| CTRI Number |
CTRI/2025/03/081877 [Registered on: 07/03/2025] Trial Registered Prospectively |
| Last Modified On: |
06/03/2025 |
| Post Graduate Thesis |
Yes |
| Type of Trial |
Interventional |
|
Type of Study
|
Medical Device Surgical/Anesthesia |
| Study Design |
Randomized, Parallel Group, Active Controlled Trial |
|
Public Title of Study
|
Comparison of two devices for airway management of obese patients for providing breaths to patients during surgery |
|
Scientific Title of Study
|
Clinical performance of I-gel and I-gel plus for airway management of obese patients: a prospective randomised controlled study |
| Trial Acronym |
NIL |
|
Secondary IDs if Any
|
| Secondary ID |
Identifier |
| NIL |
NIL |
|
|
Details of Principal Investigator or overall Trial Coordinator (multi-center study)
|
| Name |
Farhan Zahir Shaikh |
| Designation |
Junior Resident |
| Affiliation |
King Georges Medical University |
| Address |
Room No. 1, Department of Anaesthesiology, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh,
Lucknow UTTAR PRADESH 226003 India |
| Phone |
9839088823 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
drfarhan1508@gmail.com |
|
Details of Contact Person Scientific Query
|
| Name |
Dr Rajesh Raman |
| Designation |
Additional Professor |
| Affiliation |
King Georges Medical University |
| Address |
Room No. 2, Department of Anaesthesiology, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh,
Lucknow UTTAR PRADESH 226003 India |
| Phone |
9451564339 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
ramanrajesh83@gmail.com |
|
Details of Contact Person Public Query
|
| Name |
Dr Rajesh Raman |
| Designation |
Additional Professor |
| Affiliation |
King Georges Medical University |
| Address |
Room No. 2, Department of Anaesthesiology, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh,
Lucknow UTTAR PRADESH 226003 India |
| Phone |
9451564339 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
ramanrajesh83@gmail.com |
|
|
Source of Monetary or Material Support
|
| King Georges Medical University, Chowk, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India. Pin code-226003 |
|
|
Primary Sponsor
|
| Name |
Dr Farhan Zahir Shaikh |
| Address |
Room No. 1, Department of Anesthesiology, King Georges Medical University, Chowk, Lucknow, Pin code-226003, Uttar Pradesh, India. |
| Type of Sponsor |
Other [Self-funded] |
|
|
Details of Secondary Sponsor
|
|
|
Countries of Recruitment
|
India |
|
Sites of Study
|
| No of Sites = 1 |
| Name of Principal
Investigator |
Name of Site |
Site Address |
Phone/Fax/Email |
| Dr Rajesh Raman |
King Georges Medical University |
Department of Anesthesiology, King Georges Medical University, Chowk, Lucknow, Pin code-226003 Lucknow UTTAR PRADESH |
9451564339
ramanrajesh83@gmail.com |
|
|
Details of Ethics Committee
|
| No of Ethics Committees= 1 |
| Name of Committee |
Approval Status |
| Institutional Ethics Committee, King Geroge Medical University |
Approved |
|
|
Regulatory Clearance Status from DCGI
|
|
|
Health Condition / Problems Studied
|
| Health Type |
Condition |
| Patients |
(1) ICD-10 Condition: O||Medical and Surgical, |
|
|
Intervention / Comparator Agent
|
| Type |
Name |
Details |
| Intervention |
Group I |
Airway of the patients managed using I-gel supraglottic airway device. The duration of the intervention will start from start of the surgery to the end of the surgery. |
| Comparator Agent |
Group P |
Airway of the patients managed using I-gel plus supraglottic airway device. The duration of the intervention will start from start of the surgery to the end of the surgery. |
|
|
Inclusion Criteria
|
| Age From |
18.00 Year(s) |
| Age To |
60.00 Year(s) |
| Gender |
Both |
| Details |
Obesity (BMI greater than or equal to 30 KG/m2)
ASA physical Status II & III
Elective surgery |
|
| ExclusionCriteria |
| Details |
Pregnancy
Inter-incisor gap
Head and neck surgery
Respiratory and cardiovascular disease
Refusal to give consent |
|
|
Method of Generating Random Sequence
|
Computer generated randomization |
|
Method of Concealment
|
Sequentially numbered, sealed, opaque envelopes |
|
Blinding/Masking
|
Participant Blinded |
|
Primary Outcome
|
| Outcome |
TimePoints |
| Oropharyngeal leak pressure |
One minute after confirmation of supraglottic airway device placement |
|
|
Secondary Outcome
|
| Outcome |
TimePoints |
1. Time taken for supraglottic airway device insertion
2. Success rate of insertion
3. Ease of Insertion
4. Leak Fraction
5. Fiberoptic view of glottis
6. Complications |
1. Time taken for supraglottic airway device insertion, Success rate of insertion, Ease of Insertion, Leak Fraction, and Fiberoptic view of glottis will be recorded after confirmation of supraglottic airway device before start of surgery intraoperatively.
Complications will be recorded in the first 24 hours after surgery |
|
|
Target Sample Size
|
Total Sample Size="76" Sample Size from India="76"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (Total)= "76"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (India)="76" |
|
Phase of Trial
|
N/A |
|
Date of First Enrollment (India)
|
01/04/2025 |
| Date of Study Completion (India) |
30/06/2025 |
| Date of First Enrollment (Global) |
Date Missing |
| Date of Study Completion (Global) |
Date Missing |
|
Estimated Duration of Trial
|
Years="0" Months="3" Days="0" |
|
Recruitment Status of Trial (Global)
|
Not Applicable |
| Recruitment Status of Trial (India) |
Completed |
|
Publication Details
|
N/A |
|
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement
|
Will individual participant data (IPD) be shared publicly (including data dictionaries)?
Response - YES
- What data in particular will be shared?
Response - All of the individual participant data collected during the trial, after de-identification.
- What additional supporting information will be shared?
Response - Study Protocol Response - Statistical Analysis Plan
- Who will be able to view these files?
Response - Researchers whose proposed use of the data has been approved by an independent review committee identified for this purpose.
- For what types of analyses will this data be available?
Response - For individual participant data meta-analysis.
- By what mechanism will data be made available?
Response - Proposals should be directed to [ramanrajesh83@gmail.com].
- For how long will this data be available start date provided 01-01-2026 and end date provided 31-12-2028?
Response - Beginning 9 months and ending 36 months following article publication.
- Any URL or additional information regarding plan/policy for sharing IPD?
Additional Information - NIL
|
|
Brief Summary
|
Clinical
performance of I-gel and I-gel plus for airway management of obese patients: A
prospective randomised controlled study
INTRODUCTION
Obesity
has emerged as a global health concern, and its prevalence continues to rise,
presenting unique challenges in various medical contexts, particularly during
anesthesia and surgery.[1] Airway management in obese patients poses
distinct difficulties due to altered anatomy, increased adipose tissue, and a
higher prevalence of comorbid conditions such as obstructive sleep apnea. As
such, there is a growing need for effective and safe airway management
strategies tailored to this specific population.
Clinical
performance of I-gel and I-gel plus for airway management of obese patients: a
prospective randomised controlled study
I-gel is a new supraglottic airway
device designed to fit the peri-laryngeal and hypo-pharyngeal
structures without the use of an inflatable cuff, made of a thermoplastic
elastomer (styrene ethylene
butadiene styrene) with a soft durometer (hardness) and gel like, provides a seal in patients with a wide range of
anatomical variation. The claimed potential advantages include ease of
insertion and use with minimal tissue compression and congestion, airway
complications and stability
following insertion. The I-gel
is a second-generation supraglottic airway device designed to provide a
non-invasive means of securing the airway. A previous anatomical study in cadavers has shown that the I-gel™ is capable of achieving a good peri-laryngeal seal without the
requirement for an inflatable cuff.[2]
It also has features designed to allow a
gastric tube to be passed into the stomach. The anatomically shaped non
inflatable cuff may be responsible for higher oropharyngeal leak pressure that suggests better
safety and provide
positive pressure ventilation.[3]
Several
studies have investigated the role of the I-gel in obese patients. Here are references to some
of these studies-
Prabha et al compared I-gel for general anesthesia in obese and
nonobese patients.[4] In this study they concluded that i-gel is as
effective in obese patients as in nonobese patients when used for securing the
airway for surgical procedures.
Singh et al did
a comparative
evaluation of ProSeal laryngeal mask airway, I-gel and Supreme laryngeal mask
airway in adult patients undergoing elective surgery a randomised trial study.[5] They found that PLMA provides better sealing pressure but takes
longer to insert. I-gel and SLMA have similar sealing pressures. I-gel
insertion time is quicker. |