FULL DETAILS (Read-only)  -> Click Here to Create PDF for Current Dataset of Trial
CTRI Number  CTRI/2025/03/082995 [Registered on: 20/03/2025] Trial Registered Prospectively
Last Modified On: 20/03/2025
Post Graduate Thesis  No 
Type of Trial  Observational 
Type of Study   Diagnostic 
Study Design  Other 
Public Title of Study   Ultrasound is used to confirm gastric tube placement in children 
Scientific Title of Study   Point-of-care ultrasound for confirmation of gastric tube placement in pediatric patients requiring mechanical ventilation 
Trial Acronym  NIL 
Secondary IDs if Any  
Secondary ID  Identifier 
NIL  NIL 
 
Details of Principal Investigator or overall Trial Coordinator (multi-center study)  
Name  Dr Niraj Kumar 
Designation  Professor 
Affiliation  All India institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS) New Delhi 
Address  Room no 709, 7th floor, Department of Neuroanesthesiology and Critical Care, Neuroscience Center, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi

New Delhi
DELHI
110029
India 
Phone  09013770806  
Fax    
Email  drnirajaiims@gmail.com  
 
Details of Contact Person
Scientific Query
 
Name  Dr Niraj Kumar 
Designation  Professor 
Affiliation  All India institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS) New Delhi 
Address  Room no 709, 7th floor, Department of Neuroanesthesiology and Critical Care, Neuroscience Center, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi

New Delhi
DELHI
110029
India 
Phone  09013770806  
Fax    
Email  drnirajaiims@gmail.com  
 
Details of Contact Person
Public Query
 
Name  Dr Niraj Kumar 
Designation  Professor 
Affiliation  All India institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS) New Delhi 
Address  Room no 709, 7th floor, Department of Neuroanesthesiology and Critical Care, Neuroscience Center, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi

New Delhi
DELHI
110029
India 
Phone  09013770806  
Fax    
Email  drnirajaiims@gmail.com  
 
Source of Monetary or Material Support  
All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, 110029 
 
Primary Sponsor  
Name  AIIMS NEW DELHI 
Address  All India institute of Mdical Sciences, New Delhi, india, 110029 
Type of Sponsor  Research institution and hospital 
 
Details of Secondary Sponsor  
Name  Address 
NIL  NIl 
 
Countries of Recruitment     India  
Sites of Study  
No of Sites = 1  
Name of Principal Investigator  Name of Site  Site Address  Phone/Fax/Email 
Dr Niraj Kumar  AIIMS, New Delhi  Room no 709, 7th floor, Department of Neuroanesthesiology and Critical Care, Neuroscience Center, All India institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi
New Delhi
DELHI 
09013770806

drnirajaiims@gmail.com 
 
Details of Ethics Committee  
No of Ethics Committees= 1  
Name of Committee  Approval Status 
Institutional Ethics Committee ALL INDIA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES (AIIMS), Room no -102, 1st floor O.T. Block, Ansari Nagar New Delhi 110029  Approved 
 
Regulatory Clearance Status from DCGI  
Status 
Not Applicable 
 
Health Condition / Problems Studied  
Health Type  Condition 
Patients  (1) ICD-10 Condition: 4||Measurement and Monitoring,  
 
Intervention / Comparator Agent  
Type  Name  Details 
Intervention  NIL  NIL 
Comparator Agent  NIL  NIL 
 
Inclusion Criteria  
Age From  1.00 Year(s)
Age To  14.00 Year(s)
Gender  Both 
Details  Paediatric patients aged between 1 and 14 years, of either gender, with severe traumatic brain injury admitted to the Neuro ICU, requiring an FT placement.
Admitted in NICU within 72hr of injury
 
 
ExclusionCriteria 
Details  Patients with a history or confirmed case of esophageal varices with endoscopy.
Patient with blunt trauma abdomen, severe thoracic injury with associated hemothorax
Patients with a history of post-gastric bypass surgeries
Patients with a known history of nasopharyngeal, esophagus, or stomach carcinoma
Patients with a history of neck trauma or swelling including goiter
Patients relative (LAR) who do not wish to participate in the study
 
 
Method of Generating Random Sequence   Not Applicable 
Method of Concealment   Not Applicable 
Blinding/Masking   Participant Blinded 
Primary Outcome  
Outcome  TimePoints 
To assess the ability of the esophageal and gastric ultrasound to confirm the successful placement of a gastric tube (GT) in paediatric head injury patients requiring mechanical ventilation.  Baseline (T0)- Feeding tube insertion
T1- Compare the tube to confirm the successful placement of GT using ultrasonography and radiography at 24 hours 
 
Secondary Outcome  
Outcome  TimePoints 
To compare the time to confirm the successful placement of GT using ultrasonography and radiography.  Baseline (T0)- Feeding tube insertion
T1- Compare the tube to confirm the successful placement of GT using ultrasonography and radiography at 24 hours 
 
Target Sample Size   Total Sample Size="104"
Sample Size from India="104" 
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (Total)= "Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (India)="Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials" 
Phase of Trial   N/A 
Date of First Enrollment (India)   01/04/2025 
Date of Study Completion (India) Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials 
Date of First Enrollment (Global)  Date Missing 
Date of Study Completion (Global) Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials 
Estimated Duration of Trial   Years="1"
Months="6"
Days="0" 
Recruitment Status of Trial (Global)   Open to Recruitment 
Recruitment Status of Trial (India)  Open to Recruitment 
Publication Details   N/A 
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement

Will individual participant data (IPD) be shared publicly (including data dictionaries)?  

Response - NO
Brief Summary   Introduction
Severe brain injury patients enter an acute catabolic state and necessitate nutrition to maintain cerebral metabolic homeostasis, skeletal muscle mass, and vital organ function. In an ICU feeding tubes are frequently inserted for critically ill patients and for those who are intubated and require ventilator support. Although the incidence of tube displacement is low serious complications have been reported because of tube displacement, including misplacement of the tube in the tracheobronchial tree pneumothorax pneumomediastinum pneumonia bronchopleural fistula esophageal perforation bleeding aspiration, and even death. Meta-analysis and review studies reported that capnography alone unreliably reflects FT placement, and X-rays will be unavoidable. Therefore, the radiographic confirmation of FT placement is considered the gold standard. However using this method in ICU patients has several disadvantages, including radiation exposure high cost, and extensive labor. Ultrasonography allows for real-time images of the FT passage to be obtained while verifying the tube placement in the esophagus and the stomach. USG may play a new and yet important role in catering to the needs of these patients. While point-of-care ultrasound is currently used to confirm FT insertion reports of its use in the pediatric emergency department are still scarce. We want to conduct this study to estimate the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound examination at the neck and gastric region in verifying the correct placement of FTs in pediatric patients requiring mechanical ventilation in the NICU.

To assess the ability of the esophageal and gastric ultrasound to confirm the successful placement of a gastric tube in pediatric head injury patients requiring mechanical ventilation.

Secondary

Compare the time to confirm the successful placement of GT using ultrasonography and radiography.

Materials and Methods

Following approval of the Institute Ethics Committee one hundred four pediatric head injury patients admitted to the neuro ICU requiring mechanical ventilation in the JPNTC Centre AIIMS New Delhi will be enrolled for this study. Written informed consent will be obtained from the patient’s legally authorized representative before the study.

Study design- A prospective observational study.

Inclusion criteria

Pediatric patients aged between 1 and 14 years, of either gender, with severe traumatic brain injury admitted to the Neuro ICU requiring an FT placement.

Admitted to the NICU within 72 hours of injury

Exclusion criteria

Patients with a history or confirmed case of esophageal varices with endoscopy.

Patient with blunt trauma abdomen severe thoracic injury with associated hemothorax

Patients with a history of post-gastric bypass surgeries

Patients with a known history of nasopharyngeal, esophagus, or stomach carcinoma

Patients with a history of neck trauma or swelling, including goiter

Patients relative or LAR who do not wish to participate in the study

Nasogastric tube placement

An orogastric or nasogastric tube will be inserted on admission to the NICU. Anaesthesiology residents will insert polyvinylchloride FTs. with radio-opaque lines using the nose ear mid-umbilicus method. The length of the NG tube will be established by measuring the distance from the tip of the nose to the tip of the patient’s earlobe and then to the mid-umbilicus process.

In every instance, the end of the tube will be lubricated before being inserted. Once the clinical signs of accurate placement are achieved by either auscultation or aspiration of stomach material, the FT will be fixed to the patient’s nose or cheek using adhesive tape. The clinical team will be blinded to the ultrasonography findings of the study so that it will not influence their standard treatment protocol.

Ultrasonographic verification protocol

A trained anesthesiologist investigator with experience in more than 40 cases of ultrasound confirmation of gastric tubes would perform the ultrasound examination. In the present study a portable ultrasound device Sonosite Edge II Fujifilm Sonosite Inc., Bothell WA USA will be utilized. The device will be equipped with a linear probe of 10-5 MHz and a curved probe of 8-3 MHz.

The child will be placed in a supine with their head facing upward in a sniffing position. The investigator will employ a standardized method by positioning the linear probe horizontally on the front region of the neck, specifically focusing on the portion of the esophagus. Once the feeding tube is identified the probe will be rotated 90 degrees and an attempt will be made to visualize the FT in a longitudinal view. Next, a curved probe will be positioned in the subxiphoid area to acquire a visual portion of the stomach. The probe will be directed towards the left upper abdominal quadrant and angled towards the left subcostal area.

Radiographic confirmation Protocol

All patients will be ultimately evaluated via direct radiography. X-rays of the chest will be regarded as the gold standard method.

Primary outcome- The primary outcome of the study is the accuracy of ultrasonography as determined by the sensitivity and specificity of correctly identifying feeding tubes in pediatric patients as compared with Chest X ray.

Secondary outcomeThe secondary outcome of the study is the time required to confirm the FT position from the time point of feeding tube insertion.

Definition

Positive USG examination

·        If the FT is observed as a hyperechogenic circle posterior to the left thyroid lobe and adjacent to the trachea as well as a hyperechogenic point in the stomach the USG examination will be deemed positive.

·     Dynamic fogging test- If the NG tube cannot be verified at the subxiphoid region a pine-tipped syringe will be used to administer a mixture of 1 cc per kg of air. Evaluation by the US will be then repeated. At the tip of the NG tube, US operators should watch for dynamic fogging in the stomach.

·     Time of assessment- Total duration from feeding tube insertion to confirmation of FT position.

Sample size calculation

The sample size calculation was based on a previous study by Teo et al. and Yilderium et al. with a sensitivity of 91 percent. Assuming an alpha error of 5 percent and statistical power of 80 percent we would need to enroll 94 subjects. Considering a dropout rate of 10 percent, the final sample size would be 104 patients. The sample size was calculated using R version 4.3.3 with MKMisc packages.

Statistics analysis

Data will be analyzed using STATA 14 software and presented in mean SD and frequency percent. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy will be presented with a 95 percent confidence interval. We will do a subgroup analysis to compare the findings of various levels of experience. Other appropriate statistical analyses will be carried out as per the requirement of the objective at the time of analysis. For all final comparisons, a p-value less than or equal to 0.05 will be considered statistically significant.

 
Close