CTRI/2025/09/094091 [Registered on: 02/09/2025] Trial Registered Prospectively
Last Modified On:
13/03/2026
Post Graduate Thesis
No
Type of Trial
Interventional
Type of Study
Drug
Study Design
Randomized, Parallel Group Trial
Public Title of Study
Clinical trial of Cenobamate tablets in Focal Seizures
Scientific Title of Study
A phase III, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group clinical trial to compare the efficacy and safety of the Cenobamate tablets as adjunctive therapy versus Eslicarbazepine in focal seizures
Trial Acronym
NIL
Secondary IDs if Any
Secondary ID
Identifier
LCT-04/23, version no. 2.0 dated 20-Sep-24
Protocol Number
Details of Principal Investigator or overall Trial Coordinator (multi-center study)
Name
Dr Mukund Zarapkar
Designation
Sr. Vice President
Affiliation
LifeSan Clinical Research, division of Centaur Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd.
Address
5th floor, Centaur House, Near Hotel Grand Hyatt, Vakola, Santacruz [E], Mumbai, 400055
Mumbai (Suburban) MAHARASHTRA 400055 India
Phone
02266499154
Fax
Email
drzarapkar@lifesan.in
Details of Contact Person Scientific Query
Name
Dr Mukund Zarapkar
Designation
Sr. Vice President
Affiliation
LifeSan Clinical Research, division of Centaur Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd.
Address
5th floor, Centaur House, Near Hotel Grand Hyatt, Vakola, Santacruz [E], Mumbai, 400055
Mumbai (Suburban) MAHARASHTRA 400055 India
Phone
02266499154
Fax
Email
drzarapkar@lifesan.in
Details of Contact Person Public Query
Name
Dr Mukund Zarapkar
Designation
Sr. Vice President
Affiliation
LifeSan Clinical Research, division of Centaur Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd.
Address
5th floor, Centaur House, Near Hotel Grand Hyatt, Vakola, Santacruz [E], Mumbai, 400055
Mumbai (Suburban) MAHARASHTRA 400055 India
Phone
02266499154
Fax
Email
drzarapkar@lifesan.in
Source of Monetary or Material Support
Sponsor of the study: Bajaj Healthcare Limited, 6th floor, Bhoomi Velocity Infotech Park, Thane West, 400604, telephone number 912266177400
Primary Sponsor
Name
Bajaj Healthcare Limited
Address
6th floor, Bhoomi Velocity Infotech Park, Thane [W],400604
Type of Sponsor
Pharmaceutical industry-Indian
Details of Secondary Sponsor
Name
Address
Ms Bajaj Healthcare Ltd
602-606, Bhoomi Velocity infotech Park, Road No. 23, Wagle Industrial Estate, Thane West, Maharashtra,400604 India Phone number 91-8655353090
Uttar Pradesh University of Medical Sciences, Saifai
New OPD building, First floor, Room No 40,Clinical Research Cell, Uttar Pradesh 206130 Etawah UTTAR PRADESH
9415181190
rkyadav_2003@yahoo.com
Dr Bala Pradeep Boyidapu
Visakha Institute of Medical Sciences
Deaprtment of Neurology, Visakha Institute of Medical Sciences, Hanumanthuwaka, Chinnagadhili, Visakhapatnam-530040, Andhra Pradesh, India Visakhapatnam ANDHRA PRADESH
All India Institute of medical Sciences Bhubaneswar for Dr. Menka Jha
Approved
Capital Hospitals Institutional Ethics Committee for Dr. Anil Kumar Devanaboina
Approved
Drug Trial Ethics Committee Dayanand Medical College and Hospital for Dr Gagandeep Singh
Approved
Ethics committee, MLB Medical College & associated hospital for Dr. Arvind Kumar Kankane
Approved
Institutional Ethics Committee Aman Hospital and Research Centre for Dr. Yogesh Sharma
Approved
Institutional Ethics Committee for Dr. Ramakant Yadav
Approved
Institutional Ethics Committee for Dr. Vishal Vishnoi
Approved
Institutional Ethics Committee Gangasheel Advanced Medical Research Institute for Dr. Shah Mohd. Faisal
Approved
Institutional Ethics Committee Jawahar Lal Nehru Medical College for Dr. Dilip Nagrawal
Approved
Institutional Ethics Committee NIMHANS for Dr. Ravindranadh Chowdary
Approved
Institutional Ethics Committee SGRDIMSAR for Dr. Dinesh Kumar
Approved
Institutional Ethics Committee Sparsh Hospitals and Critical Care private Limited for Dr Surjyaprakash Sibanarayan Choudhry
Approved
Institutional Ethics Committee, DMIHER for Dr. Tushar Patil
Approved
Institutional Ethics Committee- Clinical Studies for Dr S. Muthukani
Approved
Institutional Ethics Committee- Clinical Studies for Dr Sucheta Mudgerikar
Approved
KMCRI Ethics Committee for Dr. Amruth
Approved
V3 Healthcare Private Limited IEC for Dr. Sourabh Kumar Jain
Approved
Visakha Institute of Medical Sciences for Dr. Bala Pradeep Boyidapu
Approved
Regulatory Clearance Status from DCGI
Status
Approved/Obtained
Health Condition / Problems Studied
Health Type
Condition
Patients
(1) ICD-10 Condition: G401||Localization-related (focal) (partial) symptomatic epilepsy and epileptic syndromes with simple partial seizures,
Intervention / Comparator Agent
Type
Name
Details
Intervention
Cenobamate tablet
Week 1: 1 tablet of 12.5 mg once daily at bedtime
Week 2 : 1 tablet of 25 mg once daily at bedtime
Week 3 & 4: 1 tablet of 50 mg once daily at bedtime
Week 5 & 6: 1 tablet of 100 mg once daily at bedtime
Week 7 & 8 : 1 tablet of 150 mg once daily at bedtime
Week 9: 1 tablet of 200 mg once daily at bedtime
Comparator Agent
Eslicarbazepine tablet
Week 1: 1 tablet of 200 mg once daily at bedtime
Week 2 : 1 tablet of 400 mg once daily at bedtime
Week 3 & 4: 1 tablet of 600 mg once daily at bedtime
Week 5 & 6: 1 tablet of 800 mg once daily at bedtime
Week 7 & 8: 1 tablet of 1200 mg once daily at bedtime
Week 9 : 1 tablet of 1600 mg once daily at bedtime
Inclusion Criteria
Age From
18.00 Year(s)
Age To
70.00 Year(s)
Gender
Both
Details
1.Age: 18 to 70 years [both inclusive]
2.Gender: Male or female patients
3.All the patients willing to voluntarily participate in the clinical trial and signing on duly filled Informed Consent Form
4.A diagnosis of focal seizures according to the International League Against Epilepsy is Classification of Epileptic Seizures (1981).Diagnosis should have been established by clinical history and an electroencephalogram (EEG).
5.Within the 2 months before randomization (baseline period), Subjects are required to have ≥3 focal aware (simple) seizures with motor component, including aphasia and other observable symptoms; focal impaired awareness (complex); or focal to bilateral tonic-clonic (secondarily generalized) seizures per month, plus no consecutive 21-day seizure-free period
6.EEG performed within 5 years prior to Visit 1 that is consistent with localization related epilepsy; normal interictal EEGs will be allowed provided that the subject meets the other diagnosis criterion (i.e. clinical history) and/ or there are at least 3 home videos of an ictal event with QOV score of ≥ 5. For chronic patients for which the current diagnosis is not very clear, additional EEG results older than 5 years but within 10 years may be used for final confirmation of epilepsy diagnosis
7.Need additional antiepileptic drug (AED) treatment despite having been treated with at least one AED with adequately tolerated dose for the last 2 years
8.Currently on stable antiepileptic treatment regimen:
8.1 Subject must have been receiving stable doses of 1 to 3 AEDs for at least 4 weeks prior to Visit 1 to be continued unchanged throughout the double-blind treatment period of titration and maintenance phase.
8.2 Vagal nerve stimulator (VNS) or deep brain stimulator (DBS) will not be counted as an AED; however, the parameters must remain stable for at least 4 weeks prior to Visit 1 and during the study. VNS or DBS must have been implanted at least 5 months prior to Visit 1.
8.3 The daily use of benzodiazepines (except for diazepam) for epilepsy, or for anxiety or sleep disorder, will be counted as 1 AED and must be continued unchanged throughout the study. Therefore, only a maximum of 2 additional approved AEDs will be allowed
8.4 Subjects receiving felbamate as a concomitant AED must meet the following criteria:
8.4.1 Two-year history of felbamate use and a history of a fixed dosing regimen for a minimum of 60 days prior to Visit 1
8.4.2 No prior or known history of hepatotoxicity or hematologic disorder due to felbamate
9. Computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan performed within the past 5 years that ruled out a progressive cause of epilepsy. If brain imaging has not been performed within the past 5 years, a CT scan must be performed prior to randomization. For chronic patients for which the current diagnosis is not very clear, additional CT or MRI results older than 5 years but within 10 years may be used for final confirmation of epilepsy diagnosis.
10. Ability to reach Subject by telephone.
11.Use of an acceptable form of birth control by female subjects of childbearing potential.
12.Subject taking a ketogenic diet will be allowed as long as the diet has been stable for at least 3 months prior to Visit 1 and will remain stable for the duration of the study.
ExclusionCriteria
Details
1.Known hypersensitivity to cenobamate or structurally similar drugs or eslicarbazepine or to any of the excipients of the investigational products.
2.Patients taking vigabatrin within the past year, felbamate for less than 18 continuous months, or intermittent rescue benzodiazepines more than once a month within the past month.
3.Patients taking phenytoin or phenobarbital because of the potential for drug-drug interaction with cenobamate inhibition of CYP2C19.
4.Patients with a history of status epilepticus within the past year.
5.Patients with history of alcoholism or drug abuse within the past 2 years.
6.Patients with clinically significant psychiatric illness.
7.Patient with active suicidal ideation within the past 6 months or history of suicide attempt in the past 2 years.
8.8.Patients with more than 2 allergic reactions to an AED or 1 serious hypersensitivity reaction.
9.Patients with clinically significant impaired hepatic function established by SGOT & SGPT values more than 2.5 times the UNL and/ or Total bilirubin value of more than 1.5 times the UNL.
10.Patients with other clinically laboratory (biochemistry and hematology) evaluations and 12 lead ECG readings outside the reference range of the testing laboratory and the results are deemed clinically significant by the investigator.
11.Patients with history of clinically significant cardiovascular disease (e.g. ischemic heart disease), central nervous system disorders (e.g. seizure, bipolar disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, untreated depression, psychosis or post-traumatic stress disorder), suicidal behavior, angle closure glaucoma, angioedema, urinary retention, thyroid disorder, uncontrolled hypertension etc., which are not fit for inclusion in this CT as per investigator.
12.Patient has a clinically significant disorder that, in the opinion of the investigator, would result in the participant’s inability to understand and comply with the requirements of the trial.
13.Patients with medical history of oncological conditions since last 5 years.
14.Positive testing for HIV, hepatitis B (hepatitis B virus surface antigen [HBsAg]) or hepatitis C (hepatitis C virus antibody [HCV Ab]) virology.
15.Patients who had suffered from COVID-19 within 8 weeks prior to study drug administration or patients with suspected signs and symptoms of COVID-19/ confirmed novel coronavirus infection (COVID-19)
16.Women of child bearing potential not practicing any acceptable methods of contraception during study. For this study, acceptable and effective methods of contraception for females include at least one of the following:
a.Intrauterine device placed at least 6 months prior to the first study dose and agree to follow throughout the study
b.Two barrier methods used together (cervical cap, diaphragm, contraceptive sponge, or vaginal spermicide plus a male or female condom)
c.Absolute sexual abstinence (no sexual intercourse or genital contact with a male partner)
d.Females who are surgically sterile
e.Females who are post-menopausal for at least one year
17.Pregnant or lactating women
18.Concurrent participation in another clinical trial or any investigational therapy within 90 days prior to signing informed consent.
Method of Generating Random Sequence
Computer generated randomization
Method of Concealment
Not Applicable
Blinding/Masking
Double Blind Double Dummy
Primary Outcome
Outcome
TimePoints
Primary outcome of the trial is to evaluate efficacy i.e. percent change from baseline in focal seizure frequency per 28 days.
Seizure frequency during the baseline and 12 week treatment periods and dividing by the total duration
Visit 1: Baseline Visit at Day 00
Visit 2: Screening Visit: any time 2 weeks after baseline visit
Visit 3: Enrollment Visit: week 4/day 28
Visit 4: Follow up Visit: week 5/day 35
Visit 5: Follow up visit: week 6/day 42
Visit 6: Follow up visit: Week 8/day 56
Visit 7: Follow up visit: Week 10/day 70
Visit 8: Follow up visit: Week 12/day 84
Visit 9: Follow up visit: week 15/day 105
Visit 10: Follow up visit: week 18/day 126
Secondary Outcome
Outcome
TimePoints
The secondary objective of this study is to evaluate the safety of Cenobamate tablets vis-Ã -vis active control medication, i.e. Eslicarbazepine acetate by comparing treatment-emergent adverse events or serious adverse events
Responder rate (response defined as a ≥50% reduction in seizure frequency) – Analysis of subjects who experience a 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency in the double-blind treatment period – comparison between treatment groups.
Seizure freedom rate (all seizure types) during the 14-week treatment period.
Time to the first Type I seizure during the treatment period
Time to the fifth Type I seizure during the treatment period
Time to the tenth Type I seizure during the treatment period
Assessment of seizure frequency by seizure type: focal aware with motor component, focal impaired awareness, or focal to bilateral tonic-clonic – comparison between treatment groups.
Visit 1: Baseline Visit at Day 00
Visit 2: Screening Visit: any time 2 weeks after baseline visit
Visit 3: Enrollment Visit: week 4/day 28
Visit 4: Follow up Visit: week 5/day 35
Visit 5: Follow up visit: week 6/day 42
Visit 6: Follow up visit: Week 8/day 56
Visit 7: Follow up visit: Week 10/day 70
Visit 8: Follow up visit: Week 12/day 84
Visit 9: Follow up visit: week 15/day 105
Visit 10: Follow up visit: week 18/day 126
Target Sample Size
Total Sample Size="230" Sample Size from India="230" Final Enrollment numbers achieved (Total)= "240" Final Enrollment numbers achieved (India)="240"
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement
Will individual participant data (IPD) be shared publicly (including data dictionaries)?
Response - NO
Brief Summary
Study Title: A phase III, multicenter, randomized,
double-blind, parallel-group clinical trial to compare the efficacy and safety
of the Cenobamate tablets as adjunctive therapy versus Eslicarbazepine in focal
seizures
Details of Investigational medicinal
product:
Test Product: Cenobamate tablets of Bajaj Healthcare
Limited
Active- Control: Eslicarbazepine acetate tablets
Study Objective(s):
Primary Objective: The primary objective of this study is
to evaluate the efficacy of Cenobamate tablets vis-Ã -vis active control
medication, i.e. Eslicarbazepine acetate on the basis of primary and secondary
efficacy endpoints
Secondary Objective: The secondary objective of this study
is to evaluate the safety of Cenobamate tablets vis-Ã -vis active control
medication, i.e. Eslicarbazepine acetate by comparing treatment-emergent
adverse events or serious adverse events as well as comparison of baseline and
end-of-study assessment by virtue of physical examination and clinical
laboratory investigations.
Sample Size: 230 Male or female patients [Age: 18 to
70 years (both inclusive)]
Study Design:
1.It
will be a phase III, multicenter, randomized, double blind, parallel-group,
active-controlled study clinical trial to test the safety and efficacy of Cenobamate
tablets vis-Ã -vis active control medication, i.e. eslicarbazepine tablets in focal
seizures as an adjuvant therapy.
The definition of drug-resistant focal seizure: Drug
resistant focal seizure is defined as failure of adequate trials of two
tolerated, appropriately chosen and used antiepileptic drug schedules (whether
as monotherapies or in combination) to achieve sustained seizure freedom.
2.The
study will be conducted in the hospital set-up as per NDCT rules. The patients
could be treated on outpatient [OP] basis or may be in need of in-patient
admission [IP].
3.The
investigator will identify the patient of epilepsy as per points stated in the
recruitment flyer. The patients will be called to the clinical trial site and
this will be day 0 of the trial. On day 0, patient/ patient’s legally
acceptable representative [LAR] will be informed by the delegated staff of
clinical trial site under supervision of investigator about the objectives and
procedure and duration of this trial along with entire information about the
study drugs along with possible adverse events as well as responsibilities of
the patient throughout the trial. Sufficient time would be given to the patient
for understanding the procedures of the trial and following his/ her voluntary
informed consent, they will be provided with a seizure diary to record seizure
frequency. This is baseline phase and it will last for 4 weeks. During the
baseline phase, the Subjects will be screened after at least 2 weeks of
baseline phase after checking the seizure diary. The screening will be done as
per section 11.1 to decide eligibility.
4.If any
Subject is already and adequately maintaining seizure diary for a 4-week
period, he/ she can be screened immediately to decide eligibility for the
trial. In this case, there is no need for separate baseline phase. Following
decision of eligibility, Subject will be called for participation in the study.
5.This
will be followed by randomization into one of the two arms, i.e. Test or
Active-control in 1:1 ratio in a double-blind manner.
6.Subjects
will then enter titration phase of 8-weeks in a double-blind manner, which will
start from
12.5
mg in case of Test/ 200 mg in case of active-control in the first week
25 mg in
case of Test/ 400 mg in case of active-control in the second week
50 mg in
case of Test/ 600 mg in case of active-control in the 3rd and 4th
week
100 mg
in case of Test/ 800 mg in case of active-control in the 5th and 6th
week
150 mg
in case of Test/ 1200 mg in case of active-control in the 7th to 8th
week and
200 mg
in case of Test/ 1600 mg in case of active-control from the 9th
week, which is maintenance dose
7.This
will be followed by a maintenance phase of 6 weeks, i.e. from week 9 to week
14, the Subjects will be continued on 200 mg of the Test medication or 1600 mg
or the active-control medication in double-blind manner.
8.If a
Subject could not tolerate the next higher dose during titration phase, the
Subject’s dose will be reduced to the previous dose and he/ she will continue
the maintenance phase of 6 weeks on that dose, e.g. if any Subject could not
tolerate 150 mg/ 1200 mg dose of Test or Active-control medication, that
Subject’s dose will be reduced to 100 mg/ 800 mg and 6-weeks’ maintenance phase
will continue from then onwards
9.If it
is noted that the Subject who has reached the maximum dose of 200 mg/ 1600 mg
of Test/ Active-control medication and shows signs of intolerance, the dose
will be reduced as per investigator’s discretion for the remaining period of
maintenance phase.
10.No
dose changes to concomitant AEDs will be allowed during the double-blind study.
Patients will continue taking their allowed concomitant AEDs without any dose
changes throughout the double-blind treatment period.
11.At the
end of the maintenance phase, the efficacy and safety endpoints will be
checked.
12.Total maximum
duration of the clinical trial will be of 18 weeks including 4-weeks baseline
phase. The maximum duration of double-blind treatment period is 14 weeks for
any Subject who is enrolled and randomized. This duration could be shorter for
patient who shows intolerance to any dose during titration phase as his/ her
maintenance phase will begin from the tolerated dose.
13.The
trial could end prior to week 18 for an individual Subject, who voluntarily
drops out.
14.In
case of adverse event/ serious adverse event irrespective of whether it is due
to study procedure or study drug and anytime within 14 weeks from the
enrolment, the investigator could withdraw the patient and switch to
appropriate medical management of the said AE/ SAE.
15.Since
the study is blinded, the patient, investigator or any study staff would not
know the nature of the treatment [Test or Active-control] until end of the
study or until after the code is broken in case of AE or SAE.
16.End-of-study
[EOS] assessment would be performed after 6-weeks of maintenance phase is
completed or at the time of early discontinuation or withdrawal of the patient.
17.All
Subjects will be telephonically followed 15 days after the end-of-study and
inquired about the safety.