Epidural block is one of the most commonly performed block in anaesthesia practice when it comes to lower abdominal and lower extremity surgeries. The procedure is blind procedure, wherein depth of epidural space is anticipated and cautiously achieved by using various techniques like loss of resistance, balloon technique et cetera. Conventionally positive meniscus sign is used to confirm epidural catheter in epidural space.
Loss of resistance technique found sometimes difficult to teach as loss of resistance to needle and syringe after passing into spinal ligament can be found in two cases either in epidural space or paraspinal tissues. Nowadays many institutions abroad are using ultrasound machine to guide epidural space but in India where resources are not in abundance and everyone does not have ultrasound machine , this procedure is still performed as blind procedure. Usually senior anaesthesiologist who teaches students about this block , handholding for the procedure anticipates epidural space by taking into consideration the height, weight, abdominal girth et cetera of the patient.
Dr Emmanouil Stamatakis , Eleni Moka, Ioanna Siafaka, Erifilli Arygra, Athina Vadalouca proposed mathematical equation to anticipate depth of epidural space in greek population but this equation is little complex and cumbersome to practice on day to day basis. He mentioned height , weight, body massage index and other parameters to be considered in this calculation. So we decided to study how it will be easier and less time consuming to place epidural catheter, as it will not be possible to estimate the epidural space with help of mathematical equation everytime.
In this study, we are going to predict epidural space depth by comparing parameters like body mass index, abdominal circumference et cetera . We will estimate epidural space depth at lumbar region both with body massage index and ratio of length of vertebral column (seventh cervical - first sacral vertebra) to abdominal circumference . On the basis of results we get with these parameters, we will compare which ratio gives better estimation of epidural space depth.
Body mass index has weight as its component , but ratio of length of vertebral column to abdominal circumference does not take into consideration weight of the patient. Body mass index due its weight component tells you about obesity. It is considered that all obese patients due to there weight have higher intra-abdominal pressure. There is direct co-relation that increased intra-abdominal pressure causes epidural space to reduce and so it may be achieved at less depth. Patients with intra-abdominal tumors or certain pathologist may not high weight, but due to pathology the pressure on epidural space may cause it to be at lower depth. In ratio of length of vertebral column to abdominal circumference weight component is absent. So we are trying to estimate which one of them is more accurate to predict depth of epidural space. One point that we understand here is that as epidural space is potential space, it may or may not be altered due to all of the above factors. Still we will be able to evaluate the effect of contributing factors on body mass index as well as in ratio of length of vertebral column to abdominal circumference on depth of epidural space.
AIM AND OBJECTIVES -
AIM - Comparison between body mass index and ratio of length of vertebral column( se enth cervical - first sacral vertebra) to abdominal circumference in estimation of lumbar epidural space depth.
OBJECTIVES -
1. Primary objective is to compare effectiveness of two different measurements in estimating of lumbar epidural space from skin.
2.To evaluate which measurement is more practical in clinical settings for estimating lumbar epidural space depth.
3.Other objective is to enhance safety of procedure to place epidural catheter.
STUDY DESIGN - It will be an observational study.
PLACE OF STUDY - Operation theatres of Topiwala National Medical College and Bai Yamunabai Laxman Nair charitable hospital, mumbai.
DURATION OF STUDY - 18 months.
ETHICS - This study will be initiated after obtaining permission from institutional ethics committee and research committee. Valid informed written consent will be taken prior to procedure. Identity of the patient will be kept confidential.
MATERIAL AND METHODS -
MATERIAL -
1. Patients willing to participate in study.
2. ASA 1 and 2 patients.
3. Patients undergoing surgeries where epidural anaesthesia or analgesia is indicated.
SAMPLE SIZE -
The review of literature does not show any studies using the ratio of length of vertebral column to abdominal circumference in estimating the depth of epidural space from skin. However there are few studies saying body mass index has a positive corelation with the depth of epidural space from skin. The sample size calculation for this study is based on the need to detect an anticipated effect size of 0.15 considering the variance of body mass index to be 0.11 using the following formula
Sample size (n) = 2( z1 - alpha÷2 + z1 - beta)2 × variance ÷ (effect size)2
Where alpha= 0.05 error
Beta= 95% power
z1- alpha ÷2 = 1.96 at a 95% confidence interval
z1-beta = 0.84 at 80% power
effect size= 0.15
Variance=0.11
Inserting the values,
n=2(1.96+ 0.84)2 × 0.11÷(0.15)2
n= 2 × 7.84 × 0.11 ÷ 0.0225
n= 76.65 +7.665 (10% dropout)
n= 84.315.
Therefore the sample size of this study will be taken as approximately 84.
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS -
Descriptive statistics will be used to summarize the demographic characteristics of the study population including mean, median, standard deviation and range for continuous Variables such as age, body mass index, ratio of length of vertebral column to abdominal circumference and depth of epidural space.
Simple linear regression analysis will be conducted for each predictor variable ( BMI and length of vertebral column to abdominal circumference) separately against epidural space depth, followed by a multiple linear regression combining both predictors. Model performance will be assessed using the coefficient of determination (R-squared) with higher values indicating better predictive capability and the model with highest R- squared value will be considered the better predictor.
The predictive accuracy of body mass index and ratio of length of vertebral column to abdominal circumference in estimating the depth of epidural space will be compared using appropriate statistical tests such as paired t-tests , wherein stronger associations will be indicated by higher t values.
Statistical significance will be set at p less than 0.05 for all analyses. All statistical analysis will ne performed using appropriate software packages such as SPSS, R, SAS.
METHODOLOGY -
1. After obtaining necessary approval and clearance for study from institutional ethics committee and research committee, study begins with pre-anesthetic checkup which includes detailed history, general and systemic examination, vital parameters like heart rate, blood pressure, temperature , oxygen saturation. Valid informed written consent will be taken for the procedure. Prior to any intervention height in cm, weight in kg will be measured and then body mass index will be calculated in kg/cm2. Vertebral column length will be measured from 7th cervical vertebra to 1st sacral vertebra in sitting position without any flexion of back. Abdominal circumference in cm will be measured at the level of umbilicus during end of expiration in sitting position.
2. All patients will be kept nil by mouth for 8 hours. Upon arrival of patient to operating room, consent and nil by mouth status will be checked. In operating room, preoperative vitals will be checked and noted , monitored for heart rate, non-invasive blood pressure, oxygen saturation and ECG after recording baseline values. A large bore intravenous cannula will be secured and patient will be preloaded with 10 ml/kg of ringer’s lactate solution considering fasting hours before epidural catheter placement and drug administration.
3. Patient shall be placed in sitting position , under all aseptic precautions painting and draping will be done by anaesthesiologist. Then anaesthesiologist will perform procedure with 16/18 G tuhoy’s needle at L3-L4 interspace. Epidural space will be estimated by loss of resistance technique. The mark at which epidural space found on tuhoy’s needle will be noted. Then epidural catheter will be inserted and fixed after confirming positive meniscus sign.
4. The mathematical equation for estimation of epidural space depth given in one of study done for the same in 2005 is as follows
A) Formula for predicting skin to lumbar epidural space distance in the general greek population is
3.307 + ( 0.00577 × age ) + ( 0.340 × gender ) + (0.02286 × weight ) + ( -0.00123 × height ) + (0.05065 × BMI ) + (0.199 × VI )
B) Formula for predicting skin to lumbar epidural space distance in female population is
8.401 + ( 0.002949 × age ) + ( 0.0748 × weight ) + ( - 0.0443 × height ) + ( - 0.0802 × BMI ) + ( 0.135 × VI ) + ( - 0.340 × PT )
Variables - gender( female - 0, male - 1), age in years, weight in kg, height in cm, Body Mass Index (BMI) in kg/cm2 , vertebral interspace (VI) as L1-L2 = 1, L2-L3 = 2, L3- L4 = 3, population type (PT) as non- obstetric = 0, obstetric = 1 .
The above said procedure will be done in 84 patients. In each patient, body mass index and ratio of length of vertebral column to abdominal circumference along with mark on the tuhoy’s needle at which epidural space found will be noted. With the help of data obtained after the procedure , simple linear regression analysis will be conducted to know whether BMI or ratio of length of vertebral column ( seventh cervical vertebra - first sacral vertebra ) to abdominal circumference giving approximate estimation of epidural space depth.