| CTRI Number |
CTRI/2025/02/080584 [Registered on: 14/02/2025] Trial Registered Prospectively |
| Last Modified On: |
13/02/2025 |
| Post Graduate Thesis |
No |
| Type of Trial |
Interventional |
|
Type of Study
|
Drug |
| Study Design |
Randomized, Parallel Group Trial |
|
Public Title of Study
|
A Study Comparing Two Treatment Methods for Women with Low Ovarian Reserve Who Struggle to Respond to IVF, to See Which One Works Better |
|
Scientific Title of Study
|
Comparing IVF Outcomes of Progestin Primed Ovarian stimulation(PPOS) with Ultrashort flare(USF)GnRH Agonist in Expected Poor responders(POSEIDON 3,4)-A Multicentric Randomised controlled Trail |
| Trial Acronym |
NIL |
|
Secondary IDs if Any
|
| Secondary ID |
Identifier |
| NIL |
NIL |
|
|
Details of Principal Investigator or overall Trial Coordinator (multi-center study)
|
| Name |
POOJITHA CH |
| Designation |
FNB FELLOW |
| Affiliation |
OASIS Fertility hospital -unit of Sadguru healthcare services pvt.Ltd, HYDERABAD |
| Address |
No. 8-2-269/3/1/4, Road No. 2, near NATCO Pharma, Park View Enclave, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad, Telangana 500034
Hyderabad TELANGANA 500034 India |
| Phone |
08897262122 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
chalamalasettypoojitha@gmail.com |
|
Details of Contact Person Scientific Query
|
| Name |
DrKrishna chaitanya |
| Designation |
Scientific head and HOD department of embryology |
| Affiliation |
OASIS Fertility hospital -unit of Sadguru healthcare services pvt.Ltd, HYDERABAD |
| Address |
No. 8-2-269/3/1/4, Road No. 2, near NATCO Pharma, Park View Enclave, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad, Telangana 500034
Hyderabad TELANGANA 500034 India |
| Phone |
8008812999 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
quality@oasisindia.in |
|
Details of Contact Person Public Query
|
| Name |
DrKrishna chaitanya |
| Designation |
Scientific head and HOD department of embryology |
| Affiliation |
OASIS Fertility hospital -unit of Sadguru healthcare services pvt.Ltd, HYDERABAD |
| Address |
No. 8-2-269/3/1/4, Road No. 2, near NATCO Pharma, Park View Enclave, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad, Telangana 500034
Hyderabad TELANGANA 500034 India |
| Phone |
8008812999 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
quality@oasisindia.in |
|
|
Source of Monetary or Material Support
|
| Oasis Fertility Centre
No. 8-2-269/3/1/4, Road No. 2,
Near NATCO Pharma, Park View Enclave,
Banjara Hills, Hyderabad, Telangana 500034 |
|
|
Primary Sponsor
|
| Name |
Oasis Fertility Centre |
| Address |
No. 8-2-269/3/1/4, Road No. 2,
Near NATCO Pharma, Park View Enclave,
Banjara Hills, Hyderabad, Telangana 500034 |
| Type of Sponsor |
Research institution and hospital |
|
|
Details of Secondary Sponsor
|
|
|
Countries of Recruitment
|
India |
|
Sites of Study
|
| No of Sites = 3 |
| Name of Principal
Investigator |
Name of Site |
Site Address |
Phone/Fax/Email |
| Dr Poojithach |
Oasis Fertility Centre |
No. 8-2-269/3/1/4, Road No. 2,
Near NATCO Pharma, Park View Enclave,
Banjara Hills, Hyderabad, Telangana 500034.
Hyderabad TELANGANA |
08897262122
chalamalasettypoojitha@gmail.com |
| Dr Poojithach |
Oasis Fertility Centre |
Oxford Street, Sarojini Devi Road 2nd Floor CVK Park Square, Krishna Complex, Kalasiguda, Secunderabad, Telangana 500003. Hyderabad TELANGANA |
08897262122
chalamalasettypoojitha@gmail.com |
| Dr Poojithach |
Oasis Fertility Centre |
2nd & 3rd Floor, 16-2-741/29 & 57, NH 65, Bank Colony, New Malakpet,Dilsukhnagar,Hyderabad, Telangana 500036 Hyderabad TELANGANA |
08897262122
chalamalasettypoojitha@gmail.com |
|
|
Details of Ethics Committee
|
| No of Ethics Committees= 1 |
| Name of Committee |
Approval Status |
| Oasis Ethics Committee |
Approved |
|
|
Regulatory Clearance Status from DCGI
|
|
|
Health Condition / Problems Studied
|
| Health Type |
Condition |
| Patients |
(1) ICD-10 Condition: O090||Supervision of pregnancy with history of infertility, |
|
|
Intervention / Comparator Agent
|
| Type |
Name |
Details |
| Intervention |
Progestin primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) |
T.Medroxy progesterone acetate 10 mg once daily orally along with gonadotrophins from D2 of menstrual cycle (maximum dose 375 IU of HP HMG +- r FSH /r FSH + r LH per day ). When two or more follicles reaches 18 mm, dual trigger was given,medroxyprogesterone acetate tablet stopped,followed by transvaginal oocyte retrieval at 35-36 hours. ICSI was done followed by elective cryopreservation and frozen embryo transfer and bHCG after 2 weeks followed for 3 months if bHCG positive . |
| Comparator Agent |
Ultrashort flare GnRH agonist protocol (USF) |
Inj Lupride 1 mg s.c will be given for four days from D1/D2 of menstrual cycle along with gonadotropins from D2/D3 of menstrual cycle (maximum dose 375 IU of HP HMG +- r FSH /r FSH + r LH per day ) Inj cetrotide 0.25 mg s.c/day was added when follicle crosses 14 mm and when two or more follicles reaches 18 mm, dual trigger was given .Transvaginal oocyte retrieval at 35-36 hours. ICSI was done followed by elective cryopreservation and frozen embryo transfer bHCG after 2 weeks followed for 3 months if bHCG positive . |
|
|
Inclusion Criteria
|
| Age From |
21.00 Year(s) |
| Age To |
50.00 Year(s) |
| Gender |
Female |
| Details |
Expected Poor responders as defined by POSEIDON criteria (Groups 3-4).
Freeze all cycles |
|
| ExclusionCriteria |
| Details |
Women with any current or past diseases affecting ovaries
Hypogonadotrophic hypogonadism
Premature ovarian insufficiency |
|
|
Method of Generating Random Sequence
|
Permuted block randomization, fixed |
|
Method of Concealment
|
On-site computer system |
|
Blinding/Masking
|
Outcome Assessor Blinded |
|
Primary Outcome
|
| Outcome |
TimePoints |
| Oocyte Retrieval Rate,Maturation rate ,Fertilization rate, ,blastulation rate . |
Till 1 year |
|
|
Secondary Outcome
|
| Outcome |
TimePoints |
| days of stimulation ,Total gonadotropin dosage ,cycle cancellation rate , Follicular output rate(FORT) ,Follicle to oocyte index(FOI ),Implantation rate (IR),Biochemical pregnancy(BPR),Clinical pregnancy rate (CPR),Miscarriage rate (MR),Multiple pregnancy rate (MPR) ,Utilization rate |
From time of recruitment till three to four months |
|
|
Target Sample Size
|
Total Sample Size="220" Sample Size from India="220"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (Total)= "0"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (India)="0" |
|
Phase of Trial
|
Phase 3 |
|
Date of First Enrollment (India)
|
24/02/2025 |
| Date of Study Completion (India) |
21/11/2025 |
| Date of First Enrollment (Global) |
Date Missing |
| Date of Study Completion (Global) |
Date Missing |
|
Estimated Duration of Trial
|
Years="1" Months="0" Days="0" |
|
Recruitment Status of Trial (Global)
|
Not Applicable |
| Recruitment Status of Trial (India) |
Completed |
|
Publication Details
|
N/A |
|
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement
|
Will individual participant data (IPD) be shared publicly (including data dictionaries)?
Response - NO
|
|
Brief Summary
|
Poor responders constitute approximately 47% of assisted reproductive technology (ART) patients. With the increasing delay in childbearing, POSEIDON group 4 seems to increase constituting more than 50% of the total POSEIDON population, whereas group 3 patients constitute approximately 10%(1). Inspite of various treatment options available, there are lack of good quality studies to suggest the stimulation protocol for better results in women with poor ovarian reserve .Also ,need for multiple stimulations for pooling up of embryos also make cost as concern. The recommendations from ESHRE regarding the use of PPOS for IVF stimulation are conditional, emphasizing the need for more robust and high-quality studies.However, limited data were available to compare the efficacy of PPOS and Ultrashort flare GnRH agonist protocol in expected poor responders. There are previous studies comparing ppos with GnRH antagonist protocol retrospectively with no difference in CLBR by Zhang et al in china (2) But there were no randomised controlled trails in poseidon population comparing ppos with ultra short flare GnRH agonist protocol so we need a Randomized controlled trial to investigate the potential of PPOS and USF GnRH agonist protocol used for the poor responders undergoing IVF/ICSI treatment to suggest better stimulation in terms of cost , compliance and IVF outcomes. 1.Conforti A, Esteves SC, Picarelli S, Iorio G, Rania E, Zullo F, et al. Novel approaches for diagnosis and management of low prognosis patients in assisted reproductive technology: the POSEIDON concept. Panminerva Med. (2019) 61:24–9. 10.23736/S0031-0808.18.03511-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] 2.Zhang S, Yin Y, Li Q, Zhang C. Comparison of Cumulative Live Birth Rates Between GnRH-A and PPOS in Low-Prognosis Patients According to POSEIDON Criteria: A Cohort Study. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021 Jun 21;12:644456. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.644456. PMID: 34234739; PMCID: PMC8256850.
|