PTR) for its potential integration into chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) management protocol as an adjunct to standard treatment. Primary objectives: 1. To assess the effect of supervised PTR as an adjunct to standard management on symptoms and functional abilities (changes in six-minute walk test (6MWT), 30-sec sit-to-stand test (30STS) and pulmonary function test) in newly diagnosed cases of COPD after 12 weeks of initiation of treatment in a tertiary care hospital in Delhi (intervention group). 2. To assess the effect of standard management on symptoms and functional abilities in newly diagnosed cases of COPD after 12 weeks of initiation of treatment (control group). Secondary objectives: 1. To compare the symptoms and functional abilities in the intervention and control groups after 12 weeks of initiation of treatment. 2. To compare the difference in quality of life in these two groups after 12 weeks of initiation of treatment. Study design: A Randomised Controlled trial Study period: August 2025 – November 2026 Study Setting: Community-based Place of Study: Catchment area of GTB Hospital, a tertiary care hospital in Delhi. Recruitment of participants would be done from OPD of Department of Respiratory Medicine, GTB Hospital. Study participants: Newly diagnosed COPD cases visiting the Respiratory Medicine Outpatient Department (OPD) at GTB Hospital. Sample size: The required sample size for the study was 128 participants (64 in each group). Accounting for a potential 10% dropout rate, the final adjusted sample size was calculated as 144 participants (72 in each group). Methods: A randomised controlled trial would be carried out to compare the effectiveness of PTR with standard management in newly diagnosed COPD patients attending the Respiratory Medicine Outpatient Department (OPD) at GTB Hospital. A total of 144 participants meeting the inclusion criteria will be recruited over a three-month period, with 72 participants allocated to each of the intervention and control groups using block randomisation. The intervention group will receive an initial in-person pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) session conducted by the investigator with the help of a physiotherapist specifically trained in PR in addition to the standard treatment and an educational e-booklet and instructional videos in Hindi language. Educational sessions as a part of PR covering key topics such as COPD management, benefits of PTR, lifestyle modification, nutrition, smoking cessation, inhalation techniques, and information with regard to recognition of early signs of exacerbation would also be provided to them. Participants will then undergo remotely supervised PTR sessions (50–60 minutes) via a web-based video conferencing platform, three times per week for the next 12 weeks. The control group participants will receive only standard treatment, initiated immediately upon diagnosis, without PTR. Symptoms of COPD, lung function and quality of life shall be assessed both at baseline and after 12 weeks of intervention. The study will compare both primary and secondary outcomes between the intervention and control groups to evaluate the effectiveness of Pulmonary Tele-rehabilitation (PTR) in the management of COPD. Primary outcome measures: 1. Difference in the mean COPD Assessment Test (CAT) scores in the intervention and control group at baseline and after 12 weeks of follow up. 2. Difference in the mean 6-min walk distance and 30-sec sit-to-stand test (30STS) in the two groups at baseline and after 12 weeks of follow up. 3. Difference in the mean FVC (Forced Vital Capacity), FEV1 (Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second) and FEV1/FVC values in the two groups at baseline and after 12 weeks of follow up. Secondary outcome measures 1. Difference in mean quality of life scores, assessed by EuroQol-5D-3L (EQ-5D-3L), in the intervention and control groups at baseline and after 12 weeks of follow up. Statistical analysis: Analysis will be done based both on Intention to Treat and Per Protocol principle. Continuous variables would be summarized using means and standard deviations. Categorical variables will be expressed as proportions. Between-group comparisons of continuous variables will be performed using independent t-tests, and categorical variables will be analysed using the chi-square test. A p-value < 0.05 will be considered statistically significant.
|