| CTRI Number |
CTRI/2025/03/082390 [Registered on: 17/03/2025] Trial Registered Prospectively |
| Last Modified On: |
27/02/2025 |
| Post Graduate Thesis |
No |
| Type of Trial |
Interventional |
|
Type of Study
|
Drug Surgical/Anesthesia |
| Study Design |
Single Arm Study |
|
Public Title of Study
|
Novel treatment for Recurrent High Grade Brain tumors |
|
Scientific Title of Study
|
Pilot Study for intra-tumoral administration of L- 2,4- Diamino-N-Butyric Acid Dihydrochloride (DAB) and Prazosin in 10 recurrent glioblastoma patients |
| Trial Acronym |
NIL |
|
Secondary IDs if Any
|
| Secondary ID |
Identifier |
| NIL |
NIL |
|
|
Details of Principal Investigator or overall Trial Coordinator (multi-center study)
|
| Name |
Dr Shailesh A V Rao |
| Designation |
Professor and Head of the Department |
| Affiliation |
St. Johns Medical College Hospital |
| Address |
Department of Neurosurgery,
A-block, 3rd Floor,
St. Johns Medical College Hospital Sarjapur Road Bangalore.
Bangalore KARNATAKA 560034 India |
| Phone |
9845104035 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
shailesh.rao@stjohns.in |
|
Details of Contact Person Scientific Query
|
| Name |
Dr Shailesh A V Rao |
| Designation |
Professor and Head of the Department |
| Affiliation |
St. Johns Medical College Hospital |
| Address |
Department of Neurosurgery,
A-block, 3rd Floor,
St. Johns Medical College Hospital Sarjapur Road Bangalore.
Bangalore KARNATAKA 560034 India |
| Phone |
9845104035 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
shailesh.rao@stjohns.in |
|
Details of Contact Person Public Query
|
| Name |
Dr Shailesh A V Rao |
| Designation |
Professor and Head of the Department |
| Affiliation |
St. Johns Medical College Hospital |
| Address |
Department of Neurosurgery,
A-block, 3rd Floor,
St. Johns Medical College Hospital Sarjapur Road Bangalore.
Bangalore KARNATAKA 560034 India |
| Phone |
9845104035 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
shailesh.rao@stjohns.in |
|
|
Source of Monetary or Material Support
|
| Department of Neurosurgery,
St Johns Medical College Hospital Sarjapur Road Bangalore 560034 |
|
|
Primary Sponsor
|
| Name |
St Johns Medical College Hospital |
| Address |
A-Block, 3rd Floor, St Johns Medical College Hospital, Sarjapur Road Bangalore 560034 |
| Type of Sponsor |
Research institution and hospital |
|
|
Details of Secondary Sponsor
|
|
|
Countries of Recruitment
|
India |
|
Sites of Study
|
| No of Sites = 1 |
| Name of Principal
Investigator |
Name of Site |
Site Address |
Phone/Fax/Email |
| Dr Shailesh AV |
St Johns Medical College Hospital |
Dept of Neurosurgery, A-Block, 3rd Floor, St Johns Medical College Hospital, Sarjapur Road Bangalore 560034 Bangalore KARNATAKA |
9845104035
shailesh.rao@stjohns.in |
|
|
Details of Ethics Committee
|
| No of Ethics Committees= 1 |
| Name of Committee |
Approval Status |
| Instituti onal Ethics Committ ee, St John’s Medical College and Hospital |
Approved |
|
|
Regulatory Clearance Status from DCGI
|
|
|
Health Condition / Problems Studied
|
| Health Type |
Condition |
| Patients |
(1) ICD-10 Condition: C718||Malignant neoplasm of overlappingsites of brain, (2) ICD-10 Condition: O||Medical and Surgical, |
|
|
Intervention / Comparator Agent
|
| Type |
Name |
Details |
| Intervention |
2,4 Diamino Butyricacid Dihydrochloride(DAB) and Prazosin |
A novel treatment for recurrent glioblastoma that involves intra-tumoral administration of a a proprietary mixture of two drugs.
Following Surgical tumour resection a catheter will be placed inside the tumour cavity. This will be used to administer DAB at a Concentration of 100 millimolar at pH 7.55, at a rate of 45 to 180ml/hour (depending on patients ICP) for 3 days. This is followed by a similar infusion of Prazosin at concentration of 25 micromolar at pH 7.55.
Total duration of intervention is 5 days |
| Comparator Agent |
NIL |
NIL |
|
|
Inclusion Criteria
|
| Age From |
18.00 Year(s) |
| Age To |
75.00 Year(s) |
| Gender |
Both |
| Details |
1. histopathologically confirmed glioblastoma with MR evidence of neurosurgically significant recurrence
2. age between 18 and 75 years
3. any other existing inclusion criteria of the Neurosurgery Department of the hospital |
|
| ExclusionCriteria |
| Details |
1. absence of informed consent
2. age outside the range for inclusion
3. extension of the lesion across the midline to the contralateral hemisphere
4. any other existing exclusion criteria of the Neurosurgery Department of the hospital |
|
|
Method of Generating Random Sequence
|
Not Applicable |
|
Method of Concealment
|
Not Applicable |
|
Blinding/Masking
|
Not Applicable |
|
Primary Outcome
|
| Outcome |
TimePoints |
| RANO(Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology ) criteria of non recurrence 6 months post treatment |
6 months post treatment |
|
|
Secondary Outcome
|
| Outcome |
TimePoints |
Time to recurrence.
|
Follow up MRI Brain at 6 Months post treatment & another at 12 Months |
|
|
Target Sample Size
|
Total Sample Size="10" Sample Size from India="10"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (Total)= "Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (India)="Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials" |
|
Phase of Trial
|
Phase 3 |
|
Date of First Enrollment (India)
|
25/03/2025 |
| Date of Study Completion (India) |
Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials |
| Date of First Enrollment (Global) |
Date Missing |
| Date of Study Completion (Global) |
Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials |
|
Estimated Duration of Trial
|
Years="2" Months="0" Days="0" |
|
Recruitment Status of Trial (Global)
|
Open to Recruitment |
| Recruitment Status of Trial (India) |
Not Yet Recruiting |
|
Publication Details
|
N/A |
|
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement
|
Will individual participant data (IPD) be shared publicly (including data dictionaries)?
Response - YES
- What data in particular will be shared?
Response - Individual participant data that underlie the results reported in this article, after de-identification (text, tables, figures, and appendices).
- What additional supporting information will be shared?
Response - Informed Consent Form Response - Clinical Study Report
- Who will be able to view these files?
Response - Researchers whose proposed use of the data has been approved by an independent review committee identified for this purpose.
- For what types of analyses will this data be available?
Response - To achieve aims in the approved proposal.
- By what mechanism will data be made available?
Response - Proposals should be directed to [shaileshavrao@yahoo.com].
- For how long will this data be available start date provided 31-12-2026 and end date provided 31-12-2029?
Response - Beginning 9 months and ending 36 months following article publication.
- Any URL or additional information regarding plan/policy for sharing IPD?
Additional Information - NIL
|
|
Brief Summary
|
Elimination of High-grade Gliomas Through Induced Cytolysis, Elucidated by Two Patient CasesCHRISTOS PANOTOPOULOS, GEORGE ATHANASIOU, STAVROS STAVROPOULOS, NICK BOUTOS, SHAILESH RAO, GEORGE PANAYOTOU, NEELAM K. VENKATARAMANA and GUNNAR RONQUIST Anticancer Research January 2025, 45 (1) 201-207; DOI: https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.17405
Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most common and aggressive form of primary malignant tumors in the central nervous system of adults. In practice, all patients with GBM experience relapse, and treatment options become limited following first-line therapy. We previously reported a new, successful treatment approach for a GBM patient, implemented in direct conjunction with surgical intervention. Case Report: Here, we present an additional case demonstrating the success of this protocol, along with an overview of its underlying rationale and mechanisms. Following maximal safe tumor resection, our protocol involves the placement of two catheters in the tumor excision bed, connected to drug infusion pumps for continuous administration. The tumor’s excision beds are irrigated for 90-120 hours with a slightly alkaline Tris-buffered solution containing L-2,4 diaminobutyric acid, an unnatural amino acid, and Prazosin, a proapoptotic drug widely used as an antihypertensive. Both patients demonstrated marked clinical improvement. Recent contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging revealed no evidence of malignancy, with Case 1 remaining disease-free for seven years and Case 2 for two years of follow-up. Conclusion: This innovative approach not only enhances local drug delivery but also minimizes systemic side effects, addressing a critical challenge in GBM treatment. These cases highlight the potential of this protocol as an adjunct to standard therapies, offering a promising option for managing inoperable or recurrent GBM. |