| CTRI Number |
CTRI/2025/07/091496 [Registered on: 23/07/2025] Trial Registered Prospectively |
| Last Modified On: |
21/07/2025 |
| Post Graduate Thesis |
Yes |
| Type of Trial |
Observational |
|
Type of Study
|
Prospective Study |
| Study Design |
Other |
|
Public Title of Study
|
Comparing Robotic and Laparoscopic Surgery for Removing the Uterus in Non-Cancerous Conditions : A Study of Patient Outcomes.
The research compares the following between laparoscopic and robotic hysterectomy :
- Surgical outcomes (like complication rates, hospital stay)
- Cost |
|
Scientific Title of Study
|
Robotic versus laparoscopic hysterectomy
Comparison of perioperative outcomes in benign gynecological diseases |
| Trial Acronym |
Nil |
|
Secondary IDs if Any
|
| Secondary ID |
Identifier |
| NIL |
NIL |
|
|
Details of Principal Investigator or overall Trial Coordinator (multi-center study)
|
| Name |
Dr Soofia Jamal |
| Designation |
Secondary DNB Resident |
| Affiliation |
|
| Address |
Department of obstetrics and gynecology, Max Smart super speciality hospital, Saket, New Delhi
South DELHI 110017 India |
| Phone |
7500608933 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
soofiajamal20@gmail.com |
|
Details of Contact Person Scientific Query
|
| Name |
Dr Manju Khemani |
| Designation |
PRINICPAL DIRECTOR AND CONSULTANT |
| Affiliation |
|
| Address |
G1 OPD, Department of obstetrics & gynecology, Max Smart Hospital, Saket, New Delhi
South DELHI 110017 India |
| Phone |
9810611598 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
manju.khemani@maxhealthcare.com |
|
Details of Contact Person Public Query
|
| Name |
Dr Soofia Jamal |
| Designation |
MBBS, DGO, Secondary DNB Resident |
| Affiliation |
Max Smart, Saket, New Delhi |
| Address |
G1, Department of obstetrics & gynecology, Max Smart super speciality hospital, Saket, New Delhi
South DELHI 110017 India |
| Phone |
7500608933 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
soofiajamal20@gmail.com |
|
|
Source of Monetary or Material Support
|
|
|
Primary Sponsor
|
| Name |
Max Smart |
| Address |
Max Smart Superspeciality Hospital, Saket, New Delhi |
| Type of Sponsor |
Private hospital/clinic |
|
|
Details of Secondary Sponsor
|
|
|
Countries of Recruitment
|
India |
|
Sites of Study
|
| No of Sites = 1 |
| Name of Principal
Investigator |
Name of Site |
Site Address |
Phone/Fax/Email |
| Dr Soofia Jamal |
Max Smart super speciality Hospital |
Room number G1, Department of obstetrics and gynecology South DELHI |
7500608933
soofiajamal20@gmail.com |
|
|
Details of Ethics Committee
|
| No of Ethics Committees= 1 |
| Name of Committee |
Approval Status |
| Max Healthcare Ethics Committee |
Approved |
|
|
Regulatory Clearance Status from DCGI
|
|
|
Health Condition / Problems Studied
|
| Health Type |
Condition |
| Patients |
(1) ICD-10 Condition: N889||Noninflammatory disorder of cervixuteri, unspecified, |
|
|
Intervention / Comparator Agent
|
| Type |
Name |
Details |
| Intervention |
Nil |
Nil |
|
|
Inclusion Criteria
|
| Age From |
40.00 Year(s) |
| Age To |
89.00 Year(s) |
| Gender |
Female |
| Details |
All the patients above the age of 40 years undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy or robotic hysterectomy for benign gynecological diseases and willing to be a part of the study will be included. |
|
| ExclusionCriteria |
| Details |
- The patient who are not willing to be a part of the study will be excluded.
- Patients with malignant gynecological disease
- Patient undergoing additional surgeries like cholecystectomy, breast surgery.
- Patients with coagulation disorders
- Patients with severe endometriosis (stage 3 and 4)
|
|
|
Method of Generating Random Sequence
|
Not Applicable |
|
Method of Concealment
|
Not Applicable |
|
Blinding/Masking
|
Not Applicable |
|
Primary Outcome
|
| Outcome |
TimePoints |
To compare early surgical outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic hysterectomy.
To compare following between robotic and laparoscopic hysterectomy
- Intra operative complications
- Conversion to open surgery
- Estimated blood loss
- Post operative pain as per visual analogue scale and need for extra analgesics
- First gas discharge
- Hospital stay |
8 months |
|
|
Secondary Outcome
|
| Outcome |
TimePoints |
| Nil |
Nil |
|
|
Target Sample Size
|
Total Sample Size="102" Sample Size from India="102"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (Total)= "Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (India)="Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials" |
|
Phase of Trial
|
N/A |
|
Date of First Enrollment (India)
|
01/08/2025 |
| Date of Study Completion (India) |
Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials |
| Date of First Enrollment (Global) |
Date Missing |
| Date of Study Completion (Global) |
Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials |
|
Estimated Duration of Trial
|
Years="0" Months="8" Days="0" |
|
Recruitment Status of Trial (Global)
|
Not Applicable |
| Recruitment Status of Trial (India) |
Not Yet Recruiting |
|
Publication Details
|
N/A |
|
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement
|
Will individual participant data (IPD) be shared publicly (including data dictionaries)?
Response - YES
- What data in particular will be shared?
Response (Others) -
- What additional supporting information will be shared?
Response - Study Protocol Response - Statistical Analysis Plan Response - Informed Consent Form Response (Others) -
- Who will be able to view these files?
Response - Researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal.
- For what types of analyses will this data be available?
Response - To achieve aims in the approved proposal.
- By what mechanism will data be made available?
Response (Others) -
- For how long will this data be available start date provided 01-05-2026 and end date provided 01-01-2029?
Response - Immediately following publication. No end date.
- Any URL or additional information regarding plan/policy for sharing IPD?
Additional Information - NIL
|
|
Brief Summary
|
Hysterectomy is one of the commonest gynecological procedure done for benign conditions apart from malignant conditions. There is rising trend of minimally invasive surgeries worldwide. Robotic hysterectomy can be safely performed and has perioperative outcomes equivalent to Laparoscopic hysterectomy and superior to Total Abdominal hysterectomy. Robotic hysterectomy is an alternative tool for minimally invasive hysterectomy. However there is a relative dearth of Indian literature with regard to this modality. More studies are required to assess patient safety and identify specific sub groups who would benefit from robotic approach. |