FULL DETAILS (Read-only)  -> Click Here to Create PDF for Current Dataset of Trial
CTRI Number  CTRI/2025/09/095087 [Registered on: 19/09/2025] Trial Registered Prospectively
Last Modified On: 18/09/2025
Post Graduate Thesis  Yes 
Type of Trial  Interventional 
Type of Study   Dentistry 
Study Design  Randomized, Parallel Group Trial 
Public Title of Study   Study on using special barriers to prevent filling material from going beyond the root in children’s resorbing back teeth. 
Scientific Title of Study   Assessment of the Efficacy of Apical Barrier Technique in Preventing the Extrusion of Obturating Material Using Resorbable Collagen Plug and Modified Suture Apical Matrix in Primary Mandibular Molar Undergoing Resorption-A Randomised Controlled Trial 
Trial Acronym  NIL 
Secondary IDs if Any  
Secondary ID  Identifier 
NIL  NIL 
 
Details of Principal Investigator or overall Trial Coordinator (multi-center study)  
Name  Risana Jasmin V P 
Designation  Junior resident 
Affiliation  Government Dental College ,Kozhikode 
Address  Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Room no.28,2nd Floor, Government Dental College ,Government Medical College, Kozhikode.

Kozhikode
KERALA
673008
India 
Phone  9961210439  
Fax    
Email  risanajasmin96@gmail.com  
 
Details of Contact Person
Scientific Query
 
Name  Dr Madhu S 
Designation  Head of the department 
Affiliation  Government Dental College ,Kozhikode 
Address  Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Room no.28,2nd Floor, Government Dental College ,Government Medical College, Kozhikode.

Kozhikode
KERALA
673008
India 
Phone  9447775435  
Fax    
Email  madhupedo@gmail.com  
 
Details of Contact Person
Public Query
 
Name  Risana Jasmin V P 
Designation  Junior resident 
Affiliation  Government Dental College ,Kozhikode 
Address  Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Room no.28,2nd Floor, Government Dental College ,Government Medical College, Kozhikode.

Kozhikode
KERALA
673008
India 
Phone  9961210439  
Fax    
Email  risanajasmin96@gmail.com  
 
Source of Monetary or Material Support  
Government Dental College, Government Medical College, Kozhikode, 673008 
 
Primary Sponsor  
Name  Risana Jasmin V P 
Address  Government Dental College,Government Medical College,Kozhikode,673008 
Type of Sponsor  Other [Self] 
 
Details of Secondary Sponsor  
Name  Address 
NIL  NIL 
 
Countries of Recruitment     India  
Sites of Study  
No of Sites = 1  
Name of Principal Investigator  Name of Site  Site Address  Phone/Fax/Email 
Dr Risana Jasmin V P  Government Dental College,Kozhikode  Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Room no.28,2nd Floor, Government Dental College ,Government Medical College, Kozhikode. Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Room no.28,2nd Floor, Government Dental College ,Government Medical College, Kozhikode.
Kozhikode
KERALA 
9961210439

risanajasmin96@gmail.com 
 
Details of Ethics Committee  
No of Ethics Committees= 1  
Name of Committee  Approval Status 
INSTITUITIONAL ETHICS COMMITTEE ,GOVERNMENT DENTAL COLLEGE ,KOZHIKODE  Approved 
 
Regulatory Clearance Status from DCGI  
Status 
Not Applicable 
 
Health Condition / Problems Studied  
Health Type  Condition 
Healthy Human Volunteers  Healthy patients requiring root canal therapy in primary mandibular molar teeth. 
Patients  (1) ICD-10 Condition: K040||Pulpitis,  
 
Intervention / Comparator Agent  
Type  Name  Details 
Intervention  Group 1:Obturated with resorbable collagen plug as apical barrier. Group 2:Obturated with resorbable suture matrix as apical barrier.  Immediately after obturation 1.Apical extrusion of obturating material – assessed radiographically. 2.Radiographic success (baseline) – immediate postoperative radiograph. 3.Time taken for obturation – measured in minutes. At 3 months follow-up 4. Clinical success – evaluated based on absence of pain, swelling, sinus tract, tenderness, or abnormal mobility. At 6 months follow-up 5. Radiographic success – absence of periapical/furcal radiolucency, no pathological resorption, evidence of normal healing. 6. Clinical success – continued absence of symptoms and signs of pathology. 
Comparator Agent  Group 3: Obturated with conventional technique without apical barrier  Immediately after obturation 1.Apical extrusion of obturating material – assessed radiographically. 2.Radiographic success (baseline) – immediate postoperative radiograph. 3.Time taken for obturation – measured in minutes. At 3 months follow-up 4. Clinical success – evaluated based on absence of pain, swelling, sinus tract, tenderness, or abnormal mobility. At 6 months follow-up 5. Radiographic success – absence of periapical/furcal radiolucency, no pathological resorption, evidence of normal healing. 6. Clinical success – continued absence of symptoms and signs of pathology. 
 
Inclusion Criteria  
Age From  7.00 Year(s)
Age To  10.00 Year(s)
Gender  Both 
Details  1.7-10 year old children whose mandibular primary molar with irreversible pulpitis indicated for pulpectomy.
2.Primary mandibular molars with at least two-thirds of the root length reamaining.
3.Patients exhibiting Frankels positive or definitely positive behavior.
 
 
ExclusionCriteria 
Details  1.Non-restorable teeth.
2.Radiographic evidence of severe external or internal pathological resorption.
3.Peri-radicular radiolucencies involving the permanent tooth follicle.
4.Primary mandibular molars with preoperative radiographs showing extreme positioning (mesial/distal) of the permanent tooth bud.
5.Teeth with no radiographic resorption.
6.Dentition with congenitally missing permanent tooth buds.
7.Uncooperative during treatment after initially being cooperative.
8.Tooth with perforation of the pulpal floor.
9.Extreme tooth mobility.
10.Presence of dentigerous or follicular cyst.
11.Differently abled children and childrens with systemic disease.
 
 
Method of Generating Random Sequence   Permuted block randomization, fixed 
Method of Concealment   Sequentially numbered, sealed, opaque envelopes 
Blinding/Masking   Participant and Outcome Assessor Blinded 
Primary Outcome  
Outcome  TimePoints 
1.APICAL EXTRUSION:Efficacy of different apical barriers in preventing apical extrusion of obturating materials in deciduous tooth pulpectomies
 
1.Apical extrusion assessed using radiograph immediately after obturation.
 
 
Secondary Outcome  
Outcome  TimePoints 
1.Radiographic Success
2.Clinical Success
3.Time taken for obturation in minute. 
1.Radiographic success immediately & 6 months after obturation
2.Clinical success at 3 month & 6 month after obturation
3.Time taken for obturation in minute. 
 
Target Sample Size   Total Sample Size="225"
Sample Size from India="225" 
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (Total)= "Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (India)="Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials" 
Phase of Trial   Phase 2/ Phase 3 
Date of First Enrollment (India)   30/09/2025 
Date of Study Completion (India) Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials 
Date of First Enrollment (Global)  Date Missing 
Date of Study Completion (Global) Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials 
Estimated Duration of Trial   Years="1"
Months="6"
Days="0" 
Recruitment Status of Trial (Global)   Not Applicable 
Recruitment Status of Trial (India)  Not Yet Recruiting 
Publication Details   N/A 
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement

Will individual participant data (IPD) be shared publicly (including data dictionaries)?  

Response - NO
Brief Summary  

Assessment of the efficacy of apical barrier technique in preventing the extrusion of obturating material using resorbable collagen plug and modified suture apical matrix in primary mandibular molar undergoing resorption- A randomized controlled trial.

Pulp therapy in primary teeth, particularly in resorbing mandibular molars, is often complicated by apical extrusion of obturating material due to open apices and physiological root resorption. Extrusion may result in postoperative complications such as inflammation, pain, or damage to the underlying permanent tooth bud.

 Effective apical barriers are needed to prevent this while maintaining biocompatibility and resorbability suitable for primary dentition.This study assess the efficacy of different resorbable apical barriers in preventing apical extrusion of obturation materials in deciduous tooth pulpectomies. 

         The groups are Group A: Resorbable collagen plug as apical barrier. Group B: Modified suture apical matrix as apical barrier. Group C (Control): Conventional obturation without apical barrier.
Sample size of the study is 225 root canals and the study period is 1.5 years.
         Primary objective is to compare the radiographic assessment of apical extrusion of obturating material using three different techniques. 
         Secondary objective is to compare the radiographic success of obturation using these three techniques immediately and 6 month interval. To assess the clinical success of obturation using these three techniques 3month and 6 month interval. To compare the time taken for obturation using these three technique.
         The null hypothesis state that there is no significant difference in the apical extrusion of obturating material in resorbing primary mandibular molars with apical barrier technique using resorbable collagen plug or modified suture apical matrix and the conventional method of obturation without the use of an apical barrier.
The following clinical outcomes are assessed-
     Presence of apical extrusion of obturation material , Quality of obturation (radiographic), radiographic success immediately and 6 months after obturation, Clinical success of obturation in 3 and 6 months and finally Time taken for obturation using stopwatch.
 
Close