| CTRI Number |
CTRI/2025/03/081528 [Registered on: 03/03/2025] Trial Registered Prospectively |
| Last Modified On: |
27/02/2025 |
| Post Graduate Thesis |
Yes |
| Type of Trial |
Interventional |
|
Type of Study
|
Diagnostic |
| Study Design |
Randomized, Parallel Group, Active Controlled Trial |
|
Public Title of Study
|
A Clinical Trial To Know The Benefits Of Ultrasonography In Spinal Anaesthesia Among Elderly Population |
|
Scientific Title of Study
|
Comparison of First Pass Success Rate in Spinal Anesthesia between Anatomical Landmark Technique and Pre-Procedure Ultrasound Technique in Geriatric Population - A Randomized Control Trial |
| Trial Acronym |
NIL |
|
Secondary IDs if Any
|
| Secondary ID |
Identifier |
| NIL |
NIL |
|
|
Details of Principal Investigator or overall Trial Coordinator (multi-center study)
|
| Name |
Dr Pooja Ratnakar Vernekar |
| Designation |
DNB PG Resident |
| Affiliation |
Narayana Hrudayalaya Hospitals |
| Address |
Dept of Anaesthesiology,
Mazumdar Shaw Medical Center - Narayana Hrudayalaya Hospitals
Bommasandra Industrial area, Anekal Tq, Bangalore
Bangalore KARNATAKA 560099 India |
| Phone |
9036372682 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
poojarv2012@gmail.com |
|
Details of Contact Person Scientific Query
|
| Name |
Dr Rakesh R |
| Designation |
Associate Consultant |
| Affiliation |
Narayana Hrudayalaya Hospitals |
| Address |
Dept of Anaesthesiology,
Mazumdar Shaw Medical Center -Narayana Hrudayalaya Hospitals
Bommasandra Industrial area,
Anekal Tq, Bangalore
Bangalore KARNATAKA 560099 India |
| Phone |
9886670995 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
rakeshrbmc@gmail.com |
|
Details of Contact Person Public Query
|
| Name |
Dr Rakesh R |
| Designation |
Associate Consultant |
| Affiliation |
Narayana Hrudayalaya Hospitals |
| Address |
Dept of Anaesthesiology,
Mazumdar Shaw Medical Center -Narayana Hrudayalaya Hospitals
Bommasandra Industrial area,
Anekal Tq, Bangalore
Bangalore KARNATAKA 560099 India |
| Phone |
9886670995 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
rakeshrbmc@gmail.com |
|
|
Source of Monetary or Material Support
|
|
|
Primary Sponsor
|
| Name |
Dr Pooja Ratnakar Vernekar |
| Address |
Dept of Anaesthesiology,
Mazumdar Shaw Medical Center - Narayana Hrudayalaya Hospitals
Bommasandra Industrial area,
Anekal Tq, Bangalore |
| Type of Sponsor |
Other [SELF] |
|
|
Details of Secondary Sponsor
|
|
|
Countries of Recruitment
|
India |
|
Sites of Study
|
| No of Sites = 1 |
| Name of Principal
Investigator |
Name of Site |
Site Address |
Phone/Fax/Email |
| Dr Pooja Ratnakar Vernekar |
Mazumdar Shaw Medical Center - Narayana Hrudayalaya Hospitals |
Dept of Anaesthesiology,
Mazumdar Shaw Medical Center - Narayana Hrudayalaya Hospitals
Bommasandra Industrial area,
Anekal Tq, Bangalore
Bangalore KARNATAKA |
09036372682
poojarv2012@gmail.com |
|
|
Details of Ethics Committee
|
| No of Ethics Committees= 1 |
| Name of Committee |
Approval Status |
| Narayana Health Academic Ethics Committee |
Approved |
|
|
Regulatory Clearance Status from DCGI
|
|
|
Health Condition / Problems Studied
|
| Health Type |
Condition |
| Patients |
(1) ICD-10 Condition: O||Medical and Surgical, |
|
|
Intervention / Comparator Agent
|
| Type |
Name |
Details |
| Comparator Agent |
Spinal anesthesia |
Conventional anatomical landmark-based marking of injection site |
| Intervention |
Spinal anesthesia |
Pre procedure Ultrasound testing to mark appropriate injection site |
|
|
Inclusion Criteria
|
| Age From |
60.00 Year(s) |
| Age To |
99.00 Year(s) |
| Gender |
Both |
| Details |
requiring spinal anaesthesia for elective surgical procedures |
|
| ExclusionCriteria |
| Details |
a. Patient in pain or discomfort who are unable to cooperate for an ultrasound scan.
b. Hemodynamically unstable patients in whom performing the scan can be difficult.
c. Patients who had underwent previous spinal surgeries
d. Patients with kyphoscoliosis
e. Patients who are not suitable for a spinal anaesthesia procedure
|
|
|
Method of Generating Random Sequence
|
Computer generated randomization |
|
Method of Concealment
|
Sequentially numbered, sealed, opaque envelopes |
|
Blinding/Masking
|
Open Label |
|
Primary Outcome
|
| Outcome |
TimePoints |
| Number of passes and attempts |
During Spinal anaesthesia |
|
|
Secondary Outcome
|
| Outcome |
TimePoints |
| Procedure time |
duration in seconds |
| Pain during procedure |
Numerical rating scale |
| Complications |
2 days |
|
|
Target Sample Size
|
Total Sample Size="50" Sample Size from India="50"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (Total)= "Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (India)="Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials" |
|
Phase of Trial
|
N/A |
|
Date of First Enrollment (India)
|
05/03/2025 |
| Date of Study Completion (India) |
Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials |
| Date of First Enrollment (Global) |
Date Missing |
| Date of Study Completion (Global) |
Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials |
|
Estimated Duration of Trial
|
Years="0" Months="0" Days="20" |
|
Recruitment Status of Trial (Global)
|
Not Applicable |
| Recruitment Status of Trial (India) |
Not Yet Recruiting |
|
Publication Details
|
N/A |
|
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement
|
Will individual participant data (IPD) be shared publicly (including data dictionaries)?
Response - NO
|
|
Brief Summary
|
This is a randomized control trial to compare the outcomes of spinal anaesthesia in geriatric population between two techniques, a pre-procedure ultrasound technique versus the conventional anatomical landmark technique. The study also aims to know whether a pre-procedure ultrasonography reduces the complications of spinal anaesthesia. 50 subjects will be recruited for the study and will be allocated to either group based on computer generated randomization table. In Anatomical group (AG), spinal anaesthesia will be given by the anatomical landmark technique. In Ultrasound group (UG), spinal anaesthesia will be given after a pre-procedure ultrasound. Then, first pass success rate of spinal anaesthesia between two groups will be compared along with other parameters like procedure time, pain during procedure and complications between two groups. |