FULL DETAILS (Read-only)  -> Click Here to Create PDF for Current Dataset of Trial
CTRI Number  CTRI/2025/03/081877 [Registered on: 07/03/2025] Trial Registered Prospectively
Last Modified On: 06/03/2025
Post Graduate Thesis  Yes 
Type of Trial  Interventional 
Type of Study   Medical Device
Surgical/Anesthesia 
Study Design  Randomized, Parallel Group, Active Controlled Trial 
Public Title of Study   Comparison of two devices for airway management of obese patients for providing breaths to patients during surgery 
Scientific Title of Study   Clinical performance of I-gel and I-gel plus for airway management of obese patients: a prospective randomised controlled study 
Trial Acronym  NIL 
Secondary IDs if Any  
Secondary ID  Identifier 
NIL  NIL 
 
Details of Principal Investigator or overall Trial Coordinator (multi-center study)  
Name  Farhan Zahir Shaikh 
Designation  Junior Resident 
Affiliation  King Georges Medical University 
Address  Room No. 1, Department of Anaesthesiology, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh,

Lucknow
UTTAR PRADESH
226003
India 
Phone  9839088823  
Fax    
Email  drfarhan1508@gmail.com  
 
Details of Contact Person
Scientific Query
 
Name  Dr Rajesh Raman 
Designation  Additional Professor 
Affiliation  King Georges Medical University 
Address  Room No. 2, Department of Anaesthesiology, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh,

Lucknow
UTTAR PRADESH
226003
India 
Phone  9451564339  
Fax    
Email  ramanrajesh83@gmail.com  
 
Details of Contact Person
Public Query
 
Name  Dr Rajesh Raman 
Designation  Additional Professor 
Affiliation  King Georges Medical University 
Address  Room No. 2, Department of Anaesthesiology, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh,

Lucknow
UTTAR PRADESH
226003
India 
Phone  9451564339  
Fax    
Email  ramanrajesh83@gmail.com  
 
Source of Monetary or Material Support  
King Georges Medical University, Chowk, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India. Pin code-226003 
 
Primary Sponsor  
Name  Dr Farhan Zahir Shaikh 
Address  Room No. 1, Department of Anesthesiology, King Georges Medical University, Chowk, Lucknow, Pin code-226003, Uttar Pradesh, India. 
Type of Sponsor  Other [Self-funded] 
 
Details of Secondary Sponsor  
Name  Address 
NIL  NIL 
 
Countries of Recruitment     India  
Sites of Study  
No of Sites = 1  
Name of Principal Investigator  Name of Site  Site Address  Phone/Fax/Email 
Dr Rajesh Raman  King Georges Medical University  Department of Anesthesiology, King Georges Medical University, Chowk, Lucknow, Pin code-226003
Lucknow
UTTAR PRADESH 
9451564339

ramanrajesh83@gmail.com 
 
Details of Ethics Committee  
No of Ethics Committees= 1  
Name of Committee  Approval Status 
Institutional Ethics Committee, King Geroge Medical University  Approved 
 
Regulatory Clearance Status from DCGI  
Status 
Not Applicable 
 
Health Condition / Problems Studied  
Health Type  Condition 
Patients  (1) ICD-10 Condition: O||Medical and Surgical,  
 
Intervention / Comparator Agent  
Type  Name  Details 
Intervention  Group I  Airway of the patients managed using I-gel supraglottic airway device. The duration of the intervention will start from start of the surgery to the end of the surgery. 
Comparator Agent  Group P  Airway of the patients managed using I-gel plus supraglottic airway device. The duration of the intervention will start from start of the surgery to the end of the surgery. 
 
Inclusion Criteria  
Age From  18.00 Year(s)
Age To  60.00 Year(s)
Gender  Both 
Details  Obesity (BMI greater than or equal to 30 KG/m2)
ASA physical Status II & III
Elective surgery 
 
ExclusionCriteria 
Details  Pregnancy
Inter-incisor gap
Head and neck surgery
Respiratory and cardiovascular disease
Refusal to give consent 
 
Method of Generating Random Sequence   Computer generated randomization 
Method of Concealment   Sequentially numbered, sealed, opaque envelopes 
Blinding/Masking   Participant Blinded 
Primary Outcome  
Outcome  TimePoints 
Oropharyngeal leak pressure  One minute after confirmation of supraglottic airway device placement 
 
Secondary Outcome  
Outcome  TimePoints 
1. Time taken for supraglottic airway device insertion
2. Success rate of insertion
3. Ease of Insertion
4. Leak Fraction
5. Fiberoptic view of glottis
6. Complications 
1. Time taken for supraglottic airway device insertion, Success rate of insertion, Ease of Insertion, Leak Fraction, and Fiberoptic view of glottis will be recorded after confirmation of supraglottic airway device before start of surgery intraoperatively.
Complications will be recorded in the first 24 hours after surgery  
 
Target Sample Size   Total Sample Size="76"
Sample Size from India="76" 
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (Total)= "76"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (India)="76" 
Phase of Trial   N/A 
Date of First Enrollment (India)   01/04/2025 
Date of Study Completion (India) 30/06/2025 
Date of First Enrollment (Global)  Date Missing 
Date of Study Completion (Global) Date Missing 
Estimated Duration of Trial   Years="0"
Months="3"
Days="0" 
Recruitment Status of Trial (Global)   Not Applicable 
Recruitment Status of Trial (India)  Completed 
Publication Details   N/A 
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement

Will individual participant data (IPD) be shared publicly (including data dictionaries)?  

Response - YES
  1. What data in particular will be shared?
    Response - All of the individual participant data collected during the trial, after de-identification.

  2. What additional supporting information will be shared?
    Response -  Study Protocol
    Response -  Statistical Analysis Plan

  3. Who will be able to view these files?
    Response - Researchers whose proposed use of the data has been approved by an independent review committee identified for this purpose.

  4. For what types of analyses will this data be available?
    Response - For individual participant data meta-analysis.

  5. By what mechanism will data be made available?
    Response - Proposals should be directed to [ramanrajesh83@gmail.com].

  6. For how long will this data be available start date provided 01-01-2026 and end date provided 31-12-2028?
    Response - Beginning 9 months and ending 36 months following article publication.

  7. Any URL or additional information regarding plan/policy for sharing IPD? 
    Additional Information - NIL
Brief Summary  

Clinical performance of I-gel and I-gel plus for airway management of obese patients: A prospective randomised controlled study

INTRODUCTION

Obesity has emerged as a global health concern, and its prevalence continues to rise, presenting unique challenges in various medical contexts, particularly during anesthesia and surgery.[1] Airway management in obese patients poses distinct difficulties due to altered anatomy, increased adipose tissue, and a higher prevalence of comorbid conditions such as obstructive sleep apnea. As such, there is a growing need for effective and safe airway management strategies tailored to this specific population.

Clinical performance of I-gel and I-gel plus for airway management of obese patients: a prospective randomised controlled study

 

 

    I-gel is a new supraglottic airway device designed to fit the peri-laryngeal and hypo-pharyngeal structures without the use of an inflatable cuff, made of a thermoplastic elastomer (styrene ethylene butadiene styrene) with a soft durometer (hardness) and gel like, provides a seal in patients with a wide range of anatomical variation. The claimed potential advantages include ease of insertion and use with minimal tissue compression and congestion, airway complications and stability following insertion. The I-gel is a second-generation supraglottic airway device designed to provide a non-invasive means of securing the airway. A previous anatomical study in cadavers has shown that the I-gel™ is capable of achieving a good peri-laryngeal seal without the requirement for an inflatable cuff.[2]

    It also has features designed to allow a gastric tube to be passed into the stomach. The anatomically shaped non inflatable cuff may be responsible for higher oropharyngeal leak pressure that suggests better safety and provide positive pressure ventilation.[3]

 

Several studies have investigated the role of the I-gel in obese patients. Here are references to some of these studies-

Prabha et al compared I-gel for general anesthesia in obese and nonobese patients.[4] In this study they concluded that i-gel is as effective in obese patients as in nonobese patients when used for securing the airway for surgical procedures.

Singh et al did a comparative evaluation of ProSeal laryngeal mask airway, I-gel and Supreme laryngeal mask airway in adult patients undergoing elective surgery a randomised trial study.[5] They found that PLMA provides better sealing pressure but takes longer to insert. I-gel and SLMA have similar sealing pressures. I-gel insertion time is quicker.

 
Close