| CTRI Number |
CTRI/2024/10/075653 [Registered on: 23/10/2024] Trial Registered Prospectively |
| Last Modified On: |
11/10/2024 |
| Post Graduate Thesis |
No |
| Type of Trial |
Interventional |
|
Type of Study
|
Surgical/Anesthesia |
| Study Design |
Randomized, Parallel Group, Placebo Controlled Trial |
|
Public Title of Study
|
comparison of the safety and effictiveness of three different approaches to pain relief after spine surgery |
|
Scientific Title of Study
|
Comparative safety and efficacy of three different ultrasound guided approaches to lumbar dorsal rami for pain relief in adults undergoing lumbar spine surgery – a double blind randomized controlled non-inferiority trial. |
| Trial Acronym |
NIL |
|
Secondary IDs if Any
|
| Secondary ID |
Identifier |
| NIL |
NIL |
|
|
Details of Principal Investigator or overall Trial Coordinator (multi-center study)
|
| Name |
Parnandi Bhaskar Rao |
| Designation |
Professor |
| Affiliation |
All India Institute of medical sciences, Bhubaneswar |
| Address |
ROOM NO. 426, 4TH FLOOR, ACADEMIC BUILDING, AIIMS, SIJUA, PATRAPADA, BHUBANESWAR
Khordha ORISSA 751019 India |
| Phone |
09438884044 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
anaes_bhaskar@aiimsbhubaneswar.edu.in |
|
Details of Contact Person Scientific Query
|
| Name |
Parnandi Bhaskar Rao |
| Designation |
Professor |
| Affiliation |
All India Institute of medical sciences, Bhubaneswar |
| Address |
ROOM NO. 426, 4TH FLOOR, ACADEMIC BUILDING, AIIMS, SIJUA, PATRAPADA, BHUBANESWAR
Khordha ORISSA 751019 India |
| Phone |
09438884044 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
anaes_bhaskar@aiimsbhubaneswar.edu.in |
|
Details of Contact Person Public Query
|
| Name |
Parnandi Bhaskar Rao |
| Designation |
Professor |
| Affiliation |
All India Institute of medical sciences, Bhubaneswar |
| Address |
ROOM NO. 426, 4TH FLOOR, ACADEMIC BUILDING, AIIMS, SIJUA, PATRAPADA, BHUBANESWAR
Khordha ORISSA 751019 India |
| Phone |
09438884044 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
anaes_bhaskar@aiimsbhubaneswar.edu.in |
|
|
Source of Monetary or Material Support
|
|
|
Primary Sponsor
|
| Name |
Parnandi Bhaskar Rao |
| Address |
Room No. 426, 4TH Floor, Academic Building, AIIMS, Sijua, Patrapada, BHUBANESWAR, PIN 751019, Orissa, India |
| Type of Sponsor |
Other [self] |
|
|
Details of Secondary Sponsor
|
| Name |
Address |
| NITASHA MISHRA |
ROOM NO. 12, 5TH FLOOR, HOSPITAL BUILDING, AIIMS, SIJUA, PATRAPADA, BHUBANESWAR |
|
|
Countries of Recruitment
|
India |
|
Sites of Study
|
| No of Sites = 1 |
| Name of Principal
Investigator |
Name of Site |
Site Address |
Phone/Fax/Email |
| Dr Parnandi Bhaskar Rao |
Orthopaedics Operation Theatre |
4TH FLOOR, S4+2, HOSPITAL BUILDING, AIIMS, SIJUA, PATRAPADA, BHUBANESWAR Khordha ORISSA |
09438884044
anaes_bhaskar@aiimsbhubaneswar.edu.in |
|
|
Details of Ethics Committee
|
| No of Ethics Committees= 1 |
| Name of Committee |
Approval Status |
| AIIMS Bhubaneswar ethics committee |
Approved |
|
|
Regulatory Clearance Status from DCGI
|
|
|
Health Condition / Problems Studied
|
| Health Type |
Condition |
| Patients |
(1) ICD-10 Condition: O||Medical and Surgical, (2) ICD-10 Condition: M479||Spondylosis, unspecified, |
|
|
Intervention / Comparator Agent
|
| Type |
Name |
Details |
| Comparator Agent |
control |
no block but shall receive standard analgesics for pain relief |
| Intervention |
three different approaches to lumbar dorsal rami block |
erector spinae plane block
thoracolumbar interfascial plane block
submultifidus block |
|
|
Inclusion Criteria
|
| Age From |
18.00 Year(s) |
| Age To |
70.00 Year(s) |
| Gender |
Both |
| Details |
Adult ASA 1 & 2 patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery up to 4 levels with midline incision in prone position |
|
| ExclusionCriteria |
| Details |
Those who refuse to participate
Sensitive to local anaesthetics
Liver and Kidney failure
|
|
|
Method of Generating Random Sequence
|
Computer generated randomization |
|
Method of Concealment
|
Sequentially numbered, sealed, opaque envelopes |
|
Blinding/Masking
|
Participant and Outcome Assessor Blinded |
|
Primary Outcome
|
| Outcome |
TimePoints |
| time from block administration to demand of first analgesia by patient after surgery |
at 0, 4 and 12 hours after surgery |
|
|
Secondary Outcome
|
| Outcome |
TimePoints |
Total tramadol consumption within 24 hours after surgery
Postoperative pain score (VAS)
Quality of Recovery – 9 score
Any block related complications
|
at 0, 6, 12 and 24 hours after surgery |
|
|
Target Sample Size
|
Total Sample Size="100" Sample Size from India="100"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (Total)= "Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (India)="Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials" |
|
Phase of Trial
|
Phase 3 |
|
Date of First Enrollment (India)
|
28/10/2024 |
| Date of Study Completion (India) |
Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials |
| Date of First Enrollment (Global) |
Date Missing |
| Date of Study Completion (Global) |
Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials |
|
Estimated Duration of Trial
|
Years="1" Months="0" Days="0" |
|
Recruitment Status of Trial (Global)
|
Not Applicable |
| Recruitment Status of Trial (India) |
Not Yet Recruiting |
|
Publication Details
|
N/A |
|
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement
|
Will individual participant data (IPD) be shared publicly (including data dictionaries)?
Response - NO
|
|
Brief Summary
|
Lumbar spine surgery is often associated with severe pain in the perioperative period. Several regional analgesia techniques have been found to be effective in the management of pain in these group of patients [1]. Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) and thoracolumbar interfascial plane block (TLIP) are established regional approaches for effective pain management with reduction in pain scores and opioid consumption [2, 3]. Similarly, lumbar submultifidus muscle block has been introduced recently as a novel regional analgesia technique. This involves instillation of local anaesthetics below the lumbar multifidus muscle to block pain conduction through dorsal rami providing acceptable analgesia following lumbar spine surgery [4]. However, scarce information is available on the comparative safety and efficacy of these approaches for post-operative analgesia for lumbar spine surgery, hence we planned this randomized controlled trial. REFERENCES: 1. Hong B, Baek S, Kang H, Oh C, Jo Y, Lee S, Park S. Regional analgesia techniques for lumbar spine surgery: a frequentist network meta-analysis. Int J Surg. 2023 Jun 1;109(6):1728-1741. 2. Oh SK, Lim BG, Won YJ, Lee DK, Kim SS. Analgesic efficacy of erector spinae plane block in lumbar spine surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Anesth. 2022 Jun;78:110647. 3. Abdildin YG, Salamat A, Omarov T, Sultanova M, Krassavina Y, Viderman D. Thoracolumbar Interfascial Plane Block in Spinal Surgery: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis. World Neurosurg. 2023 Jun;174:52-61. 4. Song L, Ying S, Wang Z, Yuan X. Ultrasound-guided lumbar multifidus block provides effective postoperative analgesia for lumbar spine surgery. J Clin Anesth. 2018 May;46:116-117. |