| CTRI Number |
CTRI/2024/08/072020 [Registered on: 07/08/2024] Trial Registered Prospectively |
| Last Modified On: |
26/08/2024 |
| Post Graduate Thesis |
Yes |
| Type of Trial |
Interventional |
|
Type of Study
|
Surgical/Anesthesia |
| Study Design |
Randomized, Parallel Group Trial |
|
Public Title of Study
|
Comparing Pain Relief and Opioid Use After Laparoscopic Gallbladder Surgery: Ultrasound-Guided Nerve Blocks -Bilateral intertransverse nerve block versus Bilateral erector spinae nerve block. |
|
Scientific Title of Study
|
Comparison of postoperative analgesia and opioid consumption in ultrasound guided bilateral intertransverse process block versus bilateral erector spinae plane block in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy |
| Trial Acronym |
nil |
|
Secondary IDs if Any
|
| Secondary ID |
Identifier |
| NIL |
NIL |
|
|
Details of Principal Investigator or overall Trial Coordinator (multi-center study)
|
| Name |
Dr Nikitha A |
| Designation |
Primary DNB Anaesthesia resident |
| Affiliation |
ASTER CMI HOSPITAL,HEBBAL |
| Address |
2nd floor,Department of anaesthesia, Aster CMI Hospital #43/2, New airport road, NH 7 Sahakara nagar, Hebbal Bengaluru-560092
Bangalore KARNATAKA 560092 India |
| Phone |
9740687521 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
nikithaanoop@gmail.com |
|
Details of Contact Person Scientific Query
|
| Name |
Dr Gaurang J Kothari |
| Designation |
Consultant |
| Affiliation |
ASTER CMI HOSPITAL,HEBBAL |
| Address |
2nd floor,Department of anaesthesia, Aster CMI Hospital #43/2, New airport road, NH 7 Sahakara nagar, Hebbal Bengaluru-560092
Bangalore KARNATAKA 560092 India |
| Phone |
8105885778 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
Gaurangkothari29@gmail.com |
|
Details of Contact Person Public Query
|
| Name |
Dr Vyshali Dharmapal |
| Designation |
Consultant |
| Affiliation |
ASTER CMI HOSPITAL,HEBBAL |
| Address |
2nd floor,Department of anaesthesia, Aster CMI Hospital #43/2, New airport road, NH 7 Sahakara nagar, Hebbal Bengaluru-560092
Bangalore KARNATAKA 560092 India |
| Phone |
9845219195 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
vyshalidharmapal@gmail.com |
|
|
Source of Monetary or Material Support
|
| Aster CMI Hospital
#43/2, New airport road, NH 7
Sahakara nagar, Hebbal Bengaluru-560092
|
|
|
Primary Sponsor
|
| Name |
Dr Nikitha A |
| Address |
DNB resident,department of anaesthesia,Aster CMI Hospital #43/2, New airport road, NH 7 Sahakara nagar, Hebbal Bengaluru-560092 |
| Type of Sponsor |
Other [Self] |
|
|
Details of Secondary Sponsor
|
|
|
Countries of Recruitment
|
India |
|
Sites of Study
|
| No of Sites = 1 |
| Name of Principal
Investigator |
Name of Site |
Site Address |
Phone/Fax/Email |
| Dr Nikitha A |
Aster CMI Hospital |
Department of anaesthesia,2nd floor,Aster CMI hospital, #43/2, New Airport road, NH 7 Sahakara Nagar, Hebbal Bengaluru-560092 Bangalore KARNATAKA |
9740687521
nikithaanoop@gmail.com |
|
|
Details of Ethics Committee
|
| No of Ethics Committees= 1 |
| Name of Committee |
Approval Status |
| The institutional ethics committee of Aster CMI Hospital ,Banglore |
Approved |
|
|
Regulatory Clearance Status from DCGI
|
|
|
Health Condition / Problems Studied
|
| Health Type |
Condition |
| Patients |
(1) ICD-10 Condition: K802||Calculus of gallbladder without cholecystitis, |
|
|
Intervention / Comparator Agent
|
| Type |
Name |
Details |
| Comparator Agent |
Bilateral erector spinae plane block |
One group will receive ultrasound guided bilateral erector spinae plane block using 60 ml 0.125% bupivacaine post surgery under general anaesthesia |
| Comparator Agent |
Bilateral intertransverse process block |
One group will receive ultrasound guided bilateral intertransverse process block using 60 mL 0.125% bupivacaine post surgery under general anaesthesia |
| Intervention |
Ultrasound guided bilateral intertransverse process block versus bilateral erector spinae plane block |
In this study, patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy will be divided into two equal groups, one group receiving ultrasound guided intertransverse process block using 0.125% bupivacaine and the other group receiving ultrasound guided erector spinae block using 0.125% bupivacaine. Intraoperatively the two groups will receive fentanyl 2mcg/cc, loading dose of dexmedetomidine 0.5 mcg/kg in 10 minutes and maintenance dose of 0.2-0.3mcg/kg/hr. till the end of surgery, paracetamol 1 Gram and inj diclofenac 75 milligrams. Their requirement of rescue analgesics , postoperative analgesics and opioid consumption in terms of morphine equivalence will be recorded over 36 hrs or till the discharge whicherver is early. Thus analgesic efficacy of both blocks can be assessed and thus will help in effective postoperative pain management in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy |
|
|
Inclusion Criteria
|
| Age From |
18.00 Year(s) |
| Age To |
80.00 Year(s) |
| Gender |
Both |
| Details |
Patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy above 18 years belonging to ASA1,ASA2 and ASA 3 Category. |
|
| ExclusionCriteria |
| Details |
1)ASA IV patients
2)Coagulopathy
3)Patient refusal
4)History of allergy to LA
5)Contraindication to any analgesics
6)Chronic pain disorders
7)Infection at the injection site
8)Pregnancy
9)Neurological cognitive disorder
10)Patients on anticoagulants
11)Acute abdomen
12)Coincidental surgeries
13)Patients with surgical drain
14)Gall bladder adhesions
|
|
|
Method of Generating Random Sequence
|
Computer generated randomization |
|
Method of Concealment
|
Not Applicable |
|
Blinding/Masking
|
Participant Blinded |
|
Primary Outcome
|
| Outcome |
TimePoints |
| 1)Compare the postoperative visual analogue scale in laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients receiving intertransverse process plane block and erector spinae plane block using 0.125% bupivacaine |
2 years |
|
|
Secondary Outcome
|
| Outcome |
TimePoints |
| 1)To measure and compare the consumption of opioid rescue analgesic and postoperative analgesics in terms of morphine equivalence over 36 hr postoperative period or till discharge whichever is earlier between two groups. |
2 years |
|
|
Target Sample Size
|
Total Sample Size="94" Sample Size from India="94"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (Total)= "Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (India)="Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials" |
|
Phase of Trial
|
Phase 3 |
|
Date of First Enrollment (India)
|
20/08/2024 |
| Date of Study Completion (India) |
Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials |
| Date of First Enrollment (Global) |
Date Missing |
| Date of Study Completion (Global) |
Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials |
|
Estimated Duration of Trial
|
Years="2" Months="0" Days="0" |
Recruitment Status of Trial (Global)
Modification(s)
|
Not Applicable |
| Recruitment Status of Trial (India) |
Not Yet Recruiting |
|
Publication Details
|
N/A |
|
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement
|
Will individual participant data (IPD) be shared publicly (including data dictionaries)?
Response - YES
- What data in particular will be shared?
Response - Individual participant data that underlie the results reported in this article, after de-identification (text, tables, figures, and appendices).
- What additional supporting information will be shared?
Response - Study Protocol Response - Statistical Analysis Plan Response - Informed Consent Form Response - Clinical Study Report Response - Analytic Code
- Who will be able to view these files?
Response - Researchers whose proposed use of the data has been approved by an independent review committee identified for this purpose.
- For what types of analyses will this data be available?
Response - To achieve aims in the approved proposal.
- By what mechanism will data be made available?
Response - Proposals should be directed to [nikithaanoop@gmail.com].
- For how long will this data be available start date provided 21-12-2026 and end date provided 21-12-2042?
Response - Immediately following publication. No end date.
- Any URL or additional information regarding plan/policy for sharing IPD?
Additional Information - NIL
|
Brief Summary
Modification(s)
|
Erector spinae plane block and intertransverse process block are regional analgesic techniques that are the latest developments in postoperative pain therapy. Both techniques are used for pain relief after mastectomy, thoracic ,abdominal and spinal surgery and are found effective due to their simplicity and lower risks compared to epidural analgesia1. The aim of the study is to compare the effect of ultrasound guided bilateral intertransverse process block versus bilateral ultrasound guided erector spinae plane block on postoperative analgesia and the opioid consumption in terms of morphine equivalence in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anesthesia by a prospective randomized double blind trial. In this study, patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy will be divided into two equal groups, one group receiving ultrasound guided intertransverse process block using 0.125% bupivacaine and the other group receiving ultrasound guided erector spinae block using 0.125% bupivacaine. Intraoperatively the two groups will receive fentanyl 2mcg/cc, loading dose of dexmedetomidine 0.5 mcg/kg in 10 minutes and maintenance dose of 0.2-0.3mcg/kg/hr. till the end of surgery, paracetamol 1 Gram and inj diclofenac 75 milligrams. Their requirement of rescue analgesics , postoperative analgesics and opioid consumption in terms of morphine equivalence will be recorded over 36 hrs. Thus analgesic efficacy of both blocks can be assessed and thus will help in effective postoperative pain management in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. |