Title:- Phase 2, randomized, investigator-initiated clinical study of Toripalimab plus chemotherapy versus placebo plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment in participants with HER2 negative, previously untreated, unresectable or metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (TORCH-GO) Principle Investigator - Dr Vikas S Ostwal: Study Site- Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai Summary The TORCH-GO study is a Phase 2, randomized, investigator-initiated, non-comparative clinical trial investigating the efficacy of Toripalimab combined with chemotherapy versus a placebo with chemotherapy as a first-line treatment for previously untreated HER2 negative, unresectable, or metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma.
The rationale for the study is supported by evidence showing improved outcomes in advanced cancers treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors like Toripalimab. The trial targets PD-L1 positive patients (CPS equal to or more than 10) and those with microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) tumour status, hypothesizing that these groups are likely to benefit the most from the combination therapy.
The primary aim of the TORCH-GO study is to assess the efficacy of Toripalimab and chemotherapy versus a placebo combined with chemotherapy in terms of progression-free survival in patients with previously untreated HER2 negative, unresectable, or metastatic gastric or GEJ adenocarcinoma.
Inclusion criteria focus on participants with confirmed diagnoses, PD-L1 expression, HER2 negative status, and specific age and performance status benchmarks, while exclusion criteria highlight recent treatments, specific health conditions, and pregnancy Inclusion Criteria: Participants must have a confirmed diagnosis of locally advanced unresectable or metastatic gastric/GEJ adenocarcinoma, PD-L1 CPS more than or equal to 10, HER2 negative status, an ECOG performance status of 0 or 1, and measurable disease according to RECIST 1.1 criteria. Exclusion Criteria: This includes prior treatment for the disease, certain health conditions, and significant recent surgeries or infections. Primary Objective Progression-Free Survival (PFS): To assess the progression-free survival at 12 months in participants receiving Toripalimab plus chemotherapy versus those receiving a placebo plus chemotherapy. Secondary Objectives Overall Survival (OS): To evaluate overall survival at 12 months. Objective Response Rate (OR): To determine the objective response rate at 6 months. Duration of Response (DOR): To assess the duration that patients maintain a response after treatment. Quality of Life (QoL): To evaluate the impact of the treatment on patients’ quality of life. Adverse Events (AEs): To monitor and record adverse events experienced by participants during the trial
Study Design: The trial is a Phase II, randomized, double-blinded study comparing Toripalimab plus CAPOX chemotherapy against a placebo plus CAPOX.
Total Participants: The study aims to enroll 190 patients, with 95 in each arm over a span of two years for recruitment, followed by one year of follow-up. Treatment Arms: Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two arms: Arm A: Toripalimab plus CAPOX (capecitabine and oxaliplatin). Arm B: Placebo plus CAPOX Randomization: Patients are randomized in a 1:1 ratio while stratifying based on PD-L1 status and MSI status, ensuring balanced groups. Treatment Administration Group ARM A:- Toripalimab dose 240 mg on Day 1 of each cycle Q3W given intravenouly ARM B:- Placebo Day 1 of each cycle Q3W administred intravenously with same method as Toripalimab Backbone Chemotherapy CAPOX Oxaliplatin- dose 130 mg/m2 on Day 1 of each cycle Q3W administered intraveously with capecitabine dose of 1000 mg/m2 twice daily on Days 1 to 14 of each cycle Q3W given orally
Study Followups-
A. Safety Follow-up: Timing: 30 days after the last dose of treatment. Purpose: To monitor participants for any adverse events (AEs) following the end of their treatment regimen to ensure patient safety and assess any ongoing side effects related to the treatment. B.Efficacy Follow-up: Timing: Every 9-12 weeks after the last dose of treatment. Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness of the treatment by assessing the participants’ response to therapy through regular imaging and clinical evaluations. C. Survival Follow-up:Timing: Every 12 weeks through telephone contact. Purpose: To gather information on overall survival and any changes in the participant’s health status, including disease progression or new treatment options post-trial. 2. Imaging and Disease Status Assessment Participants who discontinue treatment for reasons other than progression of the disease will have post-treatment follow-up imaging conducted to monitor their disease status until any of the conditions for discontinuation are met. 3. Duration of Follow-up Participants will continue to be followed for overall survival until one of the following conditions occurs: · The participant passes away. · The participant withdraws their consent to participate in the study. · The end of the study period. 4. Additional Follow-up Procedures After achieving the study objectives, participants may be enrolled in extension studies to continue protocol-defined assessments and treatment, ensuring that data is gathered even after the main study is concluded. Ethical considerations:- General ethics for the conduct of the study- Study will be conducted in compliance with the ICMR Statement on Human Experimentation, and the Declaration of Helsinki principles. Declaration of Helsinki The trial will be performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, as decided upon by the 18th World Medical Assembly, Helsinki, Finland, June 1964 (amended by subsequent World Medical Assembly Somerset West, South Africa, October 1996,). |