| CTRI Number |
CTRI/2016/12/007577 [Registered on: 14/12/2016] Trial Registered Retrospectively |
| Last Modified On: |
19/11/2019 |
| Post Graduate Thesis |
Yes |
| Type of Trial |
Interventional |
|
Type of Study
|
Surgical/Anesthesia |
| Study Design |
Randomized, Parallel Group Trial |
|
Public Title of Study
|
Comparision of epidural analgesia with transversus abdominis plane block in renal transplant recipients |
|
Scientific Title of Study
|
Comparison of analgesic efficacy of
epidural analgesia with continuous transversus
abdominis plane block in renal transplant recipients |
| Trial Acronym |
|
|
Secondary IDs if Any
|
| Secondary ID |
Identifier |
| NIL |
NIL |
|
|
Details of Principal Investigator or overall Trial Coordinator (multi-center study)
|
| Name |
Hemant Ojha |
| Designation |
Junior Resident |
| Affiliation |
Postgraduate Institue of Medical Education and Research |
| Address |
517, Kairon Block, Postgraduate Institue of Medical Education and Research Chandigarh Chandigarh CHANDIGARH 160012 India |
| Phone |
0819592155 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
hemantojha@hotmail.com |
|
Details of Contact Person Scientific Query
|
| Name |
Dr Ishwar Bhukal |
| Designation |
Associate Professor |
| Affiliation |
Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research |
| Address |
Department of Aneasthesia & Intensive Care
Postgraduate Institue of Medical Education and Research Chandigarh Chandigarh CHANDIGARH 160012 India |
| Phone |
09417936566 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
ishwar.bhukal@gmail.com |
|
Details of Contact Person Public Query
|
| Name |
Hemant Ojha |
| Designation |
Junior Resident |
| Affiliation |
Postgraduate Institue of Medical Education and Research |
| Address |
517, Kairon Block, Postgraduate Institue of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER) Chandigarh Chandigarh CHANDIGARH 160012 India |
| Phone |
0819592155 |
| Fax |
|
| Email |
hemantojha@hotmail.com |
|
|
Source of Monetary or Material Support
|
| Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education & Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh |
|
|
Primary Sponsor
|
| Name |
PGIMER |
| Address |
Sector 12, Chandigarh |
| Type of Sponsor |
Research institution and hospital |
|
|
Details of Secondary Sponsor
|
|
|
Countries of Recruitment
|
India |
|
Sites of Study
|
| No of Sites = 1 |
| Name of Principal
Investigator |
Name of Site |
Site Address |
Phone/Fax/Email |
| Dr HEMANT OJHA |
Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research |
Department Renal Transplant Surgery, Nehru Hospital, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Sector 12, Chandigarh Chandigarh CHANDIGARH |
8195921555
hemantojha@hotmail.com |
|
|
Details of Ethics Committee
|
| No of Ethics Committees= 1 |
| Name of Committee |
Approval Status |
| Institute Ethics Committee, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research |
Approved |
|
|
Regulatory Clearance Status from DCGI
|
|
Health Condition / Problems Studied
Modification(s)
|
| Health Type |
Condition |
| Patients |
End stage renal disease, (1) ICD-10 Condition: N186||End stage renal disease, |
|
|
Intervention / Comparator Agent
|
| Type |
Name |
Details |
| Comparator Agent |
Continuous epidural block |
Thoracic epidural with a catheter for continuous analgesia |
| Intervention |
Continuous transversus abdominis plane block |
Ultasound guided transversus abdominis plane block with insertion of catheter for continuous analgesia |
|
|
Inclusion Criteria
|
| Age From |
18.00 Year(s) |
| Age To |
60.00 Year(s) |
| Gender |
Both |
| Details |
Patients with end stage renal disease scheduled to undergo live donor renal transplant |
|
| ExclusionCriteria |
| Details |
1.Refusal to give consent.
2.Derangements of coagulation profile contraindicating the use of epidural anaesthesia (INR of ≥1.3 will be considered a cut-off for the study).
3. Addiction to opioids, or alcohol, or history of any other substance abuse.
4.Allergy to local anaesthetic drugs.
5.Extension of surgical incision lateral to anterior axillary line or above T8 dermatome.
6.Inability to communicate (e.g. known psychiatric disorders).
7.Accidental complications such as dural puncture or peritoneal breach.
|
|
|
Method of Generating Random Sequence
|
Coin toss, Lottery, toss of dice, shuffling cards etc |
|
Method of Concealment
|
Sequentially numbered, sealed, opaque envelopes |
|
Blinding/Masking
|
Participant Blinded |
|
Primary Outcome
|
| Outcome |
TimePoints |
| Numerical Pain rating scale score postoperatively |
Numerical Pain rating scale score at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 12, 24 hours postoperatively |
|
|
Secondary Outcome
|
| Outcome |
TimePoints |
| Requirement of postoperative opioid (fentanyl) in the first 24 hours postoperatively |
24 hours postoperatively |
| Patient satisfaction with the analgesia regimen. |
24 hours postoperatively |
|
|
Target Sample Size
|
Total Sample Size="62" Sample Size from India="62"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (Total)= "62"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (India)="62" |
|
Phase of Trial
|
N/A |
|
Date of First Enrollment (India)
|
01/08/2014 |
| Date of Study Completion (India) |
30/11/2015 |
| Date of First Enrollment (Global) |
Date Missing |
| Date of Study Completion (Global) |
Date Missing |
|
Estimated Duration of Trial
|
Years="1" Months="6" Days="0" |
Recruitment Status of Trial (Global)
Modification(s)
|
Not Applicable |
| Recruitment Status of Trial (India) |
Completed |
|
Publication Details
|
None yet |
|
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement
|
Will individual participant data (IPD) be shared publicly (including data dictionaries)?
|
|
Brief Summary
|
Although continuous TAP
block has been compared with epidural analgesia in laparoscopic surgeries, to
the best of our knowledge a study directly comparing the technique with
epidural analgesia has not been performed in renal transplant
recipients. The existing study was designed to directly compare
continuous TAP block with continuous patient controlled epidural blockade to
determine whether TAP block can provide a useful alternative to epidural
analgesia in this subset of patients.
The study
hypothesizes that transversus abdominis plane block is a non inferior analgesic
technique to continuous epidural analgesia in renal transplant recipients. |