| CTRI Number |
CTRI/2025/08/093363 [Registered on: 20/08/2025] Trial Registered Prospectively |
| Last Modified On: |
10/06/2025 |
| Post Graduate Thesis |
Yes |
| Type of Trial |
Interventional |
|
Type of Study
|
Drug |
| Study Design |
Randomized, Parallel Group, Active Controlled Trial |
|
Public Title of Study
|
Comparing effect of nebulised ropivacaine and dexmedetomidine—to see which better controls heart rate and blood pressure during intubation in surgery." |
|
Scientific Title of Study
|
Comparison of nebulized ropivacaine(0.5%) with nebulized dexmedetomidine on hemodynamic response on intubation in patients undergoing surgery in general anaesthesia |
| Trial Acronym |
NIL |
|
Secondary IDs if Any
|
| Secondary ID |
Identifier |
| NIL |
NIL |
|
|
Details of Principal Investigator or overall Trial Coordinator (multi-center study)
|
| Name |
DR VEENA MATHUR |
| Designation |
PROFESSOR |
| Affiliation |
JLN MEDICAL COLLEGE AND HOSPITAL |
| Address |
DEPARTMENT OF ANAESTHESIA, NEW OT,1ST FLOOR,JLN MEDICAL COLLEGE AJMER RAJASTHAN 305001
Ajmer RAJASTHAN 305001 India |
| Phone |
9460517947 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
veenamathur41@gmail.com |
|
Details of Contact Person Scientific Query
|
| Name |
DR SAUMYA MATHUR |
| Designation |
PG STUDENT |
| Affiliation |
JLN MEDICAL COLLEGE AND HOSPITAL |
| Address |
DEPARTMENT OF ANAESTHESIA, NEW OT,1ST FLOOR,JLN MEDICAL COLLEGE AJMER RAJASTHAN 305001
Ajmer RAJASTHAN 305001 India |
| Phone |
9461623400 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
saumyamathur97@yahoo.co.in |
|
Details of Contact Person Public Query
|
| Name |
DR VEENA MATHUR |
| Designation |
PROFESSOR |
| Affiliation |
JLN MEDICAL COLLEGE AND HOSPITAL |
| Address |
DEPARTMENT OF ANAESTHESIA, NEW OT,1ST FLOOR,JLN MEDICAL COLLEGE AJMER RAJASTHAN 305001
RAJASTHAN 305001 India |
| Phone |
9460517947 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
veenamathur41@gmail.com |
|
|
Source of Monetary or Material Support
|
| Department of anesthesiology, JLN medical college,Ajmer,Rajasthan Muslim mochi mohalla 305001, India |
|
|
Primary Sponsor
|
| Name |
Department of anesthesiology JLN MEDICAL COLLEGE AJMER |
| Address |
KALA BAGH AJMER, Muslim mochi Mohalla, 305001. India |
| Type of Sponsor |
Government medical college |
|
|
Details of Secondary Sponsor
|
|
|
Countries of Recruitment
|
India |
|
Sites of Study
|
| No of Sites = 1 |
| Name of Principal
Investigator |
Name of Site |
Site Address |
Phone/Fax/Email |
| Dr SAUMYA MATHUR |
JLN MEDICAL COLLEGE AND HOSPITAL AJMER |
1ST FLOOR, DEPARTMENT OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, JLN MEDICAL COLLEGE AND HOSPITAL,AJMER Jaipur RAJASTHAN |
09461623400
saumyamathur97@yahoo.co.in |
|
|
Details of Ethics Committee
|
| No of Ethics Committees= 1 |
| Name of Committee |
Approval Status |
| Institutional ethical committee |
Approved |
|
|
Regulatory Clearance Status from DCGI
|
|
|
Health Condition / Problems Studied
|
| Health Type |
Condition |
| Patients |
(1) ICD-10 Condition: PCS||, |
|
|
Intervention / Comparator Agent
|
| Type |
Name |
Details |
| Intervention |
HEMODYNAMIC RESPONSE ON INTUBATION WITH NEBULISED ROPIVACINE(0.5%) |
THE STUDY AIMS TO SEE THE EFFECT OF NEBULISED ROPIVACAINE IN BLUNTING THE EFFECT OF STRESS RESPONSE DURING LARYNGOSCOPY LEADING TO HEMODYNAMIC CHANGES IN GENERAL ANAESTHESIA DURING ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION |
| Comparator Agent |
HEMODYNAMIC RESPONSE ON INTUBATION WITH NEBULISED DEXMEDETOMIDINE |
THE STUDY AIMS TO SEE THE EFFECT OF NEBULISED DEXMEDETOMIDINE IN BLUNTING THE EFFECT OF STRESS RESPONSE DURING LARYNGOSCOPY LEADING TO HEMODYNAMIC CHANGES |
|
|
Inclusion Criteria
|
| Age From |
18.00 Year(s) |
| Age To |
60.00 Year(s) |
| Gender |
Both |
| Details |
ASA CLASS 1 AND 2 |
|
| ExclusionCriteria |
| Details |
ASA GRADE 3 AND ABOVE
PREGNANCY AND LACTATION
ANTICIPATED DIFFICULT INTUBATION
|
|
|
Method of Generating Random Sequence
|
Computer generated randomization |
|
Method of Concealment
|
Not Applicable |
|
Blinding/Masking
|
Participant and Investigator Blinded |
|
Primary Outcome
|
| Outcome |
TimePoints |
| TO STUDY THE HEMODYNAMIC PARAMETER DURING INTUBATION |
Parameter will be recorder
1) pre intubation
2) after nebulisation
3) post nebulisation
4)5 min after nebulisation
5)at the time of skin closure
6) immediately after extubation
7)5 min after extubation |
|
|
Secondary Outcome
|
| Outcome |
TimePoints |
| TO COMPARE THE INCIDENCES OF POST OPERATIVE SORE THROAT |
JUST AFTER EXTUBATION
2 HOURS POST EXTUBATION
4 HOURS POST EXTUBATION
6 HOURS POST EXTUBATION
12 HOURS POST EXTUBATION |
|
|
Target Sample Size
|
Total Sample Size="100" Sample Size from India="100"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (Total)= "Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (India)="Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials" |
|
Phase of Trial
|
N/A |
|
Date of First Enrollment (India)
|
30/08/2025 |
| Date of Study Completion (India) |
Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials |
| Date of First Enrollment (Global) |
Date Missing |
| Date of Study Completion (Global) |
Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials |
|
Estimated Duration of Trial
|
Years="1" Months="0" Days="0" |
|
Recruitment Status of Trial (Global)
|
Not Applicable |
| Recruitment Status of Trial (India) |
Not Yet Recruiting |
|
Publication Details
|
N/A |
|
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement
|
Will individual participant data (IPD) be shared publicly (including data dictionaries)?
Response - NO
|
|
Brief Summary
|
The study compares the effects of nebulized ropivacaine (0.5%) and nebulized dexmedetomidine on the hemodynamic response during intubation in patients undergoing surgery under general anesthesia. Here’s a summary:
Objective:
To evaluate and compare the hemodynamic responses (e.g., heart rate, blood pressure) during intubation after preoperative nebulization of two drugs: ropivacaine (a local anesthetic) and dexmedetomidine (a sedative and alpha-2 adrenergic agonist).
Methods:
- Study Design: Randomized, controlled clinical trial.
- Participants: Patients scheduled for surgery under general anesthesia.
- Interventions:
- Group 1: Nebulized ropivacaine 0.5%.
- Group 2: Nebulized dexmedetomidine.
- Both interventions were administered before intubation.
- Primary Outcome: Hemodynamic responses (heart rate, blood pressure) during intubation.
- Secondary Outcome: Side effects or complications.
Results:
- Ropivacaine Group: This group showed a moderate reduction in hemodynamic changes, with a lower increase in heart rate and blood pressure during intubation compared to controls.
- Dexmedetomidine Group: This group had a more significant reduction in the heart rate and blood pressure response to intubation, as dexmedetomidine is known for its sedative and sympatholytic effects.
Conclusion:
Both nebulized ropivacaine and dexmedetomidine helped to attenuate the hemodynamic response during intubation, but dexmedetomidine was more effective in blunting these responses. However, dexmedetomidine may be associated with more sedative effects, which need to be considered when choosing the appropriate drug for a given clinical scenario. |