| CTRI Number |
CTRI/2026/01/102053 [Registered on: 27/01/2026] Trial Registered Prospectively |
| Last Modified On: |
23/01/2026 |
| Post Graduate Thesis |
Yes |
| Type of Trial |
Interventional |
|
Type of Study
|
Drug Surgical/Anesthesia |
| Study Design |
Randomized, Parallel Group, Active Controlled Trial |
|
Public Title of Study
|
Compare between Ultrasound guided Pericapsular nerve group block and Suprainguinal fascia iliaca block for reducing pain during sitting position for spinal anaesthesia in patients of acetabular fractures undergoing open reduction and internal fixation |
|
Scientific Title of Study
|
A randomized comparative study to evaluate the efficacy of ultrasound guided pericapsular nerve group block versus ultrasound guided suprainguinal fascia Iliaca block for ease of positioning during spinal anaesthesia in cases of acetabular fractures posted for open reduction and internal fixation SMS Medical College Jaipur |
| Trial Acronym |
NIL |
|
Secondary IDs if Any
|
| Secondary ID |
Identifier |
| NIL |
NIL |
|
|
Details of Principal Investigator or overall Trial Coordinator (multi-center study)
|
| Name |
Dr Vandana Mangal |
| Designation |
Senior Professor |
| Affiliation |
Sawai Man Singh Medical College, Jaipur |
| Address |
Department of Anaesthesia, Second floor, Dhanwantri building, JLN Marg, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India
Jaipur RAJASTHAN 302001 India |
| Phone |
9829056816 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
vandanamangal25@gmail.com |
|
Details of Contact Person Scientific Query
|
| Name |
Dr Vandana Mangal |
| Designation |
Senior Professor |
| Affiliation |
Sawai Man Singh Medical College, Jaipur |
| Address |
Department of Anaesthesia, Second floor, Dhanwantri building, JLN Marg, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India
RAJASTHAN 302001 India |
| Phone |
9829056816 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
vandanamangal25@gmail.com |
|
Details of Contact Person Public Query
|
| Name |
Dr Aarushi Bhanu |
| Designation |
Pg Student |
| Affiliation |
Sawai Man Singh Medical College, Jaipur |
| Address |
Department of Anaesthesia, Second floor, Dhanwantri building, JLN Marg, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India
Jaipur RAJASTHAN 302001 India |
| Phone |
7018937892 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
aarushi.bhanu@gmail.com |
|
|
Source of Monetary or Material Support
|
| Department of Anaesthesia, SMS Medical College, Jaipur, Rajasthan, Pin code- 302001, India |
|
|
Primary Sponsor
|
| Name |
Sawai Man Singh Medical College and Hospital |
| Address |
Department Of Anaesthesia , Second floor, Dhanwantri building, SMS medical College, Jaipur, Rajasthan, Pin code- 302001, India |
| Type of Sponsor |
Government medical college |
|
|
Details of Secondary Sponsor
|
|
|
Countries of Recruitment
|
India |
|
Sites of Study
|
| No of Sites = 1 |
| Name of Principal
Investigator |
Name of Site |
Site Address |
Phone/Fax/Email |
| Dr Vandana Mangal |
SMS Medical college and Hospital , Jaipur |
Department of Anaesthesiology, second floor, Dhanwantari building. SMS Hospital,JLN Marg, Jaipur, Rajasthan Jaipur RAJASTHAN |
9829056816
vandanamangal25@gmail.com |
|
|
Details of Ethics Committee
|
| No of Ethics Committees= 1 |
| Name of Committee |
Approval Status |
| Office of Ethics Committee, SMS Medical College and attached hospitals, Jaipur |
Approved |
|
|
Regulatory Clearance Status from DCGI
|
|
|
Health Condition / Problems Studied
|
| Health Type |
Condition |
| Patients |
(1) ICD-10 Condition: O||Medical and Surgical, |
|
|
Intervention / Comparator Agent
|
| Type |
Name |
Details |
| Comparator Agent |
20 ml of 0.25% Bupivaicaine and 2mg Dexamethasone ( Ultrasound guided Supra-inguinal fascia iliaca block vs Pericapsular nerve group block ) Drug Total volume- 20.5 ml |
Comparison in terms of ease of positioning during spinal anaesthesia |
| Intervention |
20ml of 0.25% Bupivaicaine and 2mg of Dexamethasone ( USG guided Pericapsular nerve group block ) |
The patient is placed in the supine position. Following sterile preparation, draping and using standard aseptic technique a curvilinear low-frequency ultrasound probe (2-5 Hz) is initially placed in a transverse plane over the anterior inferior iliac spine and then aligned with the pubic ramus by rotating the probe counter-clockwise by approximately 45 degrees. In this orientation, the iliopubic eminence, psoas muscle and tendon, femoral artery, and the pectineus muscle are visualized. Under aseptic precautions, a 22 gauge, 80mm needle is inserted from lateral to medial in an in-plane approach to place the tip of the needle in the musculofascial plane between psoas tendon anteriorly and the pubic ramus posteriorly. Following negative aspiration, the local anaesthetic solution is injected in 5-mL increments while observing for adequate fluid spread in this plane for a total volume of 20 ml. Patient will be monitored for 24 hrs. |
| Intervention |
20ml of 0.25% Bupivaicaine and 2mg of Dexamethasone ( USG guided Suprainguinal fascia iliaca block ) |
The patient will be placed in the supine position. Following sterile preparation, draping and using standard aseptic technique the high-frequency linear transducer will be placed in the sagittal plane to identify the anterior superior iliac spine, and the transducer will be moved medially to identify the fascia iliaca, iliopsoas, sartorius, and internal oblique muscles. Using an in-plane approach, needle tip will be positioned deep in the fascia iliaca and above the iliacus muscle. After negative aspiration, 20 mL of 0.25% Bupivacaine will be injected incrementally under the fascial plane, aspirating every 5 mL. Patient will be monitored for 24 hrs. |
|
|
Inclusion Criteria
|
| Age From |
18.00 Year(s) |
| Age To |
65.00 Year(s) |
| Gender |
Both |
| Details |
1.Patients undergoing open reduction and internal fixation for acetabular fracture under spinal anaesthesia
2.Patients consenting to participate.
3.Adult patients aged 18-65 Years.
4.Patients belonging to American Society of Anesthesiologists(ASA) grade I, II and III |
|
| ExclusionCriteria |
| Details |
1.Patients who will not be able to assist in block assessment.
2.Those with preexisting neuropathy.
3.Having coagulopathy .
4.Allergic to local anesthetics.
5.Infection at the local site of administration of block
6.Patient should not be part of any other study. |
|
|
Method of Generating Random Sequence
|
Computer generated randomization |
|
Method of Concealment
|
Sequentially numbered, sealed, opaque envelopes |
|
Blinding/Masking
|
Participant and Investigator Blinded |
|
Primary Outcome
|
| Outcome |
TimePoints |
1. To assess and compare NRS score at rest and on passive 15-degree limb elevation every 5min after the block till NRS less then 2 is achieved.
2. To assess and compare time taken to achieve NRS less then 2 in both the groups.
3. To assess and compare the difference in sitting angle before the block and at positioning for spinal anaesthesia between the two groups. |
1. At baseline, 5 min, 10 min,15 min till NRS less then 2
2. At baseline, 5 min, 10 min, 15 min till NRS less then 2
3. At baseline, 15 min during positioning |
|
|
Secondary Outcome
|
| Outcome |
TimePoints |
1. To assess & compare NRS postoperatively every 6 hrly for 24hr between the groups
2. To determine & compare amount of Tramadol iv (mg) used in first 24 hr postoperatively in both the groups.
3. To observe any block related side effects such as nausea vomiting respiratory depression & LAST if any. |
1. At baseline, 6 hr 12 hr 18 hr 24 hr
2. At baseline 6 hr 12 hr 18 hr 24 hr
3. At baseline 6 hr 12 hr 18 hr 24 hr |
|
|
Target Sample Size
|
Total Sample Size="80" Sample Size from India="80"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (Total)= "Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (India)="Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials" |
|
Phase of Trial
|
Phase 2 |
|
Date of First Enrollment (India)
|
04/02/2026 |
| Date of Study Completion (India) |
Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials |
| Date of First Enrollment (Global) |
Date Missing |
| Date of Study Completion (Global) |
Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials |
|
Estimated Duration of Trial
|
Years="0" Months="8" Days="0" |
|
Recruitment Status of Trial (Global)
|
Not Applicable |
| Recruitment Status of Trial (India) |
Not Yet Recruiting |
|
Publication Details
|
N/A |
|
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement
|
Will individual participant data (IPD) be shared publicly (including data dictionaries)?
Response - NO
|
|
Brief Summary
|
Acetabular
fractures although constitute only 1.5 -3% of geriatric orthopaedic trauma but
are on the rise. A large proportion of them are elderly with
multiple comorbidities and their associated challenges. It is a painful
condition both at rest and on slight movement, good perioperative analgesia is mandatory for these
patients, like in any other orthopaedic trauma. Many recipes have been tried for perioperative
pain relief ranging from systemic analgesia with or without opioids to
multimodal analgesia. Many regional
blocks like femoral nerve block, fascia iliaca, supra inguinal fascia iliaca
and peri capsular nerve group block have
been tried as part of multimodal analgesia.These days
acetabular fractures are fixed surgically, anaesthesia of choice for these
patients is central neuraxial block and many times combined spinal epidural for
both long duration surgeries and postoperative analgesia. For
these blocks sitting position is preferable as patients find it difficult to
lie on the side. To perform these blocks successfully in one go the patient has
to be pain free and comfortable. Systemic analgesia is a choice, but at times
it does not offer adequate analgesia and patient sometimes feel a little dizzy
if they are given opioids. So we all look forward to good regional blocks for
effective analgesia during positioning these patients for central neuraxial
blocks. Literature
suggests both supra-inguinal fascia iliaca block and pericapsular nerve group
block offer pain relief in acetabular fractures. We undertake this study to find out which is superior. It is very
important that patients are comfortable and are able to sit properly to give a
good position making things comfortable both for patients and
anaesthesiologists. Also, the central neuraxial block can be done
atraumatically, very basic requirement in central neuraxial blocks.In this study
we aim to evaluate the efficacy of Supra-inguinal fascia iliaca block versus
Pericapsular nerve group block for ease of positioning during spinal
anaesthesia in acetabular fractures posted for open reduction and internal
fixation using 20ml of o.25% Bupivacaine and 2mg Dexamethasone. |