FULL DETAILS (Read-only)  -> Click Here to Create PDF for Current Dataset of Trial
CTRI Number  CTRI/2025/02/080519 [Registered on: 13/02/2025] Trial Registered Prospectively
Last Modified On: 06/02/2025
Post Graduate Thesis  No 
Type of Trial  Interventional 
Type of Study   Dentistry 
Study Design  Randomized, Parallel Group Trial 
Public Title of Study   Hydrophilic versus Hydrophobic Dental Sealants in preventing dental caries 
Scientific Title of Study   Comparative evaluation of Hydrophilic and Hydrophobic Dental Sealants in preventing dental caries among 6–12-year-old school children: A split mouth randomized controlled trial 
Trial Acronym  NIL 
Secondary IDs if Any  
Secondary ID  Identifier 
NIL  NIL 
 
Details of Principal Investigator or overall Trial Coordinator (multi-center study)  
Name  Dr Bhavna Sabbarwal 
Designation  Associate Professor 
Affiliation  Post graduate Institute of Dental Sciences, Pt BD Sharma University 
Address  Department of Public Health Dentistry, PGIDS, Rohtak

Rohtak
HARYANA
124001
India 
Phone  09466857242  
Fax    
Email  bhavnasabbarwal@gmail.com  
 
Details of Contact Person
Scientific Query
 
Name  Dr Bhavna Sabbarwal 
Designation  Associate Professor 
Affiliation  Post graduate Institute of Dental Sciences, Pt BD Sharma University 
Address  Department of Public Health Dentistry, PGIDS, Rohtak

Rohtak
HARYANA
124001
India 
Phone  09466857242  
Fax    
Email  bhavnasabbarwal@gmail.com  
 
Details of Contact Person
Public Query
 
Name  Dr Bhavna Sabbarwal 
Designation  Associate Professor 
Affiliation  Post graduate Institute of Dental Sciences, Pt BD Sharma University 
Address  Department of Public Health Dentistry, PGIDS, Rohtak

Rohtak
HARYANA
124001
India 
Phone  09466857242  
Fax    
Email  bhavnasabbarwal@gmail.com  
 
Source of Monetary or Material Support  
Pt. BD Sharma University of Health Sciences, Rohtak, Haryana, India. Pin code- 124001  
 
Primary Sponsor  
Name  Dr Bhavna Sabbarwal 
Address  Department of Public Health Dentistry, Postgraduate institute of Dental Sciences, Rohtak, Haryana, India- 124001 
Type of Sponsor  Other [Primary investigator] 
 
Details of Secondary Sponsor  
Name  Address 
NIL  NIL 
 
Countries of Recruitment     India  
Sites of Study  
No of Sites = 1  
Name of Principal Investigator  Name of Site  Site Address  Phone/Fax/Email 
Dr Bhavna Sabbarwal  department of public health dentistry   Room number 14, postgraduate institute of dental sciences, Rohtak, Haryana
Rohtak
HARYANA 
9466857242

bhavnasabbarwal@gmail.com 
 
Details of Ethics Committee  
No of Ethics Committees= 1  
Name of Committee  Approval Status 
BIOMEDICAL AND HEALTH RESEARCH ETHICS COMMITTEE, PGIDS, ROHTAK  Approved 
 
Regulatory Clearance Status from DCGI  
Status 
Not Applicable 
 
Health Condition / Problems Studied  
Health Type  Condition 
Healthy Human Volunteers  Deep Pits and Fissure on occlusal surface of posterior molars 
 
Intervention / Comparator Agent  
Type  Name  Details 
Intervention  Hydrophillic sealant  UltraSeal XT hydro hydrophilic pit and fissure sealant is a light-cured, radiopaque, fluoride-releasing composite sealant. It is stronger and more wear resistant because it is a 53%-filled resin and has less polymerization shrinkage than competitive products. 
Comparator Agent  Hydrophobic sealant   Clinpro is an unfilled, bis-GMA-containing sealant. It is a visible light cure and fluoride-releasing pink sealant, which changes to white colour after polymerization. 
 
Inclusion Criteria  
Age From  6.00 Year(s)
Age To  12.00 Year(s)
Gender  Both 
Details  Completely erupted first permanent molars with deep pits and fissures which are either caries free or exhibiting incipient non cavitated enamel lesion in the pit & fissure system and without any restoration on any of the tooth surface will be included in the study
 
 
ExclusionCriteria 
Details  Children with hypoplastic first permanent molars or developmental anomalies will be excluded from the study 
 
Method of Generating Random Sequence   Computer generated randomization 
Method of Concealment   Sequentially numbered, sealed, opaque envelopes 
Blinding/Masking   Participant and Investigator Blinded 
Primary Outcome  
Outcome  TimePoints 
retention of pit and fissure sealants more than 50 percent fissure coverage  at 1 month and 6 months 
 
Secondary Outcome  
Outcome  TimePoints 
Assessment of caries risk through AAPD criteria  at 1 month and 6 months 
 
Target Sample Size   Total Sample Size="82"
Sample Size from India="82" 
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (Total)= "Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (India)="Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials" 
Phase of Trial   N/A 
Date of First Enrollment (India)   28/02/2025 
Date of Study Completion (India) Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials 
Date of First Enrollment (Global)  Date Missing 
Date of Study Completion (Global) Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials 
Estimated Duration of Trial   Years="0"
Months="6"
Days="0" 
Recruitment Status of Trial (Global)   Not Yet Recruiting 
Recruitment Status of Trial (India)  Not Yet Recruiting 
Publication Details   N/A 
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement

Will individual participant data (IPD) be shared publicly (including data dictionaries)?  

Response - NO
Brief Summary  
Background: Pit and fissure caries are challenging to deal with as the area is neither self cleaning nor accessible to conventional methods of tooth cleaning. Hence we need a good preventive measure to avoid the onset of caries in first place. Pit and fissure sealants are one such option.
Rationale: Conventional pit and fissure sealants are hydrophobic and cannot be applied where there are problems of moisture control. So isolation is mandatory for them. Hence hydrophilic sealants provide a hope to overcome the limitation.
Objectives: To assess the effectiveness of hydrophilic vs hydrophobic dentals in preventing dental caries.
Methods: It will be a split mouth randomized controlled trial among 6-14 year school children. One group will receive hydrophilic sealant and the other will receive hydrophobic one. Follow up will be done at 1, 6 and 18 months. Suitable descriptive and inferential statistics will be applied.
Expected outcome: We are expecting better retention with hydrophilic sealant material compared to hydrobhobic but no difference in cariostatic effect and discoloration. So that hydrophilic material can be recommended for newly erupted teeth that were left unsealed due to problem of moisture control among children.
 
Close