Protocol 1. Title of the project: Development and validation of multimodality Artificial Intelligence (AI) tool for prediction of short-term changes in clinical status among patients with pneumonia requiring intensive care 2. Type of Study: Prospective study- longitudinal study 3. Aims & objectives (hypotheses if applicable): Objectives - Build and validate a multimodality Artificial Intelligence (AI) tool to predict clinical status over the next 24-48 hours (classification problem) of patients with pneumonia admitted to Emergency Department (ED), High Dependency Unit (HDU) and/or Intensive Care Unit (ICU) settings.
- Build and validate a deep learning (DL) based image classification model to diagnose pneumonia on chest X-ray images.
4. Justification for study (whether of national significance with rationale): Intensive care or high-dependency units are scarce and valuable resources which need to be used optimally and turned over rapidly to benefit a greater number of patients. Pneumonia is one of the most common causes of admission to the ICU/HDU. Currently, the decision to escalate and de-escalate the level of care between ICU/HDU and wards is clinical. It depends on the best judgement of the physician based on his/her assessment of patient data and may be subjective. However, such assessments are usually carried out only once or twice per day in the usual ICU/HDU setting during clinical rounds. This process involves a judgement/prediction on the likelihood of deterioration or improvement of a patient’s health status and is prone to errors and delays. There is scope for improvement in these predictions using data-driven approaches as evidenced by the use of scoring systems like Modified/National Early Warning Scores (MEWS/NEWS). The use of AI methods to address this issue promises to improve the accuracy of such predictions further. Moreover, an AI approach would also be more scalable and deployable in resource-limited settings with minimal involvement of doctors or healthcare providers. The development of such an accurate AI tool can have a huge impact on the optimal utilization of ICU/HDU resources and improve patient outcomes on a large scale both nationally and internationally. 5. Departments involved: Departments of Critical Care Medicine, Emergency Medicine, Radiodiagnosis, Cardiology and Plastic Surgery. 6. Study period: Two years 7. Sample size: 3000 patients There are no standard guidelines for calculating the sample size required for training a deep-learning model for image classification tasks or for training a multimodality AI model. Though “larger the better†is the rule in building these models, it may not be suitable for the medical domain where there are significant costs, efforts and ethical concerns involved. To minimize the sample size required to build accurate models, we plan to employ techniques like transfer learning which involves utilization of architectures trained for other related tasks to be utilized for effectively learning from the limited medical datasets. Following these principles and from the review of the literature on successful medical AI models for classification tasks, we estimate that a sample size of 3000 would be a reasonable estimate to build an accurate, clinically useful model. 8. Materials and methods: a) Inclusion and exclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria: - All adult patients (> 18 years of age) admitted to ED, HDU and/or ICU during the study period with clinical diagnosis of pneumonia at admission.
Exclusion criteria: - Pregnant women.
- Patients with diagnosed hospital-acquired pneumonia at admission.
- Patients with advanced directives for non-escalation of care/palliative care.
- Patients are not willing to give informed consent.
b) Biological materials required (type - blood, tissue etc and quantity): Yes ☠No �’ i) Biological material: Nil ii) Biosafety Measures: NA c) Statistical methods: Mean and standard deviation will be used to summarize continuous normally distributed data, and median (interquartile range) will be used to summarize non-normal data. Frequency and percentages will be used for nominal/categorical data. The steps involved in machine learning are detailed in the methods section. After models are trained using the training data, they will be evaluated on the unseen test data against the ground truths (labels) using the confusion matrix, accuracy, f1-score and ROC analysis. We will use the temporal validation method: training data will be from the first 75-80% of patients recruited in the study and test data will be from the final 20-25% of the patients recruited. Using this method, we ensure that the test data is truly unseen during the training phase. A similar testing process will be carried out for both the deep learning image classification model and the multimodality AI model. d) Tools used: Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS), SOFA score, APACHE II score, all available for free to use. 9. Detailed description of procedure / processes: After obtaining the ethical committee clearance, the study will be registered with the CTRI before recruiting patients. For patients admitted to hospital in the ED, HDU or ICU setting, fulfilling the inclusion criteria stated above, patients or their legal representatives will be approached for informed consent. They will be explained about the study procedure and provided with the patient information sheet. A written informed consent will be obtained before data is collected. Clinical workflow Baseline demographic data, clinical data including physical examination findings and laboratory data will be recorded. Clinical monitoring data for patients admitted to ED, HDU or ICU will be recorded at hourly or two-hourly intervals (based on availability and feasibility) throughout their stay. Only those parameters which are routinely monitored and those lab test data which are done as part of standard care will be recorded. No additional tests will be done for the purpose of this study. For ease of capturing data, a tool which auto-captures numbers from images of ICU monitors and ventilator screens will be used (details below). No patient photos or their identifiers will be captured. Such tools will be used only by the research team and all such data will be stored securely. Chest x-ray images of the patients will be stored after deidentification. Patient outcomes will be recorded as ‘improved’, ‘deteriorated’ or ‘status-quo’ as adjudicated by the subject expert. Details of the variables/parameters that will be recorded are provided in the proforma/data collection form. There will be no additional treatment or tests, visits or follow-ups for the purpose of this study. All study patients will receive standard of care as per existing guidelines at the discretion of the treating physician. Clinical status will be as determined by the treating physician as improved, deteriorated or status quo based on the status 24-48 hours ago. Clinical status will be recorded on a daily basis. AI/Machine learning workflow Data management software: A custom, secure data management platform will be built for this study which will have role-based access for each member of the research team. Details of the research assistants recruited for the study will be informed to the IEC as they are onboarded through amendments. All the research data will be collected in a relational database which will be part of this platform. It will have a provision for capturing data from images of the monitor screens to ease the workflow and to ensure accurate recording of serial data with time logging. The rest of the data will be entered manually by research assistants with supervision from PI and Co-Is to ensure high-quality data is captured. Data preprocessing, model building and evaluation: All data especially the image data will be deidentified and accessed only by the research team and data scientists authorized by the research team for model building. Data will be divided into training and test data using a temporal method (as described in statistical analysis). Training data will be further divided into train and validation subsets for training the models. Appropriate data preprocessing steps will then be applied to prepare the data for ML tasks. Several candidate model architectures will be tried and the one giving the best accuracy along with good cross-validation scores (indicating robustness) will be chosen as the final model. Evaluation of the models for classification tasks will be done on unseen test data using standard methods like confusion matrix, accuracy score, f1-score and ROC analysis. Data Sharing Data (both clinical and imaging data) after appropriate deidentification will be shared with the Data Science team from 5C Network (India) Private Limited which is collaborating with KMC Manipal, MAHE, Manipal on this project. The data will be used to build and train deep learning image models and multimodality AI models described above. An NDA will be signed between MAHE Manipal and 5C Network (India) Private Limited for effective collaboration. Data will not be shared with any other team or organization or on public forums. 5C Network (India) Private Limited is located within the Indian national borders. Data will not be shared with any team outside the country. No funds are being transferred from 5C Network (India) Private Limited to KMC, Manipal or MAHE, Manipal. 10. Outcome measures: Accuracy of prediction by multimodality AI tool for the change in clinical status over the next 24-48 hours. Accuracy of deep learning AI image classification model in diagnosing pneumonia. 11. Potential risks and benefits: Potential risks: Minimal risk. This is an observational study which does not involve any additional investigations or interventions as a part of the study. Potential benefits: Successful development of such AI tools will be of great benefit as it can be employed with minimal involvement of healthcare professionals (after further validation studies) especially in resource-limited settings to make decisions regarding escalation or de-escalation of care. Such a tool will be scalable to secondary care settings and also be suitable for tele-ICU solutions. 12. Ethical considerations and methods to address issues: This is an observational study where only the clinical, lab and imaging data of patients are used after appropriate de-identification steps. The patients continue to receive standard of care. There are no additional tests, expenses or clinical visits for the purpose of this study. Therefore, it is minimal risk. 13. Budget (give details) and proposed funding source: | Sl.No | Details | Justification | Funding agency | INR | | 1. | Research Assistants | Needed for data collection | MAHE, Manipal | Rs. 5,00,000/- | 14. Review of literature (within 1000 words): Pneumonia, particularly in adults, is a significant precipitant for ICU/HDU admissions and is also the most common secondary infection acquired by critically ill patients (1,2). Community-Acquired Pneumonia (CAP), an acute lung infection acquired outside of the hospital, is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide (3). India, accounting for 23% of the global pneumonia burden, experiences high mortality and morbidity rates from CAP (4). Timely and appropriate management of CAP is crucial as it directly impacts patient outcomes (5). ICU/HDU units are scarce and valuable resources that need to be optimally used and rapidly turned over to benefit a greater number of patients (6). The decision to escalate or de-escalate care between ICU/HDU and wards is often based on the physician’s subjective judgement, which can lead to errors and delays. Objective, data-driven approaches like MEWS/NEWS have improved these predictions, but there is still room for improvement (6). AI methods promise to enhance prediction accuracy, scalability, and deployability, especially in resource-limited settings (7,8). Deep learning techniques, particularly convolutional neural networks, pre-trained models, and ensemble models, have been extensively used for detecting pneumonia using chest X-ray images (9). For instance, a deep learning-based architecture ‘MobileNet’ was proposed for the automatic detection of pneumonia based on chest X-ray images (10). In terms of predicting pneumonia severity, a study presented a severity score prediction model for COVID-19 pneumonia for frontal chest X-ray images (11). However, there is a need for more research on the application of AI in predicting pneumonia outcomes (12). Literature reveals gaps in the integration of AI and deep learning models in healthcare (7,13). The lack of explainability and transparency of AI systems is a major reason why AI is not yet fully trusted and widely deployed in healthcare (13). Furthermore, there is a need for more research on the application of AI in specific healthcare domains, such as the prediction of patient health status in ICU/HDU settings. While multimodality AI systems have shown promise in healthcare, there are gaps in their application for predicting short-term outcomes over 1-2 days, particularly for clinical decision-making related to escalation or de-escalation of therapy (14). Most existing models focus on a single data type, limiting their ability to make comprehensive predictions (15). Integrating different data types is still a challenge and requires a new generation of algorithms (16). Therefore, there is a need for more research on the development and implementation of multimodal AI systems that can accurately predict short-term outcomes and aid in clinical decision-making. 15. References: 1. Storms AD, Chen J, Jackson LA, Nordin JD, Naleway AL, Glanz JM, et al. Rates and risk factors associated with hospitalization for pneumonia with ICU admission among adults. BMC Pulm Med. 2017 Dec 16;17(1):208. 2. Morris AC. Management of pneumonia in intensive care. J Emerg Crit Care Med. 2018 Dec;2:101–101. 3. Mandell LA, Wunderink RG, Anzueto A, Bartlett JG, Campbell GD, Dean NC, et al. Infectious Diseases Society of America/American Thoracic Society consensus guidelines on the management of community-acquired pneumonia in adults. Clin Infect Dis Off Publ Infect Dis Soc Am. 2007 Mar 1;44 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S27-72. 4. Eshwara VK, Mukhopadhyay C, Rello J. Community-acquired bacterial pneumonia in adults: An update. Indian J Med Res. 2020 Apr;151(4):287. 5. Cillóniz C, Torres A, Niederman MS. Management of pneumonia in critically ill patients. BMJ. 2021 Dec 6;375:e065871. 6. Molina JAD, Seow E, Heng BH, Chong WF, Ho B. Outcomes of direct and indirect medical intensive care unit admissions from the emergency department of an acute care hospital: a retrospective cohort study. BMJ Open. 2014 Nov 1;4(11):e005553. 7. Helaly HA, Badawy M, Haikal AY. A review of deep learning approaches in clinical and healthcare systems based on medical image analysis. Multimed Tools Appl. 2024 Apr 1;83(12):36039–80. 8. Miotto R, Wang F, Wang S, Jiang X, Dudley JT. Deep learning for healthcare: Review, opportunities and challenges. Brief Bioinform. 2017 May 30;19(6):1236–46. 9. Sharma S, Guleria K. A systematic literature review on deep learning approaches for pneumonia detection using chest X-ray images. Multimed Tools Appl. 2024 Mar 1;83(8):24101–51. 10. Trivedi M, Gupta A. A lightweight deep learning architecture for the automatic detection of pneumonia using chest X-ray images. Multimed Tools Appl. 2022 Feb 1;81(4):5515–36. 11. Cohen JP, Dao L, Roth K, Morrison P, Bengio Y, Abbasi AF, et al. Predicting COVID-19 Pneumonia Severity on Chest X-ray With Deep Learning. Cureus [Internet]. 2020 Jul 28 [cited 2024 Apr 17]; Available from: https://www.cureus.com/articles/35692-predicting-covid-19-pneumonia-severity-on-chest-x-ray-with-deep-learning 12. Ibrahim AU, Ozsoz M, Serte S, Al-Turjman F, Yakoi PS. Pneumonia Classification Using Deep Learning from Chest X-ray Images During COVID-19. Cogn Comput [Internet]. 2021 Jan 4 [cited 2024 Apr 17]; Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12559-020-09787-5 13. Korica P, Gayar NE, Pang W. Explainable Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare: Opportunities, Gaps and Challenges and a Novel Way to Look at the Problem Space. In: Yin H, Camacho D, Tino P, Allmendinger R, Tallón-Ballesteros AJ, Tang K, et al., editors. Intelligent Data Engineering and Automated Learning – IDEAL 2021. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2021. p. 333–42. 14. Huang SC, Pareek A, Seyyedi S, Banerjee I, Lungren MP. Fusion of medical imaging and electronic health records using deep learning: a systematic review and implementation guidelines. Npj Digit Med. 2020 Oct 16;3(1):1–9. 15. Rockenbach MABC. Multimodal AI in Healthcare: Closing the Gaps [Internet]. CodeX. 2021 [cited 2024 Apr 17]. Available from: https://medium.com/codex/multimodal-ai-in-healthcare-1f5152e83be2 16. Shaban-Nejad A, Michalowski M, Bianco S. Multimodal Artificial Intelligence: Next Wave of Innovation in Healthcare and Medicine. In: Shaban-Nejad A, Michalowski M, Bianco S, editors. Multimodal AI in Healthcare: A Paradigm Shift in Health Intelligence [Internet]. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2023 [cited 2024 Apr 17]. p. 1–9. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-14771-5_1 |