| CTRI Number |
CTRI/2024/12/078433 [Registered on: 23/12/2024] Trial Registered Prospectively |
| Last Modified On: |
20/12/2024 |
| Post Graduate Thesis |
Yes |
| Type of Trial |
Interventional |
|
Type of Study
|
Surgical/Anesthesia |
| Study Design |
Other |
|
Public Title of Study
|
Comparing split doses and single doses of medicine Levobupivacaine for pain relief in legs and abdomen surgeries |
|
Scientific Title of Study
|
Comparison of fractionated dose versus bolus dose of injection Levobupivacaine in
Spinal Anaesthesia for patients undergoing lower limb and lower abdominal
surgery: A Randomized control trial |
| Trial Acronym |
NIL |
|
Secondary IDs if Any
|
| Secondary ID |
Identifier |
| NIL |
NIL |
|
|
Details of Principal Investigator or overall Trial Coordinator (multi-center study)
|
| Name |
Jacinth Hazarika |
| Designation |
Postgraduate Resident |
| Affiliation |
Chettinad Hospital and Research Institute, Chennai |
| Address |
Jacinth Hazarika, Postgraduate Resident, D-Block, 1st Floor,
Department Of Anaesthesiology, Chettinad Hospital and Research
Institute, Chettinad Health City, Rajiv Gandhi Salai, Kelambakkam
Chennai
Kancheepuram TAMIL NADU 603103 India |
| Phone |
8879302952 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
jacinthhazarika@gmail.com |
|
Details of Contact Person Scientific Query
|
| Name |
Dr Ashok Kulasekar |
| Designation |
Professor and Head of the Department |
| Affiliation |
Chettinad Hospital and Research Institute, Chennai |
| Address |
Professor and Head of the Department, D-Block, 1st Floor, Department
Of Anaesthesiology, Chettinad Hospital and Research Institute,
Chettinad Health City, Rajiv Gandhi Salai, Kelambakkam
Chennai
Kancheepuram TAMIL NADU 603103 India |
| Phone |
9840498420 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
ashokk_dr@yahoo.com |
|
Details of Contact Person Public Query
|
| Name |
Jacinth Hazarika |
| Designation |
Postgraduate Resident |
| Affiliation |
Chettinad Hospital and Research Institute, Chennai |
| Address |
Jacinth Hazarika, Postgraduate Resident, D-Block, 1st Floor,
Department Of Anaesthesiology, Chettinad Hospital and Research
Institute, Chettinad Health City, Rajiv Gandhi Salai, Kelambakkam
Chennai
Kancheepuram TAMIL NADU 603103 India |
| Phone |
8879302952 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
jacinthhazarika@gmail.com |
|
|
Source of Monetary or Material Support
|
| Chettinad Hospital and Research Institute, Chettinad Health City, Rajiv Gandhi Salai,
Kelambakkam, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India-603103 |
|
|
Primary Sponsor
|
| Name |
Chettinad Hospital and Research Institute |
| Address |
Chettinad Hospital and Research Institute, Chettinad Health City,
Rajiv Gandhi Salai, Kelambakkam, Chennai, Tamil Nadu,
India-603103 |
| Type of Sponsor |
Private medical college |
|
|
Details of Secondary Sponsor
|
|
|
Countries of Recruitment
|
India |
|
Sites of Study
|
| No of Sites = 1 |
| Name of Principal
Investigator |
Name of Site |
Site Address |
Phone/Fax/Email |
| Dr Jacinth Hazarika |
Chettinad Hospital and Research Institute |
D-Block, 1st Floor,
Department Of
Anaesthesiology,
Chettinad Health City,
Rajiv Gandhi Salai,
Kelambakkam,
Chennai - 603103 Kancheepuram TAMIL NADU |
8879302952
jacinthhazarika@gmail.com |
|
|
Details of Ethics Committee
|
| No of Ethics Committees= 1 |
| Name of Committee |
Approval Status |
| INSTITUTIONAL HUMAN ETHICS COMMITTEE FOR STUDENT RESEARCH (CARE IHEC-I) |
Approved |
|
|
Regulatory Clearance Status from DCGI
|
|
|
Health Condition / Problems Studied
|
| Health Type |
Condition |
| Patients |
(1) ICD-10 Condition: M968||Other intraoperative and postprocedural complications and disorders of musculoskeletal system, not elsewhere classified, |
|
|
Intervention / Comparator Agent
|
| Type |
Name |
Details |
| Intervention |
Levobupivacaine Bolus Dose |
Intrathecal Levobupivacaine
0.5% heavy 3.5ml (17.5mg) along with an additive drug injection Buprenorphine 0.3ml(90mcg) |
| Comparator Agent |
Levobupivacaine Fractionated Dose |
Fractionated dose of 0.5% Inj Levobupivacaine, two‑third of the total calculated dose given initially followed by one‑third dose after 60 seconds.
•After injection of initial two‑third dose, the syringe will be kept attached to the spinal needle for remaining 60 seconds, after which remaining one‑third dose will be administered.
|
|
|
Inclusion Criteria
|
| Age From |
18.00 Year(s) |
| Age To |
70.00 Year(s) |
| Gender |
Both |
| Details |
1) ASA GRADE 1, 2 & 3 patients
2) Elective and Emergency Surgeries under Spinal Anaesthesia
|
|
| ExclusionCriteria |
| Details |
1)Patients refusing to participate in the study
2)History of allergy to study drug
3)Patients with infection at the site of injection, coagulopathy, increased Intracranial Pressure
4)Severely altered mental status
5)Spine deformities or history of laminectomy
6)Unknown duration of surgery,
7)Patients converted to general anaesthesia intra-operatively.
|
|
|
Method of Generating Random Sequence
|
Computer generated randomization |
|
Method of Concealment
|
Pre-numbered or coded identical Containers |
|
Blinding/Masking
|
Open Label |
|
Primary Outcome
|
| Outcome |
TimePoints |
| To compare hemodynamic stability and to compare duration of analgesia |
First 24 hours |
|
|
Secondary Outcome
|
| Outcome |
TimePoints |
1) To assess time of onset, level and regression of motor and sensory block
2) To assess two segment regression time
3) Requirement of vasopressors if any |
First 24 hours |
|
|
Target Sample Size
|
Total Sample Size="50" Sample Size from India="50"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (Total)= "Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (India)="Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials" |
|
Phase of Trial
|
Phase 4 |
|
Date of First Enrollment (India)
|
31/12/2024 |
| Date of Study Completion (India) |
Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials |
| Date of First Enrollment (Global) |
Date Missing |
| Date of Study Completion (Global) |
Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials |
|
Estimated Duration of Trial
|
Years="0" Months="0" Days="0" |
|
Recruitment Status of Trial (Global)
|
Not Applicable |
| Recruitment Status of Trial (India) |
Not Yet Recruiting |
|
Publication Details
|
N/A |
|
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement
|
Will individual participant data (IPD) be shared publicly (including data dictionaries)?
Response - NO
|
|
Brief Summary
|
INTRODUCTION
•Spinal Anaesthesia is a commonly used anaesthetic
technique in patients undergoing lower-limb, lower abdomen, pelvis and perineum
surgeries. It is often preferred over general anaesthesia for its properties of
providing a dense block, rapid action, its effect on mental status being
minimal, decreased blood loss and its protective effect against thrombo-embolic
complications.
•Spinal Anaesthesia causes a sympathetic blockade by
way of sympathetic denervation resulting in prolonged and occasionally severe
hypotension. This occurs because of the rapid sympathetic block extension,
impeding adaptation of cardiovascular system, hence causing significant
morbidity and mortality.
•Fractionated dose of a Spinal Anaesthetic can also be
administered, in which two thirds of the total calculated dose is initially
administered; and one third dose after a time-gap of 60 seconds, which in turn
achieves adequate motor and sensory blockade. •The administration of fractionated dosage of the local
anaesthetic agent, provides a dense block with greater hemodynamic stability.
•In recent years levobupivacaine, the pure S (−)
enantiomer of bupivacaine, has emerged as a safer alternative for regional
anaesthesia than its racemic parent. It demonstrated less affinity and strength
of depressant effects onto myocardial and central nervous vital centers in
pharmacodynamic studies, and a superior pharmacokinetic profile.
•Clinically, levobupivacaine is well tolerated in a
variety of regional anesthesia techniques both after bolus administration and
continuous postoperative infusion. Reports of toxicity with levobupivacaine are
scarce and occasional toxic symptoms are usually reversible with minimal
treatment with no fatal outcome. Levobupivacaine has not entirely replaced
bupivacaine in clinical practice.
•In anesthesia and analgesia practice, levobupivacaine
and bupivacaine produce comparable surgical sensory block with similar adverse
side effects, and equal labor pain control with comparable maternal and fetal
outcome. AIMS & OBJECTIVES AIM - The aim of this study is to compare fractionated dose
versus bolus dose injection in spinal anaesthesia for patients undergoing lower
abdominal surgeries. OBJECTIVES Primary objective: To compare hemodynamic stability and duration of analgesia Secondary objective: To assess time of onset, level and regression of motor
and sensory block
To assess two segment regression time
Requirement of vasopressors if any STUDY DESIGN - A Randomized Control Trial SAMPLE SIZE •Alpha error was taken as 0.03, beta- 0.20,
•k=n2/n1=1
•n1 = (σ12+σ2 2/K) (z1−α/2+z1−β) 2 /Δ2
• Δ = |μ2-μ1| = absolute difference between two means
•σ1, σ2 = variance of mean #1 and #2
•n1 = sample size for group #1
•n2 = sample size for group #2
•α = probability of type I error =2.17 at 97% CI
•β = probability of type II error
•z = critical Z value for a given α or β
•k = ratio of sample size for group #2 to group #1
•n1= 24 subjects in group 1≈ 25 subjects
•n2 = 24 subjects in group 2 ≈ 25 subjects
•Hence the total sample size will be 50 MATERIALS AND METHODS Inclusion criteria: ASA GRADE 1, 2 & 3 patients Age: 18 years to 70 years Both Gender Elective and
Emergency Surgeries under Spinal Anaesthesia Exclusion criteria: Patients refusing to participate in the study
History of allergy to study drug
Patients with infection at the site of injection,
coagulopathy, increased Intracranial Pressure
Severely altered mental status
Spine deformities or history of laminectomy
Unknown duration of surgery,
Patients converted to general anaesthesia
intra-operatively. METHODOLOGY Spinal Anaesthesia will be given in sitting position with a 26‑gauge Quincke spinal needle in L3–L4 or L4–L5 interspace after skin infiltration with 2% Inj Lignocaine. On noticing free flow and aspiration of Cerebrospinal Fluid, Inj Levobupivacaine 0.5% 3.5ml(17.5mg) along with Inj Buprenorphine 0.3 ml(90mcg) will be injected according to respective groups, B and F (group B – bolus dose group F – fractionated dose) Group B patients will receive a single bolus dose of 0.5% Inj Levobupivacaine 3.5ml(17.5mg) along with Inj Buprenorphine 0.3ml(90mcg) over 10 seconds Group F patients will receive fractionated dose of 0.5% Inj Levobupivacaine 3.5ml(17.5mg) along with Inj Buprenorphine 0.3ml(90mcg), two‑third of the total calculated dose given initially followed by one‑third dose after 60 seconds. After injection of initial two‑third dose, the syringe will be kept attached to the spinal needle for remaining 60 seconds, after which remaining one‑third dose will be administered. Both the drug will be given at a rate of 0.2 ml/second. Patients will be put in supine position (5-10◦ Trendelenburg). The time of onset, level and the regression of sensory and motor block will be assessed. Assessment of sensory block will be done and confirmed by loss of sensation to pinprick, while modified Bromage scale will be used to assess motor block. Surgeon will be allowed for incision when sensory block at T10 level and Bromage scale of 3 will be achieved. Patients with inadequate sensory blockade and requiring conversion to general anaesthesia are excluded from the study. The number of hypotensive episodes and the use Inj. Ephedrine/Inj Phenylephrine will be recorded. The tests will be performed every 5 min till the achievement of maximum sensory and motor block (Bromage scale 3) and every 30 min post‑operatively until the sensory and motor variables are back to normal. REFERENCES 1. Srivastava N, Ahluwalia P, Jheetay GS, Singh G. Bolus dose versus fractionated dose injection of hyperbaric bupivacaine in spinal anaesthesia among adult patients undergoing lower limb surgery: A prospective study. Indian J Clin Anaesth 2020;7(2):238-244 2. Bajwa SJ, Kaur J. Clinical profile of levobupivacaine in regional anesthesia: A systematic review. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2013 Oct;29(4):530-9. doi: 10.4103/0970-9185.119172. PMID: 24249993; PMCID: PMC3819850 3. Goyal A, Singi Y, Mallya P, Bhat G, P S. A Comparison Between Intrathecal Levobupivacaine and Bupivacaine for Quality and Safety During Infraumbilical Surgeries. Cureus. 2022 Oct 22;14(10):e30590. doi: 10.7759/cureus.30590. PMID: 36426304; PMCID: PMC9681702 4. Derakhshan P, Faiz S H R, Rahimzadeh P, Salehi R, Khaef G. A Comparison of the Effect of Fractionated and Bolus Dose Injection on Spinal Anesthesia for Lower Limb Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Anesth Pain Med. 2020;10(5):e102228. https://doi.org/10.5812/aapm.102228
|