TITLE Comparative cephalometric evaluation of changes in the upper airway among patients with developing class III malocclusion treated using two interceptive orthodontic appliances. INTRODUCTION, RATIONALE, RELEVANCE Breathing is one of the primary essential processes of the human body, and it is facilitated by the upper airway. Orthodontists have always been interested in investigating the upper airway, with the primary goal being to explain the relationship between pharyngal features and the growth and development of the craniofacial complex. Predisposing factors that block the upper airway include obstructive processes of morphologic, physiologic, or pathologic nature, such as tumors, polyps, allergic and chronic rhinitis, infections, irritant environmental factors, congenital nasal deformities, tonsil, and hypertrophy etc. When that occurs, a functional imbalance leads to an oral breathing pattern that might modify the shapes of the dental arch and the face morphology, ultimately resulting in a malocclusion. One of the most difficult malocclusions to treat is skeletal Class III malocclusion. Studies on the etiology of Class III malocclusion have shown that 32–63% of patients with a skeletal Class III malocclusion have a retruded maxilla or a combination of a retruded maxilla and excessive mandibular growth. A mixture of various treatment methods, such as chin cups, SEC III appliance, skeletal anchorage systems, removable functional appliances, fixed appliances, and removable appliances are possible approaches. The size of the maxilla and the mandible has been shown to correlate with the pharyngeal airway dimensions. A skeletal change that can occur from the orthopedic treatment of Class III malocclusion is the alteration of the size of the airway. The primary effects of correction with the SEC III appliance were mainly skeletal and slightly dentoalveolar in nature with the greatest impact on maxillary and mandibular position, with significant amount of sagittal advancement in maxilla. The RME- reverse pull headgear induces a significant increase of the inter maxillary vertical relationships. Airway dimensions can be assessed using different imaging techniques, one of which is lateral cephalometric radiography. Lateral cephalograms are obtained routinely as a part of orthodontic diagnostic procedures. The accuracy of airway measurements from lateral cephalograms, cone-beam computed tomographic (CBCT) lateral reconstructions, and CBCT axial planes, airway linear measurements are reliable, with both lateral cephalograms and CBCT reconstruction. Cephalometric analysis allows the measurement of the airway dimensions without exposing the patient to additional radiation.In this study pre-and post-treatment lateral cephalometric radiographs of 30 patients who will be treated using two interceptive orthodontic appliances in developing class III malocclusion will be used. Group I patients will be treated using a reverse pull headgear after rapid maxillary expansion (RME).Group II patients will be treated using the modified SEC III appliance having two occlusal splints with Class III elastics, RME, and a chin cup as part of it. NOVELTY Currently studies evaluating the impact of airway dimensions in patients receiving RME -reverse pull headgear/ The modified SEC III appliance treatment for developing skeletal class III malocclusion are not available in the literature and there is a lacuna in the literature. So, the purpose of this study is to assess whether there are any appreciable variations in the airway dimensions when employing two interceptive orthodontic appliances—the modified SEC III appliance and RME -reverse pull headgear in patients with developing skeletal class III malocclusion reporting to the Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, MES Dental College Perinthalmanna. RESEARCH QUESTION Will there be a noticeable difference in airway dimensions between the two interceptive orthodontic appliances (the modified SEC III appliance and RME -reverse pull headgear) in patients with developing skeletal class III malocclusion who are reporting to the Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, MES Dental College, from May 31, 2024 to December 31, 2025? AIM To evaluate any changes in the upper airway while using the modified SEC III appliance and RME -reverse pull headgear in patients with developing skeletal class III malocclusion who are reporting to the Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, MES Dental College Perinthalmanna.
INCLUSION CRITERIA Patients with developing skeletal Class III Malocclusion will be included in the study Angles class III molar and canine relationship with anterior and posterior crossbite Absence of CO CR discrepancy Wits appraisal of 2 mm Skeletal maturation CVMI 2&3 stage EXCLUSION CRITERIA Patients with facial asymmetry Patients with CVMI stage 4 onward Patients with a history of previous facial trauma tonsillectomy maxillofacial surgery adenoidectomy Patients with congenital syndromes History of metabolic disorders Presence of periodontitis History of previous orthodontic orthopaedic treatment Presence of decayed molar teeth
|