FULL DETAILS (Read-only)  -> Click Here to Create PDF for Current Dataset of Trial
CTRI Number  CTRI/2025/03/083699 [Registered on: 28/03/2025] Trial Registered Prospectively
Last Modified On: 21/03/2025
Post Graduate Thesis  Yes 
Type of Trial  Interventional 
Type of Study   Physiotherapy (Not Including YOGA) 
Study Design  Non-randomized, Multiple Arm Trial 
Public Title of Study   A study to compare the improvement in balance and walking using EMG Biofeedback with and without Optokinetic Stimulation in patients with stroke 
Scientific Title of Study   Effectiveness of Electromyography (EMG) Biofeedback With and Without Optokinetic Stimulation on Balance and Gait in Stroke Patients 
Trial Acronym  NIL 
Secondary IDs if Any  
Secondary ID  Identifier 
NIL  NIL 
 
Details of Principal Investigator or overall Trial Coordinator (multi-center study)  
Name  Avani Nataraj K 
Designation  PG Student 
Affiliation  R.V. College of Physiotherapy 
Address  G02 Department of Neurological Physiotherapy RV College of Physiotherapy No.CA 2 83-3 9th Main Rd 4th T Block East 4th Block Jayanagar

Bangalore
KARNATAKA
560011
India 
Phone  8971501802  
Fax    
Email  avani.nataraj99@gmail.com  
 
Details of Contact Person
Scientific Query
 
Name  Trapthi Kamath 
Designation  Associate Professor 
Affiliation  R.V. College of Physiotherapy 
Address  G02 Department of Neurological Physiotherapy RV College of Physiotherapy No.CA 2 83-3 9th Main Rd 4th T Block East 4th Block Jayanagar

Bangalore
KARNATAKA
560011
India 
Phone    
Fax    
Email  trapthikamath.rvcp@rvei.edu.in  
 
Details of Contact Person
Public Query
 
Name  Avani Nataraj K 
Designation  PG Student 
Affiliation  R.V. College of Physiotherapy 
Address  G02 Department of Neurological Physiotherapy RV College of Physiotherapy No.CA 2 83-3 9th Main Rd 4th T Block East 4th Block Jayanagar


KARNATAKA
560011
India 
Phone  8971501802  
Fax    
Email  avani.nataraj99@gmail.com  
 
Source of Monetary or Material Support  
G02 Department of Neurological Physiotherapy RV College of Physiotherapy No.CA 2 83-3 9th Main Rd 4th T Block East 4th Block Jayanagar Bengaluru Karnataka 560011 
 
Primary Sponsor  
Name  Avani Nataraj K 
Address  #186 2nd A Cross KPSC Layout Nagadevanahalli Bengaluru 560056 
Type of Sponsor  Other [Self] 
 
Details of Secondary Sponsor  
Name  Address 
NIL  NIL 
 
Countries of Recruitment     India  
Sites of Study  
No of Sites = 2  
Name of Principal Investigator  Name of Site  Site Address  Phone/Fax/Email 
Avani Nataraj K  RV College of Physiotherapy   G02 Department of Neurological Physiotherapy RV College of Physiotherapy No.CA 2 83-3 9th Main Rd 4th T Block East 4th Block Jayanagar
Bangalore
KARNATAKA 
8971501802

avani.nataraj99@gmail.com 
Avani Nataraj K  Sukino Hospital   Department of Rehabilitation 5th floor 196 Circle Bannerghatta Rd Arekere Bengaluru Karnataka 560076
Bangalore
KARNATAKA 
8971501802

avani.nataraj99@gmail.com 
 
Details of Ethics Committee  
No of Ethics Committees= 2  
Name of Committee  Approval Status 
RV INSTITUTIONAL ETHICAL COMMITTE  Approved 
RV INSTITUTIONAL ETHICAL COMMITTE  Approved 
 
Regulatory Clearance Status from DCGI  
Status 
Not Applicable 
 
Health Condition / Problems Studied  
Health Type  Condition 
Patients  (1) ICD-10 Condition: I619||Nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage, unspecified,  
 
Intervention / Comparator Agent  
Type  Name  Details 
Intervention  Electromyography (EMG) biofeedback with Optokinetic Stimulation  Optokinetic stimulation will be given on an electronic device with a velocity of 1cm/s for a duration of 20 minuites (4 minuites with 1 min rest) along with which EMG biofeedback will be given for ankle strengthening for a 20 minuite duration. Both therapies will be given for 2 days weekly for 8 weeks. 
Comparator Agent  Electromyography (EMG) biofeedback without Optokinetic Stimulation  EMG biofeedback will be given for ankle strengthening for a 20 minuite duration. It will be given for 2 days weekly for 8 weeks. 
 
Inclusion Criteria  
Age From  35.00 Year(s)
Age To  65.00 Year(s)
Gender  Both 
Details  Subjects who are willing to participate as volunteers and sign the informed written consent.
Subjects diagnosed with one time stroke.
Able to maintain upright standing posture
Subjects who are medically stable
Subjects with MoCA score more than 26
Subjects with FAC score more than than 3 
 
ExclusionCriteria 
Details  Any other neurological or rheumatic disorders
Recent spinal or lower limb surgery
Any spinal or limb deformities
Uncontrolled hypertension
Skin rashes or allergy
Lower extremity fractures
Amputation of lower extremity
Vestibular disorders
Partial or Complete Blindness
 
 
Method of Generating Random Sequence   Not Applicable 
Method of Concealment   Not Applicable 
Blinding/Masking   Not Applicable 
Primary Outcome  
Outcome  TimePoints 
IMPROVE BALANCE AND GAIT WITH THE TINETII PERFORMANCE ORIENTED MOBILITY ASSESSMENT SCALE  2
PRE-INTERVENTION
POST-INTERVENTION 
 
Secondary Outcome  
Outcome  TimePoints 
IMPROVE FALL RISK  2
PRE-INTERVENTION
POST-INTERVENTION 
 
Target Sample Size   Total Sample Size="60"
Sample Size from India="60" 
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (Total)= "Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (India)="Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials" 
Phase of Trial   N/A 
Date of First Enrollment (India)   01/04/2025 
Date of Study Completion (India) Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials 
Date of First Enrollment (Global)  Date Missing 
Date of Study Completion (Global) Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials 
Estimated Duration of Trial   Years="0"
Months="6"
Days="0" 
Recruitment Status of Trial (Global)   Not Yet Recruiting 
Recruitment Status of Trial (India)  Open to Recruitment 
Publication Details   N/A 
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement

Will individual participant data (IPD) be shared publicly (including data dictionaries)?  

Response - NO
Brief Summary  
Title

EFFECTIVENESS OF ELECTROMYOGRAPHY (EMG) BIOFEEDBACK WITH AND WITHOUT OPTOKINETIC STIMULATION ON BALANCE AND GAIT IN STROKE PATIENTS- A COMPARATIVE STUDY

Introduction

Stroke is one of the leading causes of disability worldwide, affecting millions of people each year. Many stroke survivors struggle with balance and walking, making everyday activities challenging and increasing their risk of falls. Traditional rehabilitation methods focus on improving motor control, but newer approaches, like Electromyographic (EMG) Biofeedback and Optokinetic Stimulation (OKS), have shown to be effective in various literature. EMG Biofeedback provides real-time feedback on muscle activity, helping patients regain control, while OKS stimulates the brain using visual motion cues to stimulate and strengthen the vestibulo-ocular reflex to improve stability. This study explores whether combining these two therapies leads to better recovery compared to using EMG Biofeedback alone.
Aim and Objectives

Aim:
To compare the effectiveness of EMG Biofeedback with and without Optokinetic Stimulation in improving balance and gait in individuals with stroke.

Objectives:
To assess the effectiveness of Optokinetic Stimulation combined with EMG Biofeedback on balance improvement in stroke survivors.
To evaluate the impact of Optokinetic Stimulation with EMG Biofeedback on gait in stroke patients.
To determine the effectiveness of EMG Biofeedback alone in enhancing balance.
To analyze the effectiveness of EMG Biofeedback alone in improving gait.


Methodology and Procedure

A non-randomized comparative parallel-arm study will be conducted on 60 stroke patients divided into two groups:

Group A: EMG Biofeedback with Optokinetic Stimulation

Group B: EMG Biofeedback without Optokinetic Stimulation


Participants will undergo an 8-week intervention, with balance and gait assessed using the Tinetti Performance-Oriented Mobility Assessment (POMA) scale. Conventional therapy, including stretching, strengthening, and balance training, will be provided to both groups. The study will be conducted at R.V. College of Physiotherapy and affiliated centers.

Statistical Analysis

Descriptive statistics will summarize categorical variables as frequencies and percentages, and quantitative variables as means and standard deviations. The effectiveness of interventions will be analyzed using paired t-tests or Wilcoxon signed-rank tests for within-group comparisons, and unpaired t-tests or Mann-Whitney U tests for between-group comparisons. A p-value of less than 0.05 will be considered statistically significant.

 
Close