FULL DETAILS (Read-only)  -> Click Here to Create PDF for Current Dataset of Trial
CTRI Number  CTRI/2025/02/080774 [Registered on: 18/02/2025] Trial Registered Prospectively
Last Modified On: 18/02/2025
Post Graduate Thesis  Yes 
Type of Trial  Interventional 
Type of Study   Surgical/Anesthesia 
Study Design  Randomized, Parallel Group, Active Controlled Trial 
Public Title of Study   Comparing Techniques: Selective Trunk Block vs. Corner Pocket Approach for Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block in upper limb surgeries 
Scientific Title of Study   Comparison of Selective Trunk Block and Corner Pocket Approach of Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block : A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial 
Trial Acronym  NIL 
Secondary IDs if Any  
Secondary ID  Identifier 
NIL  NIL 
 
Details of Principal Investigator or overall Trial Coordinator (multi-center study)  
Name  Salma Suman P 
Designation  Junior Resident (Academic) 
Affiliation  All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 
Address  Department of Anaesthesiology, Pain Medicine and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi

South
DELHI
110029
India 
Phone  8138815709  
Fax    
Email  salmasuman99@gmail.com  
 
Details of Contact Person
Scientific Query
 
Name  Arshad Ayub 
Designation  Additional Professor 
Affiliation  All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 
Address  Department of Anaesthesiology, Pain Medicine and Critical Care, Room No. 707A, 7th floor, Dr. RP Centre of Ophthalmic Sciences, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi

South
DELHI
110029
India 
Phone  9953542344  
Fax    
Email  drarshad2k1@gmail.com  
 
Details of Contact Person
Public Query
 
Name  Salma Suman P 
Designation  Junior Resident (Academic) 
Affiliation  All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 
Address  Department of Anaesthesiology, Pain Medicine and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi

South
DELHI
110029
India 
Phone  8138815709  
Fax    
Email  salmasuman99@gmail.com  
 
Source of Monetary or Material Support  
Department of Anaesthesiology, Pain Medicine and Critical Care, 5th floor, Academic block, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar East, New Delhi, Delhi, 110029 
 
Primary Sponsor  
Name  Arshad Ayub 
Address  Department of Anaesthesiology, Pain Medicine and Critical Care, Room No. 707A, 7th floor, Dr. RP Centre of Ophthalmic Sciences, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 
Type of Sponsor  Other [Self] 
 
Details of Secondary Sponsor  
Name  Address 
Department of Anaesthesiology Pain Medicine and Critical Care  All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar , New Delhi, 110029 
 
Countries of Recruitment     India  
Sites of Study  
No of Sites = 1  
Name of Principal Investigator  Name of Site  Site Address  Phone/Fax/Email 
Salma Suman P  All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi  Department of Anaesthesiology, Pain Medicine and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, 110029
South
DELHI 
8138815709

salmasuman99@gmail.com 
 
Details of Ethics Committee  
No of Ethics Committees= 1  
Name of Committee  Approval Status 
Institute Ethics Committee, AIIMS, New Delhi  Approved 
 
Regulatory Clearance Status from DCGI  
Status 
Not Applicable 
 
Health Condition / Problems Studied  
Health Type  Condition 
Patients  (1) ICD-10 Condition: O||Medical and Surgical,  
 
Intervention / Comparator Agent  
Type  Name  Details 
Comparator Agent  Corner pocket approach of Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block   Corner pocket approach of Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block is a nerve block in upper limb surgeries in which local anesthetic is injected to the corner pocket between subclavian artery and first rib where elements of brachial plexus are found. Procedure: Group C will receive conventional corner pocket approach of supraclavicular brachial plexus block. With the patient lying supine and head tilted to the opposite side, a high frequency linear probe (6-13 MHz) will be placed in supraclavicular fossa and the corner pocket between inferolataeral side of subclavian artery and first rib where trunks and divisions of brachial plexus are present, appearing as a cluster of grapes is identified. After obtaining an adequate sonographic view, 20 ml of the same drug (1:1 ratio of 0.75% Ropivacaine and 2% Lignocaine with 1 mcg/kg Dexmedetomidine) will be injected at the corner pocket with a 5 cm,22 G needle after negative aspiration of blood. The estimated duration of the intervention will be 15-30 minutes, depending on the ease of scanning and visualising each trunk and needling experience of the operator. 
Intervention  Selective Trunk Block  Selective Trunk Block is a regional anaesthesia technique used in upper limb surgeries where we selectively identify all 3 trunks using Sequential Ultrasound Imaging Technique(SUIT) and block them separately. Procedure: Group S will undergo Sequential Ultrasound Imaging Technique (SUIT) followed by Selective Trunk Block (SeTB). With the patient lying supine and head tilted to the opposite side, a high frequency linear ultrasound probe (6-13 MHz) will be placed in supraclavicular fossa directly cranial to midpoint of clavicle to visualize brachial plexus applying as cluster of grapes on the posterolateral aspect of subclavian artery. The transducer will be then manipulated cranially and caudally to sequentially identify the following structures : • C7 transverse process and ventral ramus • C6 transverse process and ventral ramus • C5 transverse process and ventral ramus • Fusion of C5 and C6 ventral rami to form superior trunk • Neural stack which include superior trunk, middle trunk and C8 ventral ramus • Fusion of C8 and T1 ventral rami to form inferior trunk After SUIT, sterile preparation of skin and probe will be done and local infiltration of local anaesthetic (2% Lignocaine) is given. Two injections of the drug (1:1 ratio of 0.75% Ropivacaine and 2% Lignocaine with 1 mcg/kg Dexmedetomidine) are given at the following sites with a 22G needle after negative aspiration of blood : 1. 13 ml of the drug is given at the neural stack between superior and middle trunk. 2. 7 ml of the drug is given in inferior trunk. The estimated duration of the intervention will be 15-30 minutes, depending on the ease of scanning and visualising each trunk and needling experience of the operator. 
 
Inclusion Criteria  
Age From  18.00 Year(s)
Age To  65.00 Year(s)
Gender  Both 
Details  1. All adults posted for surgeries of distal humerus, elbow, forearm, wrist and hand.
2. Age group : 18-65 years
3. ASA grade - 1,2
4. Body mass index of 18 to 35 kg/sq.m 
 
ExclusionCriteria 
Details  1. Patients not giving consent for the block
2. Patients not able to understand the procedure and risks associated with it
3. Known neuropathy or injury of musculocutaneous, radial, ulnar or median nerve
4. Abnormal neck or shoulder anatomy
5. Any history of previous surgery in supraclavicular or infraclavicular fossa
6. Patients with decreased mentation or altered sensorium
7. Patients with any local site infection
8. Any other surgical contraindications for regional anaesthesia
9. ASA grade 3 or more
10. Patients with local anaesthetic allergy

 
 
Method of Generating Random Sequence   Computer generated randomization 
Method of Concealment   Sequentially numbered, sealed, opaque envelopes 
Blinding/Masking   Participant, Investigator, Outcome Assessor and Date-entry Operator Blinded 
Primary Outcome  
Outcome  TimePoints 
Comparison of sensory blockade of median, radial, ulnar and musculocutaneous nerves in both groups  5,10,15,20,25,30 minutes after nerve block  
 
Secondary Outcome  
Outcome  TimePoints 
Comparison of motor blockade of median, radial, ulnar and musculocutaneous nerves in both groups  5,10,15,20,25,30 minutes after nerve block  
Comparison of time taken to perform block in both groups  During the nerve block 
Comparison of time taken to achieve sensory anaesthesia in both groups  5,10,15,20,25,30 minutes after nerve block  
Comparison of time taken to achieve motor blockade in both groups  5,10,15,20,25,30 minutes after nerve block  
Comparison of incidence of phrenic nerve palsy in each group  Baseline (before giving nerve block) and 30 minutes after nerve block 
Assessment of patient discomfort during the procedure by VAS score  During nerve block 
Success or feasibilty of discovering all three trunks in selective trunk block  During nerve block 
 
Target Sample Size   Total Sample Size="50"
Sample Size from India="50" 
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (Total)= "Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials"
Final Enrollment numbers achieved (India)="Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials" 
Phase of Trial   N/A 
Date of First Enrollment (India)   01/03/2025 
Date of Study Completion (India) Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials 
Date of First Enrollment (Global)  Date Missing 
Date of Study Completion (Global) Applicable only for Completed/Terminated trials 
Estimated Duration of Trial   Years="2"
Months="0"
Days="0" 
Recruitment Status of Trial (Global)   Not Applicable 
Recruitment Status of Trial (India)  Not Yet Recruiting 
Publication Details   N/A 
Individual Participant Data (IPD) Sharing Statement

Will individual participant data (IPD) be shared publicly (including data dictionaries)?  

Response - NO
Brief Summary  

Supraclavicular brachial plexus block (BPB) is the most used regional anesthesia technique in upper limb surgeries. It is considered equivalent to spinal anesthesia in these surgeries due to its rapid onset, reliable, effective and comprehensive block of all the necessary nerves of upper limb. Ultrasound guided corner pocket approach is the recommended and most widely practiced technique for supraclavicular BPB. In this approach, a single injection of local anesthetic is given  at the angle formed between the first rib and inferolateral side of subclavian artery 1. The limitation of this approach, however, is the deeper location of T1 ventral ramus and inferior trunk compared to superior and middle trunks. This often results in inferior trunk (C8-T1, ulnar nerve) sparing. Previous studies, also concurred this and observed an ulnar nerve sparing of 5-30%  with this approach, which can result in incomplete anesthesia for  these surgeries.2-5

With the recent updates in ultrasound resolution, it is now feasible to isolate and locate all three trunks of brachial plexus. Dr Karmakar et al. recently described one such method called as Sequential Ultrasound Imaging Technique (SUIT) to identify all the three trunks.4,5  This enables us to block each trunk separately, making Selective Trunk Block (SeTB) a potential approach to provide comprehensive and complete anesthesia or analgesia for all the patients undergoing any upper limb surgery. In this technique, we sequentially identify ventral rami of all the roots and formation of all trunks of brachial plexus.6,7 After obtaining an appropriate ultrasound view, local anesthetic is deposited two sites – one between superior and middle trunk, another at the inferior trunk.

We therefore hypothesize that an approach to selectively identify and block all three trunks should be able to produce a comprehensive and complete anasethesia for all upper limb surgeries without ulnar nerve sparing common with corner pocket approach.

REFERENCES

  1. Soares LG, Brull R, Lai J, Chan VW. Eight ball, corner pocket: the optimal needle position for ultrasound-guided supraclavicular block. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2007;32(1):94-95. doi:10.1016/j.rapm.2006.10.007
  2. Trivedi, Saurabh; Gupta, Srishti1; Bhardwaj, Hemendra; Sahoo, Tapan Kumar; Gupta, Seema; Trivedi, Gaurav2. Efficacy of intertruncal and corner-pocket approaches of ultrasound-guided supraclavicular block in terms of ulnar nerve blockade: A randomised controlled study. Indian Journal of Anaesthesia 67(9):p 778-784, September 2023. | DOI: 10.4103/ija.ija_45_23
  3.  Kukreja P, Kofskey AM, Ransom E, et al. Comparison of Supraclavicular Regional Nerve Block Versus Infraclavicular Regional Nerve Block in Distal Radial Open Reduction and Internal Fixation: A Retrospective Case Series. Cureus. 2022;14(4):e24079. Published 2022 Apr 12. doi:10.7759/cureus.24079
  4.  Fredrickson MJ, Patel A, Young S, Chinchanwala S. Speed of onset of ’corner pocket supraclavicular’ and infraclavicular ultrasound guided brachial plexus block: a randomised observer-blinded comparison. Anaesthesia. 2009;64(7):738-744. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2044.2009.05918.x
  5.  Jo Y, Park J, Oh C, et al. Comparison of the ulnar nerve blockade between intertruncal and corner pocket approaches for supraclavicular block: a randomized controlled trial. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2021;74(6):522-530. doi:10.4097/kja.21028
  6.   Karmakar MK, Pakpirom J, Songthamwat B, Areeruk P. High definition ultrasound imaging of the individual elements of the brachial plexus above the clavicle. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2020;45(5):344-350. doi:10.1136/rapm-2019-101089
  7.   Songthamwat B, Pakpirom J, Pangthipampai P, Vorapaluk P, Karmakar MK. Reliability of a sequential ultrasound imaging technique (SUIT) to identify the individual elements of the brachial plexus above the clavicle. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2021;46(12):1107-1109. doi:10.1136/rapm-2021-102701

 
Close