Pediatric asthma is a chronic condition with prevalence of 1 to
18 percent of children globally, presenting a significant public health challenge with far reaching economic implications. The economic burden of pediatric asthma is multifaceted, encompassing direct, indirect and intangible costs. Direct costs include healthcare expenses such as hospitalisations, emergency room visits, outpatient consultations, medications, and medical supplies. Indirect costs arise from lost productivity of parents or caregivers who must miss work to care for their children, and long-term economic consequences linked to reduced educational attainment and sub-optimal quality of life in affected children. Intangible costs are related to the pain and suffering endured by patients leading to decline in their quality of life. The alarming rise in pediatric asthma cases has led to increased utilisation of healthcare resources and escalated financial pressures on families and healthcare systems. According to a research conducted by Nurmagambetov et al. in the United States and by Sennhauser FH et al. in Europe, hospitalisations and medications constituted the largest share of direct costs. The indirect costs are equally significant, as parents often face reduced work-productivity or job loss due to frequent absences needed to care for their children suffering from asthma, leading to substantial economic losses. The chronic nature of asthma also means that children with poorly controlled symptoms may experience frequent school absences, adversely affecting their educational outcomes and future earning potential. These indirect costs extend beyond immediate financial impacts, influencing broader socio-economic dimensions and quality of life.
Understanding and quantifying of the economic burden of pediatric asthma is essential for formulating effective public health policies and interventions. By consolidating the principles followed in estimating the socioeconomic burden from various previous studies, this research aims to present a detailed analysis of direct, indirect and intangible costs associated with pediatric asthma, not just on the family but also on the healthcare system. There is paucity of Indian studies evaluating the socioeconomic burden of pediatric asthma on the family and the healthcare system.8 Hence this dissertation project has been conceived to study the socioeconomic burden of pediatric asthma on the family and the healthcare system in a tertiary care public hospital in an urban setting.
Aim:
Primary aim: To estimate the socioeconomic burden of pediatric asthma management by estimating its direct, indirect and intangible costs.
Secondary aim: To assess the factors affecting the socioeconomic burden.
Materials and Methods:
Ethics: The study will be initiated after seeking approval from the Institutional Ethics Committee (IEC) of the hospital. The study will be conducted in compliance with the Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical Research on Human Participants by the Indian Council of Medical Research.
Consent and Assent: Case enrollment will be done after a written informed consent from the parent or guardian. Assent will be procured from children aged 7 years and above.
Study design: Cross sectional, non-interventional, single center study.
Study duration: The study will be conducted over a period of 18 months (prospectively) after approval from the IEC.
Study site: The study will be conducted in patients attending Pediatric Chest Clinic (OPD) of KEM hospital, Mumbai, which is a tertiary care center.
Inclusion Criteria: Children aged more than or equal to 3 years to up to 12 years diagnosed as asthma will be enrolled. Patients with a follow up of at least 1 year in the Pediatric Chest Clinic will be enrolled and information will be extracted from the OPD papers.
Exclusion Criteria: Cases in which parent or guardian not willing for consent to participate in the study.
Confidentiality: The participants details will not be disclosed at any point of time.
Total number of patients to be studied (sample size calculation)
Convenience sample will be taken. PCC has an average of 30 enrollments per year, and follow up patients for at least 3 years (about 90 to100 patients). About 30 percent of these patients are below 3 years of age. Expected enrollment is 50.
Data Recording:
Demographic and Socioeconomic data like age of child and parents, sex, per capita income of family, number of siblings, socioeconomic status according to modified Kuppuswamy scale, type of school, tuition and other extra-curricular activities will be recorded.
Parents details like education, occupation, per capita income and type of family will be recorded.
Clinical data of the child: age of onset of symptoms, age of
diagnosis, severity of asthma, number of exacerbations or
EPR visits in last 1 year, medications details and device
details.
A structured questionnaire will be used to interview the parent
or guardian to collect data on direct, indirect and intangible
costs.
Calculation of direct, indirect, intangible, average and total
costs in INR and US dollar will be done.
A. From the afflicted family’s perspective the costs calculated will be as follows
1. Direct costs:
i. Direct medical costs: OPD registration fees, Bed charges (if admitted), Investigations, and Medications.
ii. Direct non-medical costs: Travel expenses and Food expenses.
2. Indirect costs: Loss of earnings of parent or guardian, loss of job, and school absenteeism.
3. Intangible costs: By documenting the parent or guardians
willingness to pay value using the contingent valuation
technique. It is a recommended method in cost of illness
studies that adopt a societal perspective.The parent will be provided with an initial bid namely, their per capita income to
minimise their starting bid bias and will be asked whether they would like to pay this amount of money as a one time payment for a remedy that would cure their childs asthma. If the parent answers positively then the amount will be increased i.e., doubled until the parent declines to (hypothetically) pay the specified amount. However, if the parent answers negatively then the amount will be decreased i.e., halved until the parent accepts to (hypothetically) pay the specified amount.
Plan for Statistical Analysis:
The following statistical tests will be applied for the various
variables and their analysis: Mean, Median, Mode. Used to
summarize central tendencies in cost data.
Standard Deviation and Variance: Measures of dispersion to
understand the variability in costs.
Quantile regression model will be used to assess the impact of
variables on the costs.
Expected Outcomes:
This study will help in determination and evaluation of economic
costs of asthma and thereby may provide insights on better
planning and improving the infrastructure, for providing better
care to children with asthma and their families and evolve
policies for reduction and control of disease. Implementation of
robust asthma management programs and policies can mitigate
these costs incurred to family and healthcare facility. Enhanced
preventive measures, better access to healthcare, and targeted
interventions can significantly reduce the financial and health
burden of pediatric asthma, ultimately leading to improved
health outcomes and economic benefits to society and
individuals.
References:
1. Liu AH, Bacharier LB, Fitzpatrick AM, Sicherer SH. Childhood Asthma. In: Kliegman RM, St Geme III JW, Blum NJ, Tasker RC, Wilson KM, Schuh AM, Mack CL, editors. Nelson Textbook of Pediatrics, 22nd ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2023 p 1386-1410.
2. Global Initiative for Asthma. Global strategy for asthma management and prevention.2023 update.[Internet].Global Initiative for Asthma; 2023[cited 2024 Aug 20]. Available from: https://ginasthma.org
3. Krahn MD, Berka C, Langlois P, Detsky AS. Direct and indirect costs of asthma in Canada, 1990. CMAJ 1996; 154:821-831.
4. Cohen AJ, Anderson HR, Brunekeef B, et al. The impact of asthma on healthcare utilization and costs in children: a systematic review. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2021;147:556564.
5. Nurmagambetov T, Kuwahara R, Garbe P. The Economic Burden of Asthma in the United States, 2008-2013. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2018;15:348-356.
6. Sennhauser FH, Braun-Fahrländer C, Wildhaber JH. The burden of asthma in children: a European perspective. Paediatr Respir Rev 2005;6:2-7.
7. Lodha R, Puranik M, Kattal N, Kabra SK. Social and economic impact of childhood asthma. Indian Pediatr 2003;40:874-879.
8. Lal A, Kumar L, Malhotra S. Socio-economic burden of childhood asthma. Indian Pediatr 1994;31:425-432.
9. Daniel RA, Aggarwal P, Kalaivani M, Gupta SK. Prevalence of asthma among children in India: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Lung India 2022;39:357-367.
10. Lahiri K, Najmuddin F. Correlation of financial burden with severity of asthma in children. Pediatric Rev Int J Pediatrics Res 2018;5:273-277.
11. Suárez-Varela MM, González AL, Martínez Selva MI. Socioeconomic risk factors in the prevalence of asthma and other atopic diseases in children 6 to 7 years old in Valencia, Spain. Eur J Epidemiol 1999;15:35-40.
12. Jo C. Cost-of-illness studies: concepts, scopes, and methods. Clin Mol Hepatol 2014; 20:327-337.
13. Karande S, Gogtay NJ, More T, Sholapurwala RF, Pandit S, Waghmare S. Economic burden of limited English proficiency: A prevalence-based cost of illness study of its direct, indirect and intangible costs. J Postgrad Med 2023;69:27-34.
14. Wu P, Xu B, Shen A, He Z, Zhang CJP, Ming WK, et al. The economic burden of medical treatment of children with asthma in China. BMC Pediatr 2020;20:386.