| CTRI Number |
CTRI/2025/08/093613 [Registered on: 25/08/2025] Trial Registered Prospectively |
| Last Modified On: |
23/08/2025 |
| Post Graduate Thesis |
No |
| Type of Trial |
Observational |
|
Type of Study
|
Cohort Study |
| Study Design |
Single Arm Study |
|
Public Title of Study
|
MEthods for LOcalization of Different types of breast lesions |
|
Scientific Title of Study
|
A prospective non-interventional multicenter cohort study to evaluate different imaging-guided methods for localization of malignant breast lesions |
| Trial Acronym |
|
|
Secondary IDs if Any
|
| Secondary ID |
Identifier |
| NCT05559411 |
ClinicalTrials.gov |
| NIL |
NIL |
|
|
Details of Principal Investigator or overall Trial Coordinator (multi-center study)
|
| Name |
Jyoutishman Saikia |
| Designation |
Assistant Professor |
| Affiliation |
AIIMS New Delhi |
| Address |
Room no 14, Ground floor, Academic Building, NCI AIIMS, Jhajjar-124105 HOD Office, Room no 231, IRCH Building, 2nd floor, AIIMS Ansari Nagar-110029 South DELHI 110029 India |
| Phone |
9612892050 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
jyoutishman@gmail.com |
|
Details of Contact Person Scientific Query
|
| Name |
Jyoutishman Saikia |
| Designation |
Assistant Professor |
| Affiliation |
AIIMS New Delhi |
| Address |
Room no 14, Ground floor, Academic Building, NCI AIIMS, Jhajjar-124105 HOD Office, Room no 231, IRCH Building, 2nd floor, AIIMS Ansari Nagar-110029 South DELHI 110029 India |
| Phone |
9612892050 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
jyoutishman@gmail.com |
|
Details of Contact Person Public Query
|
| Name |
Jyoutishman Saikia |
| Designation |
Assistant Professor |
| Affiliation |
AIIMS New Delhi |
| Address |
Room no 14, Ground floor, Academic Building, NCI AIIMS, Jhajjar-124105 HOD Office, Room no 231, IRCH Building, 2nd floor, AIIMS Ansari Nagar-110029 South DELHI 110029 India |
| Phone |
9612892050 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
jyoutishman@gmail.com |
|
|
Source of Monetary or Material Support
|
| All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi |
|
|
Primary Sponsor
|
| Name |
Nil |
| Address |
Nil |
| Type of Sponsor |
Other [Nil] |
|
|
Details of Secondary Sponsor
|
|
|
Countries of Recruitment
|
Argentina Egypt France Germany Greece India Israel Italy Pakistan Peru Poland Portugal South Africa |
|
Sites of Study
|
| No of Sites = 1 |
| Name of Principal
Investigator |
Name of Site |
Site Address |
Phone/Fax/Email |
| Dr Jyoutishman Saikia |
All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi |
Department of Surgical Oncology, NCI AIIMS New Delhi South DELHI |
9612892050
jyoutishman@gmail.com |
|
|
Details of Ethics Committee
|
| No of Ethics Committees= 1 |
| Name of Committee |
Approval Status |
| AIIMS Institute Ethics Committee |
Approved |
|
|
Regulatory Clearance Status from DCGI
|
|
|
Health Condition / Problems Studied
|
| Health Type |
Condition |
| Patients |
(1) ICD-10 Condition: R688||Other general symptoms and signs, |
|
|
Intervention / Comparator Agent
|
| Type |
Name |
Details |
| Intervention |
Nil |
Nil |
|
|
Inclusion Criteria
|
| Age From |
18.00 Year(s) |
| Age To |
70.00 Year(s) |
| Gender |
Female |
| Details |
1. Signed consent
2. Malignant breast lesion requiring breast-conserving surgery and imaging-guided
localization (either DCIS or invasive breast cancer; multiple or bilateral lesions and
the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy are allowed)
3. Planned surgical removal of the lesion using one or more of the following imaging guided
localization techniques (Wire, intraoperative USG, Dye, seed) |
|
| ExclusionCriteria |
| Details |
1. Patients not suitable for surgical treatment
2. Patients requiring mastectomy as first surgery
3. Surgical removal without imaging-guided localization |
|
|
Method of Generating Random Sequence
|
Not Applicable |
|
Method of Concealment
|
Not Applicable |
|
Blinding/Masking
|
Not Applicable |
|
Primary Outcome
|
| Outcome |
TimePoints |
1. Intended target lesion and/or marker removal, independent of margin status on final
histopathology
2. Negative resection margin rates (defined as lesion removal with no invasive or
non-invasive carcinoma on ink) at first surgery |
1. At Baseline before image-guided localisation
2. During Surgery
3. At 2 weeks after Surgery
4. At 4 weeks after Surgery |
|
|
Secondary Outcome
|
| Outcome |
TimePoints |
- Rates of second surgery, mastectomy, resection ratio, marker dislocation rates
- Volume and weight of resected tissue
- Impact of experience of study sites on other outcome measures, depending on the
localization technique used
- Impact of self-reported ethnicity on other outcome measures
- Evaluation of surgical standards of care in different countries
- Evaluation of economic resources required for different localization techniques
(material costs, operative time etc.)
- Evaluation of MRI artifacts
- Evaluation of complication rates related to marker placement
- Evaluation of perioperative complication rates |
post surgry 3monthly for 1 year |
|
|
Target Sample Size
|
Total Sample Size="500" Sample Size from India="30"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (Total)= "Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (India)="Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials" |
|
Phase of Trial
|
N/A |
|
Date of First Enrollment (India)
|
05/09/2025 |
| Date of Study Completion (India) |
Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials |
| Date of First Enrollment (Global) |
05/09/2025 |
| Date of Study Completion (Global) |
Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials |
|
Estimated Duration of Trial
|
Years="1" Months="0" Days="0" |
|
Recruitment Status of Trial (Global)
|
Not Yet Recruiting |
| Recruitment Status of Trial (India) |
Not Yet Recruiting |
|
Publication Details
|
N/A |
|
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement
|
Will individual participant data (IPD) be shared publicly (including data dictionaries)?
Response - NO
|
|
Brief Summary
|
This is a multivcentre international observational study. The aim of the proposed study is to comparatively evaluate different imaging-guided localization methods used for surgical removal of non-palpable malignant breast lesions with regard to oncological safety and patient-reported outcomes. |