| CTRI Number |
CTRI/2025/03/082978 [Registered on: 20/03/2025] Trial Registered Prospectively |
| Last Modified On: |
12/05/2026 |
| Post Graduate Thesis |
No |
| Type of Trial |
Interventional |
|
Type of Study
|
Medical Device Surgical/Anesthesia |
| Study Design |
Randomized, Parallel Group Trial |
|
Public Title of Study
|
Comparison of Two Blades (C-MAC Miller and Macintosh) for Intubation in Preterm Infants and Neonates |
|
Scientific Title of Study
|
Comparison of C-MAC Miller Size 0 Blade and C-MAC Macintosh Size 0 Blade for Intubation in Preterm Infants & Neonates: A Randomised Controlled Study |
| Trial Acronym |
Nil |
|
Secondary IDs if Any
|
| Secondary ID |
Identifier |
| NIL |
NIL |
|
|
Details of Principal Investigator or overall Trial Coordinator (multi-center study)
|
| Name |
Renu Sinha |
| Designation |
professor |
| Affiliation |
All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi |
| Address |
Department of Anaesthesiology, Pain Medicine and Critical Care, Room No.- 376, Dr Rajendra Prasad Centre for Ophthalmic Sciences, Aiims, New Delhi
New Delhi DELHI 110029 India |
| Phone |
9810305156 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
renusinha@aiims.edu |
|
Details of Contact Person Scientific Query
|
| Name |
Renu Sinha |
| Designation |
professor |
| Affiliation |
All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi |
| Address |
Department of Anaesthesiology, Pain Medicine and Critical Care, Room No.- 376, Dr Rajendra Prasad Centre for Ophthalmic Sciences, Aiims, New Delhi
New Delhi DELHI 110029 India |
| Phone |
9810305156 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
renusinha@aiims.edu |
|
Details of Contact Person Public Query
|
| Name |
Renu Sinha |
| Designation |
professor |
| Affiliation |
All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi |
| Address |
Department of Anaesthesiology, Pain Medicine and Critical Care, Room No.- 376, Dr Rajendra Prasad Centre for Ophthalmic Sciences, Aiims, New Delhi
New Delhi DELHI 110029 India |
| Phone |
9810305156 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
renusinha@aiims.edu |
|
|
Source of Monetary or Material Support
|
| All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, Sri Aurobindo Marg, Ansari Nagar, Ansari Nagar East, New Delhi, India, Pin-110029 |
|
|
Primary Sponsor
|
| Name |
NIL |
| Address |
NIL |
| Type of Sponsor |
Other [NIL] |
|
|
Details of Secondary Sponsor
|
|
|
Countries of Recruitment
|
India |
|
Sites of Study
|
| No of Sites = 1 |
| Name of Principal
Investigator |
Name of Site |
Site Address |
Phone/Fax/Email |
| Dr Renu Sinha |
AIIMS, New Delhi |
RPC OT, Department of Anesthesiology, Pain Medicine and Critical Care, New Delhi South DELHI |
9810305156
renusinha@aiims.edu |
|
|
Details of Ethics Committee
|
| No of Ethics Committees= 1 |
| Name of Committee |
Approval Status |
| Institute Ethics Committe, AIIMS, New Delhi |
Approved |
|
|
Regulatory Clearance Status from DCGI
|
|
|
Health Condition / Problems Studied
|
| Health Type |
Condition |
| Patients |
(1) ICD-10 Condition: H351||Retinopathy of prematurity, |
|
|
Intervention / Comparator Agent
|
| Type |
Name |
Details |
| Intervention |
C-MAC Macintosh |
Intubation with C-MAC Macintosh size 0 blade in preterm infants and Neonates |
| Comparator Agent |
C-MAC Miller |
Intubation with C-MAC Miller size 0 blade in preterm infants and Neonates |
|
|
Inclusion Criteria
|
| Age From |
0.00 Day(s) |
| Age To |
1.00 Month(s) |
| Gender |
Both |
| Details |
Preterm infants & neonates [from birth till 60 weeks post conceptional age (PCA) or 1 month of age]. |
|
| ExclusionCriteria |
| Details |
1. Neonates with known craniofacial abnormalities or congenital airway malformations.
2. History of difficult intubation.
3. Hemodynamic instability or conditions contraindicating elective intubation.
|
|
|
Method of Generating Random Sequence
|
Computer generated randomization |
|
Method of Concealment
|
An Open list of random numbers |
|
Blinding/Masking
|
Not Applicable |
|
Primary Outcome
|
| Outcome |
TimePoints |
| Time to Intubation (TTI): Time from insertion of the blade in the mouth to the passage of the endotracheal tube through the vocal cords. |
From the time of induction of anaesthesia till endotracheal intubation is completed. (usually 5-10 minutes from start of anaesthesia induction) |
|
|
Secondary Outcome
|
| Outcome |
TimePoints |
1.Time to Best Glottic View (TTGV): Time from insertion of the blade in the mouth to achieving the best possible glottic view.
2.Time to Procedure (TTP): Time from insertion of the blade in the mouth till square shaped etCO2 tracing is seen in the monitor.
3.Percentage of glottic opening (POGO) score: Graded on a scale of 0–100% based on visualized glottis.
4.Number of intubation attempts required.
5.Ease of blade insertion, ease of ETT insertion, ease of intubation, graded on a scale of 1 (easy) to 5 (very difficult).
6.Adverse events, including desaturation , mucosal trauma, or bradycardia .
|
From the starting time of induction of anaesthesia till completion of endotracheal intubation. (usually takes 5-10 minutes from start of induction of anaesthesia) |
|
|
Target Sample Size
|
Total Sample Size="50" Sample Size from India="50"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (Total)= "Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (India)="Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials" |
|
Phase of Trial
|
Phase 3/ Phase 4 |
|
Date of First Enrollment (India)
|
15/04/2025 |
| Date of Study Completion (India) |
Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials |
| Date of First Enrollment (Global) |
Date Missing |
| Date of Study Completion (Global) |
Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials |
|
Estimated Duration of Trial
|
Years="1" Months="0" Days="0" |
Recruitment Status of Trial (Global)
Modification(s)
|
Not Applicable |
| Recruitment Status of Trial (India) |
Closed to Recruitment of Participants |
|
Publication Details
|
N/A |
|
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement
|
Will individual participant data (IPD) be shared publicly (including data dictionaries)?
Response - NO
|
|
Brief Summary
|
Neonatal airway management presents unique challenges due to the anatomical and physiological differences in preterm infants and neonates, such as a proportionally larger tongue, anterior larynx, and narrower airway. These features make intubation technically demanding and necessitate specialized tools. The C-MAC video laryngoscope, with its Miller and Macintosh blades, has been extensively used in adult and pediatric airway management. However, there is limited evidence comparing these blades for intubation in preterm infants and neonates. This randomised controlled study aims to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of the C-MAC Miller size 0 blade with the C-MAC Macintosh size 0 blade for endotracheal intubation in this population. After performing a pre-anesthetic check-up and obtaining consent, eligible participants will be randomised into two groups: Group Miller: Intubation with the C-MAC Miller size 0 blade and Group Macintosh: Intubation with the C-MAC Macintosh size 0 blade. In the operation theatre, routine monitors (ECG, SpOâ‚‚, NIBP) will be applied, and general anesthesia will be induced with sevoflurane. After adequate depth of anesthesia is achieved, atracurium (0.5 mg/kg) will be administered, and manual ventilation will be provided. Intubation will then be performed using the allocated blade by an experienced paediatric anaesthesiologist, following standardized techniques. The primary outcome will be the time to intubation (TTI) and secondary outcomes will include: Total time for the procedure (TTP), Glottic visualization quality (POGO score), Intubation attempts, Ease of blade, and ETT insertion and adverse events, such as desaturation (SpOâ‚‚ < 90%) or bradycardia. All intubations will be video-recorded to ensure objectivity during outcome analysis. If intubation fails after two attempts, an alternative blade will be used, and the event will be documented as a failure. This study aims to identify the optimal blade design for preterm neonatal intubation by analysing efficiency, ease of use, and safety parameters, contributing to improved clinical practices in neonatal airway management. |